Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"
+
Add Report
Results 5,296 to 5,310 of 16987
-
01-19-23 11:18 #11692Senior Member

Posts: 277I would say try negotiating. She did not budge in my case. Please report if you have success.
Originally Posted by SugarDaddio
[View Original Post]
-
01-19-23 10:34 #11691Senior Member

Posts: 355SucculentSweetheart
So it sounds like there is no need to try and negotiate her down then if you saw her at 400. I appreciate the input.
Thanks,
SD.
Originally Posted by PeterPan
[View Original Post]
-
01-19-23 10:29 #11690Senior Member

Posts: 450PetiteYoga
Has anyone had experience with Petiteyoga? I know she is on both Seeking and SDM. We messaged a little off site and she is firm on 400 per meet.
https://members.seeking.com/member/f...4-8dd7acd12d72
Thanks.
-
01-19-23 00:08 #11689Senior Member

Posts: 277I have seen her
I have seen her and that number quoted is accurate and she cannot host. But she is DTF.
Originally Posted by Rican2323
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-23 23:57 #11688Senior Member

Posts: 35Seemed a little flakey
Chatted a bit on the site, tried to move off the site. Never reached out to me, and when I came back on the site a month later when I renewed, she reached out to me with small talk on the site. I lost interest.
Originally Posted by Rican2323
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-23 20:27 #11687Senior Member

Posts: 64I'm surprised that she hasn't been reviewed or mentioned before. Her profile says she's been on the site since 2017.
Originally Posted by SugarDaddio
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-23 20:00 #11686Senior Member

Posts: 355SucculentSweetheart
She can't host and she wants 400 ppm. I haven't tried to negotiate down yet but seems DTF.
SD.
Originally Posted by Rican2323
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-23 18:51 #11685Senior Member

Posts: 3298I don't fish in your sugar bowl (to mix metaphors) but she's been on less than a week. She likely will have few different course corrections in her time on the site. I wouldn't write her off based on what you've said she replied thus far.
Originally Posted by TylerDurden07
[View Original Post]
I also wasn't too impressed w / her. Despite her 'slim' self-description, she looks a little thick for me. We have Latinas like her a lot on the site in southern California.
-
01-18-23 18:14 #11684Senior Member

Posts: 182Agree
Likely true. Which makes her refusal to provide sexual benefits all the more appalling.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-23 18:05 #11683Senior Member

Posts: 64SucculentSweetheart
Anyone have any history on this one?
https://members.seeking.com/member/e...a-23a4e32295b6
-
01-18-23 15:55 #11682Senior Member

Posts: 1238Urfr3akflor
https://members.seeking.com/member/b...c-623e5843c32c
Urfr3akflor
Here's one I moved off site and had some good conversations with. Sent confirmation pic so I know she's real. Settled on 200 ppm plus hotel. She's a little far out for me and I'm pretty happy with my regular SB so I'm throwing her to here. Was open to BBJ. She didn't want to send nudes without payment (another reason I didn't chase, if an SB wants $ to send nudes I normally eject) but I think she's easy to land if you're looking for a nice latina.
-
01-18-23 15:48 #11681Senior Member

Posts: 300It's just pussy capitalism and also these young not terribly bright females translate loads of messages and likes on their profiles to potential cash offerings, which is not even remotely true. They end up pricing themselves out of an arrangement either wittingly or unwittingly ultimately wasting their time and everyone else's.
Originally Posted by BrassMan73
[View Original Post]
How do I know this? B / c I'll do 2 30 day memberships spread out of the course of a year and see the same hot chicks on SA online. If they had landed what they were looking for, why would they still be online all the time? They're stupid and their shelf life is limited to just a few years but they won't know it till it's too late.
The really hot ones keep chasing squirrels on SA. The mid tier ones will eventually give up. Both go back to banging guys their own age for free.
What would help SA is to stop allowing male users to send messages to girls before paying. Don't new users get to send up to 10 messages before paying? It's flooding girls inboxes and screwing everything up. Maybe they will fix that, b/c SA really has little value for me now. All the girls I'd consider allowances don't seem to respond. I only get legit responses from low-mid tier girls and pros, neither of which I'm interested in paying.
-
01-18-23 10:51 #11680Regular Member

Posts: 17I met with her about two years ago at a Mexican restaurant for drinks. At the time, she wanted $1500/ month. (Inflation is killing us! She's beautiful, but older than 43. The chemistry in person wasn't there; she didn't flirt or touch my arm or anything. She was very nice. However, I'm younger than her. I can pull older women like her just by going out to a bar and buying them a drink. I think her demographic is older rich, retired guys (based on an arrangement story she told me). Also, she might still be married if that matters. My take: She doesn't fit into what this board is looking for.
Originally Posted by SugarDaddio
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-23 10:43 #11679Senior Member

Posts: 162More of this is to come.
The typical modern western woman thinks all she has to do is show up and bless you with her presence. They don'twant to do anything to earn their resources. They think having a v-jay-jay ENTITLES them to your time when they need you, and your resources when they want them!
Originally Posted by HollowGuy
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-23 10:03 #11678Senior Member

Posts: 355BeautifulMind
She offered me 2,500/ month on the site. I just simply replied that I couldn't meet her expectation and never heard back from her.
SD.
Originally Posted by DArrow404
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote



