Thread: Kgirls Rebrands
+
Add Report
Results 781 to 795 of 1136
-
12-09-22 19:51 #356Senior Member

Posts: 119With Vivian also
Seems true. Sophia works with Vivian doubles and she is going too.
Originally Posted by GG1234
[View Original Post]
-
12-09-22 13:03 #355Senior Member

Posts: 448CAKD Sophia is Helen
It looks like CAKD Sophia may be making a move to the Bay Area and changing her name (back) to Helen at a new org, Asian K-dolls. Maybe this is CAKD's NorCal expansion.
https://www.asian-kdolls.ch/
-
12-09-22 02:09 #354Regular Member

Posts: 10Casey from FA in OC
Anyone happen to know if Casey is a rebrand?
-
12-08-22 13:56 #353Senior Member

Posts: 284Props to this atlanta booker for the trailer vids LOL. Wish LA would do that. Would increase bookings 10x.
Originally Posted by GG1234
[View Original Post]
-
12-08-22 13:22 #352Senior Member

Posts: 232Bulma she went by for a hot minute.
Originally Posted by GG1234
[View Original Post]
-
12-08-22 13:20 #351Senior Member

Posts: 1190OG Kay, Socal Bulma
I first saw her working in Norcal at GFEI. Her name was Kay. When I came down to LA she was using the name Bulma. She has changed name a few times since then. Her ad was last seen in VA working for SAG's east coast branch.
Originally Posted by GG1234
[View Original Post]
-
12-08-22 12:57 #350Senior Member

Posts: 448Does anyone remember her name?
https://www.kblackpink.blog/copy-of-abba-1
I remember her being with SAG in Orange County, but I forgot her name. She seems to be in Atlanta now as Lora Queen.
-
12-07-22 00:38 #349Senior Member

Posts: 132This happens from time to time. Legendary Hosi did this as well and would not see Korean clients back in the days. Koreans can pretty much instantly tell if someone is Korean or not.
Originally Posted by Monger5614
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-22 19:44 #348Senior Member

Posts: 2060Sfk / kbliss Tuesday lineup.
Sfk Eva Nina Kona Viki.
K bliss Jessica Eva Nina.
-
12-06-22 17:16 #347Senior Member

Posts: 284Of course I understand why she doesn't take koreans.
Originally Posted by Ggininder
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-22 14:57 #346Senior Member

Posts: 47
Originally Posted by DankDonk
[View Original Post]
So this girl specifically asks her bookers to not accept appointments with Korean clients? Interesting. What if the client lies about not being Korean? How would the booker be sure? And would the Korean client be blacklisted if he actually got through to booking the session? All this seems pretty silly and nowhere close to being foolproof at all smh.
Originally Posted by Ggininder
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-22 13:46 #345Senior Member

Posts: 177Because she has many relatives in LA and she doesn't want to be recognized and doesn't want any of her info to be circulated in Korean community that any of her relatives can be aware of it's her.
Originally Posted by DankDonk
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-22 08:38 #344Senior Member

Posts: 284I'm going to guess she's also MKC Lovely. Anyone have any tips on circumventing the "no koreans" rule? Lmao. I feel like LA bookers are stricter with this rule. Pretty bummed. I first saw her as Nicole through club loveline in vegas and she is very attractive. I recall her BJ being great and started in the shower. Her face is pretty w / nice dimples and a bangin body.
Originally Posted by BroKageUzumaki
[View Original Post]
I got to see her by promising the booker I wouldn't speak korean LOL. Would love to see her again.
-
12-06-22 00:58 #343Senior Member

Posts: 47C'Mon. Buddy, she looks exactly like her pics? None of these girls are using real pics. How many times does this fact have to be repeated. Even those pics you attached, you can clearly see all the facial features have been photoshopped (eyes, jawline, etc). Some of these photos might have originally been "real" but they've been photoshopped to the point where they may as well have been fake.
Originally Posted by CornDoggyDog
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-22 00:19 #342Senior Member

Posts: 3488M Chirsty = Yunhee
I believe you.
Originally Posted by HexenDuction
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote









