Agency Girls Report REVIEWS OF GIRLS ONLY

[OF Charlie]

They do take 50%. A girl told me that. I couldn't believe she is willing to work at this rate. So then I said how about we have a private deal and she wanted 4. 5 anyway. I'm like how does that make any sense?? You are taking 2. 5 now. The win win would be you get like 3 or 3. 5 and I save 1. We both win. She couldn't understand the logic of business. And she's not the only one, I've had this conversation with several. So I guess that explains the brain power of why they are in this line of work instead. Makes no sense. Booker does nothing. It should be at least 80/20 or 70/30 split. These girls are being taken to the cleaners. And the Eastern euros are taking even less. That's why they wised up and XOC and others are charging more now. For Ukraine, they would be rich, but living and spending here, they need more and they send money home. Whoever can pull off an agency by mongers for mongers would be genius.

This topic has been discussed before. It's not that easy. In your 350 private deal scenario, who would pay for the hotel room? Someone has to pay. Whoever is paying the room cost is not going to be better off at 350.

Some girls can't or might not want to host. Even if you say you will host, the commute time for the girl to and from your place is at least an hour. Is she really better off at 350 for 2 hours (one hour commute time plus one hour private time) when she could potentially make 450 in 2 hours at the agency. Sure, she would have to fuck 2 guys at the agency, but it's more money.

Also, a girl would need to have work for a while at the agency to build up a clientele. Guys get bored, so the number of guys will drop off slowly. Some girls simply don't want to deal with the hassle. Anyone remembers Autumn from the old MCE days. She was a dental student. She told me she just wants to show up at the hotel, work 6 hours and go home. She was doing this on the side as her main focus was her study. She doesn't have the time to deal with 6 guys to coordinate the logistics. Think about how much time and efforts it takes to coordinate for 6 guys to show up on the same day at 6 different time slots even if she has 100 side deal guys. Working for an agency, all a popular has to do is show up and she will be fully booked. I remember I always had to book Autumn as soon as the schedule comes out on Monday. She was that popular. Working for the agency, all she has to do is tell them which days and what hours she wants to work. Remember time is money too.

[Witness2002]

They do take 50%. A girl told me that. I couldn't believe she is willing to work at this rate. So then I said how about we have a private deal and she wanted 4. 5 anyway. I'm like how does that make any sense?? You are taking 2. 5 now. The win win would be you get like 3 or 3. 5 and I save 1. We both win. She couldn't understand the logic of business. And she's not the only one, I've had this conversation with several. So I guess that explains the brain power of why they are in this line of work instead. Makes no sense. Booker does nothing. It should be at least 80/20 or 70/30 split. These girls are being taken to the cleaners. And the Eastern euros are taking even less. That's why they wised up and XOC and others are charging more now. For Ukraine, they would be rich, but living and spending here, they need more and they send money home. Whoever can pull off an agency by mongers for mongers would be genius.

This makes sense.

I'm sure we can find talent to pull off a website, easy marketing, and managing a booking system. Only item in question is how to get the girls. Have to recruit the pro mongers in the SArrangements section or something. LOL.

I still wonder how Marcus does it.

[Member #6286]

Damn, is it really a 50% take for the agency? That's ridiculous itself.

For those seeing Alexandra (former AC girl), is she charging $225 while being Indy?

They do take 50%. A girl told me that. I couldn't believe she is willing to work at this rate. So then I said how about we have a private deal and she wanted 4. 5 anyway. I'm like how does that make any sense?? You are taking 2. 5 now. The win win would be you get like 3 or 3. 5 and I save 1. We both win. She couldn't understand the logic of business. And she's not the only one, I've had this conversation with several. So I guess that explains the brain power of why they are in this line of work instead. Makes no sense. Booker does nothing. It should be at least 80/20 or 70/30 split. These girls are being taken to the cleaners. And the Eastern euros are taking even less. That's why they wised up and XOC and others are charging more now. For Ukraine, they would be rich, but living and spending here, they need more and they send money home. Whoever can pull off an agency by mongers for mongers would be genius.

[Witness2002]

It's ridiculous we're dealing with this agency behavior all the while they take 50% of the money. Some mongers need to come together and put together an agency by the mongers for the mongers.

Damn, is it really a 50% take for the agency? That's ridiculous itself.

For those seeing Alexandra (former AC girl), is she charging $225 while being Indy?

[ThanksMan]

This is brilliant.

Figure out a way to set it up with ethereum or some blockchain smart contracts. Or something untraceable as to the bookers.

We would all be in.

It's ridiculous we're dealing with this agency behavior all the while they take 50% of the money. Some mongers need to come together and put together an agency by the mongers for the mongers.

[Flipper12]

So I got banned at old AC pre pandemic because of 1 review that was actually good, but had one statement about girl being a little late. It's stupid but they are stupid and rude. What can you do if you want the merchandise? They are in control. Somehow post pandemic they opened the books again and I got in again. Now, I don't post reviews till much later. Plenty of bookings between me and the review. And yes it's not fair that we can't post a girl has smelly hygiene or is a dead fish because that offends them. Maybe they should screen better. Not every girl will be great and we have the right to discuss that. Anyway, my review on the "other board" not here. I'm pretty sure AC doesn't pay attention here, only the other board. MA as we know is all over this board and gets pissed about it on Twitter. ECE doesn't look here and he's crazy anyway. CCG used to look here but not sure they still do. 262 doesn't look or listen anywhere LMaO. So anyway, moral of the story is, they control this process. So if you want the upper hand, don't post as soon as you get to the parking lot unless all you got to say is wonderful stuff.

It's ridiculous we're dealing with this agency behavior all the while they take 50% of the money. Some mongers need to come together and put together an agency by the mongers for the mongers.

[ThanksMan]

I don't have Alexandra's digits anymore. We were close FWB at one time.

Dude, how you know it's her? And if you have Alexandra digits, why hit up her mom? So much to ask. Anyway, please PM info, because most of us not in SA.

[Member #6286]

It's a shame for anybody to be intimidated into not giving honest reports. My advice would be to be as non-specific as possible. Give a description of the services provided, the accuracy of her photo and some details on how it might differ from her photos, what you paid / tipped and whether you would repeat and why or why not (in generic terms). That's all most guys want to know anyway.

I haven't used any of these agencies yet, but I'm a regular at CLM. I'm sure they could figure out who I am if they haven't already because I usually write a review right after seeing a girl. But I couldn't imagine they would ever ban me for writing a bad review because 1) I spent a ton of money on them and 2) my positive reviews generate a lot more money for them than my negative reviews take away. That gives me the freedom to be detailed and honest. An agency would have to be petty to the point of self-destructive to cut off a regular because he had a bad experience and reported on it.

So I got banned at old AC pre pandemic because of 1 review that was actually good, but had one statement about girl being a little late. It's stupid but they are stupid and rude. What can you do if you want the merchandise? They are in control. Somehow post pandemic they opened the books again and I got in again. Now, I don't post reviews till much later. Plenty of bookings between me and the review. And yes it's not fair that we can't post a girl has smelly hygiene or is a dead fish because that offends them. Maybe they should screen better. Not every girl will be great and we have the right to discuss that. Anyway, my review on the "other board" not here. I'm pretty sure AC doesn't pay attention here, only the other board. MA as we know is all over this board and gets pissed about it on Twitter. ECE doesn't look here and he's crazy anyway. CCG used to look here but not sure they still do. 262 doesn't look or listen anywhere LMaO. So anyway, moral of the story is, they control this process. So if you want the upper hand, don't post as soon as you get to the parking lot unless all you got to say is wonderful stuff.

[Member #6286]

Alexandra had mentioned her mom had SDs.

So sure enough found mom on seeking.

Went to her place and she gives BBBJ the same way. Nice CIM. But a bit pro like.

Then DATY. Super vocal and tasty. Got an O.

BBFS / cip was good. Complete GFE.

Facially she resembles Alexandra but there is some baby damage. LOL.

Nice ass. But not the same legs.

Happy Hobbying gents!

Dude, how you know it's her? And if you have Alexandra digits, why hit up her mom? So much to ask. Anyway, please PM info, because most of us not in SA.

[DMichaels69]

Het Bruh, send me the digits for that GILF, LOL.

Alexandra had mentioned her mom had SDs.

So sure enough found mom on seeking.

Went to her place and she gives BBBJ the same way. Nice CIM. But a bit pro like.

Then DATY. Super vocal and tasty. Got an O.

BBFS / cip was good. Complete GFE.

Facially she resembles Alexandra but there is some baby damage. LOL.

Nice ass. But not the same legs.

Happy Hobbying gents!

[ThanksMan]

Alexandra had mentioned her mom had SDs.

So sure enough found mom on seeking.

Went to her place and she gives BBBJ the same way. Nice CIM. But a bit pro like.

Then DATY. Super vocal and tasty. Got an O.

BBFS / cip was good. Complete GFE.

Facially she resembles Alexandra but there is some baby damage. LOL.

Nice ass. But not the same legs.

Happy Hobbying gents!

LMAO! That was good for a chuckle. Yeah, I'd like that too.

[Jinurso]

I'm not following. Please explain. What do we need to be careful of? Hobbyists monitor these posts also, that is the point. If one visits an agency girl and, in their opinion, it is a poor experience why should we not share our experience with others? What could happen if we do? Why would one be concerned with being banned from an agency where they had a poor experience?

Yeah exactly you risk an agency banning for negative reviews. I got banned by MA for negative reviews. I think the Alena owner is known to frequent this board.

The concern is that you may have had a poor experience with one girl but still want to test other girls at the same agency. Alena is a relatively difficult one to get into so you risk wrecking your membership with negative reviews.

This fear does tend to result in more positive than negative reviews so definitely something to be aware of.

It's a shame for anybody to be intimidated into not giving honest reports. My advice would be to be as non-specific as possible. Give a description of the services provided, the accuracy of her photo and some details on how it might differ from her photos, what you paid / tipped and whether you would repeat and why or why not (in generic terms). That's all most guys want to know anyway.

I haven't used any of these agencies yet, but I'm a regular at CLM. I'm sure they could figure out who I am if they haven't already because I usually write a review right after seeing a girl. But I couldn't imagine they would ever ban me for writing a bad review because 1) I spent a ton of money on them and 2) my positive reviews generate a lot more money for them than my negative reviews take away. That gives me the freedom to be detailed and honest. An agency would have to be petty to the point of self-destructive to cut off a regular because he had a bad experience and reported on it.

[Tkow70]

So you used your wand and fingers again and got her to pee? Interesting how this works. It's the kind of thing you need someone to show you to teach you, LOL. Is her hygiene OK? Last monger said she could use a refresh.

Fingers only this time. Two fingers did the trick as she is tight. I daty and it only took 2-3 minutes for her to O with the right technique so I knew she could have multiple Os easily. She was fresh as a rose down there. I could smell her perfume when entered the door. She is very clean.

[Tkow70]

I'm not following. Please explain. What do we need to be careful of? Hobbyists monitor these posts also, that is the point. If one visits an agency girl and, in their opinion, it is a poor experience why should we not share our experience with others? What could happen if we do? Why would one be concerned with being banned from an agency where they had a poor experience?

Dude, I don't know if it was intended or not, but I can do without whatever a white knight syndrome is. Look. It's one thing to talk services not rendered, poor performance and looks within reason. Sounds like this guy obviously had a bad experience. Shit happens. No need to get into discussing hygiene and shit like that. Just flat out disrespectful and not needed. She was fresh as a rose for me and her English is perfect. Slight accent but, makes her very sexy.

No need to continue discussing.

[Flipper12]

I'm not following. Please explain. What do we need to be careful of? Hobbyists monitor these posts also, that is the point. If one visits an agency girl and, in their opinion, it is a poor experience why should we not share our experience with others? What could happen if we do? Why would one be concerned with being banned from an agency where they had a poor experience?

Yeah exactly you risk an agency banning for negative reviews. I got banned by MA for negative reviews. I think the Alena owner is known to frequent this board.

The concern is that you may have had a poor experience with one girl but still want to test other girls at the same agency. Alena is a relatively difficult one to get into so you risk wrecking your membership with negative reviews.

This fear does tend to result in more positive than negative reviews so definitely something to be aware of.