"Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?

**Broadway Jay** · 10-30-22 21:54

Originally Posted by FarFarAway [View Original Post]

IK there are tech types who read here, my? Is about what is unsafe about my personal cell phone (not my burner phone) when I am out of pocket seeing a SB. On all the police procedurals, they are locating people instantly by where their cell phones are pinging. Is this capability available only to LE? Never my SO? IK that some people (sadly) have an iPhone w / a FindMyIPphone app on it, and that likely inhibits them from meeting up w / SBs where they aren't supposed to be. Also, are there records kept (I guess by your cell provider) of where the phone was pinging at all times?

Can my SO in any way shape or form track where I have been based on my cell phone? Should I therefore turn the dam thing off before I go off my well-trodden path to meet up w / a SB?

Google, and probably other apps, tracks your location via your smart phone. However, getting that info from Google is very difficult. LE can obtain it via a search warrant. Not your SO. LE have apprehended people this way when there are no other leads. E. g. , a string of pharmacy break ins at night. Across multiple states. LE sent a search warrant to Google and identified the perps because they had their smart phones with them when they pulled the heists. Idiots, but I guess that goes with the territory. Needless to say LE will not be issuing a search warrant to Google to catch someone who is cheating on their spouse, LOL.

Your SO can find your phones location if you have "Find my iPhone" turned on and she knows your Apple I'd. I always have that turned off for obvious reasons.

Same thing with "pinging. " It can be done but the phone carriers don't do unless it's a big emergency, like someone's kid is missing. That kind of thing.

I believe you can reduce risk even further by turning off "Location Services" on your iPhone. Then it won't track your location.

**FarFarAway** · 10-30-22 12:01

IK there are tech types who read here, my? Is about what is unsafe about my personal cell phone (not my burner phone) when I am out of pocket seeing a SB. On all the police procedurals, they are locating people instantly by where their cell phones are pinging. Is this capability available only to LE? Never my SO? IK that some people (sadly) have an iPhone w / a FindMyIPphone app on it, and that likely inhibits them from meeting up w / SBs where they aren't supposed to be. Also, are there records kept (I guess by your cell provider) of where the phone was pinging at all times?

Can my SO in any way shape or form track where I have been based on my cell phone? Should I therefore turn the dam thing off before I go off my well-trodden path to meet up w / a SB?

**Tyrex2** · 10-30-22 00:10

Originally Posted by Kwagmire [View Original Post]

Actually -- after sending out (and continuing to send) lots of messages on Seeking, I think I would call the "two word screen name" (without any spaces or numbers, etc) a red flag for a scam account. Of course, it's not 100% guaranteed to be a fake account, just like "Virginia, Virginia is occasionally a real person, but I think it's a red flag and should make us suspect. If I go through my inbox, the ONLY real humans I am talking with have screen names that DON'T follow that formula. The ones WITH names in that format send messages like this (this one from an account called ObscureNerd):

Hello how are you doing
Im Stephanie and Im here seeking for ongoing mutual relationship with a responsible man just fun and intimacy,no strings attached if you okay with that lets text better and see how it goes .

This person is obviously not a native english speaker, and likely not even a girl. It would be rare for a girl to say something that explicit in her first message.

Its almost like they're working on training a bot. Not a guy on some end. Whether that bot is a translator or truly fully auto, I dunno.

**IbDaddy** · 10-29-22 22:14

Hey everyone, well I had a lapse of memory and good sense and renewed and hoping things have gotten a little better and legit here. Any recommendations of legit women 30 plus years old near Chester VA? Prefer White / Russian / Latin / Asian / Pacific. TIA.

**CandyMan555** · 10-29-22 22:03

This sounds strange Texted and talked about meeting but won't take cash but wants an Ebay gift card.

I am confused and suspicious.

Please advise thanks.

CM.

**Blak Gekko** · 10-29-22 17:41

Gents,

Had the pleasure of meeting this one and she's absolutely good to go! She is 100% legit.

Happy Hunting BG.

**Kwagmire** · 10-29-22 08:57

Originally Posted by kwagmire

So I've signed up for another month of SA and I've been spending quite a bit of time trying to get lots of phone numbers before the month is up.

In addition to all the other red flags on Seeking that indicate a probable fake profile there's one more now, I believe: the two (occasionally three) word screen name. It's not 100% all the time a perfect tell (kind of like Virginia, Virginia usually indicates a fake profile, but sometimes not), but this is another data point to add a profile to the "suspect" list.

This is usernames like "HumorousHottie", "SmokeyBaby", "FlirtyLover", "FunAngel", "StylishChick", "FavoriteForeign" "EasygoingDame", "CheekyVenus", "StylishDiva", "BraveLover", etc. (many of these are "girls" who have favorited me out of the blue usually without reading my profile).

More often than not these profiles have above average TGTBT pics specially designed to look "natural" and a sparse or poorly written bio section. I think there is a group operating on SA that is using this pattern (or software) to create usernames for fake accounts all over the place. This, combined with other tells is a red flag that you may be inviting a scam or simply wasting your time.

If I'm stating the obvious, forgive me, but maybe this info will help a few guys not get taken to the cleaners.

Originally Posted by BamBam

I thought the same when two-names first started appearing but the two word names are not a reliable indicator. When women enroll in the site, the site gives them a choice of one from column A, one from column B choice to create a profile name. I think they did this because too many women were using uncreative profile names that led back to their PII. I look for three tells: age in the early 30's, ethnicity as mixed (to Asians all Americans have mixed heritage,) and indicating they are looking for True Love. Pictures in an elegant setting help close the deal. All these indicate a crypto-scammer. Language in any communications usually confirm the case.

BAM.

Originally Posted by Kwagmire [View Original Post]

Oh, wow. I didn't know that the site prompted women with the "column A / column B" naming thing. You may be right, and this isn't a reliable indicator at all. Maybe there are just a ton of fakes. Are guys prompted with the same naming tool? My profile on SA has been around since Seeking was Seeking Arrangement (I just usually keep it dormant), so maybe they've evolved since I joined up.

Thanks for the clarification!

Actually -- after sending out (and continuing to send) lots of messages on Seeking, I think I would call the "two word screen name" (without any spaces or numbers, etc) a red flag for a scam account. Of course, it's not 100% guaranteed to be a fake account, just like "Virginia, Virginia is occasionally a real person, but I think it's a red flag and should make us suspect. If I go through my inbox, the ONLY real humans I am talking with have screen names that DON'T follow that formula. The ones WITH names in that format send messages like this (this one from an account called ObscureNerd):

Hello how are you doing
Im Stephanie and Im here seeking for ongoing mutual relationship with a responsible man just fun and intimacy,no strings attached if you okay with that lets text better and see how it goes .

This person is obviously not a native english speaker, and likely not even a girl. It would be rare for a girl to say something that explicit in her first message.

**Makethescoop** · 10-28-22 10:44

Originally Posted by WhoMe2050 [View Original Post]

Started texting this one with a 757 # after a few niceties went straight to sending me a grocery list asking for help.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...4-eb31996ec078

I forget her name but she's pretty well known in the Richmond area. I found her on tinder. Exchanged some pics and some flirting. When she got to the agreed spot it was $300 (maybe more) for the session. I declined and she left.

**WhoMe2050** · 10-27-22 17:00

Started texting this one with a 757 # after a few niceties went straight to sending me a grocery list asking for help.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...4-eb31996ec078

**Btt123** · 10-27-22 13:05

Originally Posted by GiveItRaw10 [View Original Post]

Had a chance to talk with this one. Says she is in Petersburg attending Uni. Exchanged digits and was a NC area code. Continued messaging back and forth, basically wants deposit prior to meet.

Thanks, adding the link so others find when searching.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...4-b5239ecf106e

**Kwagmire** · 10-26-22 13:37

Originally Posted by BamBam [View Original Post]

I thought the same when two-names first started appearing but the two word names are not a reliable indicator. When women enroll in the site, the site gives them a choice of one from column A, one from column B choice to create a profile name. I think they did this because too many women were using uncreative profile names that led back to their PII. I look for three tells: age in the early 30's, ethnicity as mixed (to Asians all Americans have mixed heritage,) and indicating they are looking for True Love. Pictures in an elegant setting help close the deal. All these indicate a crypto-scammer. Language in any communications usually confirm the case.

BAM.

Oh, wow. I didn't know that the site prompted women with the "column A / column B" naming thing. You may be right, and this isn't a reliable indicator at all. Maybe there are just a ton of fakes. Are guys prompted with the same naming tool? My profile on SA has been around since Seeking was Seeking Arrangement (I just usually keep it dormant), so maybe they've evolved since I joined up.

Thanks for the clarification!

**BamBam** · 10-26-22 13:24

Originally Posted by Kwagmire [View Original Post]

So I've signed up for another month of SA and I've been spending quite a bit of time trying to get lots of phone numbers before the month is up.

In addition to all the other red flags on Seeking that indicate a probable fake profile there's one more now, I believe: the two (occasionally three) word screen name. It's not 100% all the time a perfect tell (kind of like Virginia, Virginia usually indicates a fake profile, but sometimes not), but this is another data point to add a profile to the "suspect" list.

This is usernames like "HumorousHottie", "SmokeyBaby", "FlirtyLover", "FunAngel", "StylishChick", "FavoriteForeign" "EasygoingDame", "CheekyVenus", "StylishDiva", "BraveLover", etc. (many of these are "girls" who have favorited me out of the blue usually without reading my profile).

I thought the same when two-names first started appearing but the two word names are not a reliable indicator. When women enroll in the site, the site gives them a choice of one from column A, one from column B choice to create a profile name. I think they did this because too many women were using uncreative profile names that led back to their PII. I look for three tells: age in the early 30's, ethnicity as mixed (to Asians all Americans have mixed heritage,) and indicating they are looking for True Love. Pictures in an elegant setting help close the deal. All these indicate a crypto-scammer. Language in any communications usually confirm the case.

BAM.

**GiveItRaw10** · 10-26-22 10:43

Well, it happened for the second time. I've been suspended!! Right when my account was renewed too took the membership Then suspended me.

**Kwagmire** · 10-25-22 22:26

So I've signed up for another month of SA and I've been spending quite a bit of time trying to get lots of phone numbers before the month is up.

In addition to all the other red flags on Seeking that indicate a probable fake profile there's one more now, I believe: the two (occasionally three) word screen name. It's not 100% all the time a perfect tell (kind of like Virginia, Virginia usually indicates a fake profile, but sometimes not), but this is another data point to add a profile to the "suspect" list.

This is usernames like "HumorousHottie", "SmokeyBaby", "FlirtyLover", "FunAngel", "StylishChick", "FavoriteForeign" "EasygoingDame", "CheekyVenus", "StylishDiva", "BraveLover", etc. (many of these are "girls" who have favorited me out of the blue usually without reading my profile).

More often than not these profiles have above average TGTBT pics specially designed to look "natural" and a sparse or poorly written bio section. I think there is a group operating on SA that is using this pattern (or software) to create usernames for fake accounts all over the place. This, combined with other tells is a red flag that you may be inviting a scam or simply wasting your time.

If I'm stating the obvious, forgive me, but maybe this info will help a few guys not get taken to the cleaners.

**Ernest Ll** · 10-25-22 17:21

Originally Posted by FarFarAway [View Original Post]

What do you guys think broadly about SBs # of kids. I have no problem w / single moms, but most typically have had SBs who had one child. Anything special to think about if they have 2? Or more?

My biggest issue is damage to the body -- stretch marks and the tummy pooch are way to common and a big turn off (never had kids so never had to deal with first hand).

2nd is damage to the equipment. -- nipples can get really jacked up when the get sucked on like your life depended on it (because it does) not to mention loss of tightness and general impact to the vag. As one comedian once put it "looks like someone punched a lasagna."

But no doubt there are some freaks who know sugar is a big help in life and rarely have GPS. But add the physical to the reliability and availability issues and it can be tough to navigate it all for a good experience.