Arrangement Reports

**OnlyBbbj1** · 10-20-22 19:35

Ugh. This one just seemed legit. Last minute asked for $100 even though I said earlier on I don't do that. Annoying bi-atch.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...e-af3c3ca2c7ac

**Limeyincal** · 10-20-22 16:02

Suprabby.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...3-2552fbc7a70a

Says she's from Bulgaria and is looking for 2K ppm! - WTF really! Her private pics are very average.

Didn't discuss what was on offer, but I'm not sure I'd give her 400 ppm.

But I guess some idiot will pay it. SMH.

**Da Monger** · 10-20-22 00:21

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...d-9939a2090702

Standard scam, Lets meet for Coffee / drinks, $100 for the meet and ghost you after. I was so good for a while but she was so good at texting and I fell for it.

**RayMunroe** · 10-19-22 23:53

Originally Posted by TopGun9 [View Original Post]

Here's 20% off code for SA if anyone is looking.

VWO20 RBELT1.

20OFFSD works too and pretty consistently from month to month.

**DynoJr** · 10-19-22 22:37

Originally Posted by Freakspead [View Original Post]

So I think that SA controls what messages girls gets. That's my theory. I think that SA is definitely playing with the authenticity of when girls sign on. Certain messages get buried. And I'm not talking about new girls. I'm talking about chicks that have been on SA for a while now.

Somehow the same girls that are buried with messages, get to see the message that some dude has removed access and is losing interest. Therefore losing interest is bad for business for SA. So that notification pops up to the top?

Also when you do a search you see that 10 K results are possible, but you're not seeing that many results. There are people that have been shared with me, from another user of SA, who should be showingup in my search, and instead is never showing up. The levels of membership help unlock more potential. That's the value proposition. I'm sure if you're a diamond member, your messages don't get buried.

SA let's you send messages as a non premium but one you pay the message is nothing like what you wrote. I could write "you'd look great riding my cock" and it will come back as "you look great, what are you seeking"?

In other news I'm on Day 3 of SB and have burned through the equivalent of one month of SA. If you like them young and non-white, SB is a fishbowl. But it's a lot of work because the young ones are not quick to respond.

**KnightKing** · 10-19-22 19:51

Originally Posted by Freakspead [View Original Post]

So I think that SA controls what messages girls gets. That's my theory. I think that SA is definitely playing with the authenticity of when girls sign on. Certain messages get buried. And I'm not talking about new girls. I'm talking about chicks that have been on SA for a while now.

Somehow the same girls that are buried with messages, get to see the message that some dude has removed access and is losing interest. Therefore losing interest is bad for business for SA. So that notification pops up to the top?

Also when you do a search you see that 10 K results are possible, but you're not seeing that many results. There are people that have been shared with me, from another user of SA, who should be showingup in my search, and instead is never showing up. The levels of membership help unlock more potential. That's the value proposition. I'm sure if you're a diamond member, your messages don't get buried.

Seeking absolutely plays with the results of messages and profiles. I have simultaneously ran my basic premium account and my diamond member account to see what kind of results I've had. Part of this experiment is why I don't do seeking very often anymore, it's becoming too much of a scam. Pretty close to the original Ashley Madison days.

In a nutshell, diamond members profiles are visible and at the top of the search results, essentially seeking wide regardless where you set as a location. Being a diamond member had no difference in whether my messages showed up at the top of a SB inbox. Next message came through and mine moved down on the list. Also, the removing access to a message didn't update my previously sent / unread message. It stayed in the queue wherever it was in the girls inbox. Removing access to photos, did move the message up to the top. No idea why one would update to the top of the list and one wouldn't. Having diamond membership basically amounts to paying more and being more visible across the platform. You show up more often, that's about it.

These results were verified by numerous twin peaks waitresses who I am acquainted with in a midwest town. All knew I was on the site, dated a couple of because of seeking as well. I've had a lot of great results on seeking but it just got old. Way too many, online / platonic only sugar babies. I found it easier just to get acquainted with twin peaks girls in person and cut out the middle man.

Now, why did I have two paid accounts at the same time. Long story and kind of stupid, but I did have some decent results. That's another story for another time I suppose.

**TopGun9** · 10-19-22 18:53

Here's 20% off code for SA if anyone is looking.

VWO20 RBELT1.

**Limeyincal** · 10-19-22 18:28

SurprisedChickie.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...5-140f1e68fac8

She sent me a direct message or two in SA that included a phone number with a 619 area code on it.

After googling the number it comes up as an escort agency in San Diego!

Called her out on it too.

**FarFarAway** · 10-19-22 16:07

Originally Posted by Freakspead [View Original Post]

So I think that SA controls what messages girls gets. That's my theory. I think that SA is definitely playing with the authenticity of when girls sign on. Certain messages get buried. And I'm not talking about new girls. I'm talking about chicks that have been on SA for a while now.

Somehow the same girls that are buried with messages, get to see the message that some dude has removed access and is losing interest. Therefore losing interest is bad for business for SA. So that notification pops up to the top?

Also when you do a search you see that 10 K results are possible, but you're not seeing that many results. There are people that have been shared with me, from another user of SA, who should be showingup in my search, and instead is never showing up. The levels of membership help unlock more potential. That's the value proposition. I'm sure if you're a diamond member, your messages don't get buried.

Your self-characterization seems correct. I've been on the site for years, and I've never had a suspicion that anything like this is happening. There are many other sites that have many many weird things happening, likely fake profiles and messages, made only to drain your bank account, not your c*.

**Bourbons** · 10-19-22 10:57

Originally Posted by TimeForPlay10 [View Original Post]

I periodically remove picture access as well (just because I don't want people with extended access) and have had some success connecting with an SB that way. I don't think its any more than they get literally 100's of messages a day and missed my first message. So, when I remove access and they're notified, it actually draws their attention one last time. The site could be doing something to play with messaging but I doubt it.

Agree here. And removing access has a better psychological benefit. She gets tons of messages, and they're all saying "look at this! When the site tells you access has been removed her mind says "what am I missing?

**Roarson 1281** · 10-19-22 08:25

Has anyone messaged this girl? Trying to get some info and see if she's worth it or not.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...1-b2afc18a6cbf

**Freakspead** · 10-18-22 21:37

Originally Posted by BaltoMan66 [View Original Post]

I read your note and I'm not getting it. (Sure, I can be slow).

Are you saying that removing permissions may have triggered something? (Possible).

If you're saying something else, I don't understand.

If ANYONE has paid for Diamond, please elaborate. I can't understand why I would pay that much. Educate me.

I found a keeper. So I'm really just looking for extra to be a bit greedy (variety?

Information is almost always good, so that.

So I think that SA controls what messages girls gets. That's my theory. I think that SA is definitely playing with the authenticity of when girls sign on. Certain messages get buried. And I'm not talking about new girls. I'm talking about chicks that have been on SA for a while now.

Somehow the same girls that are buried with messages, get to see the message that some dude has removed access and is losing interest. Therefore losing interest is bad for business for SA. So that notification pops up to the top?

Also when you do a search you see that 10 K results are possible, but you're not seeing that many results. There are people that have been shared with me, from another user of SA, who should be showingup in my search, and instead is never showing up. The levels of membership help unlock more potential. That's the value proposition. I'm sure if you're a diamond member, your messages don't get buried.

**DynoJr** · 10-18-22 21:20

Originally Posted by PauFord [View Original Post]

That article is so fake and nauseating to read. I bet Seeking PR fabricated that whole article to promote their "dating site not a prostitution site" agenda.

"I said I hadn't bought my plane tickets to France yet. "Will you let me do that for you?" he said. "I would love to support you in your travel to France. " He hovered over my shoulder when I booked the business-class flights. He said, "I don't want to remove the power, so I'll give you the credit card and we can do it together. ".

Ffs this sounds like a terrible romance novel and is this sh*t absolutely never ever takes place on that scam riddled site!

SA got what they want which was a whitewashed article that passed as journalism. Most of the commentators smelled that bs immediately.

Funny thing is my messages with the sb all seem to suggest that their priors behaved just like this. When I ask what they're used to, they all claim gifts and large ppms!

**DonMartin57** · 10-18-22 13:57

Originally Posted by PauFord [View Original Post]

That article is so fake and nauseating to read. I bet Seeking PR fabricated that whole article to promote their "dating site not a prostitution site" agenda.

"I said I hadn't bought my plane tickets to France yet. "Will you let me do that for you?" he said. "I would love to support you in your travel to France. " He hovered over my shoulder when I booked the business-class flights. He said, "I don't want to remove the power, so I'll give you the credit card and we can do it together. ".

Ffs this sounds like a terrible romance novel and is this sh*t absolutely never ever takes place on that scam riddled site!

It's been a while since I visited my fellow friends in Chicago, so when I saw this I had to chuckle. Turns out that this individual is quite the character. No doubt this story was fabricated.

Always a pleasure to see how things are going south of the border. Seems like it's just as bad for you as it is up here.

**DynoJr** · 10-18-22 13:39

Originally Posted by JDuB1970 [View Original Post]

Yea, screw this Bullshit with paying to even meet much less "penpal" kind of shit.

Just had lunch with a new 20 yr old and only paid for lunch. No "allowance" to HAVE lunch. And, we've agreed on a PPM, which I'll see her this week to inaugurate. So this is the 2nd 20 yr old I've got going on.

I've got a theory that the younger ones (<24) tend to accept lower ppms and the 25-32 crowd is unreasonable.

If they're model quality that's a different story. I'm just talking about the average college girls.