Seeking Arrangement and Other Dating Site Reviews

[Sutigel2]

First one is def fake. 973 area code.

That could be another tip off. Odd area codes don't bother me that much. I have had local sugar babies with Texas and Rhode Island area codes. I have had contact with Ohio girls whose identity I was able to verify. 973 is Newark. The way I look at it, if I can get with a Smith student with from Austin, TX, it is very possible that a jersey girl relocated.

I mean: I live in one state and my cell and my burner have different area codes than the state I live in. Ive had 5 longer term SB over the past 5 or so years: 860, 413, 203, 512, and 410.

I just don't like done of the wording in her profile and the "seeking" tags were a bit odd.

I’m not trying to be argumentative with you, because I appreciate your wisdom. I’m just saying, the area code thing (by itself) doesn’t bother me too much.

[TopGun9]

Online only, waste of time.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...c-2421b7858a90

[TopGun9]

Between some of the wording and what the girls are "seeking," I find both to be a little suspect. I've seen more obvious, and maybe they're aren't scams, but I do have my suspicions.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...7-ebb585bceffb

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...5-b42e50fc30ac

I think the second one may have removed a platonic tag in the last 24 hours.

First one is def fake. 973 area code.

[Sutigel2]

Between some of the wording and what the girls are "seeking," I find both to be a little suspect. I've seen more obvious, and maybe they're aren't scams, but I do have my suspicions.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...7-ebb585bceffb

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...5-b42e50fc30ac

I think the second one may have removed a “platonic” tag in the last 24 hours.

[Gridge]

These days, I would NOT trust any company providing this service. There have been too many data breaches for people, companies, cloud services, and government agencies. It's bad enough that android (google) and ios (apple) can track and store our location history. I have no faith in big tech since I (we) are the product with our personal info for sale. I'll stick with anonymous (cash) debit cards. In me I trust! LOL.

Breaches so far, this year for each day!: https://tech.co/news/data-breaches-2022-so-far

BMD.

Just reading about all the data breaches in that link is depressing. Always better to be safe than sorry.

[Big Mac Daddy]

Anyone ever try MaskMe (by abine) or similar? I've seen the chatter about using Vanilla cards for SA and such in the past. MaskMe used to be a site, in my interpretation, that generates an alias card that masks your own credit card. You can choose your own name, so when you enter details for transactions online you would use the alias and the charge would filter through MaskMe onto your masked CC. They also have options to mask email addresses and phone numbers.

https://www.abine.com/

These days, I would NOT trust any company providing this service. There have been too many data breaches for people, companies, cloud services, and government agencies. It's bad enough that android (google) and ios (apple) can track and store our location history. I have no faith in big tech since I (we) are the product with our personal info for sale. I'll stick with anonymous (cash) debit cards. In me I trust! LOL.

Breaches so far, this year for each day!: https://tech.co/news/data-breaches-2022-so-far

BMD.

[DonnnyBravo]

Anyone ever try MaskMe (by abine) or similar? I've seen the chatter about using Vanilla cards for SA and such in the past. MaskMe used to be a site, in my interpretation, that generates an alias card that masks your own credit card. You can choose your own name, so when you enter details for transactions online you would use the alias and the charge would filter through MaskMe onto your masked CC. They also have options to mask email addresses and phone numbers.

https://www.abine.com/

[TopGun9]

I never understand what difference saving something like $35 makes in determining whether subscribing to a service that is full of fakes, time wasters, women looking to have drinks, dinner and coffee dates before asking you to spend $400 to fuck them in a room you are paying for should make. Frankly that type of website isn't worth $10 let alone $109 a month. IOW does dropping the price make all the time wasting bullshit involved suddenly make it a game changer? Now if the $109 price came with a personal Admin who would screen out all the time wasting fakes and bullshitter wannabe escorts and presented me with a list of reasonably priced ready to fuck prospects, I would gladly pay the $109 a month. But that's just me.

1 - You have any other better options? SB got way more fakes / scam profiles than SA. WYP is a shitty site, same as SB where you pay to msg. And no, I don't fuck Escorts or Streetwalkers. And I can't pick up girls at the clubs, mall, or restaurants like the single dudes.

2 - Many guys prefer to use $100 prepaid card, so a $35 or even $20 discount will bring the amount under $100.

3 - That damn $35 that I just saved will buy me Expresso for a week LOL.

[XxMarkXx]

Looks like Ella has a profile up on SA. Could be someone using her pic, but the profile text definitely sounds like her.

I am on a bit of a break from this game, but still lurk from time to time. She might get me back as a paying member, LOL.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...f-800367967660

[DaReal86]

Had a ton of luck on this site. There are a lot of fake profiles though and very hard to weed through. But I somehow make it work. Have spoken to another member that had shit luck so YMMV.

[Gridge]

Fair enough. I did SA for a couple years with some success and got tired of the price increases and the GPS. I considered making a profile but felt the pricing to be very complicated and they seemed to be nickel and diming you. I have seen others complain of similar feelings about it. I have seen some who repoy success. Hopefully they can answer your questions.

Blue.

Thanks,

I think what I'm starting to realize is all those sites are not great, but if you pick one and put in the time you will end up with a few hits.

[Stickman55]

Give this code a try, it may be targeted for specific accounts.

VWO33 RBELT1.

I never understand what difference saving something like $35 makes in determining whether subscribing to a service that is full of fakes, time wasters, women looking to have drinks, dinner and coffee dates before asking you to spend $400 to fuck them in a room you are paying for should make. Frankly that type of website isn't worth $10 let alone $109 a month. IOW does dropping the price make all the time wasting bullshit involved suddenly make it a game changer? Now if the $109 price came with a personal Admin who would screen out all the time wasting fakes and bullshitter wannabe escorts and presented me with a list of reasonably priced ready to fuck prospects, I would gladly pay the $109 a month. But that's just me.

[Gamisi]

Give this code a try, it may be targeted for specific accounts.

VWO33 RBELT1.

Nice! Thanks for looking out TG.

[TopGun9]

Give this code a try, it may be targeted for specific accounts.

VWO33 RBELT1.

[Kwagmire]

I have tried searching, but it brings up a lot of generic posts, including any that have the word price in them. I wouldn't ask if I couldn't find information on it.

In a nutshell, the overall feeling I have on WYP is "meh. " to "poor".

Just like Seeking, there are the scammers and flakes. Also, I think there are some actual fake ads posted by site staff, to help them extract credits from you, but that's just a hunch. I have no proof.

The big downside to WYP is that it costs money to open an actual conversation with a girl, with no guarantee that the girl will converse in any meaningful way.

Another downside is that the price of the conversation is tied to the amount of your offer. If you offer a lot, the conversation costs more and (if the girl is actually real) she is more likely to actually respond. If you offer a low amount to keep the costs of conversation low (but are planning to offer a more "industry standard" rate in person if the date actually turns into a trip to the bedroom) the girl is less likely to respond at all because she thinks you're a cheapskate. You can't say that you are willing to pay more in person if you get to fuck her in messaging on WYP because you'll get banned -- got to save that for text, but with the pricing structure it's really hard to get all the way to text.

Plus, at face value on the site, you are making an offer of actual $ to simply go on a date, no other activities included. Of course that's not what we want, but if you offer a large amount of money to attract the girl and she is expecting 100+ for the privilege of letting you buy her an expensive dinner you're kind of on the hook for that and if you refuse to pay up in person she can complain to site management and your account is in jeopardy that way as well.

That all said, by being VERY selective I found ONE "flash in the pan" asian girl on WYP who was incredible. Sadly she disappeared very quickly, but the day I hit her up she needed money for something and we made a deal. She was a real person, mid-20s, a true spinner in every sense of the word, shaved, amazing in bed, had a cool sense of humor and SHE actually bought our coffees at our M&G. She was the leprechaun at the end of the rainbow. That will never happen again. Don't ask for her contact -- her burner number is no longer working, so even I can't get in touch with her.

The only other date I went on from WYP was with a girl who turned out to be much bigger in person and her main goal was to get as drunk as possible as quickly as possible on my dime at the M&G. She did end up putting out, but it wasn't worth the cost of admission.

You REALLY need to weed though a lot of profiles to find the girls who are real and are actually able to "read between the lines" on WYP. Even with all its problems, Seeking is easier and overall a better value.