Thread: Seeking Arrangements
+
Add Report
Results 3,991 to 4,005 of 10975
-
08-06-22 22:16 #6985Regular Member

Posts: 1Caitlin
Hi,
New to SA. Came across the below profile seems to be genuine. Has anyone had any experience?
Thanks in Advance.
https://members.seeking.com/member/5...c-22777f1578f2
-
08-06-22 13:57 #6984Senior Member

Posts: 702The profile is rude itself. Women with profiles like that often are trouble.
Originally Posted by KcirtaPanner2
[View Original Post]
-
08-06-22 12:10 #6983Senior Member

Posts: 117https://members.seeking.com/member/9...6-d6c2828477d9
Anyone seen her? I tried a couple weeks ago but she got impatient and a bit rude. But I confirmed she's real, and I think was willing to meet for 300 iirc.
-
08-05-22 12:26 #6982Senior Member

Posts: 90Bellarose
https://members.seeking.com/member/7...6-ac32bc368d61 - Anyone have feedback. PM is fine if not here. Thanks.
-
08-04-22 16:18 #6981Senior Member

Posts: 117I talked with her before and I gave her my offer and I think she wouldn't even tell me what her asking price was. Can you post her private pics?
Originally Posted by WTRope
[View Original Post]
-
08-04-22 15:48 #6980Regular Member

Posts: 4Absolute.
Originally Posted by BR1201
[View Original Post]
[Deleted by Admin]
LOL. In a good way. She likes sex. That is my number one thing, way beyond looks. Do they like doing it or are they merely tolerating it.
+/- 700 but it's all situational.
-
08-04-22 15:11 #6979Senior Member

Posts: 203Baroque
An absolute what? Also what was the general range? I've talked to her before but we never talked turkey LOL. Thanks for the info!
Originally Posted by WTRope
[View Original Post]
-
08-04-22 14:22 #6978Senior Member

Posts: 117Looks like she deleted.
Originally Posted by Longjblues
[View Original Post]
-
08-04-22 10:36 #6977Regular Member

Posts: 4Recommended
This chick: https://members.seeking.com/member/9...8-ba43f8d546cb.
Is a few things.
1. An absolute ****.
2. Equally happy doing a date or simple pay-to-play visit.
3. Able to host.
4. Ok with short notice.
Not cheap, but it's negotiable and reasonable in exchange for what you get.
-
08-04-22 10:32 #6976Senior Member

Posts: 1732Any info on "Naughtyfun", 37, Revere?
Any info on "Naughtyfun", 37, Revere, on Seeking? She listed in her profile, 5'1, and thin. I was exchanging messages with her. She quoted $300, but she subsequently either blocked me or deleted her profile, when I tried to negotiate with her.
Sounded interesting. Pics were nice. New profile. Any info appreciated.
-
08-03-22 20:57 #6975Senior Member

Posts: 131Be very careful with Melissa
Melissa was one of my very 1st Seeking dates and I was dumb and amateur and made the mistake of giving her the cash before doing the deed. She just ran for it, once she got the money. After that, a few weeks later she had the nerve to message me to ask if I wanted to meet for another date and said she was sorry about running out last time cause her daughter was in trouble.
In my experience, Melissa is a crook, who will make all attempts to take advantage of you and provide no service in return.
Originally Posted by Patriarchist
[View Original Post]
-
08-02-22 15:44 #6974Senior Member

Posts: 108Just reached out to see if she's serious.
Originally Posted by BR1201
[View Original Post]
-
08-01-22 14:07 #6973Senior Member

Posts: 117I didn't mention anything about money. We can agree to disagree.
Originally Posted by Patriarchist
[View Original Post]
-
08-01-22 12:00 #6972Senior Member

Posts: 232First of all, there was not much about Melissa that indicated she was the type of woman you describe. In fact she didn't even smoke weed or drink and the STG ad was only created after I met with her the second time. So not sure what exactly you are talking about.
Originally Posted by KcirtaPanner2
[View Original Post]
Secondly, I don't give more than 300 to any girls. None of these promiscuous women deserve such a high reward. I have had plenty of good experiences on SA in the 300 and below range with non-pro, non-addicted girls. If anything, you're the one overpaying and / or missing out.
-
08-01-22 00:30 #6971Senior Member

Posts: 117You really didn't read my post very closely. I don't necessarily disagree with anything you just said. My only point is that most of the posts I see here are about the types that I referred to. I suppose that could be because we're all keeping the gems to ourselves for the most part, so it's a bit of a selection bias in that sense.
Originally Posted by DarkClouds
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote






