Escort Reports

**ReddyKW** · 07-10-22 20:26

I saw her when she was in Muskegon last week. Very warm personality, sensual vibe. Between her being tall, huge boobs, and the pig tails she has kind of a sexy Bavarian woman thing going on (just add a dirndl and bierstein and its Oktoberfest). Completely enjoyed my time with her!

https://grand-rapids.skipthegames.co...9/847079042890

**Benz1** · 07-10-22 13:30

Originally Posted by TokyoDawson [View Original Post]

The UTR could ask mongers for references of providers they have seen. I have had that happen in other cities and while it may delay a first date for a day or so while they checked, it worked fine in getting a regular relationship going.

They ask for a name the monger is using and a distinguishing physical characteristic to be sure the guy doesn't use someone else's screen name. The password thing may work for a group of just a couple guys but not if the circle is any bigger as you don't really know what a monger is actually doing in his sessions.

Mr. Dawson is right, if the providers are already in the hobby and know other providers.

Most of the UTRs I meet off FB have never been in the hobby to network with other providers.

Providers networking and willing to offer references might be a thing of the past.

The original Breezii has been trying to get a network started with little success.

I used a providers name and digits for reference once and she contacted me saying WTF are you doing seeing other girls. She wasn't willing to give references because she wanted all my business.

We should move this discussion to general reports so the escorts can have their thread back.

**MidwestHobby** · 07-10-22 12:54

Originally Posted by Aniles [View Original Post]

After reading so many glowing reviews of her, I finally paid a visit; contrary to all the seemingly great reviews, mine was somewhat mixed. When I walked into the room, she seemed too nice, followed me into the bathroom and demanded donation upfront, soon as she got that, her attitude suddenly changed and became somewhat negative, very formal and business-like. Said no touch here, no touch there, etc. , she acted as if no dick had touched her body. I was so pissed-off, if I had not given the donation, I would've just walked out!! When we started the "fun" and was in the middle of it, her phone rang, and she said: "I have to take it, it's important!" We stopped, she had to get off bed and answer the phone, when she was done talking, we resumed. She tried to be nice thereafter, but my mood was already off. The initial negative impression she cast on me and the phone interruption. Those two colored my whole experience. I'm not sure if I'll repeat. , even though I've read many positive reports, mine was as I've described. https://grand-rapids.skipthegames.co...e/167283890711.

Thanks, these honest reviews really help out a lot. Good to hear both positive and negative experiences from everyone. YMMV, it seems.

**BassMaster1** · 07-10-22 08:49

Originally Posted by RallyToo [View Original Post]

Saw her yesterday. Discreet and easy meeting. As advertised. She aims to please and she did so to the last drop. Slept well last night!

She was a bit nervous to start. Probably the first meeting thing. But she didn't hesitate. She's still working on getting pics back up to her stg. I'll repeat.

https://grand-rapids.skipthegames.co...a/731446686834

Met her last night for a car date hadn't seen her in a long time. She seemed a little jittery and high strung but not a big deal found a good parking spot got a nice bbbjcimws and was on my way. I will repeat when I feel the need.

**BrentRS** · 07-10-22 07:08

I believe I did my due diligence in looking for a review (s) of Snow. I can't seem to find any. 8 pages back is as far as it would take me. Could anyone who has info on her let me know. Thanks.

**TokyoDawson** · 07-10-22 07:05

Originally Posted by Benz1 [View Original Post]

If SBJsister returns, what could we do to make sure a UTR that likes to fuck and suck is safe from mongers that have a dominance and daddy fetish?
She likes to play but not that way.
Saying NO doesn't seem to matter to them. Every UTR needs gentlemen not assholes.
There's information in the New Member Guide about UTR etiquette
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...w-Member-Guide

The UTR could ask mongers for references of providers they have seen. I have had that happen in other cities and while it may delay a first date for a day or so while they checked, it worked fine in getting a regular relationship going.

They ask for a name the monger is using and a distinguishing physical characteristic to be sure the guy doesn't use someone else's screen name. The password thing may work for a group of just a couple guys but not if the circle is any bigger as you don't really know what a monger is actually doing in his sessions.

**BaseHit** · 07-10-22 06:55

Originally Posted by DuDonk [View Original Post]

My date was similar. Not at all what I expected based on the reviews. WAAAAY too much $ for the experience. She worked herself over very hard right from the beginning to ensure a squirt but it didn't happen. That's not a turn on at all for me. She could do that to herself anytime, but not while my clock is ticking. Lots of NO's. Don't do this, don't do that. Not at all my body type. Nice bbbjcimws but too much $ for just that. Won't repeat.

I just want to thank these Michigan Gentlemen for their honest reviews. I will definitely avoid seeing Adorable Rose. Much appreciate gentlemen. BH.

**BaseHit** · 07-10-22 06:45

Originally Posted by DuDonk [View Original Post]

My date was similar. Not at all what I expected based on the reviews. WAAAAY too much $ for the experience. She worked herself over very hard right from the beginning to ensure a squirt but it didn't happen. That's not a turn on at all for me. She could do that to herself anytime, but not while my clock is ticking. Lots of NO's. Don't do this, don't do that. Not at all my body type. Nice bbbjcimws but too much $ for just that. Won't repeat.

I just want to thank these Michigan Gentlemen for their honest reviews. I will definitely avoid seeing Adorable Rose. Much appreciate gentlemen. BH.

**Du Donk** · 07-10-22 06:17

Originally Posted by Aniles [View Original Post]

After reading so many glowing reviews of her, I finally paid a visit; contrary to all the seemingly great reviews, mine was somewhat mixed. When I walked into the room, she seemed too nice, followed me into the bathroom and demanded donation upfront, soon as she got that, her attitude suddenly changed and became somewhat negative, very formal and business-like. Said no touch here, no touch there, etc. , she acted as if no dick had touched her body. I was so pissed-off, if I had not given the donation, I would've just walked out!! When we started the "fun" and was in the middle of it, her phone rang, and she said: "I have to take it, it's important!" We stopped, she had to get off bed and answer the phone, when she was done talking, we resumed. She tried to be nice thereafter, but my mood was already off. The initial negative impression she cast on me and the phone interruption. Those two colored my whole experience. I'm not sure if I'll repeat. , even though I've read many positive reports, mine was as I've described. https://grand-rapids.skipthegames.co...e/167283890711.

My date was similar. Not at all what I expected based on the reviews. WAAAAY too much $ for the experience. She worked herself over very hard right from the beginning to ensure a squirt but it didn't happen. That's not a turn on at all for me. She could do that to herself anytime, but not while my clock is ticking. Lots of NO's. Don't do this, don't do that. Not at all my body type. Nice bbbjcimws but too much $ for just that. Won't repeat.

**Aniles** · 07-10-22 02:21

After reading so many glowing reviews of her, I finally paid a visit; contrary to all the seemingly great reviews, mine was somewhat mixed. When I walked into the room, she seemed too nice, followed me into the bathroom and demanded donation upfront, soon as she got that, her attitude suddenly changed and became somewhat negative, very formal and business-like. Said no touch here, no touch there, etc. , she acted as if no dick had touched her body. I was so pissed-off, if I had not given the donation, I would've just walked out!! When we started the "fun" and was in the middle of it, her phone rang, and she said: "I have to take it, it's important!" We stopped, she had to get off bed and answer the phone, when she was done talking, we resumed. She tried to be nice thereafter, but my mood was already off. The initial negative impression she cast on me and the phone interruption. Those two colored my whole experience. I'm not sure if I'll repeat. , even though I've read many positive reports, mine was as I've described. https://grand-rapids.skipthegames.co...e/167283890711.

**TampaBoi** · 07-10-22 01:18

Has anyone seen Cassie? https://tryst.link/escort/cassiecream.

**VetteMan6981** · 07-10-22 01:17

I tried to message but got a weird response so I am thinking your inbox might be full.

Originally Posted by Benz1 [View Original Post]

I know his screen name, I didn't give him a password.

Pm me if you want to know the screen name.

USA does not want us to bust other members on front page. That's why we have a private message system on this site.

**Benz1** · 07-09-22 17:47

Originally Posted by AustinRamos1 [View Original Post]

I agree with Grizzly. Standard password system accompanied with the verified USA member name could suffice. Not just for SBJ's sister, I mean in general. I remember the back and forth PMs trying to figure out who the abuser was. Makes things much simpler. Hell, I'm case someone gives provider a false user name, could make ever password slightly unique. I. e, Arish gives me a UTR and my password is USA1002, Arish gives Gene2 a UTR and his password is USA0011, etc. Just an idea to try an simplify the vetting and accountability process.

Also, LSL, I think you were referencing a "safe word". But to answer Benz's point, literally unless the provider agrees to rough and you establish said "safe word", a simple "no" or "no I don't do that" should suffice. I don't care who you are or who they are, let's treat these women with at least some modicum of respect. A basic "no" should be enough.

I know his screen name, I didn't give him a password.

Pm me if you want to know the screen name.

USA does not want us to bust other members on front page. That's why we have a private message system on this site.

**GR Man74** · 07-09-22 17:31

Originally Posted by VetteMan6981 [View Original Post]

This seems like the smartest route. Not only is there the password for protection. There is the level of if someone gets rough or pushy with the UTR, he can be exposed so future UTRs can be warned and stay away from them. I realize they can start a new account, but until they hit that 6 month period and make senior member with new account, they would be unable to get any UTR info. Doesn't truly solve the problem but is probably the closest thing to a solution that we will be able to find.

Definitely steps in a direction to help add some assurance or security. I sure miss the old board days. Yes, there always were issues and always will be issues, but the old boards felt more open with sharing, both the good and the bad. The private rooms also added another layer or two.

**VetteMan6981** · 07-09-22 17:25

This seems like the smartest route. Not only is there the password for protection. There is the level of if someone gets rough or pushy with the UTR, he can be exposed so future UTRs can be warned and stay away from them. I realize they can start a new account, but until they hit that 6 month period and make senior member with new account, they would be unable to get any UTR info. Doesn't truly solve the problem but is probably the closest thing to a solution that we will be able to find.

Originally Posted by AustinRamos1 [View Original Post]

I agree with Grizzly. Standard password system accompanied with the verified USA member name could suffice. Not just for SBJ's sister, I mean in general. I remember the back and forth PMs trying to figure out who the abuser was. Makes things much simpler. Hell, I'm case someone gives provider a false user name, could make ever password slightly unique. I. e, Arish gives me a UTR and my password is USA1002, Arish gives Gene2 a UTR and his password is USA0011, etc. Just an idea to try an simplify the vetting and accountability process.

Also, LSL, I think you were referencing a "safe word". But to answer Benz's point, literally unless the provider agrees to rough and you establish said "safe word", a simple "no" or "no I don't do that" should suffice. I don't care who you are or who they are, let's treat these women with at least some modicum of respect. A basic "no" should be enough.