Thread: News and Media Reports
+
Add Report
Results 526 to 540 of 820
-
07-01-22 16:54 #295Senior Member

Posts: 152Dave Yost also keeps denying legal pot to be on the ballot. Signatures were collected so IMO its really not his tight to deny it.
Originally Posted by Chunks92
[View Original Post]
-
07-01-22 15:48 #294Senior Member

Posts: 152Dave Yost is 100% garbage. He keeps refusing to put pot on the ballot eben though the signatures have been collected. So much for representation.
Originally Posted by Chunks92
[View Original Post]
-
07-01-22 15:10 #293Senior Member

Posts: 1126Yost
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2022/...5vzaE7bAWui-yc
Even this clown's own family isn't a big fan of his archaic views. Wonder what they think of him destroying people's lives in hooker stings for his political innuendo and pleasure. I'd love to do an interview with them about what they think of his terrible policies someday, displaying the facts that I've researched from docket sheets.
C92
-
06-27-22 23:43 #292Senior Member

Posts: 144Again. . .
For whatever reason, the URL isn't pasting correctly.
Originally Posted by Navritol
[View Original Post]
One more time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States%27_rights
If this fails again, use Google to look for States' Rights.
-
06-27-22 18:42 #291Senior Member

Posts: 144States' Rights (version 2)
That link from wiki on "States' Rights" didn't paste correctly in my earlier post.
Originally Posted by Navritol
[View Original Post]
Here is another try:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States'_rights.
The question earlier was why is the right to an abortion best decided at the state level, as was recently ruled so by the you S Supreme Court.
-
06-27-22 12:38 #290Senior Member

Posts: 144States' Rights
There is a body of American political history / constitutional law known as "State's Rights. "
Originally Posted by TheMultiverse
[View Original Post]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States'_rights.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/states-rights
-
06-25-22 18:07 #289Senior Member

Posts: 96WHY does it belong at the state level?
Originally Posted by Cheetah688
[View Original Post]
-
06-25-22 17:39 #288Senior Member

Posts: 1126I feel where you are coming from. I can tolerate what's happened to a degree. I have a problem with disgusting scumbags like Kay Ivey trying to criminalize it if Alabama residents go to other states where its legal. If someone smokes weed in ohio for example, thanks to Kasich getting rid of the scumbag Solomon Lautenberg Amendement, its a harmless fine with no additional penalties as it should be. But in Wyoming for example its a big time crime. You don't see Wyoming calling Ohio to see if their residents smoked weed while they were there are on vacation and try to charge under their statute do you? No. So the same needs to apply for this as well.
Originally Posted by Cheetah688
[View Original Post]
-
06-25-22 13:51 #287Senior Member

Posts: 484Overturning are v W did not make them illegal. It placed the decision of legality back where it rightfully belongs, at the State level. I for one don't want the federal government dictating what I can and cannot do and I'm pretty sure that neither do you. Read the Constitution and see what the roll the federal government is supposed to play.
Originally Posted by Chunks92
[View Original Post]
-
06-25-22 09:20 #286Regular Member

Posts: 12Exactly! Plus, a fake warning ad could do some good. Maybe some poor college kid who just got dumped by his girlfriend will see an ad like ours and think twice before getting caught. We've all been in a situation like that. Like you, I marvel at how some idiot might actually believe some of these ads, but the truth is, I've also been that idiot.
Originally Posted by Chunks92
[View Original Post]
-
06-25-22 00:00 #285Senior Member

Posts: 1126Re
I mean, now that I know what ad caught elyria councilman Mark, an ad like you suggest might catch Yost and his wife. Make one with just Megan Fox and the other crop a picture of Fabio's face onto Megan Fox's body and see where the chips fall. And the sting location can be the exact same that caught Mark, attached in belows picture. Such an obvious trap.
Originally Posted by AthJun
[View Original Post]
C92.
-
06-24-22 23:02 #284Senior Member

Posts: 296Divide and Conquer, baby, Divide & Conquer. Enough with the guys born in the 30's and 40's running this country. Unfortunately, there are still plenty of them born in those years that are still voting.
Originally Posted by Chunks92
[View Original Post]
-
06-24-22 21:52 #283Regular Member

Posts: 12Megan Fox
It's actually tempting to post a fake STG with Megan Fox and beneath the photos specify, "hey, responding to these is bound to get you arrested. ".
Originally Posted by Chunks92
[View Original Post]
-
06-24-22 16:06 #282Senior Member

Posts: 1126Re
They literally could apply no effort and have dumbass after dumbass show up. I guarantee you if any of us created a SKG ad and posted a picture of Megan Fox and say 50 HH, our inbox will be flooded within minutes.
Originally Posted by Rafter17
[View Original Post]
-
06-24-22 15:28 #281Senior Member

Posts: 2325I don't know why anyone would even be stupid enough to reply to that ad.
Originally Posted by BudBowl2001
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote



