Find Your New Baby
Top Escorts
Top Tier Escorts
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms

Thread: NoVA SugarBabies

+ Add Report
Page 465 of 1092 FirstFirst ... 365 415 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 515 565 965 ... LastLast
Results 6,961 to 6,975 of 16368
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #9408

    Entitled Profiles

    Quote Originally Posted by HighwayGuy  [View Original Post]
    You are just getting usernames here rather than links, because I immediately block them without a reply when they say something stupid like wanting to be paid (often a lot) for a M&G. Who does that BTW? I feel like there must be guys in this market that actually agree to pay these girls to meet up without any expectations whatsoever. And there are definitely those paying exorbitant amounts of money for a roll in the hay, which is driving the uptick in expectations for PPM etc. , imo.

    Emma.t - time waster. Exchanged a handful of messages but said she never sleeps with anyone on first meet. I said that's fine and I also like to assess chemistry and mutual desire to move forward, so no expectations on m&g but I'm decidedly NOT seeking a platonic arrangement. She went quiet for a few days then replied saying she's no longer interested and prob not a good fit anyway.

    Scarlettelle98 - in her very first reply she said her "first dates typically are typically shopping followed by dinner and drinks". I blocked her.

    Cutiepiegirl123 - exchanged a handful of sameday messages and acted like she wanted to meet that evening, then said she requires a "first date incentive of $400". Blocked her.

    Small handful of others have recently moved to text but then gotten quiet / sporadic with correspondence. Reserving those until I can further determine if they're serious or not. The bowl sure isn't what it was pre-pandemic. The proliferation of catfish, scammers and time wasters is starting to make this feel as fruitless as Tinder.

    And for the love of god. Do not tell SBs, providers, SOs or ANY woman about this site. Some of the best contributors to this board (I am admittedly not one of them) have gone virtually silent of late, and I can't help but think it's because of the white knighting that goes on when their solid, valuable reviews get regurgitated back to them by some pissed off chick who was the subject of said review.
    Excellent report Highway. Regarding Scarlettelle98, I always bypassed her profile as it's tagline is "Why spend mine, when I can spend yours?" Ugh. That's really appealing. WTF.

  2. #9407

    Time wasters and unreasonable expectations

    You are just getting usernames here rather than links, because I immediately block them without a reply when they say something stupid like wanting to be paid (often a lot) for a M&G. Who does that BTW? I feel like there must be guys in this market that actually agree to pay these girls to meet up without any expectations whatsoever. And there are definitely those paying exorbitant amounts of money for a roll in the hay, which is driving the uptick in expectations for PPM etc. , imo.

    Emma.t - time waster. Exchanged a handful of messages but said she never sleeps with anyone on first meet. I said that's fine and I also like to assess chemistry and mutual desire to move forward, so no expectations on m&g but I'm decidedly NOT seeking a platonic arrangement. She went quiet for a few days then replied saying she's no longer interested and prob not a good fit anyway.

    Scarlettelle98 - in her very first reply she said her "first dates typically are typically shopping followed by dinner and drinks". I blocked her.

    Cutiepiegirl123 - exchanged a handful of sameday messages and acted like she wanted to meet that evening, then said she requires a "first date incentive of $400". Blocked her.

    Small handful of others have recently moved to text but then gotten quiet / sporadic with correspondence. Reserving those until I can further determine if they're serious or not. The bowl sure isn't what it was pre-pandemic. The proliferation of catfish, scammers and time wasters is starting to make this feel as fruitless as Tinder.

    And for the love of god. Do not tell SBs, providers, SOs or ANY woman about this site. Some of the best contributors to this board (I am admittedly not one of them) have gone virtually silent of late, and I can't help but think it's because of the white knighting that goes on when their solid, valuable reviews get regurgitated back to them by some pissed off chick who was the subject of said review.

  3. #9406

    Babylongirl

    Wants $500 to meet and see if we click. Nope, next.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/0...d-581f3df2f669

  4. #9405

    And the Bush?

    Quote Originally Posted by ProCatHunter  [View Original Post]
    https://members.seeking.com/member/0...2-08347e22c853

    Just broke up with her boyfriend and is into the revenge fuck. First time I bagged a girl on the first day her profile was up. Not going to repeat. Her armpits aren't shaved. Maybe she will shave them for you?
    I love a little Bush.

  5. #9404

    VeryVie

    Quote Originally Posted by ProCatHunter  [View Original Post]
    Sadly my luck with her was not as good as it's been with others. Looks like one of our brothers bagged her and took her off the site. Her account has been deleted and I wish I could have said that I had the chance to tap it.

    Probably a lurker who took her down and now we will never know the details.
    There are lots of reasons for a SB deleting her profile. She may have found a SD, was turned off by the website, etc.

  6. #9403

    Veryvie

    Quote Originally Posted by DickLongwood  [View Original Post]
    She looks very cute to me, but didn't reply to my messages. Her profile is only 4 days old, so she could be untapped. Good luck! Let us know!
    Sadly my luck with her was not as good as it's been with others. Looks like one of our brothers bagged her and took her off the site. Her account has been deleted and I wish I could have said that I had the chance to tap it.

    Probably a lurker who took her down and now we will never know the details.

  7. #9402

    Check your Funk and Wagnalls

    Quote Originally Posted by Dimples572  [View Original Post]
    Not necessarily true. I've had several scenarios where they turned out to be legit, just trying not to specify their location due to privacy concerns.
    Usually-- means often, most of the time, not every time.

    One of my hottest coed scores was a Virginia, Virginia listing because one of you assholes all but raped her, so I get the privacy concerns.

    State / State usually have other redflags if they are scammers and easy to weed out -- Adjective / Noun user name, profile pics that are revealing, minor grammar / spelling mistakes, quick to move to text.

  8. #9401
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1208
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimples572  [View Original Post]
    Not necessarily true. I've had several scenarios where they turned out to be legit, just trying not to specify their location due to privacy concerns.
    Makes sense, guess I was following the conventional wisdom on several SD / SB forums.

  9. #9400

    Faerie

    https://members.seeking.com/member/0...2-08347e22c853

    Just broke up with her boyfriend and is into the revenge fuck. First time I bagged a girl on the first day her profile was up. Not going to repeat. Her armpits aren't shaved. Maybe she will shave them for you?

  10. #9399

    VeryVie

    Quote Originally Posted by ProCatHunter  [View Original Post]
    https://members.seeking.com/member/e...3-c12a4f4cdc52

    Trying to figure out how high volume this one is. How many of you mongers out there are tapping this one?
    She looks very cute to me, but didn't reply to my messages. Her profile is only 4 days old, so she could be untapped. Good luck! Let us know!

  11. #9398

    VeryVie

    https://members.seeking.com/member/e...3-c12a4f4cdc52

    Trying to figure out how high volume this one is. How many of you mongers out there are tapping this one?

  12. #9397
    Quote Originally Posted by Max#01  [View Original Post]
    "Maryland, Maryland" or any "state, state" usually means a scam.
    Not necessarily true. I've had several scenarios where they turned out to be legit, just trying not to specify their location due to privacy concerns.

  13. #9396
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1208
    Quote Originally Posted by LikItFun  [View Original Post]
    We started texting, but didn't work out a good day to meet up before the long weekend.
    "Maryland, Maryland" or any "state, state" usually means a scam.

  14. #9395

    Elle

    Quote Originally Posted by Dimples572  [View Original Post]
    This cuties had a profile for over a year and I couldn't find anything on here at all about her. Anyone ever met her or had much interaction? Thanks.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/0...e-d3076f245635
    We started texting, but didn't work out a good day to meet up before the long weekend.

  15. #9394

    Vb180

    Anyone have intel on this one? Seems TGTBT, pictures are too good and texting is erratic. Claims to be in Leesburg but I have my doubts. Reverse image search didn't come up with anything.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/1...a-d365980c7d1d

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
Live Escorts
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Protected by Copyscape