Thread: Arrangement Reports
+
Add Report
Results 5,461 to 5,475 of 17058
-
05-23-22 16:11 #11598Senior Member

Posts: 28BBFS safety?
I am not a fan of condoms, regrettably. So I had about 8 or so few sugar babies in the past and I barebacked all of them except for the first one. Never had a STD.
As of now I am having doubts as to how really safe is this as I am in a relationship.
My approach was to pick girls that appeared to be "safe" in some way (like live with parents) but the more I think, the more I realize that possibly I simply got lucky. I am also quite surprised as to how many women agree to bareback without as much as a second thought. So why should they be safe?
Anyway, how do you guys feel about safety of going BB, anyone has any bad stories to share?
-
05-23-22 14:06 #11597Senior Member

Posts: 808Even if I was single I wouldn't meet her at my place, there is a lot of public information you can get using someone's address.
Originally Posted by StanKost
[View Original Post]
-
05-23-22 13:24 #11596Senior Member

Posts: 24650% a, 50% d (hotel, not my place).
Originally Posted by Woodson2019
[View Original Post]
Used to be almost 100% a, but it seems harder to set up these days than in the past for some reason, so I take more gambles with exchanging pics and getting right to it. I'm a weekday warrior so dinner / drinks is usually not on the table, and a full lunch could get awkward fast if there's no mutual interest or connection out of the gate.
-
05-23-22 12:35 #11595Senior Member

Posts: 430I always try to meet for coffee, lunch or drinks, whichever the girl is open to unless I had seen great reviews.
Originally Posted by Woodson2019
[View Original Post]
-
05-23-22 11:43 #11594Senior Member

Posts: 73Weekly Survey Question
Trying something new. Will post a weekly survey question on Monday. Ask folks to respond to me directly to keep responses anonymous. Will post the result on Thursday. Will only accept responses from frequent commenters and delete responses from my inbox after posting the results. Open to other suggestions. First question is the following:
When meeting an SB for the first time what % of the time do you:
(a) Meet for coffee?
(b) Meet for drinks?
(c) Meet for lunch / dinner?
(d) Meet at the Hotel, her / your place, etc?
-
05-22-22 13:41 #11593Senior Member

Posts: 601I usually do a Google search, must have forgot with this one. I am a sucker for a big beautiful set of tits.
Originally Posted by PauFord
[View Original Post]
-
05-22-22 13:37 #11592Senior Member

Posts: 601Fuck $500 PPM, I don't care how hot she is. There are tons of smoking hot girls for $350-400 with reviews. So much fucking GPS on this site.
Originally Posted by Limeyincal
[View Original Post]
-
05-22-22 13:06 #11591Senior Member

Posts: 202WTF When did 500 become the average for PPM?
Contacted this chick on SDM. She asked for 500 for PPM!
https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=70963320
Offered 300 and her response was how many times per week. WTF.
Also told her no commitments without a test drive along with no advances or allowances.
She responded with "bye".
-
05-22-22 12:20 #11590Regular Member

Posts: 1Dreamboater
Checking "Seeking" out. Any intel on https://members.seeking.com/member/c...5-855fc2a1e197?
-
05-22-22 00:13 #11589Senior Member

Posts: 151Sugarbaby22
Anyone met this one before. Everything seems normal so far. I'm 75% about optics and would appreciate any feedback from anyone that has met her in person. I always like it when they are as good looking or better in person.
If you can share any other details (ie, $ damage) I'd appreciate it.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c...c-4e101855453c
Reply all or DM is fine.
-
05-21-22 18:34 #11588Senior Member

Posts: 754Of Course Not
Google image search on this girls pics brings up this - https://nitter.net/i/status/1509910477102592003 which takes you to her social media links here - www.allmylinks.com/ashltd.
This chick clearly lives in Houston and doesn't seem to show any indication of having been in Chicago at all. This took all of 2 mouse clicks to find, fellas got to do your homework and save yourselves some aggravation!
Originally Posted by HershelS
[View Original Post]
-
05-21-22 13:55 #11587Regular Member

Posts: 22Huge Percentage On Seeking Cannot Successfully Photo Verify
This one is fake. This one cannot and will not photo verify.
Originally Posted by MwmChicago
[View Original Post]
-
05-21-22 12:13 #11586Senior Member

Posts: 601Ugh
Chatting with this one, trying to close the deal for a Mon meet and out of nowhere she blocks me. These young sure are flakey.
-
05-20-22 18:51 #11585Senior Member

Posts: 151Roosterbaby
To nobody's surprise, confirmed scammer:
https://members.seeking.com/member/d...6-2cfd31e25b52
-
05-20-22 18:04 #11584Senior Member

Posts: 2250Crypto Girls
Don't disagree with the above. Not arguing. Different perspective on issue.
Originally Posted by FScott
[View Original Post]
1. Seeking is aware and doesn't care. Female profiles attract male flies. Female profiles that message men with unpaid accounts, that are curious about message they have received from a hot girl, attract paid subscriptions.
2. Crypto girl accounts that get banned just reappear a day later with a new account. Easy to do.
3. There are reports in other city forums if you report to many accounts to Seeking support for investigation, your account will get flagged as a nuisance account and get yourself banned.
4. Easier to just block and move on these accounts.
5. To each there own.












Reply With Quote




