Thread: "Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?
+
Add Report
Results 2,356 to 2,370 of 23684
-
05-04-22 19:26 #21329Senior Member

Posts: 1897SB Rates and Trends
I think most here can remember when we first discovered Calli Koa on YT and TT posting videos encouraging women to join sugar sites by telling them they could make thousands a month just by texting with lonely rich men. It was kind of ugly that she told her acolytes that, yes, you have to pretend to be willing to meet eventually. It seemed pretty obvious to me that she was a shill of some kind being paid to drive female traffic to the sugar sites. At one point, she started bad-mouthing the seeking site and pumping up the others. I interpreted that as the seeking site either refusing a request for money or cutting her off after making some payments. For a significant time, her videos led to a huge surge of women joining who had unreal expectations. All that happened about the time OF was just starting to grow. As far as I can tell, that wave has died and the women joining are getting back to normal ideas. There is an exception: SA is now apparently trying to compete with AM. I don't mind: some of the older ones are still hot and I just offer them a no allowance deal.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
As for pricing, I make a lot of offers (carefully to avoid banning) as a method to get women to agree to a MnG. My approach will not work for everybody but it lets me gauge the market based on acceptance rates. I started in the sugar bowl when Hollywood Guy was preaching the $100/meet method. I was never in his class but I had a lot of success at the 150 level. Over the last ten years rates have slowly been creeping up (or I have just started targeting much hotter women.) Recently, about halfway through covid, there was a significant jump. For a long period, I could only garner interest in my market at the 300-400 level and occasionally surging to 500 for the hottest ones. Over the last few months, again only speaking for my market, SB expectations have definitely softened. I have gotten five acceptances this week alone at the monthly equivalent of 200/ meet. I will try to get them to MnG's where I will either adjust my offer or find an excuse to lose interest.
My market analysis is based on real offers to real women. It does not address any women who may start low and move higher. It also does not deny the existence of whales. They are out there. I had an SB who was seeing me weekly at 400 and she was extremely hot. She ghosted me and suddenly her social media was featuring pictures of her in exotic locales and flashing new clothes/shoes. I think we all know how that happened. I do not begrudge her and I certainly do not blame him. If I was swimming in dough, it would certainly change my behavior. The reason I can shrug and move on is also taken from HG: it's a numbers game. You cannot get too obsessed over any one POT/SB. The bowl refills itself all the time. Any single opportunity is like a city bus. If you miss one, another is coming soon. I cannot recall who said it first, but I also strongly believe another of the truisms: everyone finds the sugar bowl they are looking for. If you are not happy with what you are finding, look within not at the bowl.
Sorry for the lengthy rant but I find the topic fascinating and the purpose of this forum is to help each other find hot young women for sex!
BAM.
-
05-04-22 19:23 #21328Senior Member

Posts: 3428Ha!
So noted. LOL. Nothing unusual about that attitude. I see it all the time. Of course, not from anyone that really has any hot SB's jumping on their dick, but that's just my observation.
Originally Posted by OliverNP
[View Original Post]
Good luck!
-
05-04-22 19:20 #21327Banned Member

Posts: 105C'Mon. Now why'all. I don't think anybody is trolling anybody, just differences in opinion on scoring pussy. Everyone can agree to disagree and move on. Gezzz. Actually, it's some best Shit I've read on here in a long time! My question to Mr. Partytime dude, being an experienced SD (older?) gentleman, I've read your in the wild posts which I find somewhat informative and amusing, the question is, when hunting in the wild do you have SD business card w / contact info and the tag line "lets talk about a mutual beneficial arrangement" you hand out? I just have this visualization of some out of place looking older dude cruising through a college campus talking to chicks (maybe handing out business cards) not saying you do that, it just seems creepy to me.
Originally Posted by RogerOver
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-22 18:57 #21326Senior Member

Posts: 196Fortunately for me, I couldn't care less what you think. I will say agree with what I think you're suggesting about this board not needing to be about competition, but I don't come here to compete or compare and I'm not going to spend time on the forum warrior bullshit other than to let someone know that they're dismissed from my replies. So include yourself on that list going forward.
Originally Posted by RogerOver
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-22 18:43 #21325Senior Member

Posts: 1897Money Before Meeting
We all, from time to time, suffer lapses in judgement or just decide to take a chance. I feel for you brother. However, I think we all could benefit from hearing what story she spun that lured you in and lowered your defenses. Can you share more details?
Originally Posted by FTP1999
[View Original Post]
BAM.
-
05-04-22 18:31 #21324Senior Member

Posts: 3428What troll?
Originally Posted by PartyTimeGuy
[View Original Post]
He's not a troll. He's provided a LOT of info that requires substantial effort to type up and share. I agree with him that you're contradictory in your posts and stated motivation. I don't think his posted pictures look "nasty. " Posting pics is a personal choice for sure, but it I find it difficult to believe you're operating in any sort of league that beats his. The truth is, most people on here don't compete that way, so if there's a troll under this bridge, I don't think it's PartyTimeGuy.
Originally Posted by OliverNP
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-22 18:24 #21323Senior Member

Posts: 196The girls I was referring to are girls I've seen in the past in a given city that I don't frequent particularly often (I travel a lot, to some cities more than others but sometimes I accumulate numbers of favorite girls in particular cities, which are nice to have in a pinch if I have a one-nighter in that town or whatever). In other words I haven't seen them in some time like maybe 6 months or a year. The inflation scenario I described never happens when I'm actively fucking them, only if I lose contact then try to reconnect later. It could also be, to some degree, a response to the fact that I haven't called them in ages.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-22 18:20 #21322Senior Member

Posts: 196You're still not paying attention. Someone asked a question and I answered it. I wasn't complaining about prices. Someone asked if there was any evidence of something and I provided anecdotal evidence. I have no desire to share anything with trolls like you, including pics of SBs who I doubt would want to be posted to hooker board anyway. I can tell by the pics you've posted, you are no where close to operating in the same league I am. That's some seriously nasty looking snatch you're picking up with all your "player" techniques there. LOL.
Originally Posted by PartyTimeGuy
[View Original Post]
Anyway don't expect any further replies from me. Feeding trolls is a waste of time.
-
05-04-22 17:31 #21321Senior Member

Posts: 420Double Speak
LMAO! Really? You just posted about the high prices of SBs ad nauseum!
Originally Posted by OliverNP
[View Original Post]
Really? Then why the big fuss about SB pricing!I have no shortage of cash, or girls interested in seeing me for minimal amounts.
So let me get this straight. You have plenty of dough but you want to complain about SB prices. And, you get girls for free (because you are such an amazing stud?) that others have to drop a kilo and a half for? There is a phrase for that: full of shit!Prior to the pandemic (which by my choice, put a hold on my sugaring), I've gotten overnight freebies from girls I've seen others post on USASG complaining about same girl is quoting them $1. 5 k, so I already know where my game stands relative to others.
Easy to talk the talk. Try walking the walk. Post some pics of your current SBs and we shall be the judge of your incredibly good taste.In the lions analogy I'm exactly where I want to be and where many would like to be. I've seen some of the pics posted here -- one man's treasure is often a girl who couldn't pay me enough to fuck her.
-
05-04-22 17:18 #21320Senior Member

Posts: 3354Are you talking someone you've been seeing wanting more? Or that you are dealing with a POT and she wants crazy amounts? I never never talk $ w / a girl electronically, only face-to-face. This blog is great evidence that people are way more bold when they have the anonymity of the internet. In person, no girl wants to be rejected, and she'll take a more reasonable amount. Negotiating this way also makes her feel less like she's a pro.
Originally Posted by OliverNP
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-22 17:10 #21319Senior Member

Posts: 3354Everyone is fishing in their own bowl. IDK where you are, but there are plenty of people in the locales where I read sugar threads, west coast, Atlanta, this one, who say that they get an initial request for a kilobuck from a girl, and they can negotiate her down to something reasonable. Maybe it isn't like that with the girls you target in your area, but that doesn't mean it is so everywhere. This thread of course includes the Richmond area but has also become the de facto national sugar thread. I definitely haven't seen rates to up by that much in the 4 years I have been on the site. There are always girls who have a glorious opinion about what they are worth, but I still find reasonable women in southern California. I could have my pick of many many desirable Caucasian girls if I were willing to part with 2 K / mo for weekly meetups. I can't quite do that much anymore, hiding that level of expenditure is challenging.
Originally Posted by Jcn1965
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-22 17:04 #21318Senior Member

Posts: 3354That's the best way to get banned that IK -.
Originally Posted by Happtrav
[View Original Post]
When you say 'text' you mean message on SA, right?
If you are texting them by phone, you can say most anything.
-
05-04-22 16:49 #21317Senior Member

Posts: 196Exactly. Whenever I said "no thanks" to the new rate, I can't remember any of these girls texting me later saying they changed their mind. They just never looked back, and neither did I. So they are clearly not bluffing.
Originally Posted by Jcn1965
[View Original Post]
I have heard of it going the other way and some SDs renegotiating the allowance to their own advantage, but I've never done that either. I usually gift them what I feel is appropriate, and I then don't let them down by giving less. They remain happy as long as I'm seeing them regularly. Where it goes wrong is when I don't see them for an extended period of time. I guess they venture out and find a needy one that's willing to pay whatever he has to in order to not be lonely.
-
05-04-22 14:35 #21316Senior Member

Posts: 464Texting Convo
I have encountered lots of POTS, that go silent after the first text.
They will text "Hi", "Yes" then will never be heard from again.
Should I just text a number eg: 500 to see their reaction?
-
05-04-22 12:50 #21315Senior Member

Posts: 1449Not trying to be argumentative but the evidence is that over past 2 years prices have increased 100-200%. If what your saying is true then you could counter offer lower amount and since they exaggerating they will take it. I find quite the opposite is true. They immediately stop conversation. So they are either starving or somebody is paying it.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote





