Sugarbabies?

**Progressou812** · 04-20-22 08:17

Reported this scam artist last year. Never actually met but she is nucking futs, threatened me multiple times, did not post my own photo or name, but she claimed she tracked my cell and address and was coming to my house several times, all this after I politely declined to meet d / t her exaggerated request. https://members.whatsyourprice.com/p...eMYQ0NYVKQEML..

She also professed to "work" at a well known hotel chain front desk, make of that what you will. Stay safe and more importantly stay away from this ding bat.

**WanderingAbout** · 04-19-22 16:57

Profile name and profile pics don't ring the memory bell. May have missed this one. Looks unfamiliar. Could be wrong.

Originally Posted by Anvil [View Original Post]

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...7-13ca383cfb5f I've been chatting with this one and we are scheduling a meet. I could have sworn there was discussion in regards to her but can't find it. Does anyone have any history?

**Anvil** · 04-19-22 08:46

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...7-13ca383cfb5f

I've been chatting with this one and we are scheduling a meet. I could have sworn there was discussion in regards to her but can't find it.

Does anyone have any history?

**JackOhLantern** · 04-18-22 09:53

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...b-ceda3420fd5a

Classic "will do a mng for $50, but you have to pay up front".

**BamBam** · 04-17-22 15:31

All I have is a short list today:

SeductiveTemptress: crypto-scammer. Why are there so many in our area? Why do they remain so obvious?

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...7-da5271491168

TabiBaby: "... Help me with a small amount first, then go from there." "So initial, I'd text a fun picture of my assets, to check is 200 and then after meeting my weekly ranges from 1,000 - 3,000." I think, she thinks, she is being clever. She softens up with a bit of sweet talk but still not my type. At least she is real. She will eventually share picks by text.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...b-ceda3420fd5a

FineAphrodite: One pic: check, mid-30's age: check, sparse profile: check, ethnicity mixed: check (for an average white girl?) I think I am going to go with scammer on this one. A lazy scammer at that!

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...2-d7e40b32eead

IllBeHomeInMay: This is a creative new twist!. I love her creativity! She says she is a senior at PSU. She just wants online support for two weeks and then she will meet May 7th when she returns to Cinti. BUT. I dunno. Graduating at age 20?? Also, the pictures have tattoos that come and go. She looks closer to 30+ than 20. I am going to offer to visit her in Happy Valley.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...4-e4332bd15482

BAM.

**BamBam** · 04-17-22 15:28

This simply illustrates why we should insist on a video chat for ANYONE prior to making an offer, be it for a MnG or for an allowance. The hottest chicks invariably are scammers who cannot do video or more normal chicks who look a lot less attractive than their pix. Having done more than my fair share of MnG's, I would say 1 in one hundred is better than their pics show.

BAM.

Originally Posted by WanderingAbout [View Original Post]

SB video verification feature sure does reveal, in some cases, the profile pics are TGTBT.

https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...1ee14326a09230

**WanderingAbout** · 04-17-22 15:11

SB video verification feature sure does reveal, in some cases, the profile pics are TGTBT.

https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...1ee14326a09230

**BamBam** · 04-17-22 15:02

Originally Posted by ToddCincy [View Original Post]

Either that, or just an outright scammer:

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...c-c6d7f7be46d6

She's 36, and only interested in guys under 56. (Sorry, you 57 year old's need not apply!) But here is the best part:

"Please be aware I request a gift for our first meeting. If that's too much for you, please don't get in touch. Looking for a chivalrous man not a cheap chap. ".

I would almost prefer to think that this one is a man trying to scam using a fake profile, rather than believe that this case of GPS is for real.

I am going to go with extreme GPS. I doubt a scammer would put that much effort into wording of a profile. She gives her age as 36. A scammer would use lower. I am guessing she is slightly over 40 based on the middle-aged backside in the profile picture. However, she probably likes to dress up and look at herself in a mirror. Why else post ten (!!!) private pictures? I suspect she is looking for a unicorn and will bitterly curse most of the guys on here. Based on her gift list, she likes to be spanked. Can someone lead with that and try to get her private pictures. I would love to see what such a deserving woman looks like in real life.

BAM.

**D Nut** · 04-16-22 20:54

Originally Posted by ToddCincy [View Original Post]

Either that, or just an outright scammer:

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...c-c6d7f7be46d6

She's 36, and only interested in guys under 56. (Sorry, you 57 year old's need not apply!) But here is the best part:

"Please be aware I request a gift for our first meeting. If that's too much for you, please don't get in touch. Looking for a chivalrous man not a cheap chap. ".

I would almost prefer to think that this one is a man trying to scam using a fake profile, rather than believe that this case of GPS is for real.

A less than 20 year difference between a 36 year old woman and a guy up to 56 why / o is not a Sugar Baby relationship. That's just dating. Regular dating.

A sugar baby relationship is legal, but socially inappropriate. "Half plus 7" is the accepted social convention. If a guy is 50,32 and above would be socially acceptable age. For a 56 year old, 35 and above. She's within the range of a socially acceptable date.

For her, a sugar daddy needs to be AT LEAST 59 years old to qualify as a sugar daddy.

**Todd Cincy** · 04-16-22 20:29

Either that, or just an outright scammer:

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...c-c6d7f7be46d6

She's 36, and only interested in guys under 56. (Sorry, you 57 year old's need not apply!) But here is the best part:

"Please be aware I request a gift for our first meeting. If that's too much for you, please don't get in touch. Looking for a chivalrous man not a cheap chap. ".

I would almost prefer to think that this one is a man trying to scam using a fake profile, rather than believe that this case of GPS is for real.

**Goo3215** · 04-16-22 15:38

Originally Posted by TickleJay [View Original Post]

She's stopped responding to me on SA I was out of town last week and she wanted to meet. Really wanted to ride that at least once.

I say try again. She just texted me yesterday asking for a meet.

**BamBam** · 04-16-22 14:26

Originally Posted by Bkbh1 [View Original Post]

https://members.seeking.com/messages...9-cb8a5f716ddc

Not in Cincinnati, but down in Louisville. Can't host. Willing to meet at a hotel right away if you can handle her GPS. Says she gets 200 for dinner. Which based on real pics she likes her food.

Your link is to your message box. Here is the original:

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...4-814e9a907cdd

It no longer works for me. Either I am blocked or she is gone!

BAM.

**BamBam** · 04-16-22 14:23

Originally Posted by Decatur21 [View Original Post]

Bam Bam,

I notice you usually post about girls that have been on the site for a day or two. Do you find that your success rate is better in the first few days they are on the site or if you wait a week? I always wonder if they are more overwhelmed in the first few days or if that is the best time because they have no expectations?

I post suspicious profiles as soon as I get whiff of anything 'off.' The earlier people get a warning, the more value it has. However, I am sometimes wrong. Don't let my warnings scare you away. Test them yourself and just use a little extra caution.

If you can reach profiles really early, there is an improved chance of them actually reading your message. Especially if they are a PYT. These profiles get buried in a thousand DM's and they cannot read all of them. I see a lot of my messages go unread even if I reach out within a day or so of their arrival. In such a case, I usually wait until they disappear for a week or more and then re-approach when they return and the message deluge has diminished. If you have limited time to invest, it may also pay to wait a couple of weeks or more before sending a message. A lot of the UTR's and scammers get deleted by then and you do not waste your time on unwanted people.

Happy hunting!

BAM.

**Bkbh1** · 04-16-22 13:38

https://members.seeking.com/messages...9-cb8a5f716ddc

Not in Cincinnati, but down in Louisville. Can't host. Willing to meet at a hotel right away if you can handle her GPS. Says she gets 200 for dinner. Which based on real pics she likes her food.

**Tickle Jay** · 04-16-22 05:24

She's stopped responding to me on SA I was out of town last week and she wanted to meet. Really wanted to ride that at least once.

Originally Posted by TroublePlay [View Original Post]

I finally saw her earlier this week.

Good: Head game is spectacular, BBBJ, inclusive of some DT, CIM, YMMV.

Kissing ok.

Great vocals.

Really gets into it.

Sweet sexy voice.

Large huge breasts.

Played with herself to climax a couple of times, very hot.

Pretty girl, with long natural hair.

Pleasant personality and complimentary, sweet.

Drove a bit to meet me.

Brought a sexy outfit to play in.

Bad: Has gained weight since pics.

Is self conscious about weight gain and stretch marks.

Late.

Some smoke smell.

I will likely not repeat due to negatives, but glad I saw her.