Thread: "Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?
+
Add Report
Results 2,626 to 2,640 of 23668
-
02-20-22 10:09 #21043Senior Member

Posts: 128Not unusual. I had a 30 day membership last summer and loaded up on texts and saw 4 from that crop. Some of the ones I didn't see for price reasons still contact me with their GPS quotes. They're just getting back to old contacts like we do all the time.
Originally Posted by Shampoo55
[View Original Post]
-
02-20-22 10:06 #21042Senior Member

Posts: 128She had reviews about 4 months ago with the monkey causing her to nod out. She's also on tryst. Link. She used to room with Dakota at the Hull St. House.
Originally Posted by SBmidlo
[View Original Post]
-
02-18-22 18:20 #21041Senior Member

Posts: 187Tattdbabii69
STG gal wanting to become a sugar baby https://members.seeking.com/member/7...f-93cd15f9e56b.
Link to her STG ad with a couple of the same pics. https://richmond.skipthegames.com/fe...d/632432379176 Haven't seen any reviews in the Escort forum on her.
-
02-16-22 09:58 #21040Senior Member

Posts: 846SecureSpend. No need to add Zipcode
It seems that there is no need to add Zipcode to the card before using, is that correct? Or should one call and add the Zipcode thru CS?.
-
02-15-22 19:44 #21039Senior Member

Posts: 2789What is going on?
So in the last week, I have gotten texts from 2 POTs, that I had conversations with last summer, when I was on the site. I had a tonne of balls in the air, so a few going ghost wasn't a problem. Both no longer have profiles posted. I saved pics of the girls and one of the profiles. Both are single Moms in their 30's.
Can't figure out if this is legit or what is up? Did these girls finally just burn through the SDs from last summer and instead of re-upping on SA, hit all of their old contacts? Or is there some kind of scam or something LE like nefarious I need to be concerned with?
One seems to want to meet and wants funds so she can pay a sitter, so not really into a M&G, just get to it. (Haven't seen her on any of the local escorts sites and she says she isn't sexually active.) The other set a M&G meeting, but now is texting her BR preferences, wants to be dominated and is calling me "Daddy" already. It's nice, but seems a little too soon / fast?
So Spidey Senses are tingling a bit. Perhaps I'm being a bit paranoid? Other views?
-
02-14-22 17:42 #21038Senior Member

Posts: 1775I've had 4 dates from WYP: cock tease and 3 absolute rockstar level fucks including a 19 yo red head who stayed the weekend for a grand. Then disappeared. In the end, it was for the best, she would have bankrupted me or given me a stroke.
Originally Posted by Shampoo55
[View Original Post]
-
02-14-22 10:47 #21037Senior Member

Posts: 846Using the term OneVanilla when it is now known as SecureSpend causes confusion.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
Perhaps we should use OneVanilla / SecureSpend so people know that either would work.
-
02-14-22 09:23 #21036Senior Member

Posts: 880Another pic seller / GPS
https://members.seeking.com/member/3...0-6d0f32911c96
Got her to snap. AFter some general convo, says "Apple pay me $69".
Why?
Because I'm cute and you want me to be your SB.
Tell her I don't do that.
Next day, same convo.
-
02-14-22 08:48 #21035Senior Member

Posts: 2789Oh no! Nothing wrong with WYP as there are EXPLICIT and clear warnings that "Sex Should Not Be Expected On A Date!" WYP is VERY clear with that! WYP is paying $ to a girl to come eat & drink food you pay for at an expensive restaurant and she is free to (and expects to) leave no-strings attached once her belly is full. If one is expecting the girl will sleep with you after the meal, they are going to find out there is a difference of opinion or intention between the parties in most cases.
Originally Posted by Tyrex2
[View Original Post]
After all, "traditional" escorting: Going out to dinner, going to the theater, going to a function with eye-candy on your arm is NOT illegal. In fact, most gray-haired judges think this is what is going on, on most escort websites, since sex for money is illegal.
I was on WYP ONCE! Never got a single date out of it as girls faked and flaked. Maybe Wade's conscience will change and he'll close the WYP site down? (or his lawyers advise him to shutter it?
DO NOT think of Secret Benefits as an alternative IF it comes to that. SB uses a "credits" system where you spend your credits to initiate contact. Problem is that there is no governance to prevent fake or BOT profiles and couple that with the flakiness of POTs as seen on SA, hit rates are much lower and "spend" per date much higher!
Other sites have a specific challenge. They don't have the VOLUME to make them viable. SA has 10 women for every guy! Not sure how other sites will be able to recruit and attract women as that is the key. Just like a bar that wants to be popular. If the girls are there the guys will show up!
-
02-13-22 20:57 #21034Senior Member

Posts: 117So. Anyone want to speculate on alternatives yet. Looking at you sugardaddy.com LOL. And WTF is he doing with WYP then -ffs its the nature of the site.
Originally Posted by RogerOver
[View Original Post]
-
02-13-22 14:02 #21033Senior Member

Posts: 3351I have posted specifically about this earlier. Perhaps the mods can move this to the archive, where you guys can ignore it. Yes, it appears that OneVanilla is undergoing rebranding in some markets. I have indeed seen the SecureSpend cards, they have the same packaging as OneVanille, in that the plastic window is vertical rather than horizontal. I have personally used SecureSpend to get SA membership in the past, perhaps 8 months ago.
Originally Posted by RegularJoe1985
[View Original Post]
-
02-13-22 12:25 #21032Senior Member

Posts: 846Well since both parties are signing Forever marriage with no divorce, I guess they'll both be tolerating each other after some time, LOL.
Originally Posted by Shampoo55
[View Original Post]
SA not being what it used to was always on the cards, with jerks like Matt Gaetz bringing Grand Jury in the mix.
Hope people wait to see what's happening before signing up even with 25% off special, LOL.
-
02-13-22 12:09 #21031Senior Member

Posts: 686Came here to post this as well. I believe SA is on the verge of being seized by the feds and hes spending alot of coin on lawyer fees to keep them at bay.
Originally Posted by Shampoo55
[View Original Post]
-
02-13-22 11:43 #21030Senior Member

Posts: 3425LOL. It's almost unwatchable. Wonder what will actually change. No one is paying that shit for a straight dating site.
Originally Posted by Shampoo55
[View Original Post]
-
02-13-22 11:21 #21029Senior Member

Posts: 2789SA to de-emphasize "Sugar Dating" as B Wade gets married!
Per this video:
https://youtu.be/sx3Dg_igqVg
Looks like founder Brandon Wade is getting married and intends to totally de-emphasize the "sugar dating" part of the website! Now it is "suppose to be" just a 'dating website!
Wonder if the heat is getting turned up on the site as a venue for prostitution and now that he's getting married, wants to further insulate himself from FOSTA-SESTA type liabilities? Any one think things will change on the site? More stringent BOT reads of emails and any mention of sugar or anything that the BOT thinks is compensation will get you booted?
But clearly Wade is an idiot! He violated one of the primary "rules" - NEVER fall in lover with a Hooker!
No pre-nup? LOL! Reports are that he's worth $35 -$50 Million. That's some pretty expensive sex! Talk about over paying!
But WAIT! Did a search and looks like he got married in 2012, so 10-yrs later he's doing it again?











Reply With Quote





