Sugar Daddy Sites

**FarFarAway** · 02-13-22 14:56

Is, sadly, running a full page ad in the LA Times today, advertising his impending marriage. Actually, I think he is a f-ing idiot and I wish he wouldn't do this. Those of us in the sugar bowl who have SOs don't need anyone reminding them that we alpha males have options out there we might indulge. Keeping my SO blissfully ignorant of the possibilities is my stock in trade.

About whether people would pay for vanilla dating through seeking, they already do that for a lot of dating sites, like match.com. There is an article in the LA Times today about expensive rich people matchmaking. It is Valentine's Day tomorrow, all this will get media attention, then blow over and go back to the old ways.

**TheHuntsman** · 02-13-22 14:28

Originally Posted by RogerOver [View Original Post]

But who would pay that monthly fee just for "dating" opportunities? I doubt the underpinnings will change. But hey, looks like there's an opening for anyone wanting to start stealing market share.

Totally agree. Regular dating sites have a premium version too, but not at the same price as SA.

**JackMiles** · 02-13-22 12:47

Originally Posted by LargeEss [View Original Post]

Odd didn't receive an email. Maybe phishing?

Not at all. It's from the site and has a video of Wade talking about it.
https://youtu.be/sx3Dg_igqVg

**RogerOver** · 02-13-22 12:44

Originally Posted by PussyPumper [View Original Post]

The original version allowed nudity. Or at the very least least topless. I saw some of that on very old profiles when I first started.

Then some years back, SA changed from being Seeking Arrangements to just Seeking, and took away the focus on arrangements. There was talk at the time of transitioning to being a regular dating site. This sounds like another step in that direction. Wade is probably hoping to increase his customer base with regular daters, while keeping present SDs. Not sure how that would work, but might be.

But who would pay that monthly fee just for "dating" opportunities? I doubt the underpinnings will change. But hey, looks like there's an opening for anyone wanting to start stealing market share.

**Large Ess** · 02-13-22 11:18

Originally Posted by JackMiles [View Original Post]

I got the email as well. He's right. He's making it a dating site, but what that means exactly I don't know. In the least it'll be rebranded.

Odd didn't receive an email. Maybe phishing?

**PussyPumper** · 02-13-22 02:11

Originally Posted by OcasianBoy [View Original Post]

Mr. Wade is getting married as he has found true love. So seeking is supposedly changing to just a regular online dating site on Valentine's Day. So no more sugar dating on the site?

The original version allowed nudity. Or at the very least least topless. I saw some of that on very old profiles when I first started.

Then some years back, SA changed from being Seeking Arrangements to just Seeking, and took away the focus on arrangements. There was talk at the time of transitioning to being a regular dating site. This sounds like another step in that direction. Wade is probably hoping to increase his customer base with regular daters, while keeping present SDs. Not sure how that would work, but might be.

**JackMiles** · 02-13-22 01:18

Originally Posted by RogerOver [View Original Post]

He was married before, right? You have a link to anything that supports what you're saying? If Mr. Wade is smart, he'll stick to what made him rich.

I got the email as well. He's right. He's making it a dating site, but what that means exactly I don't know. In the least it'll be rebranded.

**RogerOver** · 02-12-22 22:58

Originally Posted by OcasianBoy [View Original Post]

Mr. Wade is getting married as he has found true love. So seeking is supposedly changing to just a regular online dating site on Valentine's Day. So no more sugar dating on the site?

He was married before, right? You have a link to anything that supports what you're saying? If Mr. Wade is smart, he'll stick to what made him rich.

**OcasianBoy** · 02-12-22 21:33

Mr. Wade is getting married as he has found true love. So seeking is supposedly changing to just a regular online dating site on Valentine's Day. So no more sugar dating on the site?

**Alkalinedio** · 02-12-22 02:27

Originally Posted by HappyJob [View Original Post]

I got the same exact message this morning from the boba drinking duo, I asked if this date was strictly platonic but they have yet to reply.

The boba drinking duo! LOL, that's amazing.

**MrHughJazz** · 02-11-22 19:51

Her profile is deleted now, but chatted with a blonde on SA who wanted 1 k for a CBJ LOL.

Will post the link if a new profile pops up, but man this isn't GPS this is more like Platinum Mouth Syndrome.

**FirstClass1** · 02-11-22 16:54

Originally Posted by Tony1628 [View Original Post]

Is the membership for seeking worth it?. The prices seem really high just to be able to read and send messages. How much spam are you getting?. How many are fake profiles?.

Even with the uptick of scammers and profiles seeking "online / virtual only," Seeking is still the very best site to get gorgeous girls.

I've had amazing experiences from modelesque dimes on Seeking for far less than you'd pay for a quickie from a used up skank on Hx and PD, or a rub & tug at an AMP.

**RanManCan** · 02-11-22 15:05

Originally Posted by Xnintoolx [View Original Post]

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...0-bb6012cb093f

Agreed, ValentinaRose is hot.

I messaged with her like a year ago, she wanted me to come to her in SGV for the M&G. Nope, babies come to me.

**Xnintoolx** · 02-11-22 13:29

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...0-bb6012cb093f

Originally Posted by RanManCan [View Original Post]

Maybe post a proper link?

**RanManCan** · 02-11-22 12:50

Originally Posted by Xnintoolx [View Original Post]

Anyone have any luck meeting ValentinaRose / member /022 f745 f-ed32-498 a-9 d60-bb6012 cb093 f.

I've tried to get a response from her but no luck.

She's effin' gorgeous.

Maybe post a proper link?