Agency Discussion and Reviews

[Bostonpeter]

She grabbed the rubber and put it on she didn't mention anything about BB and I didn't ask so not sure if she offers it. Started and finished in missionary she is pretty flexible and can put her legs back pretty far it was a nice view. There really isn't much to say here some DFK in missionary until I blew in the bag and she cleaned me up.

I saw Daisy as well this weekend, BB seems to be off the table from what I've discussed with her. I asked out of curiosity, though I don't usually partake, and was given a no with the familiar line "safer for you and for me".

I'm not 100% sure she's the girl in the pictures, she doesn't look mixed in real life, but she's young and pretty and close enough to the pics, so I don't have any complaints. But my experience with the DFK was very similar, was LFK most of the session and DFK towards the end.

[JoeHat58]

Now that I go back and look at Zonomi's pic, the girl I saw had hair and a face that does much more resemble Zonomi. However, the body and more specifically legs do not match at all. Who knows.

Any possibility they showed you Zonomi instead?

[DMV Average Joe]

I texted and emailed AG to book a session with the legendary Siena, and got no reply, besides the automated one. Honestly got me a little worried. Anyone know why?.

Since Siena had left yesterday, typically PO won't reply your request if the girl is not available, PO should have updated their site!

[Mongeri]

I texted and emailed AG to book a session with the legendary Siena, and got no reply, besides the automated one. Honestly got me a little worried. Anyone know why?.

[Rook74]

Daisy resembles the girl in the pictures and is definitely a college student. She has a really nice tight body. She is not inexperienced in bed but she seems to be inexperienced in the business.

Anyway, it started a bit rough since I was given the wrong address but once that was all figured out I was glad she wasn't too far off in a nice apartment in Mclean where the Chinese guy let me in.

The session wasn't bad but it wasn't great. She welcomed me with a kiss and we got undressed and move on to take a shower. The shower was a bit long and there really wasn't much of a tease happening there and no preview.

Moved on to the bed hoping for some DFK but the entire session was mostly LFK with a bit of DFK as she got more into to it later so that was a bit of a bummer. She got on top for a bit of P2P and then started making her way downtown sucking on my nipples all that good stuff. She definitely took her sweet time to get downtown though but it was worth the wait. She got pretty good technique and does the thing with the tongue that felt pretty great. After a bit of that she got up made a gesture her mouth was hurting so I flipped her over and started making my way down for some DATY she's pretty sensitive down there and was really getting into it squeezing my head with her thighs and then made a comment that she ended up "cumming first". This is where she started opening up more and some DFK started happening. She grabbed the rubber and put it on she didn't mention anything about BB and I didn't ask so not sure if she offers it. Started and finished in missionary she is pretty flexible and can put her legs back pretty far it was a nice view. There really isn't much to say here some DFK in missionary until I blew in the bag and she cleaned me up.

After that we just ended up talking for the remainder of the time and she didn't make an attempt for a 2nd round and neither did I since I wasn't feeling very energetic (probably because of all the walking around I did trying to look for an obscure picture of a door that I was never going to find). Anyway, she understands English pretty well since she's been in LA for a couple of years now, so we didn't need a translator to have a conversation. She is fun to talk. She is only staying a week and said she is leaving next Sunday. I will probably repeat because she is pretty hot and feel she will be better with more visits.

[Agc90]

Agree, when I saw her I was thinking this girl has zero similarity to the pic.

She is under 5 ft. And I would almost describe the body as a tall midget. Dwarf. Little person, sorry. Thick legs and thick butt but not in a bad way. Just unique. Rest of body and face were average. Service was good, good lips and dfk. And really nice rim, might've grazed my colon.

Also feel that at the 320 point, plenty of prettier, sexier options in agencies. But I did enjoy.

Any possibility they showed you Zonomi instead?

[JoeHat58]

Agree, when I saw her I was thinking this girl has zero similarity to the pic.

She is under 5 ft. And I would almost describe the body as a tall midget. Dwarf. Little person, sorry. Thick legs and thick butt but not in a bad way. Just unique. Rest of body and face were average. Service was good, good lips and dfk. And really nice rim, might've grazed my colon.

Also feel that at the 320 point, plenty of prettier, sexier options in agencies. But I did enjoy.

I saw Tina a few days ago and just haven't gotten around to the review.

She is not even close to the pics. MP usually does a good job with the representation of the girls. Even chrissy, I could tell that couldve been her a few years back or at least its her body but Tina ws not. She's short and a bit rounder and much older. Has a big scar running vertically down her stomach. That being said I'd give her a 6 on looks and 7 on performance. She has nice full ts and a plump round ass. I mean really nice and firm. Not like any asian I've seen. Doggy view was spectacular. Nice bbj and rim. Gave extra long preview in the shower. Does a wierd thing with her tongue where she just sticks in your mouth. Went cg, rcg, doggy and finished up. I wouldn't repeat but it got the job done. Just don't think its worth the price when there are better options.

[Tomk2323]

Has anyone seen Lisa at DS before? Pics look awesome.

[FsTech69]

Anyone see Tina from MP? Curious how the "best full GFE AAAA+ service" is.

I saw Tina a few days ago and just haven't gotten around to the review.

She is not even close to the pics. MP usually does a good job with the representation of the girls. Even chrissy, I could tell that couldve been her a few years back or at least its her body but Tina ws not. She's short and a bit rounder and much older. Has a big scar running vertically down her stomach. That being said I'd give her a 6 on looks and 7 on performance. She has nice full ts and a plump round ass. I mean really nice and firm. Not like any asian I've seen. Doggy view was spectacular. Nice bbj and rim. Gave extra long preview in the shower. Does a wierd thing with her tongue where she just sticks in your mouth. Went cg, rcg, doggy and finished up. I wouldn't repeat but it got the job done. Just don't think its worth the price when there are better options.

[IceCityX1221]

Considering BBFSCIP is available with many providers here, I' wouldn't be surprised if the nuance of YMMV would go over people's heads, no matter how much you bold, capitalize, underline, and make it special.

And I do kinda agree with the response, it's a serious commitment for clients and providers, and considering we're all in this thinking with our bottom head, I could see it being a flag. Hell, there's a provider I see and I get both anal and BBFS with no up charge, but I rarely talk about that because 1) I've seen her consistently for about a year and a half and were very comfortable together, 2) first time was 100% an accident that made our session way hotter and we just never stopped (no BC, so she does NOT DO CIP or if we do anal inside) and, 3) I've seen her outside the bedroom as a friend and done extended dates. I know if you asked her right from the start, she very well would finish your session with her, and maybe block afterwards.

Added an edit, but no cip.

[Piltman]

Anyone see Tina from MP? Curious how the "best full GFE AAAA+ service" is.

[IceCityX1221]

I wrote YMMV in all caps, what nuance? LOL. What, I need an asterisk saying "Disclaimer: your results will not be 100% the same as me, in case you didn't know what YMMV meant"?

Considering BBFSCIP is available with many providers here, I' wouldn't be surprised if the nuance of YMMV would go over people's heads, no matter how much you bold, capitalize, underline, and make it special.

And I do kinda agree with the response, it's a serious commitment for clients and providers, and considering we're all in this thinking with our bottom head, I could see it being a flag. Hell, there's a provider I see and I get both anal and BBFS with no up charge, but I rarely talk about that because 1) I've seen her consistently for about a year and a half and were very comfortable together, 2) first time was 100% an accident that made our session way hotter and we just never stopped (no BC, so she does CIP or if we do anal inside) and, 3) I've seen her outside the bedroom as a friend and done extended dates. I know if you asked her right from the start, she very well would finish your session with her, and maybe block afterwards.

[FloorHump422]

I wrote YMMV in all caps, what nuance? LOL. What, I need an asterisk saying "Disclaimer: your results will not be 100% the same as me, in case you didn't know what YMMV meant"?

The nuance of YMMV. It's no laughing matter for the girls. She may not have told you explicitly, but it's expected that UTR BB is not mentioned for this very reason. It was also completely unnecessary to include, considering that your recommendation hinged on a YMMV service.

[Hum115]

I wrote YMMV in all caps, what nuance? LOL. What, I need an asterisk saying "Disclaimer: your results will not be 100% the same as me, in case you didn't know what YMMV meant"?

I think what he was saying was that, just mentioning it may make guys try to pressure the provider for it or something.

[OrZammar]

Thanks for the review. In the future, I wouldn't mention BBFS if it's YMMV, as some dudes don't understand nuance.

I wrote YMMV in all caps, what nuance? LOL. What, I need an asterisk saying "Disclaimer: your results will not be 100% the same as me, in case you didn't know what YMMV meant"?