Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 15,406 to 15,420 of 42575
-
02-01-22 01:56 #27170Senior Member

Posts: 452verification photo 2 different kinds of black ink, wrong date format.
Not even close, stolen pics with Photoshop name in there.
Originally Posted by NoClue02
[View Original Post]
If you are going to fake it, at least get the colors consistent.
No uses that date format in the US, at least anyone from the US.
-
02-01-22 00:13 #27169Senior Member

Posts: 89There were a few reviews in a row recently on RM where she told mongers she was "on her period" and couldn't have sex, which is realistically implausible, since I'm sure Lucy stopped having periods about a decade ago.
Originally Posted by NiceGuy99
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 23:14 #27168Senior Member

Posts: 44Detox Spot
I went to Detox Spot in hopes of getting Cynthia based off prior reviews of her, but unfortunately she wasn't working that day.
So in walks in Cici, pretty Latina girl with big fake tits and ass. Started off with a back massage for like a minute then asked "you want everything? I say yes and we quickly got down to business.
Now I like Latina girls with big tits and ass, but this was a bit much for me because it didn't even feel good to grab, just felt hard and plastic.
40 house fee and 140 for the FS, so 180 total. Thinking I could've tried to negotiate 120 but whatever.
Still would like to go back and try Cynthia sometime. Any other monger experiences there with the other girls? Are they all like that?
-
01-31-22 22:30 #27167I am a troll, ignore me

Posts: 239Zero STDs from F&C Lucy
BBD, yes I was talking about F&C Lucy. I have zero worries with her. She's likely on PReP and lots of antibiotics. Yes, all three holes are cheerfully open for bareback. Her hygiene is impeccable. DATY and licking her asshole are delightful and sets her on fire. DFK is welcome. She will lick your cock clean after you cum. Always cheerful. The best provider I've ever met. Yeah she's busy. Likely does 50-60 guys a week. Get in line, you'll love the experience.
Originally Posted by BigBoDonk
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 20:13 #27166Senior Member

Posts: 144Curious
Her post says "PSE" and "GFE". Very interesting. Pse to me, means BBFS cum on body or face.
Originally Posted by NoClue02
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 20:12 #27165Senior Member

Posts: 487Just for laugh
Reminds me of this https://efukt.com/23591_Bad_Times_at...ge_Parlor.html.
Originally Posted by Grimmy23
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 19:55 #27164Senior Member

Posts: 487Chloe
It is but then they stick a pencil sized thing to your dick.
Originally Posted by Grimmy23
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 19:52 #27163Senior Member

Posts: 487Which Lucy
Are you talking about FishnChips Lucy? You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand that if she hooks up with everyone for money without protection, it is just a matter of time that she will get some nasty shit.
Originally Posted by SaltyDog
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 19:50 #27162Senior Member

Posts: 487Fake pics
Pics are from pornstar.
Originally Posted by NoClue02
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 18:41 #27161Banned Member

Posts: 725Agreed. It's all common sense and how much personal risk you are willing to take. If you have bb sex with a provider, you are doing it with the assumption that it could be risky behavior, and if you're doing it a lot the odds may eventually catch up with you. It's not a risk I would ever take, not even once, but that's me. On the flip side there are mongers on here who attest to having bb sex with providers frequently. They are willing to cope with any risk and report that they have been doing it for years without any problems. Statistically it certainly is possible. It's also very possible that you can have bb sex with an infected provider and still not get infected yourself, so it falls into the category of "whatever works for you. " This is the last post I will make about the subject because I agree. This discussion probably belongs in another thread.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 17:44 #27160Senior Member

Posts: 166[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!
-
01-31-22 17:29 #27159Senior Member

Posts: 166Can someone share what L&I is? I have read a lot of the thread but y'all talk a lot (which I love), and search doesn't recognize L&I as a valid term.
Originally Posted by OCJeeper
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 17:17 #27158Senior Member

Posts: 182You may get one that is old and saggy. You may get one that is hot. Been there and I've never had one with a bad attitude or claimed to be tired. I wouldn't return due to the walk.
Originally Posted by TheBagel
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 16:22 #27157Senior Member

Posts: 3236The statistics depend on who you are having BB sex with. Now, actually, as I understand it, this conversation doesn't belong in this thread, it belongs elsewhere. If you're having bare sex w / your SO who is exclusive to you, and she is tested clean, then your risk is truly zero no matter how often you do it. If you are seeing a professional who is having unprotected sex 10 times per work day, eventually the odds will catch up to her, and then there is a possibility that you'll be the next customer. There is no rocket science or statistics to lie with here, it is just common sense.
Originally Posted by Grimmy23
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-22 14:09 #27156Banned Member

Posts: 725I'm an expert level statistician, dude. You can look up the chances of getting an STD on CDC's website and many other places. The. 04 may not be exactly correct. I didn't research it heavily. But I know it's pretty small. Say it's. 04% or. 1% or whatever. If you do it twice you don't double your odds. If you do it 100 times you aren't 100 x more likely to catch something. They are isolated incidents, so each time you do it you have the same chance of catching something that you did the last time you did it. The fact that you banged one provider unprotected this week and chose to bang a completely different provider unprotected next week are completely unrelated events.
Originally Posted by Kevin80
[View Original Post]
Now. It's obvious that the more you do it the more your chances, but the fact that you did it twice in 2 weeks doesn't double your odds. If you indulge 100 times per year your chances of catching something are definitely something non-negligible. If you assumed each time equally increased your chances, and your chance from any one incident is. 04%, then by that logic your chance would be 4% if you did it 100 times. But in reality it's something less than 4% because the odds don't add up like that. Just like buying a lotto ticket this week doesn't increase your chances of winning next week. Your chances of winning the lotto are obviously higher, but still pretty small. Now in the case of STDs you're talking one in thousands instead of one in hundreds of millions, so we're talking on a completely different scale here, but still the chances are fairly small.
All that being said, I still wouldn't risk it personally. It's a non-zero chance of catching something that could potentially ruin your life. I just wouldn't say that it's a near certainty that you caught something if you ever did it even once. It's far from that.









Reply With Quote


