Thread: Korean Agency PSE / BBFS
+
Add Report
Results 6,106 to 6,120 of 7898
-
01-30-22 05:27 #1793Senior Member

Posts: 250Crystal LTLV
For some reason I'm thinking Crystal was Skye at LTLV. Thin petite body, definitely cute, spoke good English but was only CFS. CBJ.
Originally Posted by FloorHump422
[View Original Post]
-
01-30-22 02:48 #1792Senior Member

Posts: 89Suzi
The Suzi (not Suzy) I mentioned before was at CLL maybe 18 months ago? She was listed as having "real selfies" and only did CFS. Is that the one who is Sugar at VAC now? The pictures look like her, and someone else said it was her.
Originally Posted by LvJanGun
[View Original Post]
-
01-29-22 20:28 #1791Senior Member

Posts: 281Recommend Crystal, especially if you like thinner girls. Photos are of her and accurate, with minimal P.S. Only CFS offered.
Originally Posted by KSpacey
[View Original Post]
-
01-29-22 20:02 #1790Banned Member

Posts: 131So it was 300 for just the BJ?
Originally Posted by MonLies555
[View Original Post]
-
01-29-22 19:03 #1789Senior Member

Posts: 250Lt
If you like thinner girls CL is thin. She's a cutie and aims to please. Loved her post BBBJ followed by ride my lap action in the shower before we hit the bed.
Originally Posted by KSpacey
[View Original Post]
-
01-29-22 18:16 #1788Senior Member

Posts: 54Dw
What is upwith the DW rewards?
Who is worth seeing thinking about baby.
Originally Posted by KSpacey
[View Original Post]
-
01-29-22 16:23 #1787Senior Member

Posts: 351LT Girls
Anyone seen Q at LT? I like thinner girls and wanted to see Young bit haven't connected with her yet. Jessie there has been great. Honestly I've had good and not so good experiences at every one of the places in town but any recent Intel on Q or others there lately?
-
01-29-22 10:50 #1786Senior Member

Posts: 141Here
Still here. I am not a shill. I am keeping all my intell to myself. I could have told people that sugar from VAC was not Pepperoni nipple Suzi.
Originally Posted by Pooka85
[View Original Post]
But actually Boa and Suzy was in LA trying and failing to make a go of it out there.
-
01-29-22 10:34 #1785Banned Member

Posts: 450Shills
Talking about shills. Where is my friend LVGun. Lma more obvious he couldn't be.
Originally Posted by RogerOver
[View Original Post]
-
01-29-22 01:42 #1784Senior Member

Posts: 281Her appearance may not be to your liking, but objectively, she's in good shape and her service is at least above average. If you look at her reviews in other cities, I don't think her good reviews are the result of shills. As others have mentioned, a girl charging 20 for a 2nd pop, if they're charging you, is unheard of.
Originally Posted by RogerOver
[View Original Post]
If you booked an HR and left with 25 minutes to spare, you gave up 125 so you wouldn't spend an additional 20 (sunk cost notwithstanding). Lol
-
01-28-22 22:07 #1783Senior Member

Posts: 26So hopefully this is my last little bit about VAC. Attached are the messages VAC sent me on TER, I haven't responded to VAC nor do I plan to. I still have my texts with with the booker showing my booking with Roa, but not going to upload those here. TER mods or admin haven't tried to contact me and if it gets taken down or banner put up disputing it, oh well but I think it should be known if VAC don't like your review they may try the same thing. About my review score, they are charging a premium so I expect more. If not I would go somewhere else and pay half for the same service. Not going to doubt the other reviews where they rated her highly it just wasn't my experience. I have nothing to gain from giving a bad rating and after this I doubt I will post any more bad reviews. Sharing my point of view, but as always YMMV.
-
01-28-22 21:58 #1782Senior Member

Posts: 26VAC situation
So hopefully this is my last little bit about VAC. Attached are the messages VAC sent me on TER, I haven't responded to VAC nor do I plan to. I still have my texts with with the booker showing my booking with Roa, but not going to upload those here. TER mods or admin haven't tried to contact me and if it gets taken down or banner put up disputing it, oh well but I think it should be known if VAC don't like your review they may try the same thing. About my review score, they are charging a premium so I expect more. If not I would go somewhere else and pay half for the same service. Not going to doubt the other reviews where they rated her highly it just wasn't my experience. I have nothing to gain from giving a bad rating and after this I doubt I will post any more bad reviews. Sharing my point of view, but as always YMMV.
-
01-28-22 21:27 #1781Banned Member

Posts: 521Yes
But in your case the reviewer was joining in the request to remove the review. Look at the recent Alexandra Belle thread on where a reviewed said she was over 50 years old when she's clearly under 40, and maybe as young as 30. No matter what she did, they wouldn't remove the review.
Originally Posted by HpyGolky
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-22 17:50 #1780Senior Member

Posts: 808It's been done before.
In general TER will work with you if the review in question could cause a problem for the girl. TER pulled a review that I had requested because what we did, isn't offered in her menu. Me not knowing I realized that the review could put her in a awkward position so I explained this to TER and they took it down. There was another incident but I don't recall that one. But it can happen.
Originally Posted by DCGrind
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-22 17:38 #1779Banned Member

Posts: 521Disputed Reviews
I agree that TER has begun adding a header that says "Provider disputes review" in the past year. However, I've never seen that at a KGirl agency. It's generally when a very established provider can satisfy Admin that either (1) she never scheduled a session with the reviewer, or (2) the review describes services that the Provider expressly disclaims in her ads and which have never been mentioned in her prior reviews.
TER is not exactly friendly with / to KAgencies. For example KGirls who work at agencies and KAgencies themselves are prohibited from giving Whitelists. And carefully monitors KAgencies from shilling. One of the popular agencies here in Vegas was banned a year ago for shilling and offering review discounts. Another is currently being monitored for shilling.
So I think the OP's premise that his review might be removed is wrong. And I tend to agree with Happy that the OP's review is a bit harsh.
Originally Posted by RogerOver
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote



