Korean Agency BB

[DaddyChill]

That's a substantial height difference between what M lists compared to the other 2. Could be a typo. Gray using fake pictures is expected so who knows who is behind the door but considering that M and CGLA seem to be sharing different pictures of the same set, the likelihood that it's the same girl is high for M and CGLA.

It's unfortunate we don't have more people that TOFFT and posts reviews. New starlets will get deluged with business cause of those TOFFT review (s) but I'm positive more goes undiscovered that certainly warrant the same attention but didn't because there were no reviews.

If anyone wants to donate me their $300 I'd glady take one for the team. Mickey from M for is really resonating with me that that was the Mickey from PKL that I had a really disappointing time with. Her face on the first photo closely resembles the PKL Mickey I saw in person.

[Bastard Chorum]

When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf

Sicca at Bookergray.

https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php..._mw&wr_id=2639 (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.

That's a substantial height difference between what M lists compared to the other 2. Could be a typo. Gray using fake pictures is expected so who knows who is behind the door but considering that M and CGLA seem to be sharing different pictures of the same set, the likelihood that it's the same girl is high for M and CGLA.

It's unfortunate we don't have more people that TOFFT and posts reviews. New starlets will get deluged with business cause of those TOFFT review (s) but I'm positive more goes undiscovered that certainly warrant the same attention but didn't because there were no reviews.

[LaoneBug]

Thinking about seeing one of these two when I visit OC this week but just cannot decide.

Saw Mio when she was in LA back to 2019 but now sure how she looks now but cannot find her recent information.

Yuna has a nice review but the buggy eyes scared me a little.

Just want to see who would you guys recommend.

Thanks a lot guys.

[Toungsten]

M. Viki, Allie, Stella (WLA). Miki, Sica. (MW).

https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/ Eunji, Ami, Josie, Nicole. (WLA). Remi, Daisy (MW). .

http://www.kgla.net/ Eunji, Ami, Josie, Nicole. (WLA) Remi, Daisy (MW). .

Sexy Angels. https://sexyangels.site/.................

SFK. https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/ Dana, Viki, Tiana. WLA.

[WillardJ]

Again, I wouldn't lay offense to out of towners just because they are out of towners. No one has provided concrete proof that it was or wasn't. It's disingenuous to point fingers when we don't know the facts.

I'm not sure what screening would be enough to sniff out bad actors like this. The current system no ways addresses this as everyone whose gone vetting knows. And to pivot to measures that do would scare away business of all but incredibly dedicated and die hard kgirl fans.

I think we can all agree that the more participants there are in the hobby, the chances of a psycho monger will inherently increase. That is simply how math works. The girls are obviously not hurting for business. Even the upsell BB girls are hard to book now (at least the popular ones). I think what CI is getting at is that we don't need to rock the boat and facilitate to make it easier for idiot mongers to get cleared. If these mongers are legit mongers, they will know what they need to do for screening and get cleared properly.

The issue is with the mongers who come in and have no references whatsoever and want to get cleared without having to give any references or information to provide assurances and then expecting to book only the popular girls. That is something I can't really agree with, everyone should have to earn their stripes. All the seasoned mongers know what I'm talking about.

I'm not sure how many times I've seen newbie mongers standing around the front of a k-girl incall by the intercom with their phone out, pacing around. This presents the obvious concerns about protecting the hobby. Can we expect all these new people you're trying to bring into the hobby to behave accordingly and be smart about how they participate? Just food for thought.

[Toungsten]

YMMV and everyone has their opinion. I am just making my plea anyways, just in case someone here has any sway with the k-org "bosses" or whoever selects and markets talent for employment in the LA area.

Point of information. The bookers rarely if ever see the girls. They go by what they are told by the org or by the customers.

[IAmGib1]

I'm not sure if bookers have much choice in the type of girls that are willing to get fucked by a bunch of Western mongers. If they have any choices, I personally appreciate the diversity. Petite or tall, I'm happy as long as their face, curves, and attitude are of quality. Some of them have been very enjoyable for me at least. (PKL Tiny, Teenie, Miso, Peach3).

YMMV and everyone has their opinion. I am just making my plea anyways, just in case someone here has any sway with the k-org "bosses" or whoever selects and markets talent for employment in the LA area.

[Majieroero]

Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?

I'm not sure if bookers have much choice in the type of girls that are willing to get fucked by a bunch of Western mongers. If they have any choices, I personally appreciate the diversity. Petite or tall, I'm happy as long as their face, curves, and attitude are of quality. Some of them have been very enjoyable for me at least. (PKL Tiny, Teenie, Miso, Peach3).

[JohnPot]

Man, just glanced at the title, I though you complained the 40's MILF aunties invasion that have been happened lately. To me, 4'9, 4'11, Midget. NO PROBLEM.

Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?

[Jack926]

When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf

Sicca at Bookergray.

https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php..._mw&wr_id=2639 (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.

She is SMART-Look at her RATE at BookerGray.

* Sicca Rate.

30 min / 240 roses.

30 min B /340 roses.

1 hr / 300 roses.

2 shots / 340 roses.

B / 320 roses * (Cheaper).

B2 / 360 roses.

30 minutes appointment is more expensive than 60 minutes appointment and that means she realized that for $20 less, she will not get cum dumped every 30 minutes.

[PurpleMan07]

Saw NAV Pearl, and have no clue if she was the SA Sarah I saw in WLA like a year ago.

I asked about WLA and she said yea, but then asked if she was Sarah and she said "No, Pearl!

Could you report your experience with NAV pearl?

[HotManGuy]

Wish me luck, will let everyone know my thoughts. She's been so hyped up I'm curious. My favorites are Eunji and Viki so curious if she'll be added.

[Francescoo]

I'm not sure what you have against out of towners to be so biased against their inclusion to be screened. Whether a potential client is worthwhile to screen or not will fall onto each booker / agencies' requirements and their particular situation. There's no telling where or when a bad apple will appear but all else being equal, the likelihood of one being an out of towner or a local is the same. Being a local or out of towner does not inherently make you a bad apple. Furthermore, there's theoretically a higher chance of a bad apple appearing in the local client pool than out of towners due the sheer numbers involved. Screening isn't perfect and not up to the task of evaluating how a monger will act so there will be a few who fall through the cracks.

Everyone will have different opinions but my take on helping newcomers is simple. I'll help anyone who wants to genuinely enter the kgirl scene by pointing where to find contact information and what they can expect and need to provide for screening. Whether they are local or not matters not to me. It'll be up to what references they already have, what they are willing to disclose, and the bookers evaluation of them to see if they get access or not. My helping them does not affect whether or not they will get cleared, it only eliminates a step in the process that they can do on their own by browsing here or on other forums. In addition, bookers worth their salt knows that they need to keep increasing their client pool to combat losses from attrition (mongers leaving the kgirl scene and competition / favoring other agencies) to keep their girls booked as much as possible.

I'm not sure how price increases fits into all of this in from your perspective. But price increases has been a long time coming given how flat rates have been for years. Take a moment to ponder that they increased prices during a pandemic and economic downturn. This flies in the face of any sane business model. We can only speculate on why but I think increased overhead costs started to eat at their margins or simple greed works too. Regardless, it would be naive to think it would remain the same.

Sorry bud but good luck in getting into the stables we partake in!

[TheAbc]

When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf

Sicca at Bookergray.

https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php..._mw&wr_id=2639 (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.

[SteveTandberg]

Rumor from a S. Korean girl is that and. Korean girls are short.

I think previous poster meant to say is that rumor is that these super short girls are from North Korea. South Korean women are tall, maybe very tall depending on your reference. 5'8"+ is not unusual. I'd say 5'5" is about average for 25 and younger.