Escort Reports

[HornyIndo]

Hello fellow mongers.

I know some of the agency girls provide BBFS (PSE), I am curious how that goes. Is it OK to ask the provider if she has been recently tested? Or if she has had some of the common infections like MONO?

Or is it take what you get and don't ask questions?

[AcuraTL32]

I highly recommend Mia if you are searching for a younger (mid-late 20's) natural GND, Mia at KDG. Met her in SD and now in SJ. Visited LSC several times (great line up) but Mia is best vocally as in enjoying the session instead of fake vocals. LSC caliber IMO.

[RocketManP]

I am curious too. As for videotaping during a session, it happens quite often. Some girls don't mind it, while others are not happy, and generally results in the monger being banned at the org.

I think he's referring to the rumor that gsc instituted heavy screening because of filming. I personally heard different reasons for them closing and then reopening with much demanding requirements as well as rebranded.

[Loafy]

I am curious too. As for videotaping during a session, it happens quite often. Some girls don't mind it, while others are not happy, and generally results in the monger being banned at the org.

Not only that, but girls between orgs communicate with each other.

[MrTux]

Prefer petite and / or young.

[Machita]

Can you elaborate? Did something happen? (don't see anything else in this thread).

I am curious too. As for videotaping during a session, it happens quite often. Some girls don't mind it, while others are not happy, and generally results in the monger being banned at the org.

[Mastov]

I can't see them now because someone decided to record and ruin it for the rest of us.

Can you elaborate? Did something happen? (don't see anything else in this thread).

[RocketManP]

Any recommendations for younger girls in the area? Preferably BBFS CIP, thanks.

BGC Yuki is pretty young from all reports. Mid to late 20's is what I have in my notes. All bgc girls are BBFS, tho not all are cip. Pretty green service. Second hand info, but very reliable. At least one very picky monger I know in terms of looks, is head over heels for her.

[Jizzm3]

Apparently LSC has a policy that you have to have 3 visits in 3 months to be able to pre-book. I was a regular not too long ago so not sure how continuously active you have to be to still be considered a regular.

I can't see them now because someone decided to record and ruin it for the rest of us.

[RocketManP]

Speaking of which, anyone know this c org? The sf / peninsula ones are garbage right now, was thinking about trying my luck in sj.

https://adultsearch.com/california/s...scorts/2046752

These are usually b&s places. I'd steer clear.

[Sdfg1]

Speaking of which, anyone know this c org? The sf / peninsula ones are garbage right now, was thinking about trying my luck in sj.

https://adultsearch.com/california/s...scorts/2046752

[Machita]

...OK, the faces are a privacy liability. Sure. But why are the bodies different? Why can't the body of a fat girl be actually chubby / fat in the pics? Why do we have to find out ourselves, especially those of us who don't read all reviews?
There is no privacy excuse when it comes to body types.


...The aspect of being truthful and respectful of customers time and money is being lost.

...You'd think that if pics are completely different they'd freely allow customers to walk if their blind date was a lie. But no, they get mad and threaten to bl you. And many mongers hence are hesitant to find out if it's a bluff or not.

I agree, no excuse for presenting pics with fake body types. Since they use photoshop so much, they can easily hide the face of the girl if they care about privacy. I don't think they care about their customers period.

Yeah, walking has been a no-no for as long as I remember.

I think the best solution at this time is for mongers to report the fake pics. I have seen quite a few fake pics at SA, so much so that I would not go see any of their girls, unless I have firm intel.

[RocketManP]

So I've been having a dilemma lately. Almost all of the local K- agencies are pulling bait and switches. The girls pics that they advertise are not the girls you will meet. The only actual accurate pics are of Snowflake and Hera from PCafe. Also, at PCafe NG106 and 103 were not the ones in their pics. I also read here that Laduree was also not the same girl as in the pics. Went to FtasticKGirls to see Erin. The girl I met wasn't Erin in the pics. Went KLvrs twice and the same thing. The girls I met weren't the ones in the pics. Also happened at AEyeCandy with Melody. She wasn't the one in the pic. Also twice at AAngels with Tiana and another girl. They weren't the same ones in the pics.

I'm not trying to talk crap about any KAgencies. Just sharing what I observed and my frustrations.

Any thoughts?

Broski, I've been banging this same drum for years.

OK, the faces are a privacy liability. Sure. But why are the bodies different? Why can't the body of a fat girl be actually chubby / fat in the pics? Why do we have to find out ourselves, especially those of us who don't read all reviews?

There is no privacy excuse when it comes to body types. Even the low-rate Chinese joints with gilfs have more truthful pics in terms of body type closeness.

Basically, you need to have very good research. Some people will say (removing all fluff) : stfu and eat what you're given we should be thankful blah blah because compared to some other place we have it better. How about nah, try to improve shit when so many disappointments happen? Especially with latest price hikes.

This take it or leave it attitude only worsens the snowball. Many orgs think they can put out whatever pics they want no matter how fake and we'll eat them up. The aspect of being truthful and respectful of customers time and money is being lost. You'd think that if pics are completely different they'd freely allow customers to walk if their blind date was a lie. But no, they get mad and threaten to bl you. And many mongers hence are hesitant to find out if it's a bluff or not.

[RickJames808]

It's understandable even of we as clients don't like it. One monger with reference to the real Laduree had it explained by a PO. F you were in a foreign country under flimsy to false purposes, you probably wouldn't want your real pics online announcing to the world that you're smashing for cash. If the girls were to get caught those real pics would also make it laughably easy to make a case against them. I only wish the pics at least resemble the chicks in face or body at least. Some are legit. The most recent examples I've seen were Crystal at SA, Barbie at GFEI, Snowflake at PC (photoshopped but close enough) and Yuuka at PC (photoshopped but close enough. The ones in the silver bikini more accurate). I think all of us have been on the shitty end of the AAMP ads but its part of the game. I'm curious if the sites that require passwords are more forthcoming with actual pics. At some of the AMPs in Dallas some girls would allow mongers to take pics to drum up customers. Damned if it wasn't effective.

So I've been having a dilemma lately. Almost all of the local K- agencies are pulling bait and switches. The girls pics that they advertise are not the girls you will meet. The only actual accurate pics are of Snowflake and Hera from PCafe. Also, at PCafe NG106 and 103 were not the ones in their pics. I also read here that Laduree was also not the same girl as in the pics. Went to FtasticKGirls to see Erin. The girl I met wasn't Erin in the pics. Went KLvrs twice and the same thing. The girls I met weren't the ones in the pics. Also happened at AEyeCandy with Melody. She wasn't the one in the pic. Also twice at AAngels with Tiana and another girl. They weren't the same ones in the pics.

I'm not trying to talk crap about any KAgencies. Just sharing what I observed and my frustrations.

Any thoughts?

[Jeff1976]

So I've been having a dilemma lately. Almost all of the local K- agencies are pulling bait and switches. The girls pics that they advertise are not the girls you will meet. The only actual accurate pics are of Snowflake and Hera from PCafe. Also, at PCafe NG106 and 103 were not the ones in their pics. I also read here that Laduree was also not the same girl as in the pics. Went to FtasticKGirls to see Erin. The girl I met wasn't Erin in the pics. Went KLvrs twice and the same thing. The girls I met weren't the ones in the pics. Also happened at AEyeCandy with Melody. She wasn't the one in the pic. Also twice at AAngels with Tiana and another girl. They weren't the same ones in the pics.

I'm not trying to talk crap about any KAgencies. Just sharing what I observed and my frustrations.

Any thoughts?

That's pretty much standard, coast to coast. An authentic picture of the actual girl is pretty rare. A recent picture of the actual girl is almost non-existent. The girls like their privacy, so don't expect anything more than a passing resemblance, at best. You have to go to the appointment, knowing that the pictures are not accurate. Don't have high expectations, or your session will probably be a big let down. Enjoy your time with the girl, and be thankful that you have options. Much of the country is a barren wasteland, for this hobby.