Thread: WYP, SA, and other SD sites
+
Add Report
Results 1,501 to 1,515 of 7692
-
12-04-21 09:42 #6192Senior Member

Posts: 226Stunning Runner (Angela) pic seller
Moved to text immediately. Texted a very sexy pic to start. Then small talk, followed be a request to sell pics and videos. Now she blocked me or is gone.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a...d-827a79d7acc7
Norm!
-
12-04-21 09:21 #6191Senior Member

Posts: 288Online only
Angela.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1...9-e6af5c3b04cb
Chatted in the site, then moved to Kik (can be a red flag) few days later asks if I'm looking for something online. I tell her I prefer in person and she says she doesn't do that.
Oh well, could've told me sooner or posted it on your profile.
-
12-03-21 18:57 #6190Senior Member

Posts: 226Another GPS
This one wrote to me and gave me her number immediately. She looked familiar. I think I met her years ago on a different SD website. Now she is on seeking. I found her old email from the other site where she tried to scam me for 863 dollars to pay her BGE bill. (Which was already paid because she sent enough info for me to track it!
I will text and see what the outrageous demand will be. Her profile says she is elite. IIRC, she used to dance at Millstream. When I posted abouther years ago, someone said she was married. Her old profile said single. Now Seeking says married, so at least she fesses up to that now.
I will let you all know what her demand is.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1...5-62ff2032b08a
Norm!
-
12-03-21 18:35 #6189Senior Member

Posts: 557Severe substance abuse in a 19-yo with no other overt signs of wear and tear? Maybe.
Originally Posted by Max#01
[View Original Post]
Low self-esteem in a 19-yo making them unwilling to smile with teeth? Just a tiny bit more likely.
But, you do you.
-
12-03-21 15:09 #6188Senior Member

Posts: 1212You only get a limited glimpse of her teeth in one picture. For me, that's generally a disqualifier based on my hunch that she's hiding substance abuse-caused teeth decay.
Originally Posted by Itfcd
[View Original Post]
-
12-03-21 14:11 #6187Senior Member

Posts: 226Finally got ahold of this one. Her headline mentions the 1%. Outrageous asking price. You know my thoughts on ladies asking for more than $$ Didn't ask for my picture. Clearly a pro if she doesn't care what I look like.
Originally Posted by NormGerd
[View Original Post]
Norm!
-
12-02-21 20:48 #6186Senior Member

Posts: 426No money discussion.
Getting banned is a *****. No discussion of cash until you move them off. Not worth getting blacklisted. They rebranded as seeking, got rid of the friends with benefits tag, and now the deleted profiles are "attractive members" not "sugar babies" for a reason. It's wink wink nod nod. But not worth it since getting a new profile after getting banned is a PITA.
Originally Posted by NormGerd
[View Original Post]
-
12-02-21 19:43 #6185Senior Member

Posts: 1212She can spell "tsunami". That's a good sign.
Originally Posted by MilesNoDavis
[View Original Post]
-
12-02-21 18:27 #6184Senior Member

Posts: 557Midnightfun. More like midnightfake
https://members.seeking.com/member/9...e-35a581513755
This idiot with an OH phone # tried to pass off photos from an 8-year-old Facebook group as real. Sorry, chump, Google Lens caught you out.
And no, I wouldn't remotely think of discussing numbers within the site messages. Frankly, most girls are smart enough not to do that (the one who wasn't was Maddie Eve, a known escort in the DC area who you can search for on the usual sites and here). As soon as I get any kind of good response, I immediately tell them to text me instead. Have conducted every bit of business that way.
-
12-02-21 18:25 #6183Senior Member

Posts: 54Quick update: she is now prettysea https://members.seeking.com/member/c...a-5c03bca5a291.
Originally Posted by Biggyv
[View Original Post]
Yeah I'm thinking scam.
-
12-02-21 17:59 #6182Senior Member

Posts: 54When they ask I always say that I'd rather not discuss specifics on the site, and would prefer to discuss over text. I did do that in the past and was never banned but it seems SA has become stricter about that recently.
Originally Posted by NormGerd
[View Original Post]
-
12-02-21 17:54 #6181Senior Member

Posts: 226Do you discuss PPM on Seeking
Down in the Richmond thread (which many consider the "master" sb / sd thread) there has been a discussion of people getting kicked off for discussing the PPM amount (or even saying PPM) in their messages on-site.
Does anyone here know anyone, or been banned themselves for this? A hot sb just directly asked me to give a PPM number. I want her, but am afraid to get banned this early into my premium! LOL.
Norm!
-
12-02-21 16:34 #6180Senior Member

Posts: 557Lucy
https://members.seeking.com/member/e...a-1dbda30b599f
Looks like she's been around a little bit, but I hadn't seen her in the Baltimore search set before; maybe she just reactivated. Can't host. Quick to text, and on birth control, but she sounded like she preferred protection rather than not. I asked what she wanted PPM to go BBFS regardless of her concerns, and she said 5. I countered with 4, and she stopped responding.
-
12-02-21 14:29 #6179Senior Member

Posts: 226Came across this one. Looks TGTBT. Anyone know anything?
https://members.seeking.com/member/a...1-673946834fa4#.
Norm!
-
12-02-21 14:23 #6178Senior Member

Posts: 226Sorry just saw this. It was a VanillaGo card. 6. 95 cost in addition to the loading amount.
Originally Posted by JonFisher
[View Original Post]
Norm!
N.B. You can use Google Pay if you use the app. That is guaranteed to work, you just can't use it with a discount code. So if you have a separate mongering gmail account, you can just buy a Google Play giftcard at a local store (they are sold in a lot of places, including target) load the google play card into your gmail account and pay through the app. I'm not sure, but I think there is no fee for a google play giftcard.







Reply With Quote




