The Velvet Rooms
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Escorts
Top Tier Escorts

Thread: Escort Reports

+ Add Report
Page 129 of 298 FirstFirst ... 29 79 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 179 229 ... LastLast
Results 1,921 to 1,935 of 4463
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #2543

    Helpful Website:

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed210  [View Original Post]
    Hi there. I am fairly active with los angeles K orgs and was hoping a kind san jose soul could point me in the right direction. I have LA references of course.

    (Also open to some latina tail).
    Some more experienced and generous fellow (s) made a website with a running list of orgs (not just in Bay Area but all around). Here is the link, hopefully it won't get taken down.

    https://bayareakoreangirls.com/bay-a...rls-south-bay/

    I'm not very experienced at all myself and just getting into the hobby, so others please feel free to chime in and fill in the gaps. But some of the best orgs rn seem to be LSC (Cora for eye candy, Mila seems to be extremely popular rn, Ciara for service, etc.), BGC, CA (heard good things about Jade), AEC for GFE, and some newer more "independent" ones like Yuffie (Korea-Pie now I guess. She's renowned for the waterworks) or Jennie (LKS). (All the abbreviations p much align with the URL and org names, so hope it's not too confusing.).

    LSC's probs most consistent and a staple, pretty much can't go wrong. But screening is rigorous (ID, pay stub, references, selfie), idk if you'd want to go through the hassle for your visit.

    Others are less demanding. KGA is one that I was referred to as a newbie since it's light screening. Yuna was supposed to be a legend, but have heard YMMV heavily now. Kat at KGA also has good and meh reviews.

    Do you have any preferences for what you're looking for? Idk much about the Kgirl scene in LA since never been down there before, but my understanding is that talent's usually better (younger) but also at a higher price-point / upcharge compared to Bay Area. So my 2 cents might be skewed, but still hope this helps!

  2. #2542

    Definitely different girls

    Lulu is taller, big strong girl, a little quiet but very attentive to your needs.

    Lily isn't in the rotation lately, not sure if she's coming back but was a lot shorter and heavier, she would flat out tell me she was short and fat but her service was excellent. Very eager to please.

    Yes definitely two different girls.

    Quote Originally Posted by RocketManP  [View Original Post]
    I think they're different girls. Lily is short. I heard Lulu is tall.

  3. #2541

    LA monger visiting.

    Hi there. I am fairly active with los angeles K orgs and was hoping a kind san jose soul could point me in the right direction. I have LA references of course.

    (Also open to some latina tail).

  4. #2540
    Quote Originally Posted by ProNoobXt123  [View Original Post]
    Is Lily possibly Lulu? I keep reading they are the same, but some people hear lily as Lulu. I've only seen Miyuki, Lulu and one other girl. I liked Lulu the most of them in terms of technique / looks (she looks the youngest of the 3, but still MILF / GILF status), but she's quite a clock watcher / rusher.
    I think they're different girls. Lily is short. I heard Lulu is tall.

  5. #2539
    Quote Originally Posted by RocketManP  [View Original Post]
    Which girl did you end up liking from Skylink?

    I'm OK with Sandy / Miyuki and Lily. Not lookers to put it lightly, but good service. Haven't seen Lulu yet.
    Is Lily possibly Lulu? I keep reading they are the same, but some people hear lily as Lulu. I've only seen Miyuki, Lulu and one other girl. I liked Lulu the most of them in terms of technique / looks (she looks the youngest of the 3, but still MILF / GILF status), but she's quite a clock watcher / rusher.

  6. #2538

    Brazilian desires

    FYI, Maria and Ariana available at Brazilian Desires. Highly recommend based in past experience.

    https://www.braziliandesires.com/

    Haven't seen Bella or Helena.

  7. #2537

    Sweet angels

    Outright racism aside, let's try and get back to valuable information:

    Saw two gems from Sweet Angels. This agency seems to be getting the younger girls.

    1: https://sweetangels.ch/leah.

    Booker recommended Leah and boy was this right. Young sweet girl in San Mateo. She said she is 20 and that easily fits her appearance. Great attitude. Amazing to look at while going to town on.

    2: https://sweetangels.ch/yura.

    Per prior Board recommendation, saw Yura. Very hot. She's young (or at least has a young look), but more so mid to late 20's. Also good attitude. Would recommend.

  8. #2536
    Quote Originally Posted by ProNoobXt123  [View Original Post]
    Can confirm. I've tried the 3 girls at Skylink and they are GILF territory and 2 of them, I wasn't too happy with as they got me to shoot quick, tried to get me to relax and shoot as fast as possible for my 2nd shot to get me out. I paid for 1 hr, and they got me out in 40 ish min.
    Which girl did you end up liking from Skylink?

    I'm OK with Sandy / Miyuki and Lily. Not lookers to put it lightly, but good service. Haven't seen Lulu yet.

  9. #2535
    Quote Originally Posted by BadInfluence  [View Original Post]
    "people" are fucking idiots. Whoever is telling you that K girls don't give good service is either smelly, cheap or both.
    +1. I always have a great time with K orgs. I find that they are at the top of the game when it comes to asian orgs, but they do come at a higher price and more verification in my experience. If you are getting bad service from a K-Org, I agree, you're either smelly, cheap, rude or all three.

    I know a few girls at K / C orgs who always complain about Indians who come in not showering and then worst of all, negotiating further with the girl after negotiating with the agent POC. Then they usually get angry about why they won't lower the price or being told to shower and clean up well as it "wastes" their money for the time they spent.

  10. #2534
    Quote Originally Posted by FarmD  [View Original Post]
    Most C-orgs, you don't know what you're going to get until you reach the door and they rush you out. The particular one you linked generally has the same person in the ad though, and I haven't heard anything really negative about them besides having some older gals.

    You could give Skylink a try, but be warned that is pretty much GILF territory (providers are nice though).
    Can confirm. I've tried the 3 girls at Skylink and they are GILF territory and 2 of them, I wasn't too happy with as they got me to shoot quick, tried to get me to relax and shoot as fast as possible for my 2nd shot to get me out. I paid for 1 hr, and they got me out in 40 ish min.

  11. #2533

    Sorry about that

    Cleaning my shit up now.

    Quote Originally Posted by Palo410  [View Original Post]
    That would be good news! Hey RichJames808 I tried to respond to a DM from you, but was denied because your mailbox is bursting at the digital seams!.

  12. #2532

    Asian grannies

    Looking for asian grannies next week in sj. Older the better. Any recommendations for me?

  13. #2531

    1st time playing in CA

    1st time in San Jose any advise or tips and what price range is recommended. Any and all help appreciate.

  14. #2530
    Quote Originally Posted by Runon99  [View Original Post]
    Which link did you click?
    https://adultsearch.com/california/s...scorts/2306892

  15. #2529

    Just say no

    Saw this chick.

    https://san-jose.skipthegames.com/fe...v/892316174655

    Won't go back. Started well. Until she started bleeding (and she might be over that by now. Or it might be a scam). Acted like she was surprised.

    No further action. No refund.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Live Escorts
Best Escorts
High Class Companions

Protected by Copyscape