Massage Parlor Reports

[Mfarfu Tom]

Was looking for a good place on the North side. Had been here before and was not impressed. BUT the ad said new girls so I thought I'd try and see. The ad should have said old girls. Went in the back and was greeted by a very mature woman. Asked if she someone else was working. She called out her partner who just as mature. I left without trying the service. Good news is there is parking in the back if you like them old.

https://chicago.rubratings.com/236673

What is the name of this place?

[Red6666]

Was looking for a good place on the North side. Had been here before and was not impressed. BUT the ad said new girls so I thought I'd try and see. The ad should have said old girls. Went in the back and was greeted by a very mature woman. Asked if she someone else was working. She called out her partner who just as mature. I left without trying the service. Good news is there is parking in the back if you like them old.

https://chicago.rubratings.com/236673

[Moejoo]

I am always skeptical of the reviews on RM, particularly when it comes to age, looks, cup size, all of it basically. What I typically will do is look at the reviewer's past reviews and look for any MTs I may have also visited with. If you have a visit in common then you have a good gauge on the reliability of that particular reviewer. If there is no MT review in common, maybe cross reference with a different reviewer who is more reliable. It's a tedious process but you save yourself a drive or disappointment in the long run. And, as always, you can only rely on your own standards.

Side note: Whether it's RM or here, I prefer and wish there was more of a number scale (out of 10), rating system. For example, someone can rate a MT "average" in build / body type. But what does that mean? A 4/10 to 6/10 would constitute average but I would more likely gamble on someone's perceived "6" rather than a "4". Rating rant over, good luck all!

Giving an estimated height, weight and dress size might work better. I have seen guys post pictures of what consider 8's that I would run from. We all have our own types.

[GMan25]

I am always skeptical of the reviews on RM, particularly when it comes to age, looks, cup size, all of it basically. What I typically will do is look at the reviewer's past reviews and look for any MTs I may have also visited with. If you have a visit in common then you have a good gauge on the reliability of that particular reviewer. If there is no MT review in common, maybe cross reference with a different reviewer who is more reliable. It's a tedious process but you save yourself a drive or disappointment in the long run. And, as always, you can only rely on your own standards.

Side note: Whether it's RM or here, I prefer and wish there was more of a number scale (out of 10), rating system. For example, someone can rate a MT "average" in build / body type. But what does that mean? A 4/10 to 6/10 would constitute average but I would more likely gamble on someone's perceived "6" rather than a "4". Rating rant over, good luck all!

Even if there was a specific rating system and people were honest, and no fake reviews or shills posted, it still won't matter. Everyone has a different opinion. I have read posts about how hot someone was and when I opened the ad, I almost threw up at how ugly the provider was. Some will say great body, but they are fat as hell etc. Like everyone else, you just have to sift the best you can and try to make an educated guess.

[SpaGuy21]

All I'm asking is that while it's ok for them to continue to deceive themselves to make it palatable, don't deceive the rest of us in the process by writing a bullshit age in the review.

The hands and neck, people. Look at the hands and neck.

I am always skeptical of the reviews on RM, particularly when it comes to age, looks, cup size, all of it basically. What I typically will do is look at the reviewer's past reviews and look for any MTs I may have also visited with. If you have a visit in common then you have a good gauge on the reliability of that particular reviewer. If there is no MT review in common, maybe cross reference with a different reviewer who is more reliable. It's a tedious process but you save yourself a drive or disappointment in the long run. And, as always, you can only rely on your own standards.

Side note: Whether it's RM or here, I prefer and wish there was more of a number scale (out of 10), rating system. For example, someone can rate a MT "average" in build / body type. But what does that mean? A 4/10 to 6/10 would constitute average but I would more likely gamble on someone's perceived "6" rather than a "4". Rating rant over, good luck all!

[WalterBlack]

Hey guys, first time posting in the group here but have been in the hobby for a few years. I want to do my part and share my experiences so far.

Most recently I saw Anna at new hope. She had a decent body on her, FS I believe I paid $. 4, on top of door fee $45 for hh. She got right to the business so no BJ to speak of. I liked her squatting cg skills and the Doggie was great. Felt a bit rushed but overall pretty good experience.

Prior to that I had seen Sol at her place. Apt on the north side. Quite a hike from where I live but ohhh man was she worth it. I had seen a prior post describing her, and it was pretty accurate. Face wise she wasn't much to look at but that ass was insane. One of the nicest fat round asses I've had and some nice thick thighs on her. $. 4 for the hh plus and extra $ for fs

FS. If you're into older MILF Latinas with an ass to die for then I'd recommend.

Before that I had visited why spa and got a cute petite Asian (didn't get her name) maybe mid 30's to early 40's. Only got L1 bc I was kinda short on funds but I think I woulda taken the plunge if her price wasn't so high. I think she wanted over $$ for FS.

I've also had some good (and terrible) experiences in the suburbs but I'll probably post in those threads. For my next adventure I'd like to check out AOL, oki and Pacifico. Can anyone give me an estimate on their rates as well as the talent? Alright you guys be cool and stay safe!

[SmileySam]

Reminds me of when everyone was raving about emily the thai at west river spa.

Went there and was greeted by a chubby butterburger well past her prime. Sometimes the hype is not worth it.

Dark lighting, being horny, and a distorted view of reality are not a good mix!

[SideTalker]

Reminds me of when everyone was raving about emily the thai at west river spa.

Went there and was greeted by a chubby butterburger well past her prime. Sometimes the hype is not worth it.

[BenBeck]

If you prioritise cleanness and hygiene, then OD is not the place tovisit. TS smells weird, there is some mold etc.

I once went into the bathroom there at the start of a visit and there was a substantial dookie left in the toilet. It took all I had to convince myself it was one of you bastards who left this steaming gift and didn't flush. Otherwise I would have had no lead in my pencil for the session.

Took me a while to get over that. Still not sure I am entirely recovered.

BB,

Out.

[Walker333]

Yep. Appreciate the honesty. So I'll follow up with one of my own. Naperville Massage on Ogden. Tons of glowing reviews of korean women in their early 30's. So I stopped by after reading a review of Yuki.

Paid the mamasan and asked for Yuki. Out walks a 50 year old frumpy looking lady. I apologized to her and mamasan and said I had to go. Something came up. On the way out, saw the other girl. You guessed it, also 50's. Also frumpy. Mamasan tried a range of bullshit to get me to stay. I kept apologizing and said I have to go. I'll be back. Finally left. Place also reeked of shit and the table cover looked like it hadn't been changed. Nasty.

I don't know if these reviews are fake or if they are legit. But it's to the point now where I won't even take my shoes off unless I get a look.

If you prioritise cleanness and hygiene, then OD is not the place tovisit. TS smells weird, there is some mold etc.

[ApplePiePussy]

Judy looks like a woman in her early or even mid sixties. Moreover, she is short, a bit chubby, and uses a ton of makeup that doesn't make her look younger.

Yep. Appreciate the honesty. So I'll follow up with one of my own. Naperville Massage on Ogden. Tons of glowing reviews of korean women in their early 30's. So I stopped by after reading a review of Yuki.

Paid the mamasan and asked for Yuki. Out walks a 50 year old frumpy looking lady. I apologized to her and mamasan and said I had to go. Something came up. On the way out, saw the other girl. You guessed it, also 50's. Also frumpy. Mamasan tried a range of bullshit to get me to stay. I kept apologizing and said I have to go. I'll be back. Finally left. Place also reeked of shit and the table cover looked like it hadn't been changed. Nasty.

I don't know if these reviews are fake or if they are legit. But it's to the point now where I won't even take my shoes off unless I get a look.

[Ron M]

Still gives the best BBBJ you'll ever experience. Go figure.

They tend to give really awesome BBBJ's. FS isn't on their menu anymore. So they improve on their one remaining attribute, BBBJ.

[Biliator]

Judy looks like a woman in her early or even mid sixties. Moreover, she is short, a bit chubby, and uses a ton of makeup that doesn't make her look younger.

Still gives the best BBBJ you'll ever experience. Go figure.

[Walker333]

I appreciate the sentiment but there's no way any woman, of any race, hell, of any intergalactic alien race, can fool 20 human idiots into thinking she's 30 years younger without them wanting to be deceived. I get it. They already paid for the session, they laid down on the table, and they went through with it knowing full well this woman was born in the 60's because they didn't want have to get up, make the scene awkward, and walk out and go someplace that doesn't employ AARP members. All I'm asking is that while it's ok for them to continue to deceive themselves to make it palatable, don't deceive the rest of us in the process by writing a bullshit age in the review.

The hands and neck, people. Look at the hands and neck.

Judy looks like a woman in her early or even mid sixties. Moreover, she is short, a bit chubby, and uses a ton of makeup that doesn't make her look younger.

[Amplitude]

I appreciate the sentiment but there's no way any woman, of any race, hell, of any intergalactic alien race, can fool 20 human idiots into thinking she's 30 years younger without them wanting to be deceived. I get it. They already paid for the session, they laid down on the table, and they went through with it knowing full well this woman was born in the 60's because they didn't want have to get up, make the scene awkward, and walk out and go someplace that doesn't employ AARP members. All I'm asking is that while it's ok for them to continue to deceive themselves to make it palatable, don't deceive the rest of us in the process by writing a bullshit age in the review.

The hands and neck, people. Look at the hands and neck.

One would think that someone going on 700 posts would know to rely on his own shoe leather. SHAME on these false reports steering you wrong!