Massage Parlor Reports

[Walker333]

I appreciate the sentiment but there's no way any woman, of any race, hell, of any intergalactic alien race, can fool 20 human idiots into thinking she's 30 years younger without them wanting to be deceived. I get it. They already paid for the session, they laid down on the table, and they went through with it knowing full well this woman was born in the 60's because they didn't want have to get up, make the scene awkward, and walk out and go someplace that doesn't employ AARP members. All I'm asking is that while it's ok for them to continue to deceive themselves to make it palatable, don't deceive the rest of us in the process by writing a bullshit age in the review.

The hands and neck, people. Look at the hands and neck.

Judy looks like a woman in her early or even mid sixties. Moreover, she is short, a bit chubby, and uses a ton of makeup that doesn't make her look younger.

[Amplitude]

I appreciate the sentiment but there's no way any woman, of any race, hell, of any intergalactic alien race, can fool 20 human idiots into thinking she's 30 years younger without them wanting to be deceived. I get it. They already paid for the session, they laid down on the table, and they went through with it knowing full well this woman was born in the 60's because they didn't want have to get up, make the scene awkward, and walk out and go someplace that doesn't employ AARP members. All I'm asking is that while it's ok for them to continue to deceive themselves to make it palatable, don't deceive the rest of us in the process by writing a bullshit age in the review.

The hands and neck, people. Look at the hands and neck.

One would think that someone going on 700 posts would know to rely on his own shoe leather. SHAME on these false reports steering you wrong!

[ApplePiePussy]

Pussy, I'm approaching 70 but told I look 40-45 all the time. I've never met Judy. But it doesn't seem as though this is necessarily purposeful misleading reporting. If the girl looks 20-30 years younger than her chronological age then good for her. She certainly wouldn't be the first Asian for sure.

I appreciate the sentiment but there's no way any woman, of any race, hell, of any intergalactic alien race, can fool 20 human idiots into thinking she's 30 years younger without them wanting to be deceived. I get it. They already paid for the session, they laid down on the table, and they went through with it knowing full well this woman was born in the 60's because they didn't want have to get up, make the scene awkward, and walk out and go someplace that doesn't employ AARP members. All I'm asking is that while it's ok for them to continue to deceive themselves to make it palatable, don't deceive the rest of us in the process by writing a bullshit age in the review.

The hands and neck, people. Look at the hands and neck.

[OPIllini]

https://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/2...criminal-court

This certainly isn't good. Hope she's okay. It's guys like this that give us good mongers a bad name.

[DMichaels69]

Three spas that I know of in the suburbs seem to have the same owner as the girls rotate from the one in GlenElynn and Bartlett to the one in Naperville. I've been to all three so it sucks when I went to the one in Naperville and they say "new girl" and the one that walks out is one from Bartlett that I don't like. A lot of the asians look younger that they are so its hard for me to tell how old they are sometimes. The beat goes on, LOL.

I agree 100% with these statements. I have found myself, post-lockdown, traveling further and to more places in search of newer, younger talent. And by younger I mean I'd take early 30's as a win. It seems the new norm is a rotation of old talent bouncing around different MPs and MMS texting with "new girl, young, beautiful" only to find a mid-40's (at best) to 50's MT that you can't place where you saw her last.

Obviously, travel restrictions are hurting the flow of new talent and that's why you are finding these NY transplants popping up here and there. The young talent has probably phased them out of the local game and they're looking to cash in on this starved talent pool we have here in Chicago. I gave up on the apt scene a while back but have seriously considered checking it out again. I have a feeing it's not much better though. Maybe it's time to take a break (yeah right!) The hunt continues!!

[SpaGuy21]

63 is the new 25! LOL.

Its pathetic situation with monger to masseuse ratio. It used to be good in past with each region having some talent so we don't have to drive around. It changed and will need some serious talent inflow.

I agree 100% with these statements. I have found myself, post-lockdown, traveling further and to more places in search of newer, younger talent. And by younger I mean I'd take early 30's as a win. It seems the new norm is a rotation of old talent bouncing around different MPs and MMS texting with "new girl, young, beautiful" only to find a mid-40's (at best) to 50's MT that you can't place where you saw her last.

Obviously, travel restrictions are hurting the flow of new talent and that's why you are finding these NY transplants popping up here and there. The young talent has probably phased them out of the local game and they're looking to cash in on this starved talent pool we have here in Chicago. I gave up on the apt scene a while back but have seriously considered checking it out again. I have a feeing it's not much better though. Maybe it's time to take a break (yeah right!) The hunt continues!!

[Ron M]

Pussy, I'm approaching 70 but told I look 40-45 all the time. I've never met Judy. But it doesn't seem as though this is necessarily purposeful misleading reporting. If the girl looks 20-30 years younger than her chronological age then good for her. She certainly wouldn't be the first Asian for sure.

Us Asians tend to look younger than our actual age.

[Jayp80]

I have no problem with her being her age and working. There are plenty of 60,70 and 80 year old mongers who might appreciate her company.

My problem is this:

I'm on RM looking at reviews of OD Judy right now. The last 8 to 10 reviews of her are within the last 18 months. All of them have labeled her as being 36-40. This type of thing is extremely common in Chicago reporting habits. Understand that it makes no difference to me if half the Chicago hobbyist population wants to, essentially, gang bang a senior citizen. All I'm asking is that they make an effort to accurately depict her age, and any provider's age, when they review them. That way people like me don't have to immediately walk out of appointments.

This is a very common problem, people are not able to estimate age or do an ID outside of their own race, there have been a number of studies on this.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11694086/

[Amplitude]

I have no problem with her being her age and working. There are plenty of 60,70 and 80 year old mongers who might appreciate her company.

My problem is this:

I'm on RM looking at reviews of OD Judy right now. The last 8 to 10 reviews of her are within the last 18 months. All of them have labeled her as being 36-40. This type of thing is extremely common in Chicago reporting habits. Understand that it makes no difference to me if half the Chicago hobbyist population wants to, essentially, gang bang a senior citizen. All I'm asking is that they make an effort to accurately depict her age, and any provider's age, when they review them. That way people like me don't have to immediately walk out of appointments.

Pussy, I'm approaching 70 but told I look 40-45 all the time. I've never met Judy. But it doesn't seem as though this is necessarily purposeful misleading reporting. If the girl looks 20-30 years younger than her chronological age then good for her. She certainly wouldn't be the first Asian for sure.

[ApplePiePussy]

Her age is conspicuous, but any age discrimination at work places is against the law.

I have no problem with her being her age and working. There are plenty of 60,70 and 80 year old mongers who might appreciate her company.

My problem is this:

I'm on RM looking at reviews of OD Judy right now. The last 8 to 10 reviews of her are within the last 18 months. All of them have labeled her as being 36-40. This type of thing is extremely common in Chicago reporting habits. Understand that it makes no difference to me if half the Chicago hobbyist population wants to, essentially, gang bang a senior citizen. All I'm asking is that they make an effort to accurately depict her age, and any provider's age, when they review them. That way people like me don't have to immediately walk out of appointments.

[SchlippsBeer]

The problem is you guys all rushed at her. Every time a new report about something great appears, all the mongers rush to see that person and burn them out in less than a week. Especially the lurkers. They see a new report and bum rush to see the person but never report back. She was slammed all last week but we only see one new report. And that report was just to complain about her. Judy said that she usually have 3-4 person a day. Last week all the hours. And so she is overwhelmed by so many people. And also she is cautious of new people. Remember this is the massage section not the escorts. If you just want a BBBJ and FS then you are in the wrong section of the forum. With most reports here we had to build up a rapport with the MT. And for most first timers it is HJ but sometimes it is ss.

And usually Judy takes her time with me. But last week when I went to see her. She shorted me on time and rushed a bit because she had three people after me. And she looks exhausted.

I hadn't considered that (obviously, I know). That does make a bit more sense. I hadn't come in expecting FS, but my typical experience as a first timer is L1 or just a regular massage w / no HE if the place doesn't offer extras. This was a weird middle hence why I was thrown off. I guess there's just more to learn so thanks for the explanation.

[DMichaels69]

That's what they get from lurking. How about trying places out and you just might find what your looking for. Save up the can money people, LOL.

63 is the new 25! LOL.

Age means nothing to those horny folks who take No Risk but benefit from the reviews.

The question one should ask. How many have DFK her knowing what her specialty is?

[Devlin]

I think she turned 63.

63 is the new 25! LOL.

Age means nothing to those horny folks who take No Risk but benefit from the reviews.

The question one should ask. How many have DFK her knowing what her specialty is?

[Walker333]

Eww WTF. This is why I never take reviews here seriously. "Great girl. Beautiful girl" then you show up to a grandma. I bet people have reviewed her on other sites as being in her 40's. Fuck me, NYC has endless 20 year old pussy and here people are fucking 63 year olds.

Her age is conspicuous, but any age discrimination at work places is against the law.

[DWaits]

This person looks familiar but I can't put my finger on it.

https://chicago.rubratings.com/239315

Anyone have an experience? After some initial communication, my TGTBT sense is growing.

I'm usually in Champaign and would be more than happy swap reports.

Thank you.

She looks hot, but others will know best if the ad is using some IG model or porn star. I just wanted to point out the line that "we are real and if we are fake, it is free. " First, how is one woman a "we"? Then, if she is fake and using fake images, why would anyone trust that "they" will provide free service?