Rants and Raves

[HobbyMan51]

We need politicians that put country first ahead of any political parties, right or left wing propaganda and personal ambition. We need more like this.

I wish that was the case here but Manchin's just making it seem like he's putting country first. What he really is doing is putting himself and his family business (which happens to be in the natural gas industry) first. This makes him appear to be a patriot because it puts him at odds with the traitorous lunatics in his own party but bottom line is that he just looking out for himself. He is making them squirm though and the price tag for their wonderful spending bill is coming down from 3. 5 trillion to around 2 trillion at this point and he is at the epicenter of the major infighting now taking place within the Marxist Democratic Party. I'm all for that. The Republicans in the meantime are just the same old do-nothing doofuses they have always been. We will eventually replace them as we will eventually crush the bastards who are actively seeking to turn America into a Marxist totalitarian utopia.

[Bullett64]

We need politicians that put country first ahead of any political parties, right or left wing propaganda and personal ambition. We need more like this.

Its a lovely thought, but I think you are giving too much credit to the power of the President. What we really need is a political party (or even better, two) that shares these ideals. Laws are passed by Congress and until we can get past the current environment of partisanship, the country will not be progressing. This "I'm against it because you are for it" mentality has got to stop.

[ILoveHo]

We need politicians that put country first ahead of any political parties, right or left wing propaganda and personal ambition. We need more like this.

[Sgt Soros]

It's definitely a planned genocide! They want to kill off all the smart people. You have nothing to worry about though, right?

Psst, ask our sex board chief delusion whisperer about that white eclipse he was expecting from the Arizona election audit. Oh wait, it was a big nothing burger from the Ninja dimwits. Their audit shows Biden won the state's largest county by even more votes than the certified results.

The outcome of the GOP-backed recount in Maricopa County, Ariz., which concluded that President Biden won the states largest county by even more votes than the certified results.......

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ger-lead-biden

[RogerOver]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNIj83XNNeE

It's definitely a planned genocide! They want to kill off all the smart people. You have nothing to worry about though, right?

[Aaron Hamlet]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNIj83XNNeE

[RogerOver]

Some would say the entire nation lost when Trump lost. Now we all will suffer, just as the tyrants want. Even you my democratic brother.

Some would. There's only about 30% hardcore drumpfers out there. They're just noisy. It's always sort of head shaking to see someone refer to Biden as a "tyrant" but drumpf? Just a loving old guy that wants to help everyone. LOL.

[Redruger069]

I like one at home, and something to carry around with me. Feel vindicated? Show the damn flag!

Some would say the entire nation lost when Trump lost. Now we all will suffer, just as the tyrants want. Even you my democratic brother.

[RogerOver]

Why feel undermined? Show the damn flag! It'll be flying next to our nation's flag on Veterans Day. Available on Amazon.

I like one at home, and something to carry around with me. Feel vindicated? Show the damn flag!

[Niteluvr]

Some other examples of the armed forces feeling undermined by this administration:

https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army...over-vaccines/

https://www.wnd.com/2021/08/navy-com...curity-threat/

Point #1 on Commander Furman's list above is exactly what I've been talking about with risk assessment. Some people get it.

Why feel undermined? Show the damn flag! It'll be flying next to our nation's flag on Veterans Day. Available on Amazon.

[Aaron Hamlet]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/selling...er-11632338003

One year later, after initially denying the story, Politico now confirms the Hunter Biden laptop story about the Biden family being for sale was authentic, despite the so-called "trusted and credible" sources hailed on here squashing the story and decrying its credibility. This was squashed in the days leading up to the election in order to aid Biden's campaign, something that never would have been done for the other party.

Yet another prime example of why this administration and the main stream media has zero credibility. This is one of the most corrupt administrations in history, and certainly the most inept reporting we've ever had. And people wonder why there are so many conspiracy theories? You reap what you sow.

https://youtu.be/E_h70Q1qA2c?t=55

[RogerOver]

Suck your own dick you queer motherfucker. One day, if I ever meet you, you are fucking toast.

Is "you are fucking toast" quck code for "I really want to suck your dick?" It's difficult to keep up, what with all the shit you say is gonna happen that never does. Maybe someday I'll speak 'Dumbfuck' and be able to understand.

But at any rate, I told you, that's not my thing. Maybe if your sister hits me up, you can watch. But I'm worried she only has one eye from the inbreeding. I'm sure she's chaste though, and only accepting family members.

[HobbyMan51]

The top one. Where his wife decides the world needs to know all about her hubby's principles and sacrifice. Yes, I've been following the story for a few days. It's offered a few eye-roll opportunities for me.

Dude. So you "personally" want to come suck my dick? As much as I love watch qucks like you demean yourselves, I'm not gay like you are. I'll be happy to have a nice BBC guy standing by as a proxy. I understand they enjoy letting christian identity, white, racist turds like you suck their dicks.

Suck your own dick you queer motherfucker. One day, if I ever meet you, you are fucking toast.

[TheRabbit]

You asked for peer-reviewed research, of which I'd already given multiple examples, and I gave you that. You asked for reputable sources, of which I'd already given multiple examples, and I gave you a publication from the NIH site. You know as well as I do the purpose of peer-review is to weed-out false scientific data and premises, and yet you reject what the medical community did not because in your opinion "it's most likely fraudulent". Ok, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it, even if it goes against that of the peer-reviewed community.

The purpose of peer review is to weed out false scientific data and premises. Which is why they weeded out the Elgazzar study. It was withdrawn. The peers reviewed it and found it wanting. It engaged in plagiarization:

A medical student in London, Jack Lawrence, was among the first to identify serious concerns about the paper, leading to the retraction. He first became aware of the Elgazzar preprint when it was assigned to him by one of his lecturers for an assignment that formed part of his master's degree. He found the introduction section of the paper appeared to have been almost entirely plagiarised.

It appeared that the authors had run entire paragraphs from press releases and websites about ivermectin and Covid-19 through a thesaurus to change key words. "Humorously, this led to them changing 'severe acute respiratory syndrome' to 'extreme intense respiratory syndrome' on one occasion," Lawrence said.

The author claims about the study pool did not align with their raw data:

"The authors claimed to have done the study only on 18-80 year olds, but at least three patients in the dataset were under 18," Lawrence said.

"The authors claimed they conducted the study between the 8th of June and 20th of September 2020, however most of the patients who died were admitted into hospital and died before the 8th of June according to the raw data. The data was also terribly formatted, and includes one patient who left hospital on the non-existent date of 31/06/2020. ".

"In their paper, the authors claim that four out of 100 patients died in their standard treatment group for mild and moderate Covid-19," Lawrence said. "According to the original data, the number was 0, the same as the ivermectin treatment group. In their ivermectin treatment group for severe Covid-19, the authors claim two patients died, but the number in their raw data is four. ".

And many of the patients listed were obvious clones of other records:

"The main error is that at least 79 of the patient records are obvious clones of other records," Brown told the Guardian. "It's certainly the hardest to explain away as innocent error, especially since the clones aren't even pure copies. There are signs that they have tried to change one or two fields to make them look more natural. ".

You can find a fuller list of the errors here.

The Elgazzar study was withdrawn after it was rejected by its peers, something that is very rare, as in like 1 out of every 2500 papers thereabouts gets withdrawn.

And without the Elgazzar study, there is zero evidence in favor of ivermectin:

"Because the Elgazzar study is so large, and so massively positive showing a 90% reduction in mortality it hugely skews the evidence in favour of ivermectin," Meyerowitz-Katz said.

"If you remove this one study from the scientific literature, suddenly there are very few positive randomised control trials of ivermectin for Covid-19. Indeed, if you get rid of just this research, most meta-analyses that have found positive results would have their conclusions entirely reversed. ".

Which in turn belies the question. If the Elgazzar study is true, then why has no other study been able to replicate it? Why does every other study on ivermectin, when averaged out, amount to "no effect"? It being such a massive unreplicable outlier would be a topic of concern even if the paper wasn't laden with obvious blatant malfeasance.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/...hical-concerns

https://grftr.news/why-was-a-major-s...ust-retracted/

[RogerOver]

Which one are you talking about? Or did you even bother to read?

The top one. Where his wife decides the world needs to know all about her hubby's principles and sacrifice. Yes, I've been following the story for a few days. It's offered a few eye-roll opportunities for me.

The usual puerile drivel from you. We won't lose forever. You know it too. If I can I will personally make sure you know it.

Dude. So you "personally" want to come suck my dick? As much as I love watch qucks like you demean yourselves, I'm not gay like you are. I'll be happy to have a nice BBC guy standing by as a proxy. I understand they enjoy letting christian identity, white, racist turds like you suck their dicks.