Non Pro's

**Flash Lidar** · 09-20-21 19:27

She's a pretty cool gal. We talked on Google Voice and she wanted to set up a M&G but requires a small gift "for her time and to she her genuine interest". Normally I would pass but she is friggin' hot. Anyone else have the same experience?

**BlackMarketBb** · 09-20-21 14:34

Originally Posted by Fillipino [View Original Post]

I did a search for "sugar daddy blacklist seeking" on Google and the first result was a ****** blog that blacklisted sugar days.

https://sugardaddyblacklist.******.c...baby-blacklist

I mean sure, they could. But imagine the shitshow that is a SD blacklist site. Hard to imagine any info would be reliable. While this isn't an original opinion, it does make sense from my experience with women who sell sex for money.

**Smuma6** · 09-20-21 14:04

Originally Posted by HolderSpace [View Original Post]

I have, and it is all true. Waited 3 hours.

How long ago was this, and was it worth the wait?

**Fillipino** · 09-20-21 12:39

Originally Posted by DrtyHarry [View Original Post]

That would be interesting if they do. The fact that someone mentioned you were "blacklisted" is quiet interesting. I would love to find out more. Has anyone tried creating a SA account as a woman? That would be a good way to know for sure. I am not confident on this. But think I read somewhere that women do not need to pay for membership on that site. Is that correct? So setting up Baby account there would be totally free as long as your profile gets approved?

I did a search for "sugar daddy blacklist seeking" on Google and the first result was a ****** blog that blacklisted sugar days.

https://sugardaddyblacklist.******.c...baby-blacklist

**Original703** · 09-20-21 12:38

Originally Posted by DrtyHarry [View Original Post]

That would be interesting if they do. The fact that someone mentioned you were "blacklisted" is quiet interesting. I would love to find out more. Has anyone tried creating a SA account as a woman? That would be a good way to know for sure. I am not confident on this. But think I read somewhere that women do not need to pay for membership on that site. Is that correct? So setting up Baby account there would be totally free as long as your profile gets approved?

According to its website, sugar babies join for free. SBs are able to send / receive messages regardless of their status: premium or standard. A couple months ago, I tried to set up an SB account. Gave up after 5 minutes. Found some porn instead and masturbated. Perhaps there's somebody more persistent than I.

I kinda find SA to be comparable to strip clubs, in terms of their business model. Pay the cover fee, look at the dancers, and engage with those you like. If you take a dancer to the champagne room, both the dancer and the club get some of your money. The only big difference is that the strippers pay a steep, nightly fee to dance in the club; SBs pay only with their time (and maybe a little money if they want to be "featured" ). Chalk one up for Brandon Wade: he shifted the burden and risk onto the SBs and SDs, saddling the SDs with the heavy financial lifting. BTW, I laugh every time he insists that his is a dating platform and not a sex-for-pay operation.

If I find the time, patience and sufficient curiosity, I'll try again to create an account as an SB, and I'll report back.

**HolderSpace** · 09-20-21 10:33

Originally Posted by Smuma6 [View Original Post]

Anybody fuck this girl recently? I've read good things about performance but bad things about time management, and am curious if that has improved any lately? Wouldn't mind sampling her, but can't deal with bullshit.

I have, and it is all true. Waited 3 hours.

**Smuma6** · 09-20-21 08:17

Anybody fuck this girl recently? I've read good things about performance but bad things about time management, and am curious if that has improved any lately? Wouldn't mind sampling her, but can't deal with bullshit.

**DrtyHarry** · 09-19-21 14:08

Originally Posted by Fillipino [View Original Post]

To be honest I would suspect that there is a similar board for women. Quite frankly I think it's Seattle, all these tech c* and millionaires going about it's just something that makes you want to move to f* Kansas. I only said it's because sugar babies have told me before then I'm " blacklisted" which implies to me that there is a woman's board.

That would be interesting if they do. The fact that someone mentioned you were "blacklisted" is quiet interesting. I would love to find out more. Has anyone tried creating a SA account as a woman? That would be a good way to know for sure. I am not confident on this. But think I read somewhere that women do not need to pay for membership on that site. Is that correct? So setting up Baby account there would be totally free as long as your profile gets approved?

**Twister100** · 09-19-21 13:10

Cherrybomb - SA
https://www.seeking.com/member/10850...5-ed6c14a8435a

Profile pictures are actually of a Lily Bult.
https://twitter.com/lillymaeexo/stat...626757?lang=en
https://www.instagram.com/lilyybult/?hl=en

Sweet baby - SA
https://www.seeking.com/member/fcccdcbe-9a4f-403b-bfa3-fc4018abfbea

Profile pictures are of porn star Katya Clover
https://www.coedcherry.com/models/katya-clover
https://www.instagram.com/katyonok/?hl=en

**Ultimate90** · 09-19-21 02:56

$250 PPM.

Like anyone would believe this.

Originally Posted by Bronco62 [View Original Post]

What was her rate?

**Bronco62** · 09-19-21 02:09

Originally Posted by HolderSpace [View Original Post]

https://www.seeking.com/member/9d0d9...1-6d061e4f9e52

At my end with her, she wants to go on vacations, and gets too demanding, but if you hint at it, everything is open, all bare, not a condom in site. Ensure you use a burner.

What was her rate?

**HolderSpace** · 09-19-21 00:29

https://www.seeking.com/member/9d0d9...1-6d061e4f9e52

At my end with her, she wants to go on vacations, and gets too demanding, but if you hint at it, everything is open, all bare, not a condom in site. Ensure you use a burner.

**HolderSpace** · 09-19-21 00:23

https://www.seeking.com/member/4c19c...a-00b360a41d68

Naughty Girl sends you a text number. Once you text you get a pussy pic, and...surprise, a request to cashapp $20, but still wants to meet.

Pass.

**Fillipino** · 09-18-21 09:37

Originally Posted by MyNickname [View Original Post]

Part of the problem are those youtube and other platform videos where young women tell lies about how easy is to get tons of money from "sugar daddies" just for them to talk or letting them buy them dinner etc.

To be honest I would suspect that there is a similar board for women. Quite frankly I think it's Seattle, all these tech c* and millionaires going about it's just something that makes you want to move to f* Kansas. I only said it's because sugar babies have told me before then I'm " blacklisted" which implies to me that there is a woman's board.

**MyNickname** · 09-18-21 00:55

Part of the problem are those youtube and other platform videos where young women tell lies about how easy is to get tons of money from "sugar daddies" just for them to talk or letting them buy them dinner etc.

Originally Posted by ShadowForce [View Original Post]

Honestly I never used SA that much and used SB instead, though SA has way more options and honestly better odds.

But when I started a few years ago it was a COMPLETELY different ball game. PPMs were easy, meet ups were easy--the whole thing was easy. Now it's so much damn work that I barely even want to do it anymore. It's like the market got flooded, COVID hit, and all the girls wanted to do virtual because they realized they could scam for free.

Pretty crazy how much my experience on these sites has changed in a few years. I also wondered if there was some back channel where they were discussing amongst each other. But there isn't. I created a few different profiles, used different pics and different numbers and nothing seemed to change.

This seems like the new status quo.

Granted, I can still get some stuff arranged, it's just not at all the same ratio of messages as it used to be. Now it seems like 1 in 20 messages I send even get a response. Three years ago it was 1 in 2.