NoVA SugarBabies

[Ernest Ll]

4. Girls who got got into this for OF and never intended on meeting will still not want to meet and attempt to get easy money by scamming people on SB websites.

Either way, once OF does this, I think there will be an influx of girls on these websites, but the need to filter through, verify, and play the game will not change. It will just be a bigger pool of "SBs", whatever their intentions.

Saw this hottie on Tinder that showed up within my 50 mile radius. Added her SC as per her profile, figuring it was just a hook. Total hottie, killer body.

She posted some amazing vids, including one of her getting tooled for a good 10 minutes.

Spent about 10 minutes trading messages -- you subscribe to my OF or SC private feed and Ill consider meeting you. Smelled a rat, asked how close she was to me, she said not far. Tried to get her to be more specific, she obviously googled a map and picked a street and was clear she didn't live here.

Kept pushing me to subscribe, kept sending me her CAshapp link.

Finally told her it didn't make sense to pay for OF when they will shut her down in about a month.

She was adamant. Won't consider meeting unless you pony up.

I told her I'd be in touch on October 2nd and she blocked me!

[GMarts018]

It's a dealbreaker for me.

She looks great IMO. We had chatted a while back but I didn't renew and we lost contact until I went premium again months later. She had held that against me. Maybe she's just getting out tension but I definitely hit a sore spot. We never actually met so I'm sure the guys who have can offer more advice here but I'll just add my 2 cents here that she can definitely hold a grudge. For me, the no strings attached thing means live and let live. Both SB and SD have lives outside the hobby. Not sure if anyone has experienced this, but it's here for you when making her a consideration.

[ProCatHunter]

Looks like daddyslilbunny is back. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's experience lilbunny. Always a great experience with reasonable expectations.

https://www.seeking.com/member/bc156...d-a36bc4149f0e

It's a dealbreaker for me.

[Vanillagorilla]

I do not get it. On two occasions I have had multiple day texts back and forth with SB's and had one no show and the other ask for $60 two hours before meeting. Is this the norm for everyone? Expectations, finances and pictures are shown early in the conversations. Texting multiple times a day to make them feel comfortable and then the meet falls apart. I had one lady confirm with me the night before and the morning of and she didn't show up. Literally texted me she was on her way then no showed. She just disappeared. I assume that one was her being nervous. The second one asked for a asked for $60 two hours before the meetup time. She apparently expects to get paid for the meet and greet but wasn't upfront about it and we texted back and for for days. For $60 it cannot be worth her time to put in that much effort, can it? If I texted a picture of me late in the conversation and I had an eye patch and a hook I could understand but the amount of time put in on texting back and forth to not show is hard for me to comprehend. References are made to local places so I do not think these ladies are in the middle of no where and care about minimal amounts of money.

If anyone has any insight I would love to hear it. I am off SA as of today but still would love to know.

[FogHorn1]

I may see this 23 year old in Arlington tomorrow. Anyone have any reports?

Nice tits and legs.

https://www.seeking.com/member/607e4...d-d48fdadb0a38

Please report back if you do, or pm me. I reached out as well nut haven't connected yet. Good luck!

She's back with a new profile.

https://www.seeking.com/member/24b56...6-37a8689419c5

Same screen name, and not sure if she's still looking for 3 k monthly with only CFS unless you actually go with her to the clinic and get tested. LOL.

[Vanillagorilla]

I was just wondering if anyone cares to share Annajes Snapchat or Instagram? My SA account is expiring today and she has being offline for the past 10 days or so. Obviously I would gladly take her number but I know sharing numbers is a touchy subject to some and I haven't had much info to share. Yes, I have sent her messages but I am sure she gets many, many messages a day.

She has a great ass and I like ass!.

[GMarts018]

I could be wrong but the way I read it really the only thing they're not allowing is explicit sex, right? Like actual intercourse. And maybe oral sex and maybe some masturbation vids if the chic penetrates herself. So idk what the percentage of OF accounts that had that type of content on them was but I'm guessing it's not all that high. So if that is indeed the case then idk how much of an impact it'll have on these girls business, but I'm guessing not that much.

I think it's pretty high. I've actually paid for a few local women I had met. Off the top of my head I can count 6. It was a way of me continuing to support them and keep that line of communication alive without just sending them something for nothing. I'm talking like $10 a month type of subscriptions here. 6/6 all had full lengths full blown. I imagine there are a lot less men willing to pay for it if that was the expectation and it's now that content is suddenly gone. Perhaps I'm wrong? I have to imagine OF its trying to find a way to work around the issue. That's a lot of dough to lose for a company.

[FogHorn1]

I could be wrong but the way I read it really the only thing they're not allowing is explicit sex, right? Like actual intercourse. And maybe oral sex and maybe some masturbation vids if the chic penetrates herself. So idk what the percentage of OF accounts that had that type of content on them was but I'm guessing it's not all that high. So if that is indeed the case then idk how much of an impact it'll have on these girls business, but I'm guessing not that much.

OF hasn't yet defined what will be explicit and banned. Like Dimples, I suspect they will still allow solo nudes, etc. I think it's the outright porn and chicks getting banged out that will probably get tailored a little bit.

[FogHorn1]

Looks like daddyslilbunny is back. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's experience lilbunny. Always a great experience with reasonable expectations.

https://www.seeking.com/member/bc156...d-a36bc4149f0e

She sounds like a piece of work. Profile states she emotional (I mean they all are but for her to have to warn a dude says a lot) and that condoms are a must.

[Dimples572]

You beat me to this. But I was wondering the same. A lot of these women have been able to stay at home, record videos, and then be a lot more selective when meeting in person. I think the fallout of this will be substantial (if OF doesn't buckle to pressure).

First OF makes 20% of each dollar spent. That's a lot of money to lose, but it my understanding that the reason they are banning explicit material is because the banks and credit companies are threatening pulling support.

That said, I suspect the following:

1. Some SB will come back to seeking etc.

2. Some will miss the money from OF and simply lower their allowance so they have a more steady stream of income.

3. Some still got the GPS and will ask ridiculous amounts.

4. Girls who got got into this for OF and never intended on meeting will still not want to meet and attempt to get easy money by scamming people on SB websites.

Either way, once OF does this, I think there will be an influx of girls on these websites, but the need to filter through, verify, and play the game will not change. It will just be a bigger pool of "SBs", whatever their intentions.

I could be wrong but the way I read it really the only thing they're not allowing is explicit sex, right? Like actual intercourse. And maybe oral sex and maybe some masturbation vids if the chic penetrates herself. So idk what the percentage of OF accounts that had that type of content on them was but I'm guessing it's not all that high. So if that is indeed the case then idk how much of an impact it'll have on these girls business, but I'm guessing not that much.

[EasyeOne]

Looks like daddyslilbunny is back. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's experience lilbunny. Always a great experience with reasonable expectations.

https://www.seeking.com/member/bc156...d-a36bc4149f0e

[GMarts018]

This may bring a lot of girls back down to reality.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cne...ng-in-october/

You beat me to this. But I was wondering the same. A lot of these women have been able to stay at home, record videos, and then be a lot more selective when meeting in person. I think the fallout of this will be substantial (if OF doesn't buckle to pressure).

First OF makes 20% of each dollar spent. That's a lot of money to lose, but it my understanding that the reason they are banning explicit material is because the banks and credit companies are threatening pulling support.

That said, I suspect the following:

1. Some SB will come back to seeking etc.

2. Some will miss the money from OF and simply lower their allowance so they have a more steady stream of income.

3. Some still got the GPS and will ask ridiculous amounts.

4. Girls who got got into this for OF and never intended on meeting will still not want to meet and attempt to get easy money by scamming people on SB websites.

Either way, once OF does this, I think there will be an influx of girls on these websites, but the need to filter through, verify, and play the game will not change. It will just be a bigger pool of "SBs", whatever their intentions.

[ProCatHunter]

Yes, I've offered $1 K for sugar adventures before. In NYC, from Dinner to breakfast, with all meals as room service, several snacks in between, and a full menu of pleasures were indulged in. If that works for you, let me know.

Max Ill provide for an allowance is $500, even for the full weekend. After covering meals, room and expenses, total spend can easily breach $1 k. If you were doing all meals as room service, I suspect you probably busted $1. 5 k quickly.

Not hating at all. More power to you if you have it and can spend it like that. I wish I did. In order to get quality SBs I have to differentiate with providing a long term thing or with my winning smile. Frankly though, I'd rather be able to just drop a g instead and have a new girl in the bed each morning.

[ProCatHunter]

https://www.seeking.com/member/f645e...3-5b60db0d7677

Viewed this profile because she's relatively close by, plus the tagline made me think a little bit. Left the site, did other things, played a video game for a bit, came back to a Favorite from her and the following message 6 minutes after the Favorite:

"Didn't get a hi, so I assuming I'm just a "another woman". I mean who wants that? Am I right? BORING (boo me out of this site please)".

I thought only guys got crazy when a woman doesn't pay attention to them on these sites!

This was a fairly direct and pointed reference to something I had in my profile, but have now since changed. Awfully touching of her to think I was talking about her so specifically! I have about a thousand trollish things I'd like to say, but unlike this woman, I'm not 23 anymore, and I know better. Mostly, I just want to tell her this is an exceedingly unproductive use of her time. But, I think I'll just block her.

But after being banned once, it was such a PItA trying to get back on that I now just politely let them know that I really would like to see where things might go, but probably don't have the funds to take care of them in the manner they should be taken care of.

That usually makes them just go away.

I do miss the back and forth with the crazies tho.

[Itfcd]

https://www.seeking.com/member/f645e...3-5b60db0d7677

Viewed this profile because she's relatively close by, plus the tagline made me think a little bit. Left the site, did other things, played a video game for a bit, came back to a Favorite from her and the following message 6 minutes after the Favorite:

"Didn't get a hi, so I assuming I'm just a "another woman". I mean who wants that? Am I right? BORING (boo me out of this site please)".

I thought only guys got crazy when a woman doesn't pay attention to them on these sites!

This was a fairly direct and pointed reference to something I had in my profile, but have now since changed. Awfully touching of her to think I was talking about her so specifically! I have about a thousand trollish things I'd like to say, but unlike this woman, I'm not 23 anymore, and I know better. Mostly, I just want to tell her this is an exceedingly unproductive use of her time. But, I think I'll just block her.