Rants Opinions and Totally Pointless Bullshit

**Elduderino123** · 08-29-21 12:30

Originally Posted by JonnyWanker [View Original Post]

I don't know what's up with these so called "providers" now a-days.

Over the past couple of days, I have messaged 10 different posts and received 2 replies who then went silent when trying to actually set a time to dream.

I've looked over a hundred posts recently where there are a litany "no-go's" listed for me to find the ones I though were worth messaging and then crickets. Chirp, chirp.

Now, what are the no-go's for me you may be wondering.

If she's' seen more time at a buffet than actually taking care of business = no-go. You all have seen these. I'm not trying to yuk your yum but if they can't see their own feet without a mirror and some lifting, that's just not for me.

If her list of NO's out weigh her list of Ok's = no=go. I mean, if their post brags about being friendly and open but then a splurge of "NO This" and I don't do that" and the list goes on and on. Then you are a no go for me. I mean it's ok for you not to be into stuff but damn..

I agree with every point you make, but I'm surprised no one has really figured out what's going on with these women and the seeming inability to connect with us and make a plan for a date. I have no basis in actual evidence regarding this, but it's my feeling that they will take any and all requests to get together and then take the first one to get there. What I mean is 6 or 7 of us will text, get whatever info we need from her, set up the time and date and if another monger gets there before me, boom, he gets the room number, I get the crickets. Supply and demand actually dictates this business model if the ho has the synapses to figure it out. But its not a sustainable model, I don't think. Nor one that creates a good environment. Ultimately we're all going to say the hell with this. Save our money to go elsewhere to play. Then maybe they'll figure it out after the money has dried up.

Anyway, that's my two cents.

**Fretz** · 08-29-21 12:11

Originally Posted by Megatn2 [View Original Post]

I'm not going to pay to fuck a fat chick. Sorry.

Some of the pics on here that folks rave about makes me scratch my head. If I'm buying it it's going to look good to me.

**Veckmn** · 08-29-21 11:15

Originally Posted by Megatn2 [View Original Post]

I'm not going to pay to fuck a fat chick. Sorry.

If we only pay the $30 - $40 that the "BBW's" are worth, they will lower their prices. There other option is to go flip burgers, get taxed on earnings, and net as much in 5 hours as they could make for a qv!

**Megatn2** · 08-29-21 09:30

Originally Posted by NashPilot [View Original Post]

I don't understand what some of these girls on Tryst are thinking. I get BBW has its place, but they are wanting 500 dollars a hour? Right.

I'm not going to pay to fuck a fat chick. Sorry.

**NashPilot** · 08-28-21 17:46

I don't understand what some of these girls on Tryst are thinking. I get BBW has its place, but they are wanting 500 dollars a hour? Right.

**TheRocketeer** · 08-28-21 16:56

Am I missing something? Some of these guys are specifically saying stuff implying they're looking for women, so they're not ALL going gay. Maybe the hobby is turned upside down and we can advertise and have ladies to pay for our company?

LMAO.

**Dbronze** · 08-17-21 16:47

Honestly not sure why they even advertise. If they don't want to waste their time or ours, just put the rates in the ads. Then mongers can self select. Then they won't get all the calls and messages of what's availability and how much, etc. Then maybe they'll actually have time to meet with the GPS paying crowd. Then every body would be happy!! (Ok slight sarcasm).

Originally Posted by JonnyWanker [View Original Post]

I don't know what's up with these so called "providers" now a-days.

Over the past couple of days, I have messaged 10 different posts and received 2 replies who then went silent when trying to actually set a time to dream.

I've looked over a hundred posts recently where there are a litany "no-go's" listed for me to find the ones I though were worth messaging and then crickets. Chirp, chirp.

Now, what are the no-go's for me you may be wondering.

If she's' seen more time at a buffet than actually taking care of business = no-go. You all have seen these. I'm not trying to yuk your yum but if they can't see their own feet without a mirror and some lifting, that's just not for me.

If her list of NO's out weigh her list of Ok's = no=go. I mean, if their post brags about being friendly and open but then a splurge of "NO This" and I don't do that" and the list goes on and on. Then you are a no go for me. I mean it's ok for you not to be into stuff but damn.

If their post / profile is a regurgitation of in-coherent fragments and non-sense = no-go. If they can't string together a few sentences that actually don't make my head hurt and fill out some information (like on STG) then they aren't going to be much fun in person either. I'd rather spend my donation on someone who has a personality and not a mindless dead fish that will probably just lay there anyway.

If they expect someone to provide a complete background check = no-go. I get they want to be safe but I am sure as hell not telling you my real name, location of work, photo I'd, and other information. Are you freaking nuts?

If they want a deposit = no go. Self explanatory here. Just, Hell No. I was born at night, just not last night.

There are more items to my list but I have lost the patience to type them all out right now.

**TheRocketeer** · 08-16-21 17:03

Originally Posted by JonnyWanker [View Original Post]

I don't know what's up with these so called "providers" now a-days.

Over the past couple of days, I have messaged 10 different posts and received 2 replies who then went silent when trying to actually set a time to dream.

I've looked over a hundred posts recently where there are a litany "no-go's" listed for me to find the ones I though were worth messaging and then crickets. Chirp, chirp.

Now, what are the no-go's for me you may be wondering.

If she's' seen more time at a buffet than actually taking care of business = no-go. You all have seen these. I'm not trying to yuk your yum but if they can't see their own feet without a mirror and some lifting, that's just not for me.

If her list of NO's out weigh her list of Ok's = no=go. I mean, if their post brags about being friendly and open but then a splurge of "NO This" and I don't do that" and the list goes on and on. Then you are a no go for me. I mean it's ok for you not to be into stuff but damn.

If their post / profile is a regurgitation of in-coherent fragments and non-sense = no-go. If they can't string together a few sentences that actually don't make my head hurt and fill out some information (like on STG) then they aren't going to be much fun in person either. I'd rather spend my donation on someone who has a personality and not a mindless dead fish that will probably just lay there anyway.

If they expect someone to provide a complete background check = no-go. I get they want to be safe but I am sure as hell not telling you my real name, location of work, photo I'd, and other information. Are you freaking nuts?

If they want a deposit = no go. Self explanatory here. Just, Hell No. I was born at night, just not last night.

There are more items to my list but I have lost the patience to type them all out right now.

The list of NO's get me. It's becoming more and more common seeing girls posting heavy restrictions. Like no BJ.

No, not no BBBJ. No BJ. Yet still charge 150/200.

These also tend to be heavy screeners and whatnot. They have the self-delusion that they're high class when they're anything but.

**JonnyWanker** · 08-16-21 15:51

I don't know what's up with these so called "providers" now a-days.

Over the past couple of days, I have messaged 10 different posts and received 2 replies who then went silent when trying to actually set a time to dream.

I've looked over a hundred posts recently where there are a litany "no-go's" listed for me to find the ones I though were worth messaging and then crickets. Chirp, chirp.

Now, what are the no-go's for me you may be wondering.

If she's' seen more time at a buffet than actually taking care of business = no-go. You all have seen these. I'm not trying to yuk your yum but if they can't see their own feet without a mirror and some lifting, that's just not for me.

If her list of NO's out weigh her list of Ok's = no=go. I mean, if their post brags about being friendly and open but then a splurge of "NO This" and I don't do that" and the list goes on and on. Then you are a no go for me. I mean it's ok for you not to be into stuff but damn.

If their post / profile is a regurgitation of in-coherent fragments and non-sense = no-go. If they can't string together a few sentences that actually don't make my head hurt and fill out some information (like on STG) then they aren't going to be much fun in person either. I'd rather spend my donation on someone who has a personality and not a mindless dead fish that will probably just lay there anyway.

If they expect someone to provide a complete background check = no-go. I get they want to be safe but I am sure as hell not telling you my real name, location of work, photo I'd, and other information. Are you freaking nuts?

If they want a deposit = no go. Self explanatory here. Just, Hell No. I was born at night, just not last night.

There are more items to my list but I have lost the patience to type them all out right now.

**SecretTheLover** · 07-17-21 01:43

Originally Posted by DFK55 [View Original Post]

MODERN FAMILY*Woman claims she lets her husband 'play' with her mum leaving people stunned.

https://www.the-sun.com/lifestyle/32...hter-swingers/

If you go to her ticktock page, you'll find she has several other videos with the same text but different people playing the husband and mom (or "stepmom".

**Cromwell** · 07-17-21 01:14

Originally Posted by TheRocketeer [View Original Post]

I'm seeing those titles pop up a lot.

In my humble opinion, if it's a CBJ, or BBBJ with no catch, it's false advertising.

C'Mon. Now.

Your logic is infallible.

**TheRocketeer** · 07-17-21 00:37

I'm seeing those titles pop up a lot.

In my humble opinion, if it's a CBJ, or BBBJ with no catch, it's false advertising.

C'Mon. Now.

**DFK55** · 07-09-21 15:45

MODERN FAMILY*Woman claims she lets her husband 'play' with her mum leaving people stunned.

https://www.the-sun.com/lifestyle/32...hter-swingers/

**SecretTheLover** · 06-08-21 23:01

Originally Posted by TheRocketeer [View Original Post]

Could anyone explain to me what the deal is with some of these ads with the supposed provider flashing their driver's license?

One of the providers told me that the escort babylon site (or whatever site it was) ensures against underage users by requiring anyone advertising to submit a documentary photo proving identity and birthdate. I would guess that whoever put the ad up mixed up the documentary photo for the site managers and the advertising photos for the ad. Just my guess, because its pretty risky to do intentionally I would think.