News and Media Reports

**Peter Johnson** · 08-22-21 19:17

Originally Posted by JesusPrice [View Original Post]

I'm thinking this will have an effect.

So I'm thinking we'll see discounts and see some faces that have been gone suddenly pop back up. With the old due to popular demand I'm back LOL.

I doubt it will have a major effect, but could have some. It is nice how thee girls may now actually have to do some real work, rather than sitting there naked and having desperate guys throw money at them.

**Androo75** · 08-21-21 08:04

Originally Posted by Ozymandias [View Original Post]

That definitely torches a lot of girls' business plans.

Moreover, now you'll see a bunch of outfits come in to poach the girls and scam them (what can I say, I have a less-than-sunny view of humanity); I suspect it will be hard to replicate OF.

O.

Aye.

And traditional payment pipelines are increasingly looking at the ethics within their own books / relationships with online revenue sources.

Many corporate websites tout their wokeness via ethics, diversity and inclusion pages.

Shareholders in FinTech don’t want dirty money front and center.

I don't see this type of website folding, just moving to crypto.

**Ozymandias** · 08-21-21 01:10

Originally Posted by GoneForGood97 [View Original Post]

https://www.inputmag.com/tech/onlyfa...at-made-it-big

I wonder what effect this will have on the escort / sugar market. I suspect a major portion of the price surge in the recent year have been because a large portion of the good "mid-tier" talent (not your $1000+ high end super models, but $200-$250 GFE market I preferred) could make enough on having an O*lyFans they no longer needed to escort. I'm hoping we'll see the opposite of what happened early in the pandemic, where supply dropped as girls went to digital and demand stayed around the same, to now a flood of providers returning to the market because they can't sell explicit vids on O*lyfans, and pricing drops as competition increases.

That definitely torches a lot of girls' business plans.

Moreover, now you'll see a bunch of outfits come in to poach the girls and scam them (what can I say, I have a less-than-sunny view of humanity); I suspect it will be hard to replicate OF.

O.

**GoneForGood97** · 08-20-21 11:12

Originally Posted by RondaColdSon [View Original Post]

"Starting in October, the company will prohibit creators from posting material with sexually explicit conduct on its website, which many sex workers use to sell fans explicit content. They'll still be allowed to put up nude photos and videos, provided they're consistent with * policy, the company said Thursday. ".

Sounds like nothing will change other than the fact those of who for * will just get lower-quality content. But realistically from the subreddits I've seen with most popular * models have barely nude content anyway making hundreds of thousands a month. All that this changes is they don't have to masturbate / get fucked in front of a camera to compete with other girls that are doing that.

You're right, the "popular models" who do barely nude content won't be affected, but those same girls weren't posting on Eros for sub $300 anyways. I'm specifically talking about the "girls next door" who pre-covid you could get full GFE 1 hr from for $200-$300. Not models, just cute / hot girls who did this because it was easier than a real 9 to 5 or were just adding a little extra to their income to make ends meet. Those girls FLOCKED during the pandemic, and discovered they could make the same or more money for just taking pics, and suddenly all that was left in the market (it felt like) were LC girls / druggies who were 60 QV girls suddenly realizing they could charge more, and the models who always charged $400-$600.

We'll see how it shakes out, another site may just gobble up the people who move away, but I'm hoping it'll drive the "girl next door" girls back to seeing clients.

**Androo75** · 08-20-21 08:26

COVID and a general decline the available choices benched a lot of folks, so vaccines + this development = fantastic news.

**JesusPrice** · 08-19-21 16:27

Originally Posted by GoneForGood97 [View Original Post]

https://www.inputmag.com/tech/onlyfa...at-made-it-big

I wonder what effect this will have on the escort / sugar market. I suspect a major portion of the price surge in the recent year have been because a large portion of the good "mid-tier" talent (not your $1000+ high end super models, but $200-$250 GFE market I preferred) could make enough on having an O*lyFans they no longer needed to escort. I'm hoping we'll see the opposite of what happened early in the pandemic, where supply dropped as girls went to digital and demand stayed around the same, to now a flood of providers returning to the market because they can't sell explicit vids on O*lyfans, and pricing drops as competition increases.

I'm thinking this will have an effect.

So I'm thinking we'll see discounts and see some faces that have been gone suddenly pop back up. With the old due to popular demand I'm back LOL.

**RondaColdSon** · 08-19-21 16:00

Originally Posted by GoneForGood97 [View Original Post]

https://www.inputmag.com/tech/onlyfa...at-made-it-big

I wonder what effect this will have on the escort / sugar market. I suspect a major portion of the price surge in the recent year have been because a large portion of the good "mid-tier" talent (not your $1000+ high end super models, but $200-$250 GFE market I preferred) could make enough on having an O*lyFans they no longer needed to escort. I'm hoping we'll see the opposite of what happened early in the pandemic, where supply dropped as girls went to digital and demand stayed around the same, to now a flood of providers returning to the market because they can't sell explicit vids on O*lyfans, and pricing drops as competition increases.

"Starting in October, the company will prohibit creators from posting material with sexually explicit conduct on its website, which many sex workers use to sell fans explicit content. They'll still be allowed to put up nude photos and videos, provided they're consistent with * policy, the company said Thursday. ".

Sounds like nothing will change other than the fact those of who for * will just get lower-quality content. But realistically from the subreddits I've seen with most popular * models have barely nude content anyway making hundreds of thousands a month. All that this changes is they don't have to masturbate / get fucked in front of a camera to compete with other girls that are doing that.

**GoneForGood97** · 08-19-21 15:30

https://www.inputmag.com/tech/onlyfa...at-made-it-big

I wonder what effect this will have on the escort / sugar market. I suspect a major portion of the price surge in the recent year have been because a large portion of the good "mid-tier" talent (not your $1000+ high end super models, but $200-$250 GFE market I preferred) could make enough on having an O*lyFans they no longer needed to escort. I'm hoping we'll see the opposite of what happened early in the pandemic, where supply dropped as girls went to digital and demand stayed around the same, to now a flood of providers returning to the market because they can't sell explicit vids on O*lyfans, and pricing drops as competition increases.

**Jrody1** · 08-15-21 21:01

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to discourage members from posting information. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

**Jrody1** · 08-15-21 15:07

Originally Posted by Edawg5 [View Original Post]

You certainly can opt out. This only applies to photos stored in iCloud. All you have to do is turn off cloud photo storage. If you want to store your photos in the cloud you can still use a third party app like Amazon photos or Google Photos. But if you are storing your photos in the cloud you are not really worried about privacy anyway, are you?

I don't use the cloud to store my photos. If I get overwhelmed I put it on a SSD I have. I don't use the cloud and I'm aware of it's short comings. Thanks. Many other people use it because Iphones don't contain expandable storage nor will they for performance reasons. SD cards either like them or hate them.

**Edawg5** · 08-11-21 09:07

Originally Posted by Jrody1 [View Original Post]

https://www.theregister.com/2021/08/...csam_scanning/

Everything always start in the name of a good cause and then morphs into something totally different. Example of a country who did this is New Zealand I believe where you can get a 14 k fine for having things their Gov't labels "bad". Won't be using an Apple device any longer now LOL. If something is compared with a hash that is banned it will lead to an investigation of this person / persons. False positives are a thing with AI. You can not opt out of it. So much for "privacy" which is a core company value of Apple.

You certainly can opt out. This only applies to photos stored in iCloud. All you have to do is turn off cloud photo storage. If you want to store your photos in the cloud you can still use a third party app like Amazon photos or Google Photos. But if you are storing your photos in the cloud you are not really worried about privacy anyway, are you?

**Jrody1** · 08-09-21 08:35

https://www.theregister.com/2021/08/...csam_scanning/

Everything always start in the name of a good cause and then morphs into something totally different. Example of a country who did this is New Zealand I believe where you can get a 14 k fine for having things their Gov't labels "bad". Won't be using an Apple device any longer now LOL. If something is compared with a hash that is banned it will lead to an investigation of this person / persons. False positives are a thing with AI. You can not opt out of it. So much for "privacy" which is a core company value of Apple.

**Jrody1** · 08-06-21 14:47

https://news.yahoo.com/gang-members-...150229154.html

"Under the guise of protesting police brutality, members of the Bloods street gang established a perimeter around the Wendy's, with armed rogue members declaring control over the territory "brandishing, pointing and discharging of firearms at citizens and civilians to ensure compliance with their authority in a highly visible manner," according to the arrest warrant for the gang member allegedly responsible for the girl's death. ".

Can't make this shit up. Finally they find the dumbass apart of the dumbass blm group who murdered this 8 year old girl.

**Jrody1** · 08-06-21 14:39

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...lls-death.html

Committed suicided because she felt "lonely". Good job to the dumbass men who paid her via * for content you could find for free online.