Thread: Sugar Daddy Sites
+
Add Report
Results 5,071 to 5,085 of 10931
-
08-11-21 18:01 #5861Senior Member

Posts: 5597Alternative Type of Arrangement. Big Mistake. Just pay her whatever the agreed upon allowance is and let her be responsible for her own shit. That relationship could end tomorrow.
-
08-11-21 00:46 #5860Senior Member

Posts: 7249Way back in the day my law professor for Wills and Trusts class said if it "smells like bullshit" than it is!
Originally Posted by PriscillaM
[View Original Post]
-
08-10-21 23:04 #5859Senior Member

Posts: 39Has anyone verified their account on SA via picture, IG, etc. I guess I ask because if a girl is verified is there a pretty safe bet she's real? Or are they still pretty easy to spoof?
-
08-07-21 16:36 #5858Senior Member

Posts: 541Tbh I would've skipped her profile because of her heading. Read my profile or be blocked.
Originally Posted by HelloYouAre
[View Original Post]
But I hope your have a good time.
-
08-06-21 00:16 #5857Senior Member

Posts: 51Seeking Arrangements
https://www.seeking.com/member/5cea7...b-ca1285684ac8
Anyone have any info or experience with the hottie? We set the ground rules and said she's on bc, and can host overnight 5 benz TGTBT?
I'm usually only in the San Diego sugar bowl But this cutie caught my attention. Any info would be much appreciated.
-
08-05-21 00:22 #5856Senior Member

Posts: 82Snapchat map
Has anyone ever posted a public story on the snapchat map thing hinting at a sugar relationship? Feel like it could hit a few under the radars if you don't get banned instantly.
-
08-04-21 08:24 #5855Senior Member

Posts: 456SD Apps Ban
I had posted that all SD Apps are going to be banned from Google Play store.
Seems like Sept 1, 2021 is the date.
You can still access the sites using web browser, which is actually better.
After being banned from seeking 3 times, I investigated, and found out how much private information is shared and mined by Evil Google.
As long as you do not log in to your google account, and access the website (way more inconvenient then the App), your privacy is maintained.
Yes this means having a burner phone.
But, Seeking is king. We have to bow down, and be oppressed.
Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy
[View Original Post]
-
08-03-21 21:47 #5854Senior Member

Posts: 5597Well I'm a H.S. drop out. But I try to keep up with things the best I can.
Originally Posted by PriscillaM
[View Original Post]
-
08-03-21 16:04 #5853Troll, if you don't put me on ignore then don't complain about what I post

Posts: 2977Ordre of the queef
Yeah, I bet the legal team will be able to differentiate between (a) cityxguide that was shut down due to Fosta / Sesta and the Travel Act because there were ads for women selling pussy at hotel rooms, versus (b) seeking with women selling pussy at hotel rooms, but only after a meeting in a bar at which the parties discuss the eschatological theories of the tenth avatar of vishnu AND which hotel room they are going to fuck at and for how much.
Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy
[View Original Post]
At least I went to law school and know that as they say in Latin "bullshit is bullshit".
-
08-03-21 14:54 #5852Senior Member

Posts: 5597One here, no. But on the seeking blog you will. Let's hope they can weather the PC storm on this topic. I am sure their legal team is all over it.
Originally Posted by RogerOver
[View Original Post]
-
08-03-21 11:08 #5851Senior Member

Posts: 3357That's all fine
But I don't think anyone can deny at this point that SA is simply encouraging financial arrangements for pussy. I can't find any posts on here looking for advice about paying a girl just to hang out and have dinner. That's what is getting them kicked out of the App store.
Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy
[View Original Post]
-
08-02-21 21:11 #5850Senior Member

Posts: 5597In spite of your continued and sometimes funny sarcasm, there are non-pros on seeking. Just target the 18 and 19 year olds ([Deleted by Admin]). While NP's may be few and far between they do exist. Every girl has a first time (taking money for sex), and many choose to do it on seeking. Most do it prior to posting but some don't. Out of about 300 girls I have had two virgins. I will just assume they were NP's. Either way there are many many very low to low mileage pros. Personally I am of the view that whether it's in the form of an agreed upon cash arrangement or the old school, fancy dinner, party favors and then back to the FC. Or worse yet, getting married. It's still pay to play.
Originally Posted by PriscillaM
[View Original Post]
My granny drilled it into my sisters heads "that it's just as easy to fall in love with a rich man as a poor one". They both took that to heart, and both married very socially inept but rich guys. Took them both to the cleaners. Slice and dice it any way you like there is no such thing as free pussy unless you are a bona fide rock star fucking groupies (other possibilities include men in uniform and celebrities). On seeking if you are a cock star, have decent looks and some game you will pay less than the going rate if you make the effort.
-
08-02-21 18:20 #5849Troll, if you don't put me on ignore then don't complain about what I post

Posts: 2977Big Tech
Odd, SD apps are all about dating nonpros. They must be really confused at the app stores and think it is about prostitution.
Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy
[View Original Post]
-
08-02-21 16:04 #5848Senior Member

Posts: 5597I accidently deleted the last post about the SD apps being banned from the app stores. And yes that is going to happening soon.
-
08-02-21 12:31 #5847Senior Member

Posts: 515Very nice from head to foot
Ditto just wanted to add thanks for them not being just foot shots. LOL.
Originally Posted by RogerOver
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote


