Grand Rapids Pugilistic Society

**DjBiker** · 08-03-21 07:29

Since the new post about this sand lake provider I simply put it looked to be another one of you know whos 30 $ hooker that will now charge you guys 150 $ looks like a camper you all going to be in, guess he got to make his cut worth it lmao.

**AdorableRose** · 08-03-21 05:05

Originally Posted by Charlie441 [View Original Post]

Well for so long places didn't analyze it for some odd reason -- probably due to people knowing it was associated with "piss" and not wanting to piss people off. And not from the NIH, but I've read about it back in the day (not going to do research again to look it up & into it), and from two places. One did a test and asked girls who squirt a Ton to come in for assessment. Almost like putting up an ad asking "how much / far can you cum, dude?" and guys coming in to show off their talents like Peter North or something. Anyway, when they come in, they take them by surprise and tell them that they're not going to test them until they fully pee, and the test is Immediately following that. They couldn't find anyone who could hardly squirt anything but a dribble at most -- and the gals tested were like "No, but, but. ".

Another one actually analyzed it. It's not "pee" per se, although YES, it certainly can be included when the gal cums & squirts.

It's (forgive me for forgetting the term) the base fluid in which make pee from their chemical analysis. Kind of like -- it's not Coke, but it's the carbonated water that makes the coke inside the system, that squirts out when you rub the button. And that many had traces of stuff that makes it pee, but not enough to full-on call it straight-up Pee as if they're taking a piss.

Here's the thing, I fully empty my bladder every single time before I fuck, and I am known to squirt pints. Completely soaking beds, and nearly drowning willing participants.

As long as you're hydrated, squirt has almost no flavor, it's sort of sweet. Nothing like the bitter flavor of urine.

**ChastD1959** · 08-01-21 18:08

When a monger complains about a provider's time management skills and then boasts about her not being a clock watcher and getting an hour visit for the price of a hhr, maybe it's not her time management skills that need checking.

**Charlie441** · 07-15-21 02:35

Originally Posted by UtrGuy [View Original Post]

The NIH directly / indirectly funded gain of function research and could take at least partial credit for the creation of covid. So what the actual fuck do they know? If they say it's piss, I say it's lemonade. Science is neat!

Well for so long places didn't analyze it for some odd reason -- probably due to people knowing it was associated with "piss" and not wanting to piss people off. And not from the NIH, but I've read about it back in the day (not going to do research again to look it up & into it), and from two places. One did a test and asked girls who squirt a Ton to come in for assessment. Almost like putting up an ad asking "how much / far can you cum, dude?" and guys coming in to show off their talents like Peter North or something. Anyway, when they come in, they take them by surprise and tell them that they're not going to test them until they fully pee, and the test is Immediately following that. They couldn't find anyone who could hardly squirt anything but a dribble at most -- and the gals tested were like "No, but, but. ".

Another one actually analyzed it. It's not "pee" per se, although YES, it certainly can be included when the gal cums & squirts.

It's (forgive me for forgetting the term) the base fluid in which make pee from their chemical analysis. Kind of like -- it's not Coke, but it's the carbonated water that makes the coke inside the system, that squirts out when you rub the button. And that many had traces of stuff that makes it pee, but not enough to full-on call it straight-up Pee as if they're taking a piss.

**Gene2** · 07-13-21 22:02

Hey Purp.

I moved the response over here. Where the big boys play. (And girls. When AR goes after private parts).

Methinks he doth protest too much.

I just don't believe you man. Every other poster has been positive and you come along and accuse Berlin of lying. Of course you've tried to dance out of that accusation but we saw it.

And how badly did you fail math and economics? Here's the price chart you chose from:

30 minutes. $110.

45 minutes. $150.

60 minutes. $180.

90 minutes. $290.

Who in their right mind chooses 90 minutes, which doesn't add any extra flavors to the treat? Yup.

I know we're not all the brightest here. But c'mon clearly Brits website had the wrong step up cost from 60 to 90 minutes. And clearly no one was a dullard enough to book the 90 minutes. Until. Yup.

So far more than half of your posts have been about the horrible gyp deal you got from Berlin. So who's obsessed, dude? Yup.

G2.

**UtrGuy** · 07-12-21 19:07

Originally Posted by NWMich [View Original Post]

Nah. You basically said science was open to your own assessment.

Hahaha, you are mad about my joke? You really are a triggered child.

**NWMich** · 07-12-21 19:03

Originally Posted by UtrGuy [View Original Post]

I'm not sure what your problem is but I was just pointing out that per our government, there is a probability it leaked out of a lab where we are certain gain of function research was happening. A lab that we helped fund through the NIH. This is not an attack on your political view point. This happened while both parties were in power. You think I'm crazy for not trusting a government that funded the Tuskegee experiment? Or the time the government poisoned alcohol with methanol to help with enforcing prohibition. You are correct in saying I don't know anything for a fact but neither do you sir. I'd recommend keeping an open mind instead of being a typical cancel culture child.

Nah. You basically said science was open to your own assessment.

**UtrGuy** · 07-12-21 19:00

Originally Posted by NWMich [View Original Post]

You don't know shit for a fact. "Your own research. " Lololol. Your very own conclusion, too.

You define gullible.

I'm not sure what your problem is but I was just pointing out that per our government, there is a probability it leaked out of a lab where we are certain gain of function research was happening. A lab that we helped fund through the NIH. This is not an attack on your political view point. This happened while both parties were in power. You think I'm crazy for not trusting a government that funded the Tuskegee experiment? Or the time the government poisoned alcohol with methanol to help with enforcing prohibition. You are correct in saying I don't know anything for a fact but neither do you sir. I'd recommend keeping an open mind instead of being a typical cancel culture child.

**NWMich** · 07-12-21 17:43

Originally Posted by BetrBatr [View Original Post]

This just past asparagus season, at different times, I served a steak (sizzlers), hash browns, and asparagus dinner to 3 female friends (2 black, 1 white) with at least 1 commonality. The ability to squirt during coitus. Following the dinner, sexual activities commenced. During which all three gals squirted. The squirt was more dank, darker, and odoriferous than usual per the gals and my report.

Anecdotal conclusion: the squirt was piss rich highlighted by the known asparagus side effect.

Fun times post quarantine.

Idle minds in idle times.

LOL. Love the anecdotal conclusion.

**BetrBatr** · 07-12-21 17:13

This just past asparagus season, at different times, I served a steak (sizzlers), hash browns, and asparagus dinner to 3 female friends (2 black, 1 white) with at least 1 commonality. The ability to squirt during coitus. Following the dinner, sexual activities commenced. During which all three gals squirted. The squirt was more dank, darker, and odoriferous than usual per the gals and my report.

Anecdotal conclusion: the squirt was piss rich highlighted by the known asparagus side effect.

Fun times post quarantine.

Idle minds in idle times.

**NWMich** · 07-12-21 16:03

Originally Posted by UtrGuy [View Original Post]

I know for a fact that it's not ignorant. Ignorance is believing something just because the gubment said so. I've done my own research and come up with my own conclusion. It may or may not be correct, that has yet to be completely proven.

Edit: A female squirting is not lemonade... That was an ignorant statement.

You don't know shit for a fact. "Your own research. " Lololol. Your very own conclusion, too.

You define gullible.

**DarkGrey** · 07-12-21 15:52

Originally Posted by NWMich [View Original Post]

LOL. This is laughable.

Ya, it's piss.

**UtrGuy** · 07-12-21 15:15

Originally Posted by NWMich [View Original Post]

No. That's not true at all. That's ignorant.

I know for a fact that it's not ignorant. Ignorance is believing something just because the gubment said so. I've done my own research and come up with my own conclusion. It may or may not be correct, that has yet to be completely proven.

Edit: A female squirting is not lemonade... That was an ignorant statement.

**NWMich** · 07-12-21 14:40

Originally Posted by UtrGuy [View Original Post]

The NIH directly / indirectly funded gain of function research and could take at least partial credit for the creation of covid. So what the actual fuck do they know? If they say it's piss, I say it's lemonade. Science is neat!

No. That's not true at all. That's ignorant.

**UtrGuy** · 07-12-21 14:22

Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]

Not judging, I know people who dig water sports but according to chemical analysis and ultrasound imagery it's piss.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25545022/

The NIH directly / indirectly funded gain of function research and could take at least partial credit for the creation of covid. So what the actual fuck do they know? If they say it's piss, I say it's lemonade. Science is neat!