Escort Reports

[Jimmy 5]

Will be having incalls wed, thurs, and Fri. This week.

I had my bi-weekly appointment with her again and had a great time. And her BJ are out of this world. She is NOT a spinner but a mature 40 year old woman. She is safe, clean, skilled, and dependable. She is not doing this to get her next fix but to support her children.

She is UTR only and you will not be disappointed. PM for details.

What location on which days? Thanks in advance for the information. Hope to see her.

Jimmy:

[TnaHandyAndy]

Please see her again.

This hoe is funny af saying she only does online blah blah she lives on Sumner street. She is a junkie hooker who found some of you guys will just pay her to not meet. She ate my cum and if I ever see her again there will. Be a new video made of me whipping her like a slave on the ship Amistad.

[Member #6985]

Will be having incalls wed, thurs, and Fri. This week.

I had my bi-weekly appointment with her again and had a great time. And her BJ are out of this world. She is NOT a spinner but a mature 40 year old woman. She is safe, clean, skilled, and dependable. She is not doing this to get her next fix but to support her children.

She is UTR only and you will not be disappointed. PM for details.

I've have seen her 3 times, not a spinner but the breasts of a 20 year old, bald clean kitty enjoys Daty, no Greek not my thing anyway and covered, alhough might be negotiable after she knows you.

[KrspyCreem]

Will be having incalls wed, thurs, and Fri. This week.

I had my bi-weekly appointment with her again and had a great time. And her BJ are out of this world. She is NOT a spinner but a mature 40 year old woman. She is safe, clean, skilled, and dependable. She is not doing this to get her next fix but to support her children.

She is UTR only and you will not be disappointed. PM for details.

[JohnBGood1113]

This hoe is funny af saying she only does online blah blah she lives on Sumner street. She is a junkie hooker who found some of you guys will just pay her to not meet. She ate my cum and if I ever see her again there will. Be a new video made of me whipping her like a slave on the ship Amistad.

[JohnBGood1113]

Brother, I am not married either. We are talking about a scenario where LEO can get you only if you are using the text now app AND make an appearance in one of their operations. The point Mopar was trying to make and I agreed with is that the apps will shield you from the hooker drama but LEO can still find out info if they want it. If you walk into their operation you are dead meat as soon as you make the appearance no questions asked. I know this for a fact. Yes its a wrongful arrest, yes it will likely get reduced or dismissed if you said nothing. But the point of their operation is to make arrests and they do not care if its a proper arrest or not. This will continue until someone sues them for it which I bet you that day will come. I'm not worried about any of the legit hookers that I have seen anything coming from the previous interactions either because just like you do, those numbers have long since been burned for me as well and the pigs can't turn the clocks back. Im also not one of those guys that sends messages to every ad i see because the majority of those ads are not legit hookers they are spam or LEO. if i was one of those guys i would be burning my number every other day. The advice was actually for our married friends out there, a burner phone instead of app would be much more safer for them because to an extent and depending on how savvy they are, they can be identified with a burner app. I use fake emails and stuff as well so again, no case possible unless an appearance is made.

The point of the arrest is to embarrass and divorces. Most of the guys are married. That is a fact. Therefore the police can win without an arrest why? Because simply the.

Arrest and the public accusation will male its way to the spouse through the internet and her friends seeing the article which is meant to be quite public. I for one would be smiling. However if I was married probably not so much.

As to the stings there are MANY things to look for when contacting a **** toavoid getting caught. Make the slutty cock sucker take a topless pic and put your name on a piece of paper. If they are a junkie ***** and need a good solid dope fix they will gladly. If they are a girl working with police they can't and won't.

[JohnBGood1113]

Brother, I am not married either. We are talking about a scenario where LEO can get you only if you are using the text now app AND make an appearance in one of their operations. The point Mopar was trying to make and I agreed with is that the apps will shield you from the hooker drama but LEO can still find out info if they want it. If you walk into their operation you are dead meat as soon as you make the appearance no questions asked. I know this for a fact. Yes its a wrongful arrest, yes it will likely get reduced or dismissed if you said nothing. But the point of their operation is to make arrests and they do not care if its a proper arrest or not. This will continue until someone sues them for it which I bet you that day will come. I'm not worried about any of the legit hookers that I have seen anything coming from the previous interactions either because just like you do, those numbers have long since been burned for me as well and the pigs can't turn the clocks back. Im also not one of those guys that sends messages to every ad i see because the majority of those ads are not legit hookers they are spam or LEO. if i was one of those guys i would be burning my number every other day. The advice was actually for our married friends out there, a burner phone instead of app would be much more safer for them because to an extent and depending on how savvy they are, they can be identified with a burner app. I use fake emails and stuff as well so again, no case possible unless an appearance is made.

If you use a text app correctly absolutely nobody can find out anything about you. Clearly if you show up to a sting nothing matters except why are you there LOL.

[Chunks92]

Ok first off. I do not ever talk about sex in a text or on the phone. It is clearly understood. Secondly, I use only texting apps and BTW text now does NOT verify the email account info at all. I have used text now apps over 1,000 times. When it asked for an email to sign up. Dkcjrcic@yahoo.com.

When it asks for a password? Xkdnfkd.

My point is I use the app until I make contact then I delete it and poof I am gone. Suuure they can try to gain a warrant for my phone which they will never get. You people are married so clearly a little bit paranoid. I the infamous Johnbgood1113 is absolutely not married and therefore dgaf anyways. The app is not because I give any fucks about a minor misdemeanor ticket its because of hooker drama. However the texting apps work extremely well to stay anonymous as does the TOR app. Always run it to text the hoe through TOR and short of the CIA getting I valve over your personal date with a hooker which was consensual you are fine! Don't let others make you crazy paranoid.

Brother, I am not married either. We are talking about a scenario where LEO can get you only if you are using the text now app AND make an appearance in one of their operations. The point Mopar was trying to make and I agreed with is that the apps will shield you from the hooker drama but LEO can still find out info if they want it. If you walk into their operation you are dead meat as soon as you make the appearance no questions asked. I know this for a fact. Yes its a wrongful arrest, yes it will likely get reduced or dismissed if you said nothing. But the point of their operation is to make arrests and they do not care if its a proper arrest or not. This will continue until someone sues them for it which I bet you that day will come. I'm not worried about any of the legit hookers that I have seen anything coming from the previous interactions either because just like you do, those numbers have long since been burned for me as well and the pigs can't turn the clocks back. Im also not one of those guys that sends messages to every ad i see because the majority of those ads are not legit hookers they are spam or LEO. if i was one of those guys i would be burning my number every other day. The advice was actually for our married friends out there, a burner phone instead of app would be much more safer for them because to an extent and depending on how savvy they are, they can be identified with a burner app. I use fake emails and stuff as well so again, no case possible unless an appearance is made.

[MoparMan426]

Mopar, I too have a close friend on that side of the law in a different state that actually enforces the hobby much more aggressively then even Ohio. Ohio is still very primitive in their stings in comparison, hard to believe but true. I have brought up the topic to him when were hanging out when I'm in that neck of the woods, and he said to take an escort to dinner and for drinks there is no way in hell would hold up in court. So in person dates are looking like the only sure way of the future. I wouldn't count on any jury being asinine enough to convict someone for dating another adult. I agree though, that with a warrant for the voip number and an appearance however brief at their physical incall sting location, that would be sufficient for at least an arrest if not a conviction depending on what was said in the messages. Remember with these voip numbers though they can also be sent from laptops, etc. So text messages alone would not be enough to prove exactly who sent the messages. Also the contents of the text are important as well. Yes, even if you don't talk about anything, you will be arrested based on speculation solely on what site you were using if an appearance is made. But at this stage in this day and age IF we stumble upon a bad situation what were aiming for is reduced charges or dismissals, which by not talking about anything and pleading the 5th when the cuffs are slapped on you is a definite probability. In the situation I described in Akron the guy was arrested at an address in the middle of the road so not like a residence. So he definitely had to have made an appearance. There is no way there will be phantom citations based on speculation where the text message came from. its the same concept as seeing a woman on the side of the road, does that automatically mean you want to do anything with her? establishing our intent despite what their ad is offering is the key and the only way to shield ourselves. I agree completely about the apps, theyve had a good run, but a burner phone is probably the best route to go in this day and age.

Yes totally agree burner phone is way to go. The other thing on the Texting Apps is while most of us on here using them to really meet girls. A HUGE amount of guys use them to sit at home jacking off making fake appointments with girls. This has major impact on us guys that really meet escorts. This is why you now see so many girls wanting a deposit or some sort of verification as the no show rates are insane right now. These fucking losers can hide behind the text apps & play games. It also effects us real guys in the girls have to schedule these fake appointments & then tell us they are not available.

[JohnBGood1113]

Mopar, I too have a close friend on that side of the law in a different state that actually enforces the hobby much more aggressively then even Ohio. Ohio is still very primitive in their stings in comparison, hard to believe but true. I have brought up the topic to him when were hanging out when I'm in that neck of the woods, and he said to take an escort to dinner and for drinks there is no way in hell would hold up in court. So in person dates are looking like the only sure way of the future. I wouldn't count on any jury being asinine enough to convict someone for dating another adult. I agree though, that with a warrant for the voip number and an appearance however brief at their physical incall sting location, that would be sufficient for at least an arrest if not a conviction depending on what was said in the messages. Remember with these voip numbers though they can also be sent from laptops, etc. So text messages alone would not be enough to prove exactly who sent the messages. Also the contents of the text are important as well. Yes, even if you don't talk about anything, you will be arrested based on speculation solely on what site you were using if an appearance is made. But at this stage in this day and age IF we stumble upon a bad situation what were aiming for is reduced charges or dismissals, which by not talking about anything and pleading the 5th when the cuffs are slapped on you is a definite probability. In the situation I described in Akron the guy was arrested at an address in the middle of the road so not like a residence. So he definitely had to have made an appearance. There is no way there will be phantom citations based on speculation where the text message came from. its the same concept as seeing a woman on the side of the road, does that automatically mean you want to do anything with her? establishing our intent despite what their ad is offering is the key and the only way to shield ourselves. I agree completely about the apps, theyve had a good run, but a burner phone is probably the best route to go in this day and age.

Ok first off. I do not ever talk about sex in a text or on the phone. It is clearly understood. Secondly, I use only texting apps and BTW text now does NOT verify the email account info at all. I have used text now apps over 1,000 times. When it asked for an email to sign up. Dkcjrcic@yahoo.com.

When it asks for a password? Xkdnfkd.

My point is I use the app until I make contact then I delete it and poof I am gone. Suuure they can try to gain a warrant for my phone which they will never get. You people are married so clearly a little bit paranoid. I the infamous Johnbgood1113 is absolutely not married and therefore dgaf anyways. The app is not because I give any fucks about a minor misdemeanor ticket its because of hooker drama. However the texting apps work extremely well to stay anonymous as does the TOR app. Always run it to text the hoe through TOR and short of the CIA getting I valve over your personal date with a hooker which was consensual you are fine! Don't let others make you crazy paranoid.

[JasonDono]

I'm assuming she'shad the baby by now.

What's her body like now? It used to be very nice.

I've seen a several times in the past and only issue was her calling me looking for advances on next appointment or trying to sell photos because she needed money for (insert crisis here) . I wouldn't mind seeing her again had some good times.

Most recent new ad pictures (and attached) are accurate, with some touchups. She has some scar or something on her stomach. Not really sure if it was there before the baby or not since I never saw her before, and it doesn't show on her ads, naturally. But that was really it. She doesn't have a tight, toned, spinner body or anything but she doesn't have a terribly flap of a stomach with stretch marks. Except maybe that scar, maybe that scar is a stretch mark. She was clean, shaved, I didn't smell any odor. I saw her at about 10 am, too, so that could have played a part in it. It might be different at 10:00 pm Or something. Can't say about drug use marks or anything like that because, like I said, for whatever reason I'm absolutely terrible about looking for that kind of stuff.

[Hotrodvfr]

I'm assuming she'shad the baby by now.

What's her body like now? It used to be very nice.

I've seen a several times in the past and only issue was her calling me looking for advances on next appointment or trying to sell photos because she needed money for (insert crisis here) . I wouldn't mind seeing her again had some good times.

Took a chance and saw Chloe this morning.

https://akron-canton.skipthegames.co...r/241398512788

I have never seen her before, and She had all those ripoffs and such but from what I could remember, it was always guys sending a deposit whether for outcall or incall. So, Like. Don't do that.

I did also remember her having a crap incall situation for a while so I was going to see what her location was before committing.

I texted her and she got back to me about a half hour-ish later. Communication had slight delays but maybe 10 minutes each time. Nothing annoying. I was planning on doing incall anyway so a deposit wasn't planned on and was never asked for. She offers bb for 30 extra if you're into that. Otherwise, rates on her ad are what she sticks with. Told her I was doing cashapp and she agreed. Yes, cashapp. Welcome to the 21st century, guys.

Told her I needed to get ready real quick and she stated the same. Texted about half hour later and got her location. Hotel on S Arlington which definitely concerned me. Been a while for me so went anyway. She said she was going to meet me at the side door. When I pulled in, some dude was chilling in his truck. I parked probably 4 spots from him and he moved down to the other end of the lot. At the time I thought it was a dude of hers, but they were probably unrelated, as he was gone when I came out.

She met me at a side door as she said. Seemed cleaned and coherent, dressed in a sun dress, pics were accurate. I can't remember if there were drug reports with her or not. We went to go in and her key card was shut off so she had to go get it reactivated, leaving me there. Which definitely set of the senses. But a few minutes later she came to the door and got me. Went up the stairs and to her room. No one there and bathroom door wide open. She locked the door and put the top swinging lock thing on as well. Got the donation out of the way and we got comfortable. We BS'd while we did. Again, she was nice and seemed coherent. I didn't see any signs of drug use but I'm admittedly not as good at noticing that as some of you guys are. Room was cluttered but basically just lived in. Clothes were folded and off to the side. I always do a qv when I first see someone and this visit was definitely just meant to be a quick thing for me since I had shit to do so hopefully you didn't expect a review if her choking on my dick upside down while I railed her mouth. She started with a BBBJ with was probably like a C+ or -. I've had better. But it got me up and we switched into mish where I finished up. Nothing crazy. Got in, got what I wanted, and left. Said out goodbyes and that was it. YMMV, especially with her past reviews. But I had no issues other than not really caring for her location.

Also she smokes in the room and it was relatively heavy so just in case that causes an issue for you in some way.

[Chunks92]

I have a best friend that is a vice detective in Columbus. There is so much speculation obviously on what they can get you for or what proof they need. They can get you just from your text thread talking about meeting up & saying your coming. They also now record phone calls which is even better in court. At least in Franklin County they have successfully convicted people that way. And as far as using texting apps they are a joke. The Feds are putting heavy pressure on the company's as they know what most are using them for. To avoid any regulations by the Feds these text app company's are now giving LE your personal information associated with your account. All the LE agency has to do is fill out a simple warrant & fax it to the text App service. You can even read about that on Google.

Mopar, I too have a close friend on that side of the law in a different state that actually enforces the hobby much more aggressively then even Ohio. Ohio is still very primitive in their stings in comparison, hard to believe but true. I have brought up the topic to him when were hanging out when I'm in that neck of the woods, and he said to take an escort to dinner and for drinks there is no way in hell would hold up in court. So in person dates are looking like the only sure way of the future. I wouldn't count on any jury being asinine enough to convict someone for dating another adult. I agree though, that with a warrant for the voip number and an appearance however brief at their physical incall sting location, that would be sufficient for at least an arrest if not a conviction depending on what was said in the messages. Remember with these voip numbers though they can also be sent from laptops, etc. So text messages alone would not be enough to prove exactly who sent the messages. Also the contents of the text are important as well. Yes, even if you don't talk about anything, you will be arrested based on speculation solely on what site you were using if an appearance is made. But at this stage in this day and age IF we stumble upon a bad situation what were aiming for is reduced charges or dismissals, which by not talking about anything and pleading the 5th when the cuffs are slapped on you is a definite probability. In the situation I described in Akron the guy was arrested at an address in the middle of the road so not like a residence. So he definitely had to have made an appearance. There is no way there will be phantom citations based on speculation where the text message came from. its the same concept as seeing a woman on the side of the road, does that automatically mean you want to do anything with her? establishing our intent despite what their ad is offering is the key and the only way to shield ourselves. I agree completely about the apps, theyve had a good run, but a burner phone is probably the best route to go in this day and age.

[JasonDono]

Took a chance and saw Chloe this morning.

https://akron-canton.skipthegames.co...r/241398512788

I have never seen her before, and She had all those ripoffs and such but from what I could remember, it was always guys sending a deposit whether for outcall or incall. So, Like. Don't do that.

I did also remember her having a crap incall situation for a while so I was going to see what her location was before committing.

I texted her and she got back to me about a half hour-ish later. Communication had slight delays but maybe 10 minutes each time. Nothing annoying. I was planning on doing incall anyway so a deposit wasn't planned on and was never asked for. She offers bb for 30 extra if you're into that. Otherwise, rates on her ad are what she sticks with. Told her I was doing cashapp and she agreed. Yes, cashapp. Welcome to the 21st century, guys.

Told her I needed to get ready real quick and she stated the same. Texted about half hour later and got her location. Hotel on S Arlington which definitely concerned me. Been a while for me so went anyway. She said she was going to meet me at the side door. When I pulled in, some dude was chilling in his truck. I parked probably 4 spots from him and he moved down to the other end of the lot. At the time I thought it was a dude of hers, but they were probably unrelated, as he was gone when I came out.

She met me at a side door as she said. Seemed cleaned and coherent, dressed in a sun dress, pics were accurate. I can't remember if there were drug reports with her or not. We went to go in and her key card was shut off so she had to go get it reactivated, leaving me there. Which definitely set of the senses. But a few minutes later she came to the door and got me. Went up the stairs and to her room. No one there and bathroom door wide open. She locked the door and put the top swinging lock thing on as well. Got the donation out of the way and we got comfortable. We BS'd while we did. Again, she was nice and seemed coherent. I didn't see any signs of drug use but I'm admittedly not as good at noticing that as some of you guys are. Room was cluttered but basically just lived in. Clothes were folded and off to the side. I always do a qv when I first see someone and this visit was definitely just meant to be a quick thing for me since I had shit to do so hopefully you didn't expect a review if her choking on my dick upside down while I railed her mouth. She started with a BBBJ with was probably like a C+ or -. I've had better. But it got me up and we switched into mish where I finished up. Nothing crazy. Got in, got what I wanted, and left. Said out goodbyes and that was it. YMMV, especially with her past reviews. But I had no issues other than not really caring for her location.

Also she smokes in the room and it was relatively heavy so just in case that causes an issue for you in some way.

[MoparMan426]

My speculation is that the guy got there or drove by and left, they got his plate, and decided that it was sufficient to go track him down by plate. I'm not an attorney obviously and can't say for sure, but this is based off alot of research on case search sites and watching the news when these wrongful busts occur.

I have a best friend that is a vice detective in Columbus. There is so much speculation obviously on what they can get you for or what proof they need. They can get you just from your text thread talking about meeting up & saying your coming. They also now record phone calls which is even better in court. At least in Franklin County they have successfully convicted people that way. And as far as using texting apps they are a joke. The Feds are putting heavy pressure on the company's as they know what most are using them for. To avoid any regulations by the Feds these text app company's are now giving LE your personal information associated with your account. All the LE agency has to do is fill out a simple warrant & fax it to the text App service. You can even read about that on Google.