LA LA Land Bullshit and Fight Club

[BuddhaHead]

Going along with your logic, here's a hot chick: https://www.eros.com/california/los_...427.htm?cat=54.

I've never tried but just wanted to share.

Actually, I have tried this girl. Pics are real.

[BobLove]

Just saw a JAV actress available and thought I would share. You guys take seeing girls way too seriously.

Going along with your logic, here's a hot chick: https://www.eros.com/california/los_...427.htm?cat=54.

I've never tried but just wanted to share.

[BuddhaHead]

Just saw a JAV actress available and thought I would share. You guys take seeing girls way too seriously.

You saw an AD of a JAV actress, not the actual actress. Big difference. I see pictures of Instagram and real models in C-Org ads all the time. Does anyone think they're really there? Who's taking these ads "way too seriously"?

Going on strike for 10 days of no kpussy, in the hopes she'll come back on day 11.

Talk about getting a life. Who is obsessed with some kgirl going on vacation?

[OneADay]

Spot on, seriously even if OneaDay was being genuine with no ulterior motive, almost 1 k for pse with an average looking has-been pornstar. NO thank you! Closer to reality, ain't no c-org has good rep on this board or any other boards for that matter. Sounds like you conveniently provided intel for other to TOFTT instead of doing it yourself, are we suppose to thank you for your great sleuthing work? "I'm not in with them, but I think it's legit. " One has to question your logic but I'll play along, so why don't you send me 600 and I'll try her out, if it's really her I'll give you back your money. You have nothing to lose since you're vouching for their legitimacy. Pm me and I'll send you an email to zelle money over ok?

Just saw a JAV actress available and thought I would share. You guys take seeing girls way too seriously.

[BobLove]

Spot on, seriously even if OneaDay was being genuine with no ulterior motive, almost 1 k for pse with an average looking has-been pornstar. NO thank you! Closer to reality, ain't no c-org has good rep on this board or any other boards for that matter. Sounds like you conveniently provided intel for other to TOFTT instead of doing it yourself, are we suppose to thank you for your great sleuthing work? "I'm not in with them, but I think it's legit. " One has to question your logic but I'll play along, so why don't you send me 600 and I'll try her out, if it's really her I'll give you back your money. You have nothing to lose since you're vouching for their legitimacy. Pm me and I'll send you an email to zelle money over ok?

Oneaday is a lame shill. He admitted in another post that he hasn't even been to that C-org.

[JungleFun]

You "think" it's legit? Based on what? That the other pictures are "legit"? That it's an obscure C-Org (and we "know" C-Orgs all use legit pictures-not.) You haven't used it, so you want someone else to TOFTT? You really think that a JAV actress will come out to a C-Org in LA?

Spot on, seriously even if OneaDay was being genuine with no ulterior motive, almost 1 k for pse with an average looking has-been pornstar. NO thank you! Closer to reality, ain't no c-org has good rep on this board or any other boards for that matter. Sounds like you conveniently provided intel for other to TOFTT instead of doing it yourself, are we suppose to thank you for your great sleuthing work? "I'm not in with them, but I think it's legit. " One has to question your logic but I'll play along, so why don't you send me 600 and I'll try her out, if it's really her I'll give you back your money. You have nothing to lose since you're vouching for their legitimacy. Pm me and I'll send you an email to zelle money over ok?

[Tomatillo]

If they were Korean, most of the mongers here would describe them as being 26. LOL.

[BuddhaHead]

You're referencing 55 and 61 yr old grannies to defend your description of Chanel's looks??

Everyone knows he's delusional and a shill for M's girls. He he has never seen real model material girls and only compares 30-something kgirls as the standard. No one thinks Chanel has a model body except him.

[RocketManP]

We never know why a review is negative but a real clue is when that review is an outlier compared with all the others. Same goes in the opposite direction. Read the reviews and read other reviews of reviewers and you will find the outliers can always be exposed. Don't have to attack reviews just point out the obvious.

Ah so a review is YMMV, but only if its not an outlier.

And if it is an outlier, you feel the need to attack it. Right? You can call it "Pointing out the obvious" or whatever you like, but it is the same attack of a review.

These attacks are designed to protect the girls business and discredit mongers who dare to write negative experiences.

Ahain, make up your mind. Either you believe all reviews are ymmvs and every monger is entitled to their own opinion, including a very negative opinion that is in minority. Because no matter what the opinion it is their experience.

Or you don't believe it at all and think you can attack negative reviews to protect girls business.

[Toungsten]

LOL no, this isn't how it works. You just said that you don't attack anyone's reviews and experiences.

Then don't attack anyone's reviews or experiences. Let it be their own.

Saying someone didn't get something they wanted - which, by the way, no one has knowledge of - and that's why a review is negative, is the SAME attack against a reviewer.

There is no out here nor any excuses to make an attack of a YMMV review. No one gets to pick or choose. Otherwise, it's quite hypocritical. People will always come up with an excuse that someone is attacking a provider when someone is merely providing a negative review.

Either you don't attack others experiences, or you do attack others experiences using whatever excuses you have. It's pretty simple imo..

We never know why a review is negative but a real clue is when that review is an outlier compared with all the others. Same goes in the opposite direction. Read the reviews and read other reviews of reviewers and you will find the outliers can always be exposed. Don't have to attack reviews just point out the obvious.

[FiatVoluptas]

Yes, respecting other people's experiences, especially negative experiences that are criminally underreported, is key.

So I would advise everyone - and I hope you do agree - that the next time they get attacked and blamed for a bad or subpar session, to report posts of people who do the attacking and blaming. As Admin advised. I will also make sure to monitor closely. I've never reported anyone because I don't like snitching but enough is enough.

Here are some examples that I consider an attack on a reviewer: "If anyone thinks she doesn't come close to that level they either were rude and crude in their behavior which never gets good results or probably had a hidden agenda. ".

"I can't believe that any upstanding monger would give her a bad rating for performance".

"A girl who consistently gets 8, 9 and 10
in looks and 9 in performance cannot suddenly become a 6 and 5 to anyone unless there is a hidden agenda. Over 250 reviewers can't be wrong"..

I agree with this, and I think it goes both ways. I have been attacked for leaving good reviews, and I think that is a problem just as much as attacking someone for leaving a bad review. I have been seeing a lot of this happening:

A reviewer has a good experience with a particular girl. One or more other reviewers then attack that reviewer because they didn't have a good experience with said girl, and thus conclude that the positive reviewer is a "shill," is "unreliable," has "poor judgment," etc. This has been going on quite a bit across all of the Asian provider threads.

My advice is if you don't have the same tastes as a particular reviewer, then don't take their suggestions. Either ignore their reviews all together, or use their reviews as a indication of which providers you aren't going to see. It's unproductive and illogical to assume that differing experiences are the result of ulterior motives or a lack of credibility. Mongers and providers are all humans. We are not robots.

[RocketManP]

Let's not forget that attacks on a provider because a monger didn't get what he wanted are the most poisonous of all to the community. How can we differentiate between a legitimate attack and one from spite? The best way is to read the provider's reviews. When we see pages and pages of "great reviews" and one outlier that seems to be about another girl we have our first clue.

LOL no, this isn't how it works. You just said that you don't attack anyone's reviews and experiences.

Then don't attack anyone's reviews or experiences. Let it be their own.

Saying someone didn't get something they wanted - which, by the way, no one has knowledge of - and that's why a review is negative, is the SAME attack against a reviewer.

There is no out here nor any excuses to make an attack of a YMMV review. No one gets to pick or choose. Otherwise, it's quite hypocritical. People will always come up with an excuse that someone is attacking a provider when someone is merely providing a negative review.

Either you don't attack others experiences, or you do attack others experiences using whatever excuses you have. It's pretty simple imo.

Cheers.

[PervySage2018]

Could be a case of burnout. That happens when they are booked solid every day and especially last call of the day. Sometimes this is their clue to slow down a bit. I've seen a few times and each time with great DFK and a superb BBBJ with lots of spit and gagging. Couldn't have been better.

I completely agree, I saw her over the weekend and she was amazing. No upgrade costs either. Pics are real (a little glammed up), beautiful skin, teeth, eyes. She's got a little baby fat on her but no big deal. Great tits, perfect little pussy. Highly skilled with BBBJ with great eye contact. Titty fucked, CG, filled her up with a week's worth with her on the bed on her back and me standing. Super sweet and has lots of personality, great attitude. Def top 5 category for me this year. I did see her early in the day.

[Toungsten]

Yes, respecting other people's experiences, especially negative experiences that are criminally underreported, is key.

So I would advise everyone - and I hope you do agree - that the next time they get attacked and blamed for a bad or subpar session, to report posts of people who do the attacking and blaming. As Admin advised. I will also make sure to monitor closely. I've never reported anyone because I don't like snitching but enough is enough.

Here are some examples that I consider an attack on a reviewer: "If anyone thinks she doesn't come close to that level they either were rude and crude in their behavior which never gets good results or probably had a hidden agenda. ".

"I can't believe that any upstanding monger would give her a bad rating for performance".

"A girl who consistently gets 8, 9 and 10
in looks and 9 in performance cannot suddenly become a 6 and 5 to anyone unless there is a hidden agenda. Over 250 reviewers can't be wrong".

Those quotes directly attack a monger for posting a less-than-stellar review and effectively bullying them and berating their YMMV experiences. Hope everyone is on the same page here, and agrees such attacks are poisonous to the community.

Imo, the more such attacks are reported, the weaker the shill / org grasp of manipulating reviews is.

Thanks.

Let's not forget that attacks on a provider because a monger didn't get what he wanted are the most poisonous of all to the community. How can we differentiate between a legitimate attack and one from spite? The best way is to read the provider's reviews. When we see pages and pages of "great reviews" and one outlier that seems to be about another girl we have our first clue.

[RocketManP]

How can anyone reading a review determine if it is dishonest. It's the personal experience of the reviewer and if you look at this or other review boards you will find varying descriptions of that experience. For example one girl was described as no so good looking while most of her reviews describe her as very good looking, pretty and even beautiful. What you the writer experienced is your experience and yours alone. Others have sometimes a similar experience and at other times a vastly different experience. If you deem their review as a a lie then they can deem yours as a lie one as well. One man's meat is another's poison. What I always did is wait for several reviews and compare them as well as looking at past reviews of the reviewer. If most seem in sync as a good experience that would serve my tastes then I go for it. I don't waste my time attacking others reviews and experiences. I spend my time looking for the good providers. There are some who disagree with the experiences I've had and many others who have thanked me for turning them on to certain girls. YMMV.

Yes, respecting other people's experiences, especially negative experiences that are criminally underreported, is key.

So I would advise everyone - and I hope you do agree - that the next time they get attacked and blamed for a bad or subpar session, to report posts of people who do the attacking and blaming. As Admin advised. I will also make sure to monitor closely. I've never reported anyone because I don't like snitching but enough is enough.

Here are some examples that I consider an attack on a reviewer: "If anyone thinks she doesn't come close to that level they either were rude and crude in their behavior which never gets good results or probably had a hidden agenda. ".

"I can't believe that any upstanding monger would give her a bad rating for performance".

"A girl who consistently gets 8, 9 and 10
in looks and 9 in performance cannot suddenly become a 6 and 5 to anyone unless there is a hidden agenda. Over 250 reviewers can't be wrong".

Those quotes directly attack a monger for posting a less-than-stellar review and effectively bullying them and berating their YMMV experiences. Hope everyone is on the same page here, and agrees such attacks are poisonous to the community.

Imo, the more such attacks are reported, the weaker the shill / org grasp of manipulating reviews is.

Thanks.