Hot Young Asian Girls

[FiatVoluptas]

It appears that Silk at Newasianvibe has been at SAG in the past as Jina / Gina. I believe she is a norcal regular who comes down south from time to time. If it is the same girl, I saw her through SAG back in 2018. Gina's pics are real and she was a HYA, in my opinion. Good service and a bubbly personality. It was a long time ago, so details are a little hazy, but I remember leaving the appointment quite pleased.

https://newasianvibe.is/project/silk/

https://www.sweetasiangem.com/gina

[BonerAppetitty]

Most recent recs by OneADay were Soo-Ah/Sua/Choa and Sue. I haven't seen any girls there recently so can't really recommend. I would TOFTT if they didn't upcharge for BBFS.

Only girls I am clueless about are Jiah and Riah. Most girls there already have reviews on TER or here and some might have been mentioned by me too. I think I saw Sue and Jinnie before at Jewelry and I enjoyed them, especially Jinnie. There is no new HYA candidate there for me at this time.

Hey boner, any recommendations from booker candygirlla for a hya to consider seeing? It seems thar everytime I check their sites, all them "fake or photoshopped" photos are very enticing.

[BonerAppetitty]

I believe same girl but Se-A left TopGirls for OC Princess.Garden as Katie.

Is Topgirl Se-a the same person as P2 G's Katie? They have the same photo but not all the photos are the same. Topgirl asks for 4 refs. If it's the same person I'll just book with P2 G. Thanks.

[SaltWaterLbc]

Does this agency upcharge for BBFS, MSOG and CIP?

They up charge for 2 pops and BBFS. I think the pricing for BBFS and 2 pops was like $400.

[Tirachinitas]

Hey gents, saw two girls so far from Kwapvibe.

Lara: young, mid twenties to late twenties. Skinny body, pics are pretty close to what she looks like. BBBJ no BBFS available for me.

Jackie: not that cute, good looking just not my type. Late twenties possibly early thirties. Not super skinny, a little thicker that Lara. BBFS and BBBJ available.

Both locations I have been two are nice apt buildings. So nothing sketchy and easy to communicate with booker.

Does this agency upcharge for BBFS, MSOG and CIP?

[BobLove]

Hey gents, saw two girls so far from Kwapvibe.

Lara: young, mid twenties to late twenties. Skinny body, pics are pretty close to what she looks like. BBBJ no BBFS available for me.

Jackie: not that cute, good looking just not my type. Late twenties possibly early thirties. Not super skinny, a little thicker that Lara. BBFS and BBBJ available.

Both locations I have been two are nice apt buildings. So nothing sketchy and easy to communicate with booker.

Lara used to offer easy BBFS for 100 tip. I wonder why she stopped offering.

[SaltWaterLbc]

Hey gents, saw two girls so far from Kwapvibe.

Lara: young, mid twenties to late twenties. Skinny body, pics are pretty close to what she looks like. BBBJ no BBFS available for me.

Jackie: not that cute, good looking just not my type. Late twenties possibly early thirties. Not super skinny, a little thicker that Lara. BBFS and BBBJ available.

Both locations I have been two are nice apt buildings. So nothing sketchy and easy to communicate with booker.

[Panda1203]

Saw Joanne is listed on Candygirls and Booker Grey.

Apparently she's really young by how she's hyped. Searched her name it came be key words such as "service bad", "small tits (a or b? "young", "skinny".

It reminds me Angel of ktownkgirls. Service doesn't really matter to me, attitude and skills do.

To me Angel is low service but average / above average attitude.

Tits are fine, natural.

She's really young, she told me she's 23 and she does look like a college girl you would see in Asia.

Some may say she's skinny but to me as an Asian she's thin not skinny yet, however, it's quite personal preference.

All in all, Angel to me is the one I would revisit.

Question is, if you think Angel is Yes to see and you would revisit, what would you call Joanne? Yes go? No go?

I saw Joanne a couple of months ago. She is tall and skinny. Eyes are big. Some have said her eyes looked a little bugged out, but that didn't really bother me. Hair length was around the shoulder and she has two visible tattoos. Service and attitude was okay.

[MrJohnJohn]

Joanne is a cute young looking woman. Her pictures are real and recent. She is fit. She was CFS.

Angel is same and with up charge service.

Saw Joanne is listed on Candygirls and Booker Grey.

Apparently she's really young by how she's hyped. Searched her name it came be key words such as "service bad", "small tits (a or b? "young", "skinny".

It reminds me Angel of ktownkgirls. Service doesn't really matter to me, attitude and skills do.

To me Angel is low service but average / above average attitude.

Tits are fine, natural.

She's really young, she told me she's 23 and she does look like a college girl you would see in Asia.

Some may say she's skinny but to me as an Asian she's thin not skinny yet, however, it's quite personal preference.

All in all, Angel to me is the one I would revisit.

Question is, if you think Angel is Yes to see and you would revisit, what would you call Joanne? Yes go? No go?

[Ggininder]

Saw Joanne is listed on Candygirls and Booker Grey.

Apparently she's really young by how she's hyped. Searched her name it came be key words such as "service bad", "small tits (a or b? "young", "skinny".

It reminds me Angel of ktownkgirls. Service doesn't really matter to me, attitude and skills do.

To me Angel is low service but average / above average attitude.

Tits are fine, natural.

She's really young, she told me she's 23 and she does look like a college girl you would see in Asia.

Some may say she's skinny but to me as an Asian she's thin not skinny yet, however, it's quite personal preference.

All in all, Angel to me is the one I would revisit.

Question is, if you think Angel is Yes to see and you would revisit, what would you call Joanne? Yes go? No go?

[EasyPeasyDong]

I've known her since 2014 ish, and hasn't she always been emotionless?

Yep. Great legs, nice tight pussy, hard to get a smile out of her or any passion.

Hot though.

[JohnHada]

Agreed. Venus can be very mechanic and emotionless. Doesn't even pretend to get excited to see you when you walk in. I still love her LOL.

I've known her since 2014 ish, and hasn't she always been emotionless?

[Mmmmm00]

Finally got to see Elle / Venus today. There was a lot of hype. So my expectations were very high. Probably too high. Physically, yes she's pretty hot. Especially the body. Face is fine. Skin isn't that great and she had some weird dewy looking stuff on that made her face all shiny. Maybe that's a cool style these days, but just looked weird to me. She wasn't as tall as described either. A bit above average for a Korean girl. Fine. But the descriptions made her out to be a model-looking girl. Not quite there.

There was definitely something missing on the service front. I've gotten along with pretty much all the providers I've seen. No matter how hot or not they were. But she is a tough nut to crack. Maybe it was because it was my first time, but to earn repeat business, you have to make a good first impression. Not sure I want to invest seeing her a few more times to find out if she gets better vs some sure things.

BBBJ was nice. Seemed like she really enjoyed it. Kissing was below average for sure. Tits were a bit too fake for me. Overall, very business-like and it got the job done. But nothing compared to the legends of several years ago. And even the legends still working today are still a better overall experience for me. In their prime. They performed like rock-stars. No attitude to crack. Now, they might have a bit saggier tits, and perhaps the butt isn't as tight anymore. But classier, sexier, and they know how to treat you well.

Agreed. Venus can be very mechanic and emotionless. Doesn't even pretend to get excited to see you when you walk in. I still love her LOL.

[DarkSide5]

How would you describe hair now?

Her hair is short and blonde.

[KingsFoil]

Lowering one's expectations is one of the most underrated pro-tips in this hobby.

Use the pictures only for keeping track of girls as they switch bookers and names, and not for trying to figure out what they look like. For the latter, learn the tastes of the reviewers by seeing who they see, and comparing your tastes with theirs so you can accurately triangulate to your own preference.