Escort Reports

**AceChase** · 05-22-21 01:16

Originally Posted by JonH4 [View Original Post]

314-2. -8301 Which one is real?
"I'm available for all kind of sex activities" (pic of a young attractive Asian).

For ads on places like LC, if it's a hot asian girl. It's fake.

**ChocLover** · 05-22-21 00:07

First post, so please excuse any newbie mistakes. Hadn't seen any recent reviews but visited Megan recently. Everything covered but she showed me a toe-curling CBJ is actually within the realm of possibility in a talented mouth. Had to stop her or I'd have blown sooner than I wanted. Not a clock watcher, very into it, all around excellent provider. Will most definitely see her again. And again.

https://escortbabylon.net/posts_list/3149008565/1

**Cybinv1** · 05-21-21 21:57

Originally Posted by JonH4 [View Original Post]

314-2. -8301 Which one is real?

Same phone number but they do not look like each other at all. Many more like this:

Soon they will be asking for 280/ hhr!

"I'm here for you" (pic of girl w / drivers license).

https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/i...r-you/37868976

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ouis/62463248/

"I'm available for all kind of sex activities" (pic of a young attractive Asian).

If they don't give a location, and you don't see every week--then I assume that they are fake / scammers just trying to get a deposit.

**JonH4** · 05-21-21 18:28

314-2. -8301 Which one is real?

Same phone number but they do not look like each other at all. Many more like this:

Soon they will be asking for 280/ hhr!

"I'm here for you" (pic of girl w / drivers license).

https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/i...r-you/37868976

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ouis/62463248/

"I'm available for all kind of sex activities" (pic of a young attractive Asian).

**RogueOne1977** · 05-21-21 14:07

Originally Posted by HolyStone1975 [View Original Post]

This was basically the menu for Ember Simmers when she was providing and she did VERY well for herself for years. If the providers knows what they are doing, you don't always need the full menu. I saw Ember numerous times over the years and she never failed to get two pops out of me every time.

Damn. Well maybe I'm seeing the wrong girls. That sounds worth it.

**Barracuda4** · 05-20-21 14:19

"This was basically the menu for Ember Simmers. " Fair point, but I would argue that she was exceptionally skilled. Not many providers could pull off the same trick.

**HolyStone1975** · 05-20-21 11:56

Originally Posted by RogueOne1977 [View Original Post]

Why do these escorts even work with that many restrictions? What man can possibly enjoy sex with a woman who won't allow anything beyond intercourse. Sounds a like a kids first time getting laid. Lame.

This was basically the menu for Ember Simmers when she was providing and she did VERY well for herself for years. If the providers knows what they are doing, you don't always need the full menu. I saw Ember numerous times over the years and she never failed to get two pops out of me every time.

**HuntingHead** · 05-20-21 02:22

I also saw her some time back. The pics in the ad aren't horrible (definitely creatively angled / altered) but in person it just wasn't good for me. She quite literally looked like she had just woken up. No make-up. Questionable shower status (no smells or anything like that, just could tell by no make-up, hair not done / bed head and the "comfy" clothes going on). She started getting undressed and I wanted to just leave at that point. Tits were not attractive. Body was definitely not attractive. Had it not been for the long drive to st. Charles I would have left. Stayed for a mediocre CBJ. Not memorable in the least. Zero skills. She actually set a phone timer for the qv. Definitely felt like I might as well have just thrown my money out the window on the drive out there. Total waste of time. Basically she writes a good ad but had nothing to back it up with in person.

Originally Posted by Qrout [View Original Post]

If I remember correctly her donation is about 180 for hh. That included CBJ, no daty, no greek, no kissing. She greeted me in her comfy clothes and wore no make up. When the underwear came off she had visible stubble in her nether region. Big surprise. Her body is not as nice as you would think from her pictures. There have been a few posts lately about getting what you pay for. I agree with this. However it works both ways. If you pay above the prevailing rate you should rightfully expect a certain level of service. She does not seem to get that. She is sweet but naive and her donation to service ratio reflects this. Her one upside is she gave a decent (not great) CBJ and seemed willing to do it for how long I wanted within my allotted time. Given all her other downsides this is much to small of an upside for me to repeat.

**RogueOne1977** · 05-20-21 01:33

Originally Posted by JonH4 [View Original Post]

http://www.meetkaydenkarter.com/faq

14) What services I do NOT offer: No DFK, Anal, BBFS, CIM, Stripper Slide, FIV, COF, Massages, FIA.

As of 5/19/21, DATY has been removed from an earlier list. That's an improvement.

Why do these escorts even work with that many restrictions? What man can possibly enjoy sex with a woman who won't allow anything beyond intercourse. Sounds a like a kids first time getting laid. Lame.

**Napster80** · 05-19-21 23:13

Originally Posted by Tdoe2500 [View Original Post]

Has anyone seen this one? I've seen her ad on STG for quite some time and nothing really changes with it. I've searched around here and can't seem to find anything. I've texted back and forth with her a couple of times and so far no obvious signs setting off my scam alarm. I'm thinking about setting something up with her this week.

https://st-louis.skipthegames.com/fe...6/216118211199

If you see her, please report back how the session goes. I've wanted to see her for a long time, but the lack of reviews and her unwillingness to give any indication of what the encounter entails have made me hesitant to pull the trigger. I'm hoping you have a nice experience with her. If she's as attractive as her photos would indicate, she would be a nice addition to the STL monger scene!

**JonH4** · 05-19-21 18:19

Originally Posted by Engr1994 [View Original Post]

One might want to read her website again because it DOES NOT state that.

http://www.meetkaydenkarter.com/faq

14) What services I do NOT offer: No DFK, Anal, BBFS, CIM, Stripper Slide, FIV, COF, Massages, FIA.

As of 5/19/21, DATY has been removed from an earlier list. That's an improvement.

**StLElvis** · 05-19-21 16:49

Originally Posted by Qrout [View Original Post]

I have been on these boards long enough to know that CM has a dedicated following. I have seen her once. She was good but did not knock my socks off like she does for a lot of other dudes. I think Tavia is similar in terms of the barbie body type and their level of GFE service is similar. I see that Tavia has been raising her donation but still asks for less than CM. Also if you are willing to donate what CM asks for you could see even the most GPS level Ana's Angels. Some of the newer Angels in the current line up are insanely hot. For my own preferences I would say hotter than CM.

I went over and perused Ana's lineup. Any recommendations for a guy that prefers they not be heavily tatted up?

**Qrout** · 05-19-21 16:06

Originally Posted by LongballLarry [View Original Post]

Are these two the same lady? Not much recent on here, though some reviews on TER under Christina Marie area code 636, but EROS ad is under Marie area code 314. Pics look great, and thinking about taking a shot next week. Any info?? Thanks!

Lball Larry.

https://www.eros.com/missouri/st_lou...es/4721028.htm

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi....asp?id=271330

I have been on these boards long enough to know that CM has a dedicated following. I have seen her once. She was good but did not knock my socks off like she does for a lot of other dudes. I think Tavia is similar in terms of the barbie body type and their level of GFE service is similar. I see that Tavia has been raising her donation but still asks for less than CM. Also if you are willing to donate what CM asks for you could see even the most GPS level Ana's Angels. Some of the newer Angels in the current line up are insanely hot. For my own preferences I would say hotter than CM.

**Qrout** · 05-19-21 15:53

Originally Posted by Mikey6969 [View Original Post]

Has anyone had any experience with this girl?

https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view...106/3144555568

If I remember correctly her donation is about 180 for hh. That included CBJ, no daty, no greek, no kissing. She greeted me in her comfy clothes and wore no make up. When the underwear came off she had visible stubble in her nether region. Big surprise. Her body is not as nice as you would think from her pictures. There have been a few posts lately about getting what you pay for. I agree with this. However it works both ways. If you pay above the prevailing rate you should rightfully expect a certain level of service. She does not seem to get that. She is sweet but naive and her donation to service ratio reflects this. Her one upside is she gave a decent (not great) CBJ and seemed willing to do it for how long I wanted within my allotted time. Given all her other downsides this is much to small of an upside for me to repeat.