Escort Reports

**HardanFast** · 05-20-21 12:54

Because the original message had no link, I thought you were talking about the Asian Samantha that several of us know, not the nycgirl one you know. The Orange County website, which is down now, used the same photos as CVIP. The TER number for her in OC is 357607 and is still active.

Originally Posted by Rhinopole [View Original Post]

I can't be 100% positive, but here's what I know. When I found her on TER I was able to see some pics and general information available. Today I saw someone who last saw her 12+ years ago posted this website for her: http://www.nycgirl.net. The pics on this website are the same as those I saw on TER. The other thing is that I'd last spoken with her on the phone before COVID-19 hit. I'm sure when I contacted her recently it was the same woman. So my conclusion is that this is really Samantha. And my memory of when I was a TER member and read her full reviews, other guys commented on her age being in the 50 ties. So if she told a guy who posted recently that she's 60, that also fits. The pics of her on http://www.nycgirl.net are old, but IMHO for a GLIF she looks darn good. Then again, I'm in my 70 ties.

Hope this helps.

**Rhinopole** · 05-20-21 10:16

Originally Posted by HardanFast [View Original Post]

I saw her recently right after she returned to the area. I agree about the age, and she has gained about 15 pounds from when she was here several months ago. Also, are you sure you are looking at the right Samantha on TER when you say she is on there? When I checked, I saw no mention of her in this area anymore and the only thing I could find were 3 reviews from a couple of months ago in Irvine, CA (search on Orange County). Interestingly enough, the link to Happy Zone where she worked there is also down with the same message as the one for CVIP. I will grant you that someone may have stolen her pictures and name, but she told me she had recently worked there when I saw her.

I can't be 100% positive, but here's what I know. When I found her on TER I was able to see some pics and general information available. Today I saw someone who last saw her 12+ years ago posted this website for her: http://www.nycgirl.net. The pics on this website are the same as those I saw on TER. The other thing is that I'd last spoken with her on the phone before COVID-19 hit. I'm sure when I contacted her recently it was the same woman. So my conclusion is that this is really Samantha. And my memory of when I was a TER member and read her full reviews, other guys commented on her age being in the 50 ties. So if she told a guy who posted recently that she's 60, that also fits. The pics of her on http://www.nycgirl.net are old, but IMHO for a GLIF she looks darn good. Then again, I'm in my 70 ties.

Hope this helps.

**Navajo101** · 05-20-21 08:09

Originally Posted by Xquisitely4 [View Original Post]

Talk about a blast from the past. I've seen her a few times approx 12+ years ago. Pics have not changed. Link below of her website.

http://www.nycgirl.net

My landscaper has visited a couple of time over the last 2 years. She's a cool gilf. Easy to talk to and good consistent service. Pics are about 20+ years old, but she's upfront about it. He said the price point is consistent with the service. She good in a pinch.

**SexFrustrate23** · 05-20-21 07:32

Originally Posted by PSmith0380 [View Original Post]

Do the pregos allow BBFS?

I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.

**RyanHarvey** · 05-20-21 06:01

Does anyone know what happened to Tyson Girls? I used them twice and now it looks like the site is gone. DM if you prefer that.

**PSmith0380** · 05-19-21 17:18

Originally Posted by BunkerBuster [View Original Post]

Her phone number has no other results, and pix on Eros on not easily searched. She literally showed up out of nowhere with no history. Also, I called and she wants $400/ hour, but could do a half for $250.

Here's another "pregnant Mary" with a different phone number.

https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/b...heart/37262609

Do the pregos allow BBFS?

**Bunker Buster** · 05-19-21 16:50

Originally Posted by SexFrustrate23 [View Original Post]

Anyone have info on her? I definitely want to try this fetish once, don't see it available often.

https://www.eros.com/washington_dc/f...?cat=6208&wn=1

Her phone number has no other results, and pix on Eros on not easily searched. She literally showed up out of nowhere with no history. Also, I called and she wants $400/ hour, but could do a half for $250.

Here's another "pregnant Mary" with a different phone number.

https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/b...heart/37262609

**Djmd1** · 05-19-21 15:03

Originally Posted by Xquisitely4 [View Original Post]

Talk about a blast from the past. I've seen her a few times approx 12+ years ago. Pics have not changed. Link below of her website.

http://www.nycgirl.net

Just spoke with her. Sounds nice. She asked me how old I was and when I told her I'm 35 she was like "you know I'm 60 right? I told her I didn't know but thanked her for the update. She's more GILF age than MILF age to me. I do like Caucasian MILFs but guess there aren't too many here.

**Thors Hammer** · 05-19-21 13:52

Originally Posted by PSmith0380 [View Original Post]

What number is everyone using to book with Sira? The one on TER or the one on the website with the agency?

The # on the agency website is the correct one. The number on TER reviews is outdated.

TH.

**Harley Dude 29** · 05-19-21 10:20

BB.

Thanks for the correction. My old brain got lost in the status of those that replied to the original. With 4 posts, this is even more not credible with this limited cryptic review. It can be heading to a bad outcome for those that tried.

HD29.

Originally Posted by BunkerBuster [View Original Post]

BadPitt only has 4 reviews.

**SexFrustrate23** · 05-19-21 07:51

Anyone have info on her? I definitely want to try this fetish once, don't see it available often.

https://www.eros.com/washington_dc/f...?cat=6208&wn=1

Also I saw Madison last week. I love seeing her. Always a great time, very friendly and aims to please. BBBJ, multiple positions, great DATY, msog.

https://www.eros.com/washington_dc/f...?cat=6208&wn=1

**Cruisin1011** · 05-18-21 22:10

Originally Posted by Mandane [View Original Post]

It's really the first one based on the lack of additional low cost hotels in the area. I you are in the hobby and haven't been to an extended stay type hotel you've really not lived. LOL

Thank you! I am new to the area still learning the lay of the land. I have been to plenty no motel in other area where I lived.

I just found it incredibly odd that 8 out of 9 ladies are staying at the same place.

**Bunker Buster** · 05-18-21 21:55

Originally Posted by HarleyDude29 [View Original Post]

This is the most cryptic review I can recall. Really worse than those that tell lots and then give no links or identifiers. You can read multiple things into this and they can all be right or none of them could be real. Her ad is cryptic and says nothing and then this? Let's call BS and wonder how this comes from a senior member with lots of posts. But WTF does she will do what you can support mean? If I have 500 I could support a lot, but the post doesn't tell me anything.

Then the icing on the cake says "no bed service here". That tells me she is a sham, but is that really what it means. And it being no Hilton would indicate that she is not good quality. Just say it if that's the case. The best part of this post would have been to not post anything. It makes me wonder if this is a LEO setup, given her lack of posts and then cryptic review by a senior member.

Is this the new way of STG setups?

BadPitt only has 4 reviews.

**Xquisitely4** · 05-18-21 21:53

Originally Posted by FreeThrow [View Original Post]

Can you provide the link please.

Talk about a blast from the past. I've seen her a few times approx 12+ years ago. Pics have not changed. Link below of her website.

http://www.nycgirl.net

**Harley Dude 29** · 05-18-21 21:31

This is the most cryptic review I can recall. Really worse than those that tell lots and then give no links or identifiers. You can read multiple things into this and they can all be right or none of them could be real. Her ad is cryptic and says nothing and then this? Let's call BS and wonder how this comes from a senior member with lots of posts. But WTF does she will do what you can support mean? If I have 500 I could support a lot, but the post doesn't tell me anything.

Then the icing on the cake says "no bed service here". That tells me she is a sham, but is that really what it means. And it being no Hilton would indicate that she is not good quality. Just say it if that's the case. The best part of this post would have been to not post anything. It makes me wonder if this is a LEO setup, given her lack of posts and then cryptic review by a senior member.

Is this the new way of STG setups?

Originally Posted by BunkerBuster [View Original Post]

If there's something we should know (eg, needle marks), just come out and say it, rather than dropping puzzles and riddles for us to sort through.