Massage Parlor Reports

**HappyDave** · 04-24-21 09:52

Originally Posted by Scraggy [View Original Post]

I called 1 Main the other day and asked "who is working today" That's my method to avoid asking for someone in particular, being told they're available when that's not the case. With 1 Main, mamasan starting screaming at me about why should I care who's working, etc. Etc. Needless to say I hung up. Then called High St and asked for a specific provider, got told she's available and I should come over. I suggested a time (thought I was making an appointment), she clearly didn't listen or care and just said come over today. Not much confidence I'd have a chance of seeing my particular provider (or the one recommended on this forum.) So, I went to my old standby, 1060, and had the usual good experience but with a small menu.

Main is about the only place I call in advance. Never an issue with Moma. She answers I ask who is working I pick who I want and say when I will be there. If we agree when the girl will be available and I show up on time, that is the girl that greets me upstairs 90% of the time. The rest I just tell the girl who I am there to meet and she gets her. Never had an issue there.

**Kiles** · 04-24-21 00:30

Same old routine getting old and tired as is the provider. Don't waste your money.

**Scraggy** · 04-23-21 16:57

Originally Posted by EasiePeasie [View Original Post]

Ghosted this week by Yuri the travelling Japanese escort so took Jr to dependable AMP. Called to ask who was on. WiWi and Amy, so picked Amy because I had last seen WiWi and wasn't impressed. Amy was taller than average with slim shapely bod, short hair, and engaging eyes, given mask at the start. Asked if I wanted her or hr, which I don't recall being asked there before. Went with hr and got adequate firm massage. Minimal tease but on flip menu was open. She seemed to enjoy 69 as much as me. Clothes and mask off had revealed enhanced chest, bit of extra belly, and attractive face. She said she was friends with JuJu, who I haven't met. Wasn't clear whether JuJu is working there now but Amy said they have worked together for a long time. Would definitely call for Amy again.

After visiting I searched the forum and sure enough, there were reports on Amy and JuJu back in December.

I called 1 Main the other day and asked "who is working today" That's my method to avoid asking for someone in particular, being told they're available when that's not the case. With 1 Main, mamasan starting screaming at me about why should I care who's working, etc. Etc. Needless to say I hung up. Then called High St and asked for a specific provider, got told she's available and I should come over. I suggested a time (thought I was making an appointment), she clearly didn't listen or care and just said come over today. Not much confidence I'd have a chance of seeing my particular provider (or the one recommended on this forum.) So, I went to my old standby, 1060, and had the usual good experience but with a small menu.

**Zombie13** · 04-23-21 16:17

Originally Posted by Dboy111 [View Original Post]

Hey guys, has anybody seen Lucy at 10 colonial in Salem? Are her tits big?

This guy said they're double D's and you're asking if they are big.

**SalamanderFour** · 04-23-21 07:37

Originally Posted by DownWind [View Original Post]

There is no joy to be had at Blue Ocean. I gave it a couple of try's but could only get an okay massage. Last time there was a gentleman doing the massages and I said no thanks, never returned.

Thanks for the report re Ocean Massage in Stoughton. Too bad.

**STDKing** · 04-23-21 06:36

Originally Posted by Longjblues [View Original Post]

It seemed that he was dismissing the charges only against women, not men. Prostitution charges will no longer be prosecuted, but "human trafficking" by johns will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, at least as far as white men are concerned.

And the problem is they've successfully blurred the line between prostitution and trafficking with this tactic (which means you get real time, not a slap on the wrist). It's a bad model: doesn't actually eliminate real trafficking, makes sex workers a lot less safe, and ruins people's lives for paying for consensual sex with an adult (also notice how frequently the journalists covering these stories repeat language that LE intentionally uses to mislead the public (how often have they referred to 45 year old women as 'girls' in the wake of busting some place known to have all middle aged and older masseuses?

**Fafafoohey** · 04-23-21 05:26

This closed down several months ago. Anyone know where Amy from formerly bobo Adams st Newton is at now?

**Dirk Ming** · 04-23-21 00:29

This is nothing new and am not surprised at all. This has been in works for years. This law which am afraid will he adopted by many DAs / SAs is based on Nordic model approach to prostitution. It punishes Johns for buying pussy, but selling pussy itself is legal. This is a wrong direction. Prostitution should be legal for buyer / seller and regulated. Johns will then report human trafficking and minors prostitution to authorities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic...o_prostitution

Originally Posted by JohnDick75 [View Original Post]

Yeah that's not fair at all the men have more to lose than the women as they are already shameless so putting them in a paper isn't as bad as putting the men in a paper as we can lose families and Carrers.

**Inside495** · 04-23-21 00:20

Originally Posted by JohnDick75 [View Original Post]

As always my fellow mongers be careful a spa in revere was busted.

https://wcvb.com/article/woman-arres...y-spa/36108331

I've met her. It's obvious who this is. Eluded scrutiny until now.

**Inside495** · 04-22-21 23:50

Hmm.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/manhattan...185325536.html

It won't work if paying clientele are persecuted. After all in this era of everything woke that would be discriminatory action towards the worker and be denying them a means to make a living.

**KatSuno1492** · 04-22-21 21:58

Originally Posted by Hans68 [View Original Post]

Headed over to cherry lane today to see if I could see lily again according to R.M she has come back, but it wasn't the visit I had hoped for.

While I can't specifically say anything about Cherry Lane or Lily, there are a ton of RM reviews in the region (and in other parts of the country) which are all from fake accounts. If the account is "firstname firstname #" then it's fake. They are all created 1-3 months prior to their first review, are all premium accounts, post reviews about every 4-5 weeks, and do nothing else. They don't comment on other people's reviews, post in forums, etc. Examples include.

Jesus rod 75.

Norman Carlton 61.

Denis Ignatio 39.

Looking at the recent ones on Bangkok Thai in Newton, for instance:

Jarrod Pierre 29.

Alvin Antoine 36.

Emmett Owen 99.

Garry Santiago 83.

Carey Noah 35.

5 out of the last 6 reviews for the past year are from fake accounts.

So I wouldn't trust anything from those accounts. My comments on reviews no longer get through moderation because I've called them out. This all makes me think it's the site admins who are posting these reviews, presumably trying to drive up the value of the site. There are far fewer of these reviews in areas which have a lot of normal reviews.

I've been talking with several other mongers and they're seeing the same pattern, so it's not just me.

**DownWind** · 04-22-21 21:46

Originally Posted by SalamanderFour [View Original Post]

Any info on Blue Ocean Reflexology of 4 Porter St, Stoughton? Right by the train station parking lot, which would make for easy, covert parking.

Stoughton PD has a reputation for being aggressive / unfriendly, so I want to use caution.

https://blueoceanreflexology.wixsite.com/02072

There is no joy to be had at Blue Ocean. I gave it a couple of try's but could only get an okay massage. Last time there was a gentleman doing the massages and I said no thanks, never returned.

**JohnDick75** · 04-22-21 21:09

Originally Posted by AzngrlLuvr [View Original Post]

Yup, that's what I took away from that too. Sounds like in NY they will instead arrest the customer. If you're a white guy, and a john and you get busted they will throw the book at you. We are easy targets in this current climate. I've heard of some places making guys go to 'John' school as part of their community service and punishment to avoid jail time. I've read horrific stories about these John schools that is basically re-education and your automatically perceived as a piece of shit. Another way to demonize, embarrass and humiliate us guys. You couldn't pay me to set foot in NY ever again. Fuck this!

Yeah that's not fair at all the men have more to lose than the women as they are already shameless so putting them in a paper isn't as bad as putting the men in a paper as we can lose families and Carrers.

**Member #6450** · 04-22-21 19:15

Originally Posted by Longjblues [View Original Post]

It seemed that he was dismissing the charges only against women, not men. Prostitution charges will no longer be prosecuted, but "human trafficking" by johns will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, at least as far as white men are concerned.

Yup, that's what I took away from that too. Sounds like in NY they will instead arrest the customer. If you're a white guy, and a john and you get busted they will throw the book at you. We are easy targets in this current climate. I've heard of some places making guys go to 'John' school as part of their community service and punishment to avoid jail time. I've read horrific stories about these John schools that is basically re-education and your automatically perceived as a piece of shit. Another way to demonize, embarrass and humiliate us guys. You couldn't pay me to set foot in NY ever again. Fuck this!

**Longjblues** · 04-22-21 18:37

It seemed that he was dismissing the charges only against women, not men. Prostitution charges will no longer be prosecuted, but "human trafficking" by johns will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, at least as far as white men are concerned.

Originally Posted by FenWay9216 [View Original Post]

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/n...stitution.html