News and Media Reports

**Marko Ramius** · 04-22-21 20:26

Originally Posted by TomaIn [View Original Post]

Just remember, never talk money in person. When you meet up, don't hand them any $$, just set it down somewhere on the floor or table. No verbal acknowledgement. If you don't physically hand them $$ you can pull the defense "I didn't pay for anything". May or may not work but it is about the only work around.

If you get caught at an incall or an MP with a bunch of cash on you or even near you you are pretty much fucked.

This is, for a great many reasons, an inherently risky activity. You can get busted, you can get robbed and beaten half to death, your employer can find out and fire you, your wife can find out and divorce you. The important thing is to never assume you are invincible and to realize that you are always one misstep from disaster. The moral of the story is that men do crazy shit for pussy.

**TomaIn** · 04-22-21 19:30

Originally Posted by Diver6390 [View Original Post]

The woke people of Seattle or NY will never allow it. Johns are seen as victimizers of the poor sex worker. So the woman chooses to do what she likes with her body, that's empowerment. But if you, you misogynistic pig, take her up on it, then you are abusing your maleness. And if you are white, well, then double whammy! In their world, they will position a social worker (because cops are bad) in the doorway of said sex worker, and as soon as you, the client pays her, they will take you to jail.

Just remember, never talk money in person. When you meet up, don't hand them any $$, just set it down somewhere on the floor or table. No verbal acknowledgement. If you don't physically hand them $$ you can pull the defense "I didn't pay for anything". May or may not work but it is about the only work around.

**Diver6390** · 04-22-21 17:30

Originally Posted by TomaIn [View Original Post]

The Seattle Clowncile has been talking about it for a while. Hopefully if they do something like this, they make the entire process legal to include the "Johns" unlike NY proposal.

The woke people of Seattle or NY will never allow it. Johns are seen as victimizers of the poor sex worker. So the woman chooses to do what she likes with her body, that's empowerment. But if you, you misogynistic pig, take her up on it, then you are abusing your maleness. And if you are white, well, then double whammy! In their world, they will position a social worker (because cops are bad) in the doorway of said sex worker, and as soon as you, the client pays her, they will take you to jail.

**TomaIn** · 04-22-21 15:29

Originally Posted by DarkDan [View Original Post]

This is interesting and I wonder if this will ever happen here in Seattle.

https://news.yahoo.com/manhattan-sto...155038135.html

The Seattle Clowncile has been talking about it for a while. Hopefully if they do something like this, they make the entire process legal to include the "Johns" unlike NY proposal.

**PriceIsRight39** · 04-22-21 14:37

Originally Posted by Fnarplep [View Original Post]

A quote from that article: "The office will continue to prosecute other crimes related to prostitution, including patronizing sex workers. . . ".

Unless there's some fancy legal definition of 'patronizing' I don't know about, it sounds like they'll still prosecute johns. While I'm all for the decriminalization of sex work, it probably won't do much if their customers are still criminalized. I can't think of any other market where it's legal to sell something but illegal to buy it. It sounds very progressive but doesn't seem to actually change anything. So, yeah, it sounds very much like something that we might do here in Seattle.

Key word " progressive".

**BBPornoGeek** · 04-22-21 12:24

Originally Posted by Fnarplep [View Original Post]

A quote from that article: "The office will continue to prosecute other crimes related to prostitution, including patronizing sex workers. . . ".

Unless there's some fancy legal definition of 'patronizing' I don't know about, it sounds like they'll still prosecute johns. While I'm all for the decriminalization of sex work, it probably won't do much if their customers are still criminalized. I can't think of any other market where it's legal to sell something but illegal to buy it. It sounds very progressive but doesn't seem to actually change anything. So, yeah, it sounds very much like something that we might do here in Seattle.

Canada is mostly like that.

**Fnarplep** · 04-22-21 12:18

Originally Posted by DarkDan [View Original Post]

This is interesting and I wonder if this will ever happen here in Seattle.

https://news.yahoo.com/manhattan-sto...155038135.html

A quote from that article: "The office will continue to prosecute other crimes related to prostitution, including patronizing sex workers. . . ".

Unless there's some fancy legal definition of 'patronizing' I don't know about, it sounds like they'll still prosecute johns. While I'm all for the decriminalization of sex work, it probably won't do much if their customers are still criminalized. I can't think of any other market where it's legal to sell something but illegal to buy it. It sounds very progressive but doesn't seem to actually change anything. So, yeah, it sounds very much like something that we might do here in Seattle.

**DarkDan** · 04-22-21 00:26

This is interesting and I wonder if this will ever happen here in Seattle.

https://news.yahoo.com/manhattan-sto...155038135.html

**Jimmysixxx7** · 04-13-21 23:41

Will someone quote Marty's post. I'm pretty sure he blocked me and I can't see them. They are always entertaining to read.

**MartyByrde** · 04-13-21 13:04

Saw this morning where the FDA is pausing the use of the J & J vaccine, due to reported blood clots in the brain for some women. I've already received both doses of the Moderna vaccine, but this is disappointing, to say the least. Getting only one dose sure is an attractive method. Hopefully these are very isolated incidents.

**Marko Ramius** · 03-31-21 11:02

Anyone want to be that the good congressman was on one or more arrangement site? Rumors are his girl was on SA.

**Facials** · 03-23-21 00:56

Originally Posted by DrSnatch [View Original Post]

I would love to see a thread for providers who are pimped vs. Indy. I've had more than one experience where the information I got from the person I was text was aligned with the provider's expectations on allowable services. I imagine there are others like me who'd rather not waste time with the pimped.

Most are pimped.

**Ashun** · 03-22-21 19:16

Originally Posted by DrSnatch [View Original Post]

I would love to see a thread for providers who are pimped vs. Indy. I've had more than one experience where the information I got from the person I was text was aligned with the provider's expectations on allowable services. I imagine there are others like me who'd rather not waste time with the pimped.

When I saw Misty, she willingly did the job and when it came time, she went back home. Speaking with her (at least with her) she was using the agency as a way to get more business. But I guess she could have just been saying that as well.

**DrSnatch** · 03-22-21 14:53

Originally Posted by Facials [View Original Post]

Most if not all of the women in Bellevue are pimped / trafficked.

I don't get how they are doing a good job. They need to not worry about the John's and go after the pimps.

I would love to see a thread for providers who are pimped vs. Indy. I've had more than one experience where the information I got from the person I was text was aligned with the provider's expectations on allowable services. I imagine there are others like me who'd rather not waste time with the pimped.

**Facials** · 03-22-21 13:00

Originally Posted by Gamper [View Original Post]

Bellevue did a good job for me not seeing anyone that hosts there. Too big of a risk and seems most providers have moved that way.

Most if not all of the women in Bellevue are pimped / trafficked.

I don't get how they are doing a good job. They need to not worry about the John's and go after the pimps.