Thread: Asian PLEASER Reviews only
+
Add Report
Results 46 to 60 of 64
-
04-18-21 16:49 #19Senior Member

Posts: 339Poppy
She's listed as a SF legend, anyone know her name in the bay area? And if she's worth the time and money?
https://www.sweetasiangem.com/poppy
-
04-13-21 09:37 #18Banned Member

Posts: 119[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!
-
02-11-21 16:28 #17Senior Member

Posts: 141Quite a few of the Redbook AMP forum regs were already pretty old to begin with. Some of the discussion moved over to Nightshift, but I think they've been down a while now too. So, this doesn't surprise me.
Originally Posted by Runon99
[View Original Post]
-
09-21-20 14:02 #16Senior Member

Posts: 355Amy
From asianangels (short time visit)
P: Photoshop used to provide a more petite build. I didn't really see the facial resemblance, but her hair was up during the session.
L: Face - 7/10. Her body is think in the right spots. Not skin and bones. Breasts felt natural. Not a bad body. Soft enough to please (if it wasn't for her hard attitude). Definitely in her thirties.
E: I didn't really stress the convo, but based on her questions and demands of me, I would say she understands enough to negotiate and complain.
A: Demanding (and not in that good dominating the session kind of way).
S: She started the session off telling me to only pay for a half, but made a grab for the full amount anyways. Then told me to take a half hour shower (while trying to joke, the tone didn't really come across as playful). Had her kneel for the oral test, but then was told I was being pushy, so that lasted maybe a 3 minutes (that's including both the position and her complaining). Went with doggy and then prone. She tried to squeeze those kegels, but that didn't last long. Kept complaining how I only had a half hour. Switched to spoon, since I wasn't going to risk an earful of complaints by asking her for CG. Pumped away to the finish line, despite the continuous whining. There was no kissing or co-ed shower. Didn't even get an offer of mouthwash.
E: $. 8.
Are: No. First time I ever felt rushed with this org, even at a half hour (which I rarely do). I don't think an hour session would have been mush different and I get the feeling she would have extended the non-activities as much as possible to waste time.
-
07-12-20 15:47 #15Senior Member

Posts: 185I am wondering where all the T orgs are. C orgs practically shut down at the peak of the shelter in place. But they are slowly coming back throughout the bay area. K orgs have been rotating ladies in the meantime so there hasnt been too many new ladies overall.
-
07-10-20 16:46 #14Senior Member

Posts: 267I absolutely agree. The LA forum is nice and busy, with the occasional update about bay area activities, as well. Would be nice to have an active SF forum, where legit information was available.
Originally Posted by MrJd1986
[View Original Post]
-
06-26-20 19:56 #13Senior Member

Posts: 593There is definitely an active hobby in SF, just no K orgs. Aside from the different types of retail parlors, there are some C orgs with locations near Japantown / Fillmore, SoMa, the newer apartment complexes in Dogpatch / Central Waterfront, among others, and more in SSF / Daly City / San Bruno and more still down in San Mateo / Foster City / etc.
Originally Posted by BadInfluence
[View Original Post]
They advertised on Backpage when that still existed, and most recently could be easily found on CityXGuide, but now that's gone too. I think some of them advertise on AdultSearch -- here's one example:
https://adultsearch.com/california/s...scorts/1175449
There probably are and will be other sites where they advertise, I'm just not yet sure what they are.
-
06-26-20 09:36 #12Senior Member

Posts: 419I'm 100% sure there's still an active hobby in SF, but after several pretty significant shutdowns I haven't found a good source of info either. I think it's probably underground. I know there are C orgs in SF but I've never been able to tap in.
Originally Posted by MrJd1986
[View Original Post]
But re: K orgs, think about the economics of it. San Jose and San Mateo are relatively less expensive places to rent multiple apartments, and the concentration of software engineers with tons of disposable cash is really high. SF is really expensive, and the ads for SF on Eros, Tryst, etc are much higher end girls.
-
06-23-20 15:23 #11Senior Member

Posts: 593The SF Forum has been very low volume for as long as I've been paying attention. A big part of that is that RB was wildly popular in the whole Bay Area and had tons of traffic in the forums and reviews and advertising -- it was the one stop shop for info on AMPs and AAMPS especially.
Originally Posted by MrJd1986
[View Original Post]
When RB was taken down, I think a good chunk of the discussion just died, but there were a couple other sites that picked up some of the slack but were eventually themselves taken down. Now, my superficial impression is that there's been an increase in action on the San Jose forum (not this particular blog, which was a very odd place for you to post your question) but not yet so much in the SF forum. I can't really explain it, maybe there are other sites that I'm not aware of that some of the people have found.
-
06-23-20 11:34 #10Senior Member

Posts: 109Thank you. I guess I'll just stick to visiting San Mateo.
Originally Posted by Runon99
[View Original Post]
I'm a little shocked about how dead the SF forum is.
-
06-22-20 17:08 #9Senior Member

Posts: 593As far as I know, there aren't any K-orgs in San Francisco proper, the closest are down the peninsula in San Mateo / Foster City, and maybe over in Emeryville, not sure if that is still active.
Originally Posted by MrJd1986
[View Original Post]
-
06-22-20 15:52 #8Senior Member

Posts: 109K-orgs in SF
Anyone aware of any k-orgs in SF?
-
06-19-20 18:20 #7Senior Member

Posts: 355Kitty
P: Photoshop used to provide a more petite build, but it is her.
L: Face - 7/10. Her body is thick, but not fat. Very similar to Yuffie, though I would say Yuffie is softer to hold.
E: I didn't really stress the convo, so unable to rate.
A: very friendly and extremely willing to please.
S: started off with some DFK, though in k-girl fashion, it's your tongue in her mouth, not her tongue in yours. I did not really sample the BJ for that long, as the session was DATY followed by my request for the cover and on to multiple positions. Very tight fit. I don't really put much here, since I'm not trying to write a memoir. She definitely was willing for another lap, but alas, work called, so I was unable to follow through. Maybe if I hadn't taken too long with the DATY this time around. She's enthusiastic and willing to please. Definitely took direction well, for those who prefer to be in control. Not sure if she has a routine for those of us who are much more passive.
E: $$. 2.
Are: Possibly as a backup, as I prefer a more petite frame at that height.
-
06-15-20 21:22 #6Senior Member

Posts: 70Of course you can share them in other forums, and if you want to provide links to those reviews you can as well.
Originally Posted by RocketManP
[View Original Post]
This forum is to help others with sharing information on reviewing providers.
-
06-14-20 22:54 #5Banned Member

Posts: 770What's the etiquette for the reviews? Can we share them elsewhere if we drop the review here? Can we share our own from elsewhere? I'm on several different sites and juggling reviews can be annoying af.










Reply With Quote









