Grand Rapids Pugilistic Society

[Benz1]

Moving this where it belongs before I make my comment. Grand Rapids Pugilist Thread.

04-30-21 Gene2 is offline.

Senior Member.

Posts: 158.

Please keep posting BoatGuy1.

Quote Originally Posted by BoatGuy1.

Point noted. I guess I will keep this type of info to myself and use to my sole benefit. Was just trying to help others be careful. Oh well.

No chance I am going to disclose where it came from for their protection as well as mine. Complaint made to township.

Good like Blackfire, we are definately on different pages in this life and thought process. Good luck on your adventures.

I for one, appreciate BoatGuy1 and his reviews and cautions. I believe he's earned a good reputation. Having someone demean his posts as rumors is just plain wrong. If you don't believe him. Just ignore him. But let the rest of us make our own decisions. BoatGuy isn't a white knight and he shares reviews from all sorts of providers and spas. So his only agenda is to share his experiences.

We need more reviews like BoatGuy provides.

Just one man's opinion.

G2.
Benz1 posted opinion....

Not just one mans opinion, my opinion too.

I'll include that there's an obvious childish school boy attempt to challenge members posts by BlackFire and DjBiker.

When is the last time either of them posted an experience with a provider?

All of their posts lately are challenges and arguments.

I challenge all members reading this post to search their past posts and see for themselves.

Neither of them ad any value, just argumentative posts that we could all live without.

[TokyoDawson]

I did the search and nothing came back "dude".

Wow. Not only do we have to tell the newbies that there is info available we have to tell them what keywords to use in the search. Here you go dude: In the forum search bar first you try 'Adorable' then you try 'Rose', then you try 'Adorable Rose'. That gives multiple pages of hits to check and leads to the alternate name she was using before so you can search even deeper if the info was not sufficient to answer your question of 'is she real?

[Gene2]

If you ever had an appointment with Lauren, you would understand why no one would want her confused with London.

I'm trying to help the posts not be misleading or confusing. At this point I believe everyone, except one man, knows the difference between Lauren and London.

I'm out.

Gene.

[CoryDuncan]

You've already said this and I've already pointed out why that doesn't mean anything. If the concept of two women being named Lauren is too much for them to handle (which, I don't even know who 'they' might even be as nobody other than you and BoatGuy1 has even commented on that thread about my report), then that really speaks more to their mental processes than my reported info. I have shown you an example of a senior member providing conflicting information (technically not conflicting, as I don't never affirm that it's the same Lauren) in a noncombative and constructive way. I have explained to you why I stand by my reported info. Yet, you still haven't put forth any evidence, other than your word, for anyone to believe that she continues to go by the name London (if she ever had at all). And on top of all of that, Admin2 has already handed you an L.

But, I'll do you one final courtesy before I have to just accept that you're going to keep doubling down on your own hypocrisy;.

As long as mods are cool with letting it through, I'm posting a screen shot of the short text exchange I had with the provider. Number is redacted, but is the same from the ad I posted, as well as street number but that's not viewable in the ad, just the street name.

Here's your chance. Go ahead and explain to me where I'm supposed to get London out of her telling me, directly, that her "Name is Lauren".

Personally, I appreciate the twitch notification in the upper corner. I hope your picture helps clear everything up for everyone.

[Frank Hider]

I hope my life never gets so pathetic that I start arguing about Vaccines or Politics on a Hooker Info Forum! I feel silly enough just bloviating in the Pugilist Thread!

Arguing or posting irrelevant statements in an informational thread degrades the utility of it, makes it harder to find actual information, and discourages people from visiting and using this site. Also, it violates the rules and guidelines. Plus it is just plain dumb.

[NoseJelly]

I hope my life never gets so pathetic that I start arguing about Vaccines or Politics on a Hooker Info Forum! I feel silly enough just bloviating in the Pugilist Thread!

[RobovDaslav]

Sorry noob. But your post made some readers think you had seen Lauren of Vickie and Issa fame. You didn't. I am simply trying to correct an error you made.

We all make mistakes and others can correct them.

You saw London. She's not one that anyone would ever confuse with Lauren. You'll be fine.

G2.

You've already said this and I've already pointed out why that doesn't mean anything. If the concept of two women being named Lauren is too much for them to handle (which, I don't even know who 'they' might even be as nobody other than you and BoatGuy1 has even commented on that thread about my report), then that really speaks more to their mental processes than my reported info. I have shown you an example of a senior member providing conflicting information (technically not conflicting, as I don't never affirm that it's the same Lauren) in a noncombative and constructive way. I have explained to you why I stand by my reported info. Yet, you still haven't put forth any evidence, other than your word, for anyone to believe that she continues to go by the name London (if she ever had at all). And on top of all of that, Admin2 has already handed you an L.

But, I'll do you one final courtesy before I have to just accept that you're going to keep doubling down on your own hypocrisy;.

As long as mods are cool with letting it through, I'm posting a screen shot of the short text exchange I had with the provider. Number is redacted, but is the same from the ad I posted, as well as street number but that's not viewable in the ad, just the street name.

Here's your chance. Go ahead and explain to me where I'm supposed to get London out of her telling me, directly, that her "Name is Lauren".

[Admin2]

Hey,

We all count on the posts being accurate. Unfortunately your prior post led some here to believe that Lauren was now working out of Byron Center. If you knew your provider London used to work at Pacific, that would clearly make it evident that you did not see Lauren who used to work with Vicki and Issa.

As a newer member, we all try to help you learn how to post accurately and informatively. There is no need to get defensive or snarky in the responses. We all get corrected on here and we learn to appreciate the correction given. You will get there in time.

G2.

Maybe if you didn't talk to him like he was an idiot when you "corrected" him he might not have gotten defensive. Before you write me an cry about it, yes, you did talk to him like that which is why I moved it to the fight thread.

A2

[Gene2]

You say her name is London with no supporting evidence. The provider says her name is Lauren out of her own mouth / words, so?

If anyone reading my review just skips over the part where I deliberately state that I don't know if it is the same Lauren or not (and even go out of my way to state that I doubt that it is), as well as BoatGuy1's response that it definitely isn't her (with a searchable timeframe for his evidence of the more respectable Lauren), then there really ain't much I can do for either them or you. I can only pass on the direct information given to me. She walked into a room at Pacific late last year and stated that her name is Lauren. She sent me a text 1 week ago (that I can provide on request) stating the parlor address and "Name is Lauren". It doesn't get any more accurate than that.

If you have information to add, then by all means, please do so. If she told you her name was London while working at Pacific, then hey, I have no reason to doubt you or believe she didn't, I imagine most of us here are well aware that providers will probably go by many names over the course of their careers. I have absolutely no problem with my info being supplemented or corrected by others.

But don't come at me with a "well, um, actually, you're wrong", state conflicting information, provide nothing to corroborate that info, and then tell me I'm being "snarky and defensive" for responding in kind. That doesn't create an environment where the most accurate information is presented by members of all ranks, it creates a space for senior members to laud their status over others with a "because I said so" mentality.

Sorry noob. But your post made some readers think you had seen Lauren of Vickie and Issa fame. You didn't. I am simply trying to correct an error you made.

We all make mistakes and others can correct them.

You saw London. She's not one that anyone would ever confuse with Lauren. You'll be fine.

G2.

[Comrad]

Wow. Just WOW. There are not appropriate words.

We just need to blow this person off, Admin needs to determine if they are actually offering anything constructive to the site. May even be a 16 year old who got bored with 4 chan.

[RobovDaslav]

Hey,

We all count on the posts being accurate. Unfortunately your prior post led some here to believe that Lauren was now working out of Byron Center. If you knew your provider London used to work at Pacific, that would clearly make it evident that you did not see Lauren who used to work with Vicki and Issa.

As a newer member, we all try to help you learn how to post accurately and informatively. There is no need to get defensive or snarky in the responses. We all get corrected on here and we learn to appreciate the correction given. You will get there in time.

G2.

You say her name is London with no supporting evidence. The provider says her name is Lauren out of her own mouth / words, so?

If anyone reading my review just skips over the part where I deliberately state that I don't know if it is the same Lauren or not (and even go out of my way to state that I doubt that it is), as well as BoatGuy1's response that it definitely isn't her (with a searchable timeframe for his evidence of the more respectable Lauren), then there really ain't much I can do for either them or you. I can only pass on the direct information given to me. She walked into a room at Pacific late last year and stated that her name is Lauren. She sent me a text 1 week ago (that I can provide on request) stating the parlor address and "Name is Lauren". It doesn't get any more accurate than that.

If you have information to add, then by all means, please do so. If she told you her name was London while working at Pacific, then hey, I have no reason to doubt you or believe she didn't, I imagine most of us here are well aware that providers will probably go by many names over the course of their careers. I have absolutely no problem with my info being supplemented or corrected by others.

But don't come at me with a "well, um, actually, you're wrong", state conflicting information, provide nothing to corroborate that info, and then tell me I'm being "snarky and defensive" for responding in kind. That doesn't create an environment where the most accurate information is presented by members of all ranks, it creates a space for senior members to laud their status over others with a "because I said so" mentality.

[Gene2]

Well, you should probably correct her direct then, cause that's the name she gave me through text and when she worked at Pacific.

Hey,

We all count on the posts being accurate. Unfortunately your prior post led some here to believe that Lauren was now working out of Byron Center. If you knew your provider London used to work at Pacific, that would clearly make it evident that you did not see Lauren who used to work with Vicki and Issa.

As a newer member, we all try to help you learn how to post accurately and informatively. There is no need to get defensive or snarky in the responses. We all get corrected on here and we learn to appreciate the correction given. You will get there in time.

G2.

[RobovDaslav]

Her name is London. Not Lauren. From Pacific massage.

London.

Details are important when posting a review.

G2.

Well, you should probably correct her direct then, cause that's the name she gave me through text and when she worked at Pacific.

[Shawtren]

This guy is a moron. They treat him like a red-headed stepchild in the Detroit forum. Read his past post and you will see how the school system failed him.

Wow. Just WOW. There are not appropriate words.

[Gene2]

Not much to say about this provider, massage wise. Sub par massage, unless you're touch starved I guess. Not sure if this is the same Lauren that was apart of the Issa quartet (quite frankly, I doubt it is), but I do remember actually seeing her by chance at pacific massage late last year. Decent prices $60 for an hour, $. 2 for topless HE on the flip, and if her menu has stayed the same, you can get full for $$.

My gripe with this girl is her ads.

None of her ad pictures have ever actually been of her.

All ad pictures are stolen from somewhere and are just close enough to say there are maybe some similarities between them and her if you squint really hard. She herself is. Pretty lackluster and definitely not the shapely model she tries to sell in those ads. She's good enough for a quick trip at her price I guess, but the blatantly stolen pictures make meeting her irl that much more disappointing and just makes me not want to see her again.

She says she works with her best friend, and I've seen some other ads using a different number, so I may go back once more just to test my luck, but Lauren isn't really worth the trip unless you just need to make something happen, nothing else is panning out and you really just don't want to pull it yourself.

https://grand-rapids.skipthegames.co...h/824871341603

Her name is London. Not Lauren. From Pacific massage.

London.

Details are important when posting a review.

G2.