Rubrankings.com
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts

Thread: Bullshit that has Nothing to do With Pussy

+ Add Report
Page 92 of 143 FirstFirst ... 42 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 142 ... LastLast
Results 1,366 to 1,380 of 2144
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #779
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeStark  [View Original Post]
    You think one party gaining complete control is a good thing because it's "your" guys. The Democratic Party is well on the way achieving permanent political dominance through their sponsorship of illegal immigration and election fraud. If they succeed in making America a single party state, I guarantee that you won't like the eventual results..
    There has never been widespread election fraud. Yes there is voter suppression to stop people of color from voting. Trump lost fair and square by millions of votes. Just last weekend a Florida state republican was arrested for election fraud. Cheers!

  2. #778
    Quote Originally Posted by SmileySam  [View Original Post]

    Actually the vast majority of gun massacres in the USA are done by white males.
    You know, I keep hearing this asserted as undisputed truth. This time, I decided to check. I'm glad I did, thank you. Like so much else asserted by Leftists as undisputed truth, this turns out to be complete bullshit.

    I pluggged the following into Google:

    Statistics mass murderers by race.

    The first 5 or 6 links that came up came up with figures of around 60% of mass murderers being non-hispanic whites. This is close to their proportion of the population, so it's unsurprising. Yes, it's "most" of the mass murderers, no it's not disproportionate. It certainly is *not* a "vast" majority". The same holds for blacks and latinos.

    Quote Originally Posted by SmileySam  [View Original Post]
    A good number of them done by white nationalists
    Well, hard to argue with a vague crap like "a good number". Doesn't matter anyhow.

    Quote Originally Posted by SmileySam  [View Original Post]
    and militia men.
    This is a separate set. If you mean "3 percenters" or Oath Keepers, I call bullshit.

    Quote Originally Posted by SmileySam  [View Original Post]
    The good news is that the majority of folks want common sense gun laws. Soon the Senate filibuster will be removed and things will slowly change. Cheers!
    You think one party gaining complete control is a good thing because it's "your" guys. The Democratic Party is well on the way achieving permanent political dominance through their sponsorship of illegal immigration and election fraud. If they succeed in making America a single party state, I guarantee that you won't like the eventual results.

    "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. " - Lord Acton.

  3. #777
    Wow, the title of this thread is really accurate.

  4. #776
    Quote Originally Posted by SamSpade  [View Original Post]
    Correct, an assault rifle, like a soldier would have, is capable of semi-automatic and fully automatic at the flip of the switch. So when the first ban came into effect, the NRA was quick to point out that without a very special license and in only a few states, a citizen couldn't own fully automatic weapons. So the gun banners and the media started to call things like an AR-15 an "assault style weapon". Meaning it looked like military without being military. So besides full auto, what's the difference? Politicians banned a tripod mount, bayonet mount, folding stocks, etc.

    Oh yeah, and I love handjobs.
    The ban expired in 2004. And assault weapons can be semi-automatic Military assault rifles are automatic, civilian assault rifles are semi-automatic.

  5. #775
    Regular Member


    Posts: 19
    Quote Originally Posted by PghTraveler  [View Original Post]
    He was a fucked up religious wacko who went to AMPs. It's racially motivated to the extent that a lot of guys believe the myth that Asian women are a special variety of pussy, "me love you long time," etc. He could have lit up a bunch of orange tanned strippers but he didn't.
    While I agree that many guys specifically like Asian pussy and consider it a category itself, we definitely have no information that he specifically liked Asian pussy over other pussy and therefore went to Asian parlors for that reason.

    I never knew how much I liked Asians until I went to several massage parlors and they all had Asians working! Only a couple years later did I find some Euro and Latina places. So those places may have just been convenient for his sexual needs.

  6. #774
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1404
    Quote Originally Posted by SmileySam  [View Original Post]
    Just another massacre by another white guy. Killed 10 people. How about universal background checks with no loopholes? How about banning assault rifles? How about banning high capacity magazines? I don't see many deer hunters using assault weapons.
    What are the loopholes you see with the form 4473? Heroin coke, and hookers are illegal to own why do you think that banning a type of gun will make it so difficult to get? How many people do you see Deer hunting and what types of guns do they use? In case you were unaware the 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting. Maybe you didn't hear about it but 13 black people were shot by a black guy a week ago on the South side I wonder if he hates black people. Other than the fact that he was a poor shot how is that any different than Atlanta?

  7. #773

    Assault style

    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeStark  [View Original Post]
    Fourth, assault rifles are already virtually banned, because an assault rifle is a full automatic weapon. An "assault weapon" is a different, made up category roughly meaning "any gun a Leftist doesn't like".
    Correct, an assault rifle, like a soldier would have, is capable of semi-automatic and fully automatic at the flip of the switch. So when the first ban came into effect, the NRA was quick to point out that without a very special license and in only a few states, a citizen couldn't own fully automatic weapons. So the gun banners and the media started to call things like an AR-15 an "assault style weapon". Meaning it looked like military without being military. So besides full auto, what's the difference? Politicians banned a tripod mount, bayonet mount, folding stocks, etc.

    Oh yeah, and I love handjobs.

  8. #772
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeStark  [View Original Post]
    First, POC are represented in the mass shootings. You just don't hear about it because that doesn't fit the narrative.

    Second, they're not "high capacity" magazines. They are typically standard capacity magazines. That's typically what the guns come with.

    Third, there ain't shit in the Second Amendment about hunting.

    Fourth, assault rifles are already virtually banned, because an assault rifle is a full automatic weapon. An "assault weapon" is a different, made up category roughly meaning "any gun a Leftist doesn't like".

    When the Second Amendment was written, the rifles used by civilians and military were the same. We can infer from this that the framers did not intend for the People to have only weapons that are unsuitable for or alien to those used by the military.
    Actually the vast majority of gun massacres in the USA are done by white males. A good number of them done by white nationalists and militia men. The good news is that the majority of folks want common sense gun laws. Soon the Senate filibuster will be removed and things will slowly change. Cheers!

  9. #771
    Quote Originally Posted by ApplePiePussy  [View Original Post]

    You can hate the CCP all you want. I hate them too... You can also hate on the fraudulent, deceptive, and dishonest business dealings of Chinese companies (Luckin coffee etc.) That's all fair game. Where you become an ignorant pos no better than the pos in Atlanta is when you project that hatred onto individual Asian-Americans or Asian immigrants who have nothing to do with the things you hate
    And I agree with that.

    But we've known for *days* now that this had nothing to do with the race of the victims, it was about their profession. The killer felt he was a sex addict and "needed" to eliminate sources of temptation. That doesn't make him any less of a POS, but we can stop flagellating ourselves over anti-asian racism.

    But that doesn't fit the narrative. Why let facts get in the way of a good story?

  10. #770
    Quote Originally Posted by SmileySam  [View Original Post]
    Just another massacre by another white guy. Killed 10 people. How about universal background checks with no loopholes? How about banning assault rifles? How about banning high capacity magazines? I don't see many deer hunters using assault weapons.
    First, POC are represented in the mass shootings. You just don't hear about it because that doesn't fit the narrative.

    Second, they're not "high capacity" magazines. They are typically standard capacity magazines. That's typically what the guns come with.

    Third, there ain't shit in the Second Amendment about hunting.

    Fourth, assault rifles are already virtually banned, because an assault rifle is a full automatic weapon. An "assault weapon" is a different, made up category roughly meaning "any gun a Leftist doesn't like".

    When the Second Amendment was written, the rifles used by civilians and military were the same. We can infer from this that the framers did not intend for the People to have only weapons that are unsuitable for or alien to those used by the military.

  11. #769

    You said ban assault rifles, high capacity magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by SmileySam  [View Original Post]
    Just another massacre by another white guy. Killed 10 people. How about universal background checks with no loopholes? How about banning assault rifles? How about banning high capacity magazines? I don't see many deer hunters using assault weapons.
    I doubt you've seen a single deer hunter your entire life, so how would you know in a country of 328 million people (plus untold millions of illegal non USA Citizens) what gun owners uses on a regular basis?

    You want to ban ban ban. Alright why don't we ban heroin / fentanyl, meth and crack? Why don't we ban trafficking women? OH We do. And anyone can get that 24/7 can't they?

    There isn't a simple answer. The quicker the side that wants guns banned understands that banning won't work as I pointed out above, a solution that hasn't been thought of will arise. You're not taking away millions of gun owners stuff.

  12. #768
    Quote Originally Posted by ApplePiePussy  [View Original Post]
    It's other white people who perpetuate this lunacy, not minorities. Yes, there are some but they are encouraged and pressured into doing so by lunatic white people.
    I agree. The white SJWs are the most insane. They are as anti-white as can be. The shit I was referring to was whipped up by a white woman, Robin DiAngelo.

  13. #767
    Who is this "we" you're talking about? I believe you when you say *you* don't want to take the guns, but if you think there aren't lots of Leftists that want every American disarmed, you haven't been paying attention. They *all* say they want "common sense" laws, but me and them have nothing in common and they don't have any sense.

    "Hell yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47" - "Beto" O'Rourke.

    "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them. 'Mr. And Mrs. America, turn 'them all in,' I would have done it. ".

    -- Dianne Feinstein.

    Feinstein is a particularly egregious case, as she carried a revolver for her own protection when she felt the need, but wants to deny everyone else the same right. I guess not all lives matter, after all.

    There's plenty more where those came from.

    Quote Originally Posted by SmileySam  [View Original Post]
    One crazy cracker with a semi automatic large clip can kill a lot more people versus using a knife. Common sense gun laws make sense. No the libs aren't out to take your guns away. We just want sensible guns laws to prevent nutjobs from killing our children in school, places we work, and businesses that we patronize.

  14. #766
    Quote Originally Posted by Moejoo  [View Original Post]
    Please inform us what those common sense gun laws should be and what lives they would have saved? Was that a crazy cracker that shot up that party on the south side a week or two ago? Isn't cracker considered a racist term? FWIW I am not offended by it but I am so anxious to hear about common sense gun laws.
    Just another massacre by another white guy. Killed 10 people. How about universal background checks with no loopholes? How about banning assault rifles? How about banning high capacity magazines? I don't see many deer hunters using assault weapons.

  15. #765
    Quote Originally Posted by RonM  [View Original Post]
    With this incident being within our field of play people need a way to vent their frustration and anger about what happened. As long as it's about the incident itself. Not about turning that.

    Anger towads the person expressing their opinions.
    Right said.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
Live Escorts
Best Escorts

Protected by Copyscape