Escort Reports

[DarkKnight22]

Can we please get off beating this dead horse llland on to reviewing some gals I'd like to bang? Does anyone know how to get in touch a maya? Please pm me if you do.

Feel free to ad a review anytime you like bub.

[Fletch1]

Can we please get off beating this dead horse llland on to reviewing some gals I'd like to bang? Does anyone know how to get in touch a maya? Please pm me if you do.

Since I have been the topic of discussion for the past week, I wanted to clarify a few things. Honestly, I am tired of people trying to create a narrative about something they know nothing about. I haven't seen 99 percent of the people commenting so how would y'all know about my services? Anyways, I just wanted to first acknowledge the complements in the review I got because that didn't go unnoticed. My issue with the whole situation is him saying I am not a GFE provider and I have too many rules. I am not going to go into the debate on if I am worth my donation or time because me and OP both know I give a top-tier performance. I think the issue here with OP is that he probably assumed a GFE does bb (hence the "too many rules" I have which isn't true). As a GFE provider, I kiss, cuddle, give massages, really get to know and connect with my clients, and do romantic dinner dates. The only rule I have is I use protection. OP is allowed to have his own opinion but for you to say I am not worth it because of your misinterpretation of what GFE is and because I don't let people raw dog me, that's pretty pathetic. But OP please feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but I find it funny you have been quiet ever since people started defending you on the fact that you didn't expect bare services. What rules were you referring to exactly? Because I think at this point we all want to know what you meant by that.

[DarkKnight22]

Isn't this the same provider who asks for a photo I. D. If you had my home address I would probably stop talking as well.

[Fuji_Rw]

Since I have been the topic of discussion for the past week, I wanted to clarify a few things. Honestly, I am tired of people trying to create a narrative about something they know nothing about. I haven't seen 99 percent of the people commenting so how would y'all know about my services? Anyways, I just wanted to first acknowledge the complements in the review I got because that didn't go unnoticed. My issue with the whole situation is him saying I am not a GFE provider and I have too many rules. I am not going to go into the debate on if I am worth my donation or time because me and OP both know I give a top-tier performance. I think the issue here with OP is that he probably assumed a GFE does bb (hence the "too many rules" I have which isn't true). As a GFE provider, I kiss, cuddle, give massages, really get to know and connect with my clients, and do romantic dinner dates. The only rule I have is I use protection. OP is allowed to have his own opinion but for you to say I am not worth it because of your misinterpretation of what GFE is and because I don't let people raw dog me, that's pretty pathetic. But OP please feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but I find it funny you have been quiet ever since people started defending you on the fact that you didn't expect bare services. What rules were you referring to exactly? Because I think at this point we all want to know what you meant by that.

Literally nobody here is saying that GFE means BBFS. It hasn't been said and it never will be. He was complaining about your session. Seeing you have gone in the offense by gas lighting not just him but the rest of us here I think we can figure this one out ourselves, okay?

[Monger Dude]

Welcome to the forum Megan.

I'm not here to dispute what you posted, in that "The only rule I have is I use protection". I respect what you do with your own body. However, to make a statement that mongers who "raw dog" are pathetic crosses a line. No one here bashed you or called you a liar. CoolPanther summed it up nicely.

Additionally, whether the OP expected BB or not, you cannot make the case that he assumed it. He only stated that you are not full GFE and set a record with too many rules. GFE can mean many things including overall chemistry. YMMV, right?

Finally, your post is directly inverse to what you've posted multiple times on Reddit. I'm certain that you read this entire thread completely, yet you did not comment on my post and direct link about how you "love creampies" and you probably do. I understand that you aren't showing the actual deed, but this is clearly false advertising.

https://www.reddit.com/r/cumfetish/c...d_creampie_oc/

https://www.reddit.com/r/blackchicks...ter_the_way_i/

https://www.reddit.com/r/PLASTT/comm...pie_plastt_oc/

https://www.reddit.com/r/creampie/co...lp_himself_oc/

https://www.redgifs.com/watch/brilli...quetzalcoatlus

Good luck with your career.

[ItsMixedGirl21]

The reason it's even being suggested is that's he was being disingenuous by planting the false flag that GFE = BBFS.

What the poster said she did was charge a premium and, even absent of GFE, was hyper-focused on spitting out rules rather than help him escape into a fantasy for an hour. There is a distinct, distinct difference between the two. You can still be a great provider and not be GFE. She is not is what the review was saying.

She is the bad actor here.

Since I have been the topic of discussion for the past week, I wanted to clarify a few things. Honestly, I am tired of people trying to create a narrative about something they know nothing about. I haven't seen 99 percent of the people commenting so how would y'all know about my services? Anyways, I just wanted to first acknowledge the complements in the review I got because that didn't go unnoticed. My issue with the whole situation is him saying I am not a GFE provider and I have too many rules. I am not going to go into the debate on if I am worth my donation or time because me and OP both know I give a top-tier performance. I think the issue here with OP is that he probably assumed a GFE does bb (hence the "too many rules" I have which isn't true). As a GFE provider, I kiss, cuddle, give massages, really get to know and connect with my clients, and do romantic dinner dates. The only rule I have is I use protection. OP is allowed to have his own opinion but for you to say I am not worth it because of your misinterpretation of what GFE is and because I don't let people raw dog me, that's pretty pathetic. But OP please feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but I find it funny you have been quiet ever since people started defending you on the fact that you didn't expect bare services. What rules were you referring to exactly? Because I think at this point we all want to know what you meant by that.

[Fuji_Rw]

I've never known anyone hear to consider GFE to mean BBFS. Not sure what the guy who posted her review meant when he said she was not at all GFE. Maybe she is trying to change the narrative to justify her otherwise poor service. Would be nice if her reviewer would go into more detail now that she opened that gate.

The reason it's even being suggested is that's he was being disingenuous by planting the false flag that GFE = BBFS.

What the poster said she did was charge a premium and, even absent of GFE, was hyper-focused on spitting out rules rather than help him escape into a fantasy for an hour. There is a distinct, distinct difference between the two. You can still be a great provider and not be GFE. She is not is what the review was saying.

She is the bad actor here.

[Alembic74]

https://greenville.skipthegames.com/...y/753007676400

Anyone know anything about this one? To me it has the feel of vengeance but if she's real and dtf she won't have my openings.

[CoolPanther]

I hate the illusion of GFE, so I will never ask for it, but if the provider allows me to finish on her, I'll do it. BBFS is not safe at all regardless of the price and the provider. But consenting adults can do so. All I'm saying is it's dangerous as hell.

However, $$$ or more might want to involve some liquid yogurt eating. For that donation, you can start an onlyfans, especially if you spend over 10 K a year. I personally don't deal with women on drugs neither do I want a BBBJ from them. So I can agree with that. But if I can get better service from a cheaper provider, I'll go in that direction.

The reviews here, for the most part, have been helpful. I've been saved from scams and bad providers because a lot of guys take the risks. I wouldn't take the BBBJ risk, but all the comments and warnings from the hobbyists here have been extremely helpful. YMMV with most providers, but I definitely take the word of regular and senior members here with caution.

I believe we're in agreement on a few points BMW but I was merely pointing out that it wasn't until I had ran through several thousand dollars that just because they ask for higher donations does not mean you'll have a better time. I think the poster mentioned that she would have been worth the donation if she was GFE and her rules were a point of contention to him I believe. Glad to hear that the forum has served as a way to keep you safe as well as the rest of us. Lastly for me I never argue over a donation nor do I ask her to lower it. For those of us that try to negotiate a lower donation I understand and get it. Nothing wrong with this considering you never know how the visit will go. I only ask the provider or I should say I only expect her to do her best while I am there.

[CityGuy1]

I personally wouldn't do BBFS with any provider. Thats really taking a risk that doesn't end well at all. There are a few excellent providers in the area that aren't on drugs and if you don't try to force BB on them you will have a good visit. The lack of advertising providers in this area is directly linked to the way the clients are treating them at this time. I am 100% sure of this.

[BlackManWorkin]

I hate the illusion of GFE, so I will never ask for it, but if the provider allows me to finish on her, I'll do it. BBFS is not safe at all regardless of the price and the provider. But consenting adults can do so. All I'm saying is it's dangerous as hell.

However, $$$ or more might want to involve some liquid yogurt eating. For that donation, you can start an onlyfans, especially if you spend over 10 K a year. I personally don't deal with women on drugs neither do I want a BBBJ from them. So I can agree with that. But if I can get better service from a cheaper provider, I'll go in that direction.

The reviews here, for the most part, have been helpful. I've been saved from scams and bad providers because a lot of guys take the risks. I wouldn't take the BBBJ risk, but all the comments and warnings from the hobbyists here have been extremely helpful. YMMV with most providers, but I definitely take the word of regular and senior members here with caution.

[DarkKnight22]

There will be some bounce back, but not as much as some people think. I'm in a city with a very active adult industry (mongering, clubs, etc.), and the quality factor had been sinking steadily for 5-6 years; heck, go back 2 years on the board and see all the complaints of "no quality girls. " Like the economy in general, you started seeing only the top 10 percent (ie well reviewed but expensive EROS girls) or the underclass (heavy drug users who either are 89 lb skeletons or 250 lb B not so hot BW). In the past 5 years, there's also an undercurrent of incel-related contempt being expressed by mongers which I know has had an impact on the willingness of the non-druggie to get involved in the industry.

For all the stories, the vast majority of providers don't make as much as, say, camming, as they do providing. But for an increasing number of them, making 50 percent of providing and not having to have actual contact was already worth it, even pre pandemic.

I'm not sure what will change the dynamic (I'd be rich if I did!) Again, there will some swing the other way once COVID is past. But to really return to the glory days, a new business model / dynamic has to be developed.

I've never known anyone hear to consider GFE to mean BBFS. Not sure what the guy who posted her review meant when he said she was not at all GFE. Maybe she is trying to change the narrative to justify her otherwise poor service. Would be nice if her reviewer would go into more detail now that she opened that gate.

[TheBlueVibes]

After a very careful and thorough review of the currently available options and after perusing through the previous several posts (Marty, Five, Monger et. Al) I've come to the conclusion that we haven't just hit the rock bottom, we have actually started to dig.

[Professor55]

Has anyone seen this Chelse?. It's not Chelsea T.

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chelsea-...enville-315496

[Monger Dude]

I think you struck a nerve with this review. She's over on the sexworkers reddit.com subreddit complaining about it. .

Looks like Reddit mods removed her rant.

Her posts about loving creampies doesn't do much for her case.

https://www.reddit.com/r/BreedingMat...not_at_all_oc/