"Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?

**BobLobLa** · 02-23-21 13:32

MILF / GND -- seems a lot of fun, but can't get to specifics. She is new and overwhelmed -- https://www.seeking.com/member/663b9...b-cc1feba2efb9.

Super cute, smoking bod, says she has done this before. Car not reliable, so expecting a $ ask before first meeting -- https://www.seeking.com/member/a15ab...3-420896092c6f.

Can't seem to get far with this one - https://www.seeking.com/member/35d59...a-9a50827fb252.

**Snake27** · 02-22-21 21:37

Hey, TheHobbyLobby. We're cool. I have no problems with guys getting it for free, I was just noting some things girls have told me (a lot). But we all know the secret life of women. They say one thing and do another (like fuck guys on SA for free). I also think that guys wouldn't try some things unless it worked at some level, and this includes the rude aggressive approach, which goes against my nature but it probably works with some women. I still think the price of joining SA is a useful filter, but that's just my opinion. Finally, I speculate that COVID-19 has a lot to do with the down turn in quality. Smaller talent pool as people are scared off.

**TheHobbyLobby** · 02-22-21 20:55

Originally Posted by Snake27 [View Original Post]

Not trying to cause trouble, but I think the price is about right. First of all, it is negligible compared to what you will be giving the girl if you are going to be her sugar daddy. Second, it helps keep out the riff raff. From the conversations I've had with girls, there is still plenty of riff raff -- guys who are cheap, rude, aggressive, focused on specific sex acts, trying to get it for free, etc. My present SB was about to quit the site when she met me. And I'm NOT saying you are one of them -- of course I don't know. Aren't there sites where guys can find girls for free? I don't know anything about those, but I'm thinking about Tinder, POF, Snapchat, etc?

Hey Snake, no worries I always like hearing what others have to say. I have had good luck with SA. I've even gone as far as getting free pussy. But admittedly it's been a while LOL. I even talk to one SB now that has been over two years. I usually get on SA one month at a time and maybe twice or three times a years. I feel like I am attractive, good shape and decent game That is how I get it for free some times. When I get on SA I collect a ton of phone numbers but many of them turn out to be flakes or not what I am looking for. I think many of them have been put off by the jerks out there. I've been spoiled and I've gotten the true SB. Someone who isn't in it for the money, completely LOL. I do agree with you Snake that I feel for women on that site because they do have to confront a lot of A $$holes. I don't know why guys can't be respectful. Those aholes ruin it for the rest of us. I also wish that 100 was enough to keep the riff raff out but when a guy is horny they will still pay for just at the chance to be a dick. But my bigges complain is that everything is going up but the quality, quantity or even the odds are getting worse. More so in the AMP world. For example, I can't believe how many of these women are using sites like SA to promote their OF account. Great. But again, that is my opinion and how I see things. Love hearing what others have to say.

**TheHobbyLobby** · 02-22-21 20:45

Originally Posted by FarFarAway [View Original Post]

My BMW was expensive, but I like how they drive. If you want quality you have to pay. Seriously, the cost of SA is in the noise for what we're doing w / SBs. It's one hotel room for one FC. If you have any game at all, after a month on SA, you will likely have met at least a few POTs, perhaps taken them to the FC, and have a long list of phone #s you can text with for the next few months. I only pay for a membership a month at a time, and perhaps once or twice a year. I like to browse at other times, putting profiles into my deep freeze to thaw out later.

I completely agree with you Far. I am more than willing to pay more for good quality. But that is the operative word, Quality. I don't see quality at the AMPs and in my opinion the quality has gotten worse. Granted it was never good to begin with but the women seem to be getting older, less attractive and the even the massage is getting worse. I've had AMP quality in San Francisco and by far no competition. They are porn star quality. Those places you'll end up paying 300 for FS and I have no problem paying that for good looking hot babes. My biggest concern is that the prices are going up and there has been no change in service, attitude, looks. The good ones are very few and far between. That's all.

**Snake27** · 02-22-21 19:29

Originally Posted by TheHobbyLobby [View Original Post]

I totally agree. However, now Seeking is charging 100 for a 30 day membership. That is bullshit. You know that will go up again. Everything is going up. ....

Not trying to cause trouble, but I think the price is about right. First of all, it is negligible compared to what you will be giving the girl if you are going to be her sugar daddy. Second, it helps keep out the riff raff. From the conversations I've had with girls, there is still plenty of riff raff -- guys who are cheap, rude, aggressive, focused on specific sex acts, trying to get it for free, etc. My present SB was about to quit the site when she met me. And I'm NOT saying you are one of them -- of course I don't know. Aren't there sites where guys can find girls for free? I don't know anything about those, but I'm thinking about Tinder, POF, Snapchat, etc?

**FarFarAway** · 02-22-21 15:49

So, in my view, this is why we are in the bowl. This was long ago and far far away from Richmond, so no need to be asking for her phone #. This was a 19 YO college student I met from SA. Just trying to make ends meet, take care of a little sister, and have some fun. Very sweet and nice. This absolutely smoking body. We met up one morning in a hotel room I had checked into the night before (I am dodging my SO). She was 45 min late, of course. She had an appointment she needed to get to, of course. Not having all the time I wanted, well, that just happens sometime. The allowance? IDK specifically, it was likely 300, just b / c that was my standard back then. She was there for that of course, but she also was very fascinated by the allure / kink of an older married guy. (I am 3 x her age). Unlike your average hooker, she didn't have a menu and I am 100% sure that I wasn't the 4th guy she'd been with that day. She wasn't making a living on the 'stroll', and I haven't seen her on SA (I keep up with it intermittently) in several years. I got in touch a few years back, she said she'd moved to northern California.

The experience w / her? Top notch. I love to eat young girls like her, you can see her peach in this photo. It was that plump and juicy. She came in about 5 minutes, and then was (sadly) too sensitive for me to keep going. We hopped into bed, she had just the most incredibly soft and smooth skin. You can't see her tits too well in this photo, but they were lovely and firm. A round robin of positions, she was no virgin of course but she'd never had someone put her ankles on his shoulders for deeper penetration, that was a highlight for her. I mean, what more can you ask than totally spontaneous, mutually enjoyable fucking with someone like this for an hour plus?! Maybe guys are getting that from escorts, but I'd be surprised there is access to someone this young and cute in that pool of girls.

**FarFarAway** · 02-22-21 09:39

Originally Posted by TheHobbyLobby [View Original Post]

I totally agree. However, now Seeking is charging 100 for a 30 day membership. That is bullshit. You know that will go up again. Everything is going up. Websites, AMPs, blowjobs. Is there going to be an end?

SA charging 100 for 30 day membership. It was 90 just last year. Before that it was something like 80.

A good and long blowjob you could get for an easy 50, at most. And I mean from good providers like Winter who didn't put any time limits. Now some of this bitches are charging 100 for QV.

Now AMPs are charging 50 for 30 min. Not so long ago a 30 min would be 30. Now it's 40 and now it's up at 50. The Massage are getting worse, the women are uglier. What the hell is going on. We cannot let this be the new normal.

My BMW was expensive, but I like how they drive. If you want quality you have to pay. Seriously, the cost of SA is in the noise for what we're doing w / SBs. It's one hotel room for one FC. If you have any game at all, after a month on SA, you will likely have met at least a few POTs, perhaps taken them to the FC, and have a long list of phone #s you can text with for the next few months. I only pay for a membership a month at a time, and perhaps once or twice a year. I like to browse at other times, putting profiles into my deep freeze to thaw out later.

**TheHobbyLobby** · 02-21-21 20:03

Originally Posted by PghGuy2005 [View Original Post]

I got on SecretBenefits thinking that the ability to message a POT forever is better than being able to message them only for the duration of the SA membership. It did not work out at all. Even though on SB POTs did respond and quite a few even gave their phone nos. And texted nothing came out of it. So with the lowest tier of 200 credits I messaged 20 POTs with 0 hits!

Even though the lowest tier on SA is $10 more than SB I got a few hits after just a couple of weeks and sometimes you get coupons for discounts on SA such as 25% for Valentine's Day.

I totally agree. However, now Seeking is charging 100 for a 30 day membership. That is bullshit. You know that will go up again. Everything is going up. Websites, AMPs, blowjobs. Is there going to be an end?

SA charging 100 for 30 day membership. It was 90 just last year. Before that it was something like 80.

A good and long blowjob you could get for an easy 50, at most. And I mean from good providers like Winter who didn't put any time limits. Now some of this bitches are charging 100 for QV.

Now AMPs are charging 50 for 30 min. Not so long ago a 30 min would be 30. Now it's 40 and now it's up at 50. The Massage are getting worse, the women are uglier. What the hell is going on. We cannot let this be the new normal.

**PghGuy2005** · 02-21-21 11:28

Originally Posted by TheHobbyLobby [View Original Post]

Does anyone know if Secrete Benefits accepts Vanilla Visa Pre paid credit card.

I got on SecretBenefits thinking that the ability to message a POT forever is better than being able to message them only for the duration of the SA membership. It did not work out at all. Even though on SB POTs did respond and quite a few even gave their phone nos. And texted nothing came out of it. So with the lowest tier of 200 credits I messaged 20 POTs with 0 hits!

Even though the lowest tier on SA is $10 more than SB I got a few hits after just a couple of weeks and sometimes you get coupons for discounts on SA such as 25% for Valentine's Day.

**TheHobbyLobby** · 02-21-21 10:48

Does anyone know if Secrete Benefits accepts Vanilla Visa Pre paid credit card.

**ChrisHansen92** · 02-18-21 08:54

I downloaded a free app called ImageSearch. It uses Google Bing Yandex Baidu and TinEye. Works well for me.

Originally Posted by Shampoo55 [View Original Post]

So I usually search images of the girls to see what I am dealing with or IF the pics are fake. All as normal due diligence.

But of recent this has been abysmal so wondering what others are doing? When I find an advert / post I right click on pic and copy image location and then past that url into the box on the search places.

I use Google Images and get the most hits. Because I use tor browser I am often having to do the captcha thing. Of recent have noticed I don't always get result from the link and with some websites I get an error. Image is too large. Interestingly, when I save one of the "too big" pictures and then upload it to GI search, THEN I get results.

Also use Tineye, but that is universally useless and almost never get any hits or get an error. Oops, Something went wrong. Please try your search again.

I see that Bing has an image search too but it's pretty much useless as well.

So what am I missing? IS there some other way t search and get results?

**Bran001** · 02-18-21 08:29

Originally Posted by Madaboutmax [View Original Post]

I agree with this. What I don't understand is how they can ban people with no explanation and no refund. I can see not wanting to give explanations to help people learn how to avoid a ban in the future, but they should at least refund the balance of their unused membership.

How can any business take your money for a service, refuse to provide that service and keep the money? So unethical and makes them liable for a class action suit, if someone had thr guts to go public with it.

They provide an explanation. It's in their Terms of Service (TOS).

"W8 Tech may terminate Your Membership for any reason, with or without notice. If W8 Tech terminates Your Membership, You will not be entitled to any refund of unused subscription fees or unused credits. If Your Membership is terminated for any reason, all terms of this Agreement survive such termination, and continue in full force and effect, except any terms that by their nature expire or are fully satisfied. ".

If you think that there would be a long parade of men SA customers who want to put their name on a class action or other litigation -- um. . . "I don't think so. ".

**FarFarAway** · 02-15-21 12:24

Originally Posted by BobLobLa [View Original Post]

Google doesn't seem to do very well. Have gotten zippty results only to find everyone of the woman's profile pics is on her social media once I find her true identity elsewhere (Linked in Premium is a gold mine for its search function for professional gals, and some college students. Employer, college will get you 75% of the way they're).

Well, FB profiles aren't indexed by google (not sure about other SM, but probably so), so it makes sense you wouldn't find a photo that a POT is using both on SM and SA.

**Madaboutmax** · 02-15-21 11:53

No I've never been kicked out or a hotel for making too much noise, but even the hotel would tell me that why I was being kicked out. They wouldn't evict with without a stated cause.

The TOS could be overcome. The biggest issue is it would not be a popular suit and no one wants to be the face of the suit.

Originally Posted by Tidad [View Original Post]

You are going to have a long wait on that lawsuit and there are many circumstances where rule breaking (even if it's only in the opinion of the business) means you lose your money. Have you ever been kicked out of a hotel for being too loud? Even if you've only been there an hour, your money is GONE. If you accepted the user agreement by joining and paying, that money is never coming back.

**BobLobLa** · 02-15-21 10:18

Google doesn't seem to do very well. Have gotten zippty results only to find everyone of the woman's profile pics is on her social media once I find her true identity elsewhere (Linked in Premium is a gold mine for its search function for professional gals, and some college students. Employer, college will get you 75% of the way they're).