Korean Agency BB

**GoldDust58** · 01-29-21 02:17

Originally Posted by BoneRanger22 [View Original Post]

If I'm not mistaken Candygirlla is the sane as kpussycat. When I saw mini I don't recall there bring an up charge. I got to BBFS CIP with mini at the rate comparable to M.

KPC basically died when Mini and Yuna left. Just after Mina went back to M as well. Last remaining girl is Kimi who went by Nabi when she was there briefly. It was a no up charge org them. Not it is combined with candygirlsla and they do up.

Charge but I think some girls are less then the full up charge.

**SsStuntCock** · 01-29-21 02:06

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

KTE Baby Becky pics look like the girl with Radeon tattoo so those may be her real pics. The last time I saw that young girl was awesome but I forgot her names.

Wish we talked more about the hits. They had some girls with recognizable pics before.

These pics were used to advertise Sara / La Lina when she was with SFK this time last year. Considering the mixed reviews at the time, I understand why she re-branded. That she did so in less than a month and stayed with the same org was odd tho.

**BonerAppetitty** · 01-29-21 01:32

KTE Baby Becky pics look like the girl with Radeon tattoo so those may be her real pics. The last time I saw that young girl was awesome but I forgot her names.

Wish we talked more about the hits. They had some girls with recognizable pics before.

Originally Posted by Frala [View Original Post]

Seconding this statement. I try to avoid KTE because I have never seen a provider from them where the picture is even close to accurate, and they are extremely hit or miss, but for some reason, they manage to have an endless rotating supply of "new" girls, and my desire for variety gets the best of me. I've had way more misses than hits, but when they hit, they really hit.

**BonerAppetitty** · 01-29-21 01:20

There were a couple bookers who used real pics of new girls. Few girls will have 100% real or accurate pics because of glam and photoshop.

I always try to point out real or good representative pics for you guys.

Originally Posted by Eponymously [View Original Post]

Can I ask a genuine question for the board? Is there any booker that has a reputation for using 100% real pics?...

**Toungsten** · 01-29-21 00:11

Originally Posted by Veni1 [View Original Post]

I see another blank as far as Newtopasian is concerned. Also no current reviews on that other site. Do you know if they are on a hiatus?

Coming back next week.

**BoneRanger22** · 01-28-21 23:56

If I'm not mistaken Candygirlla is the sane as kpussycat. When I saw mini I don't recall there bring an up charge. I got to BBFS CIP with mini at the rate comparable to M.

Originally Posted by GoldDust58 [View Original Post]

Really depends. Why do the popular girls in NorCal not leave when they make significant less than Socal? Consistency is key. And orgs like M and now it seems like new org PKL too can keep certain girls busy. Particularly the newer ones to LA, not ones who have rotated or have become jaded. M has always known to have good customer base with deep pockets but they expect quality service. And for the majority you get that at M and their assistant Lavixens. Good service at good price. You can't go wrong really. And if notice the majority of those up charge girls already went through M or SA at some point. If they left M so fast likely because the customers didn't like them as much perhaps the real reason. Eye was popular at M because she had to perform to compete with Hana. You dont see the same raving reviews for her anymore like when she was working at M. And she is now 2 times the price almost. This is a good example.

**GoldDust58** · 01-28-21 23:40

Originally Posted by PlutoKiller [View Original Post]

Well, in recent months she lost a couple of her girls to better paying bookers. Money talks and an extra 100 is an irresistible argument for the girls. Providing good looking girls with a good service attitude for a much lower pay will be the challenge for M.

Really depends. Why do the popular girls in NorCal not leave when they make significant less than Socal? Consistency is key. And orgs like M and now it seems like new org PKL too can keep certain girls busy. Particularly the newer ones to LA, not ones who have rotated or have become jaded. M has always known to have good customer base with deep pockets but they expect quality service. And for the majority you get that at M and their assistant Lavixens. Good service at good price. You can't go wrong really. And if notice the majority of those up charge girls already went through M or SA at some point. If they left M so fast likely because the customers didn't like them as much perhaps the real reason. Eye was popular at M because she had to perform to compete with Hana. You don’t see the same raving reviews for her anymore like when she was working at M. And she is now 2 times the price almost. This is a good example.

**HapaBoy86** · 01-28-21 22:50

Originally Posted by PlutoKiller [View Original Post]

Well, in recent months she lost a couple of her girls to better paying bookers. Money talks and an extra 100 is an irresistible argument for the girls. Providing good looking girls for a much lower pay will be the challenge for M.

You don't know M and she really don't care what a monger thinks or tells her how to run it!

**PlutoKiller** · 01-28-21 22:39

Originally Posted by HapaBoy86 [View Original Post]

For as long as she wants!

She has so many newbies trying to get in and I know for fact "a lot" of veteran mongers!

Well, in recent months she lost a couple of her girls to better paying bookers. Money talks and an extra 100 is an irresistible argument for the girls. Providing good looking girls with a good service attitude for a much lower pay will be the challenge for M.

**JFret** · 01-28-21 22:35

Anyone have any updates on the new ladies that came through? I've only seen Jenny and I'm curious on the stable. Also sfk's emily? I've been monitoring the last couple days but haven't seen any posts. If I'm able to free up some time I'll visit and post my findings. Recommendations please!

**HapaBoy86** · 01-28-21 21:28

Originally Posted by PlutoKiller [View Original Post]

Which brings us the the million $ question. How much longer can M sustain her present rate structure?

For as long as she wants!

She has so many newbies trying to get in and I know for fact "a lot" of veteran mongers!

**Tomatillo** · 01-28-21 20:12

Originally Posted by Jack926 [View Original Post]

I guess the point of the topic is: "Can "M" recruit new talent or retain existing talent when the girl know that they can do this for $100 more?" The free market economy favor bookers that charge extra for BB unless all mongers decide to boycott those bookers and those girls. I personally don't cough up $100 unless if I really like the girl and it has been only one girl (Emily from EUK Girl) that I have paid the extra $ because she well worth it: I saw her 12 times in two months.

It definitely doesn't favor bookers who upcharge otherwise they would have the best talent which isn't the case at all. If you consider traffic alone, the upcharge agencies have to use multiple bookers, bait and switch tactics, fake pictures etc in order to keep their girls busy where M, J, Pepsi etc. Don't need to do this and they generally keep their girls happy.

**Eponymously** · 01-28-21 18:46

Originally Posted by Pkim31 [View Original Post]

I can tell these pics are not representative, so I wouldn't try them. Rarely, they get gems who have somewhat genuine pics. The 2 x I went with them, I chose Silver and Danbi. Both delivered on looks and advertised height.

Can I ask a genuine question for the board? Is there any booker that has a reputation for using 100% real pics? In my limited experience it seems like the girls provide the photos, and take them from booker to booker. Sometimes you have a pic that looks like a real selfie in a real environment, but 98% of the time the pictures are of a different girl, touched up beyond recognition, might be some modelling shots from 5 or more years ago, or intentionally obscure the face. No matter the circumstance they're only barely representative of who you're going to see. You can use the pics w / the included measurements to get a general idea of the provider but as far as face goes that's a roll of the dice to me. It seems weird to hold "fake" pics against certain bookers when often the "real" pics communicate about as much actual information.

**Christophe1** · 01-28-21 18:43

I am extremely happy that we all are part of an extremely productive community here to communicate.

This thread has the most commented on reports in all of the LA and SoCal boards and I'm so proud to be the seed. I would contribute more but I have too much exposure to risk so much. And while I created this board solely for the purpose of not diluting the Bareback Beauties thread.

Safe bareback raw fun should be a duty.

I honest to goodness love being sexually attacked by women.

Maybe it is me. Maybe it is money. Maybe it is an illusion?

I love you fuckers!