Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 33,481 to 33,495 of 50870
-
01-28-21 22:35 #17390Senior Member

Posts: 53Sexyangels
Anyone have any updates on the new ladies that came through? I've only seen Jenny and I'm curious on the stable. Also sfk's emily? I've been monitoring the last couple days but haven't seen any posts. If I'm able to free up some time I'll visit and post my findings. Recommendations please!
-
01-28-21 21:28 #17389Senior Member

Posts: 7236For as long as she wants!
Originally Posted by PlutoKiller
[View Original Post]
She has so many newbies trying to get in and I know for fact "a lot" of veteran mongers!
-
01-28-21 21:25
Senior Member
- Reason
- Went full retard
-
01-28-21 20:12 #17388Senior Member

Posts: 392Disagree
It definitely doesn't favor bookers who upcharge otherwise they would have the best talent which isn't the case at all. If you consider traffic alone, the upcharge agencies have to use multiple bookers, bait and switch tactics, fake pictures etc in order to keep their girls busy where M, J, Pepsi etc. Don't need to do this and they generally keep their girls happy.
Originally Posted by Jack926
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 18:46 #17387Senior Member

Posts: 243Can I ask a genuine question for the board? Is there any booker that has a reputation for using 100% real pics? In my limited experience it seems like the girls provide the photos, and take them from booker to booker. Sometimes you have a pic that looks like a real selfie in a real environment, but 98% of the time the pictures are of a different girl, touched up beyond recognition, might be some modelling shots from 5 or more years ago, or intentionally obscure the face. No matter the circumstance they're only barely representative of who you're going to see. You can use the pics w / the included measurements to get a general idea of the provider but as far as face goes that's a roll of the dice to me. It seems weird to hold "fake" pics against certain bookers when often the "real" pics communicate about as much actual information.
Originally Posted by Pkim31
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 18:43 #17386I'm a troll if you don't put me on your ignore list then you want to read my stuff.

Posts: 2607Thank You
I am extremely happy that we all are part of an extremely productive community here to communicate.
This thread has the most commented on reports in all of the LA and SoCal boards and I'm so proud to be the seed. I would contribute more but I have too much exposure to risk so much. And while I created this board solely for the purpose of not diluting the Bareback Beauties thread.
Safe bareback raw fun should be a duty.
I honest to goodness love being sexually attacked by women.
Maybe it is me. Maybe it is money. Maybe it is an illusion?
I love you fuckers!
-
01-28-21 18:36 #17385Senior Member

Posts: 530Newtopasian
Yes, all the girls are not available now. Sia is in the BA.
Originally Posted by Veni1
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 18:11 #17384Senior Member

Posts: 415Newtopasian
I see another blank as far as Newtopasian is concerned. Also no current reviews on that other site. Do you know if they are on a hiatus?
Originally Posted by Toungsten
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 17:47 #17383Senior Member

Posts: 275K-Girl Roulette
Hmm interesting guys, appreciate the feedback. I guess every once in a while we got to play K-Girl Roulette to try and hit the jackpot LOL. But if we keep losing with a particular agency, just got to know when to fold / walk away like Kenny Rogers.
Originally Posted by Jack926
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 17:23 #17382Banned Member

Posts: 1333M Up charge
I guess the point of the topic is: "Can "M" recruit new talent or retain existing talent when the girl know that they can do this for $100 more?" The free market economy favor bookers that charge extra for BB unless all mongers decide to boycott those bookers and those girls. I personally don't cough up $100 unless if I really like the girl and it has been only one girl (Emily from EUK Girl) that I have paid the extra $ because she well worth it: I saw her 12 times in two months.
Originally Posted by GoodBoy88
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 15:52 #17381Banned Member

Posts: 1258Peaches
Peach3 / bookergray has different pics and description than Peach of candygirls although both offer BBFS for an upcharge. I have seen Peach from candygirls not Peach3. I have been able to book any girl on bookergray via candygirls. BA have you seen both girls? I just got confirmation from the booker that they are both the same girl.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 13:20 #17380Senior Member

Posts: 226You kidding? M has so much business that you can hardly get to her if your not a veteran regular (and even then she's constantly stacked up). She can sustain that rate indefinitely if she wants to because she's cornering the market right now by having the only stable of hot girls in LA who aren't up charging. Other bookers maybe getting that extra henny, but not half the demand. Truth is if M starts doing the 100 $ upcharge, there would be little reason to go with her stable as a pose to any other.
Originally Posted by PlutoKiller
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 12:59 #17379Banned Member

Posts: 1333Ktown
Exactly my experience-Never a true Photo (s) but I do get the warning before hand. However Ktown booker is a very nice.
Originally Posted by Frala
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 12:50 #17378Senior Member

Posts: 3480Thursday Jan 28
M. Hana, Annie, Chanel.
Sunny. Joy, Niya.
Newtopasian.
Sexy Angels. Fanny, Hami, Sophia, Helen, Erica, Taylor.
SFK. Viki, Emily.
PKL. Ara, Hazel.
-
01-28-21 12:49 #17377Senior Member

Posts: 245M
Which brings us the the million $ question. How much longer can M sustain her present rate structure?
Originally Posted by Goglo69
[View Original Post]
-
01-28-21 12:47 #17376Senior Member

Posts: 49I can tell these pics are not representative, so I wouldn't try them. Rarely, they get gems who have somewhat genuine pics. The 2 x I went with them, I chose Silver and Danbi. Both delivered on looks and advertised height.
Originally Posted by Ramen25
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote


