Rants Opinions and Totally Pointless Bullshit

[Erik 006]

Maybe I've not been in the hobby long enough. But I don't get the value of this phrase. I know what it means, but how does it ever enhance a review or bring any clarity?

Can some one explain how a review with this phrase is any different than a review without this phrase? Is anyone getting sued because they didn't use this caveat to their review?

To the casual observer, it's like ending every sentence with etc. Isn't it just assumed that every review may not guarantee the next guy will have same experience? Or maybe it means something different?

Etc, etc, etc.

Pussy is like Potato salad, you can't eat everybody's. Most Escorts see it the same way meaning a stinky dick or a dick that has bumps on it has to be covered and a clean dick may be sucked bare, if BBBJ is offered by the provider. Try tipping big one time and see if anything changes next visit (bet it does). People who low ball or don't tip at all will be subject to less services. The 30 minute guys expect the same service as the hour guys and that don't always happen. Stay safe.

E.

[Traveler4321]

But never easy to part with the chickens. Them and the Cocks are the prize of the outfit!

I think if you had offered in addition to your original live stock offer a couple of chickens it probably would've worked. CHICKENS always close the deal.

[NashFitZilla]

I think if you had offered in addition to your original live stock offer a couple of chickens it probably would've worked. CHICKENS always close the deal.

Maybe others will find this thread humorous, I do. An obvious scam going on yet I'm chatting away as if serious. Gets down to her departure. Even though earlier I mentioned deposit, and he / she didn't acknowledge. So the woman pictured below is legit LOL and doing outcall for $300. Check out the thread of the deposit discussion. Again I find it humorous. The number on top of the screen shots is the ad phone number.

[BoroGuy54]

Maybe I've not been in the hobby long enough. But I don't get the value of this phrase. I know what it means, but how does it ever enhance a review or bring any clarity?

Can some one explain how a review with this phrase is any different than a review without this phrase? Is anyone getting sued because they didn't use this caveat to their review?

To the casual observer, it's like ending every sentence with etc. Isn't it just assumed that every review may not guarantee the next guy will have same experience? Or maybe it means something different?

Etc, etc, etc.

Some guys just hit it off better than others and they build a rapport with the women and they may get services normally not given at a certain price. Women will judge you on looks I'm sure, your attitude is taken into consideration also. How often you frequent the provider can make a difference.

[Traveler4321]

Maybe others will find this thread humorous, I do. An obvious scam going on yet I'm chatting away as if serious. Gets down to her departure. Even though earlier I mentioned deposit, and he / she didn't acknowledge. So the woman pictured below is legit LOL and doing outcall for $300. Check out the thread of the deposit discussion. Again I find it humorous. The number on top of the screen shots is the ad phone number.

[ChipVoorDecker]

Maybe I've not been in the hobby long enough. But I don't get the value of this phrase. I know what it means, but how does it ever enhance a review or bring any clarity?

Can some one explain how a review with this phrase is any different than a review without this phrase? Is anyone getting sued because they didn't use this caveat to their review?

To the casual observer, it's like ending every sentence with etc. Isn't it just assumed that every review may not guarantee the next guy will have same experience? Or maybe it means something different?

Etc, etc, etc.

[Elduderino123]

The fucking fuck?

[IslandGuy1999]

I agree but one thing I have noticed is that there are posts by one person that basically dumps on two very highly rated girls but at the same time gives the highest rating possible to two or three that have little or no reviews or RR. I might have believed that it was a YMMV except based upon what he claimed to be spending he was blowing over a grand a day and one of the claimed 5 star providers is listed in another city on the same day. It makes me really question whether these are simply other providers dumping on those that are actually doing a great job at what they do.

There are so pussy whipped members and white knights that I have gotten where I only pay attention to the negative reviews. Unless it's a member that I know to be a real hobbyist that has a solid review history.

[TitansRock]

It's hard for some people to understand that one person's ATF might be another's YMMV. We're here to share experiences, both good and bad. Listcrawler reviews exist if you want a "no negativity" approach to shit (hint hint: it doesn't work well). I would imagine RubRatings works about the same way. Dude sounds like a newbie who is pussywhipped by the first woman he saw in the hobby, or is that sketchy dude you saw trying to white knight for his girl.

And regardless, it is absolutely correct that people with low post counts / reviews are to be taken with a grain of salt. Someone just posted tonight that they got fleeced by a gal who someone reviewed, and sure enough, that reviewer only had a single post. Those tend to be either the girls / their handlers reviewing themselves to bait people in, or perhaps a certain somebody who keeps making account after account because his credibility is shot to shit and he doesn't know when to give up.

I agree but one thing I have noticed is that there are posts by one person that basically dumps on two very highly rated girls but at the same time gives the highest rating possible to two or three that have little or no reviews or RR. I might have believed that it was a YMMV except based upon what he claimed to be spending he was blowing over a grand a day and one of the claimed 5 star providers is listed in another city on the same day. It makes me really question whether these are simply other providers dumping on those that are actually doing a great job at what they do.

[FarFarAway]

Indemnification is literally what allowed those pharmaceuticals the confidence to bulldoze forward and create a vaccine in a record 9 months--the average vaccine takes *years* to develop. But beyond that he also pulled back all the red tape. So basically the free market works.

I think you are misinformed. They went through every bit of regulatory approval required, because it was in the hands of the FDA and the CDC. It is true it was record time, but that was because 1) the new technology is very much amenable to that and 2) manufacturing was proceeding before efficacy was proved. These companies were working on this vaccine well before there was Operation Warp Speed. The technology has been in development for decades. I don't think Trump will get the Nobel Prize in Medicine for this.

[Aake7]

You're missing something. So, before this very recent roll out of the vaccine, the people around the elderly in nursing homes the most were the staff. Who are these people? They're young and not particularly qualified workers, not nurses for sure. There is maybe one real nurse and one real doctor around most of the time. The whole point of the nursing home is they're not hospitals and are so much cheaper. The nursing home workers are likely making minimum wage, and to make a living on that, they have multiple jobs, at multiple nursing homes. So, even if they weren't going to even get sick or die from the disease, they could (and did) definitely transmit it from one patient and one home to another. There are lots of reasons to wear a mask, of course you are correct, alone in one's car or at home, they are useless.

Trump did nothing to get the vaccine, other than indemnify the companies if their products were a bust. This really cost nothing, since they work.

Indemnification is literally what allowed those pharmaceuticals the confidence to bulldoze forward and create a vaccine in a record 9 months--the average vaccine takes *years* to develop. But beyond that he also pulled back all the red tape. So basically the free market works.

[YellowJacket]

Or is anyone else think when a provider charges $200. $300 or $400 for a 1 hour session and say "tips appreciated" are they nuts getting that kind of money up front with no real skills or education (like a Dr.) there is no way I tip them usually I don't even call them.

Ahhhh that felt good.

Look as long and there are guys out there paying 200 bucks for a hand job, these girls will keep doing it. If these girls manage to get 1 guy a day to fall for the bullshit that's 1200 for a 6 day work week, 4800 a month. Damn good money for 1 hours work a day.

Don't get me started on the Asian massage parlor scams. You know the ones right? They advertise seductive Asian women in bra a panties, but have no intention in letting you see them when you arrive.

The parlors that don't offer a happy ending, at 60 bucks an hour. If only 10 guys a day fall for the scam, on a 6 day work week, that's 14 k per month with no tips.

We are in the wrong business.

[FarFarAway]

The obvious was not done initially, which lead to the large numbers of reported deaths, which are inflated numbers anyway. NY has as many claimed deaths as the lowest reported 25 states combined. Thank God Trump got us a vaccine rather than shutting everything down like Biden plans to do. At least now the most vulnerable can have a degree of protection rather than being cut off from their families waiting to die alone. The numbers also show not only are the elderly the ones at real risk, but especially those locked away in nursing homes. Anyone who is healthy and relatively young but is worried they're going to die of corona is a nut. The numbers just don't show it, all the mask wearing is stupid. If you're at risk stay home. The idiots wearing masks alone in their cars take the cake though LOL.

You're missing something. So, before this very recent roll out of the vaccine, the people around the elderly in nursing homes the most were the staff. Who are these people? They're young and not particularly qualified workers, not nurses for sure. There is maybe one real nurse and one real doctor around most of the time. The whole point of the nursing home is they're not hospitals and are so much cheaper. The nursing home workers are likely making minimum wage, and to make a living on that, they have multiple jobs, at multiple nursing homes. So, even if they weren't going to even get sick or die from the disease, they could (and did) definitely transmit it from one patient and one home to another. There are lots of reasons to wear a mask, of course you are correct, alone in one's car or at home, they are useless.

Trump did nothing to get the vaccine, other than indemnify the companies if their products were a bust. This really cost nothing, since they work.

[SnoBallGuy]

Or is anyone else think when a provider charges $200. $300 or $400 for a 1 hour session and say "tips appreciated" are they nuts getting that kind of money up front with no real skills or education (like a Dr.) there is no way I tip them usually I don't even call them.

Ahhhh that felt good.

[Boston617]

The obvious was not done initially, which lead to the large numbers of reported deaths, which are inflated numbers anyway. NY has as many claimed deaths as the lowest reported 25 states combined. Thank God Trump got us a vaccine rather than shutting everything down like Biden plans to do. At least now the most vulnerable can have a degree of protection rather than being cut off from their families waiting to die alone. The numbers also show not only are the elderly the ones at real risk, but especially those locked away in nursing homes. Anyone who is healthy and relatively young but is worried they're going to die of corona is a nut. The numbers just don't show it, all the mask wearing is stupid. If you're at risk stay home. The idiots wearing masks alone in their cars take the cake though LOL.

Read these numbers. Close down the economy or protect the vulnerable. Which makes more sense? https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/11/18...-and-age-15163.