WYP, SA, and other SD sites

**Rudy Wellz** · 12-27-20 06:30

Originally Posted by NovaDaddy69 [View Original Post]

Hi all. Curious if anyone has ever met this one? She seems cool, dtf, says she just got out of a decade-long marriage and now wants to explore her kinky side. So that's all encouraging.

Though also into skipping right to a hotel, no M&G, which while great if it works out also always raises the question of if she's legit and / or a pro. Figured I'd seek the wisdom of the board before moving ahead in case anyone's had dealing with her. Any intel greatly appreciated.

Here's her profile link:

https://www.seeking.com/member/ff7ee...1-69f9d3900e35

Skipping the M&G, even for just a drink and going straight to the FC is not kinky. It's poor judgement, unless you are a professional (I. E. Hooker). Plus she claims to be a medical student with a picture of a cigarette in her hands? And a medical student doesn't have a flexible schedule. Spidy senses saying be careful.

They are all hookers, they won't fuck you unless you pay them, that makes them a hooker. I get it that some of you guys need to delude yourselves but end of day, you don't pay them they don't fuck you, they are prostitutes.

A2

**ProCatHunter** · 12-27-20 05:45

Originally Posted by Mongerian [View Original Post]

Of course, within hours of my monthly premium account ending, I get 7 messages.

Don't think I've had 7 messages waiting for me all month.

Yep. Every. Single. Time.

Its like the SA algos know which profiles you clicked the most and then placed your profile and your messages at the top of those girls inboxes. I used to spend the last day of each one of my membership periods sending messages with my phone number and snapchat userid to every girl that hadn't responded to a prior message, in order to take advantage of this trick they use to get you to come back. Out of about 100 messages sent over the years, about 5 have direct contacted me outside of the SA interface.

If you wanted to reup the account for another month, now wouldn't be a bad time. Federal UI benefits end this weekend, and stim checks won't go out until Trump signs the c19 releif bill. Get ready for an influx of new profiles that are going to be desparate for cash in the next few weeks. Once the c19 bill gets fixed to guve 2 k to everyone with an ectra 2 k per kid, lots of those ladies are going to go dark.

**Mongerian** · 12-26-20 23:11

Of course, within hours of my monthly premium account ending, I get 7 messages.

Don't think I've had 7 messages waiting for me all month.

**Member #7176** · 12-26-20 18:22

Probably just a old lonely guy just wants company. Most of us here are still very sexually active, so we forget that there are a lot of lonely elderly guys out there who just wants someone to spend time with them. I had other SB tell me that they had platonic relationships as well. I still find it a little hard to believe.

Originally Posted by CarloRogue [View Original Post]

OK, fair enough, but consider that there are many guys below you on the social food chain that think you're the rich asshole for taking the young, pretty girls that they should be entitled to. Be content where you are, or climb a bit if it makes you happier and the expense / effort is worth it.

I met a very attractive sugar baby a couple years back who claimed her last SD was purely platonic, left her in his will, passed away, and now she has her own townhouse and doesn't have to work ever again. Was it true, was it not? Don't know, don't really care (see rule #2) - especially after she let me show her what a non-platonic SD is like. And FYI. The reason I hold to my rule #1 (never advancing money) is not because the girl isn't worth it, it's because "she's" not likely a girl at all. It's just as likely to be some pimple-faced, 16 year old hacker in Belgrade, Serbia.

**NovaDaddy69** · 12-26-20 16:35

Hi all. Curious if anyone has ever met this one? She seems cool, dtf, says she just got out of a decade-long marriage and now wants to explore her kinky side. So that's all encouraging.

Though also into skipping right to a hotel, no M&G, which while great if it works out also always raises the question of if she's legit and / or a pro. Figured I'd seek the wisdom of the board before moving ahead in case anyone's had dealing with her. Any intel greatly appreciated.

Here's her profile link:

https://www.seeking.com/member/ff7ee...1-69f9d3900e35

**CarloRogue** · 12-26-20 14:06

Originally Posted by ProCatHunter [View Original Post]

So last week my buddy was complaining about his SO not appreciating him and everything he does for her, and the lack of sex. In response I recommended he find a SB to fill the void. His response was he couldn't afford one. I know my buddy's spending habits and he's a pretty outrageous spender, so I asked him where he got the idea that he couldn't afford an SB. Turns out when he travelled for work preCOVID his boss would sometimes call out his SBs to join them. According to my friend, real $ got dropped going out, and for allowances. The numbers made the allowances I give look like a pittance.

So where am I going with this? First off, there are plenty of dudes out there with FU $. They don't give a crap about rule #1 and so that's what we're up against. Luckily for us, guys like that are limited. They make up a smaller pool, and burn through ladies a lot faster. If I had FU $ like that, I'd have a new SB keeping my bed warm every night. On the upside, they are bringing more players into the sugar game, so its not all bad.

Second, from my experience, if you want to get away with lower allowances, you got to offer a POT more than just $. Either sell being reliable, or be someone they would want to sleep with IRL without an allowance. At the end of the day, if she would go home with you after a meeting you in a bar, she'll sleep with you for $250 even though she was getting $500 from her last SD..

OK, fair enough, but consider that there are many guys below you on the social food chain that think you're the rich asshole for taking the young, pretty girls that they should be entitled to. Be content where you are, or climb a bit if it makes you happier and the expense / effort is worth it.

I met a very attractive sugar baby a couple years back who claimed her last SD was purely platonic, left her in his will, passed away, and now she has her own townhouse and doesn't have to work ever again. Was it true, was it not? Don't know, don't really care (see rule #2) - especially after she let me show her what a non-platonic SD is like. And FYI. The reason I hold to my rule #1 (never advancing money) is not because the girl isn't worth it, it's because "she's" not likely a girl at all. It's just as likely to be some pimple-faced, 16 year old hacker in Belgrade, Serbia.

**ProCatHunter** · 12-25-20 05:56

So last week my buddy was complaining about his SO not appreciating him and everything he does for her, and the lack of sex. In response I recommended he find a SB to fill the void. His response was he couldn't afford one. I know my buddy's spending habits and he's a pretty outrageous spender, so I asked him where he got the idea that he couldn't afford an SB. Turns out when he travelled for work preCOVID his boss would sometimes call out his SBs to join them. According to my friend, real $ got dropped going out, and for allowances. The numbers made the allowances I give look like a pittance.

So where am I going with this? First off, there are plenty of dudes out there with FU $. They don't give a crap about rule #1 and so that's what we're up against. Luckily for us, guys like that are limited. They make up a smaller pool, and burn through ladies a lot faster. If I had FU $ like that, I'd have a new SB keeping my bed warm every night. On the upside, they are bringing more players into the sugar game, so its not all bad.

Second, from my experience, if you want to get away with lower allowances, you got to offer a POT more than just $. Either sell being reliable, or be someone they would want to sleep with IRL without an allowance. At the end of the day, if she would go home with you after a meeting you in a bar, she'll sleep with you for $250 even though she was getting $500 from her last SD.

I know this to be true after losing 20 lbs. SBs that wouldn't respond to higher allowance amounts from prior SA profiles would be willing to go straight to the FC after a M&G, even after I would propose "lowballer" amounts. After making them cum and being someone they could rely on for regular meetups, the allowance they're willing to take will go even lower, or won't be necessary at all when they just want someone familiar to bang.

Long story short, there are enough rich assholes who don't GAF about lighting their cash on fire to bang a hot 20 yo blonde. If you want to bang that same 20 yo blond without lighting your cash on fire, you got to set yourself apart from those rich assholes.

**Rudy Wellz** · 12-24-20 11:42

Originally Posted by MilesNoDavis [View Original Post]

I've seen her a few times. Love her energy when we fuck. If she was less like me (fucking everybody) I'd def see her more. LOL.
https://www.seeking.com/member/dd5a36ce-a627-4fde-98a2-936ba7e047e9

This one is pretty lazy, but her vibe is cool and watching her face twist up when we're fucking makes my dick harder.
https://www.seeking.com/member/44b561e0-5321-4bce-a100-07598cbb9aeb

It wouldn't surprise me if both allowed BBFS CIP. Just not my thing with these girls.

Thinking I should spend more time in Baltimore!

**MilesNoDavis** · 12-24-20 09:34

I've seen her a few times. Love her energy when we fuck. If she was less like me (fucking everybody) I'd def see her more. LOL.
https://www.seeking.com/member/dd5a36ce-a627-4fde-98a2-936ba7e047e9

This one is pretty lazy, but her vibe is cool and watching her face twist up when we're fucking makes my dick harder.
https://www.seeking.com/member/44b561e0-5321-4bce-a100-07598cbb9aeb

It wouldn't surprise me if both allowed BBFS CIP. Just not my thing with these girls.

Originally Posted by Jt1896 [View Original Post]

So it takes a few months but eventually, the choices will change. New women will come on, old ones drop off and those who are always on there will be there when you come back. If you're gone through the entire lineup right now sometimes it pays to get off and just let the process work and wait until you think there are enough new women to try.

During my month, I've been able to get 4 potential SB's. Two of which I've seen and one which is a keeper. It doesn't always work out like this but just be patient and in a month or two there will be many more new women from which you will be able to choose.

HTH.

PS. give her a try, she seems DTF. She's been talked about on here before under a different username: https://www.seeking.com/member/dd5a3...2-936ba7e047e9

**Old Chinese Guy** · 12-24-20 08:35

Originally Posted by Mongerian [View Original Post]

Exactly, pushy to meet, couldn't understand why that's tough during holidays and like you said, doesn't have the look to carry that attitude.

No amount of good looks justify bad attitude. We are the ones playing the cash so we are the customers. There are so many SBs out there that if we all avoid the ones with bad attitude, they will have to change or not be able to get any SDs. Just plain market dynamics like everything else. Would you-it up with bad attitude from a car salesman, a plumber, a financial advisor or just about anyone you pay for services? If not, then don't put up with bad attitude from a SB. They are not a wife, GF or family, these are just about the only people who can get away with bad attitude.

**Member #7176** · 12-24-20 06:56

Baltimore area pickings have been bad for me the past 2 months. I'm finding better results out in PA or NOVA. All the Baltimore girls have been asking for crazy prices, or those that I do meetup have a attitude problem. They think they are doing me a favor. Last Baltimore 1st date ok, bbj, dfk, and cfs. Talk to her and meetup all on the same day, so 1 hr date that was last min understandable. I ask her to spend more time with me next time. 2nd date 1 hr again, bbj, no kissing, and was on her phone half the date. I was hoping for BBFS, but with how things were going during the date. I just decided I wasn't going to bother with her again. She hits me up a few days ago, and told her I'm not interested in someone who is on their phone half the time and who is only with me for 1 hr. She was cute and damage was 400.

Don't ask for number or profile. She no longer on Seeking. I'll post a review of her when she pops up again. She one of those girls who setup account and deletes her accounts every few months.

Originally Posted by Jt1896 [View Original Post]

So it takes a few months but eventually, the choices will change. New women will come on, old ones drop off and those who are always on there will be there when you come back. If you're gone through the entire lineup right now sometimes it pays to get off and just let the process work and wait until you think there are enough new women to try.

During my month, I've been able to get 4 potential SB's. Two of which I've seen and one which is a keeper. It doesn't always work out like this but just be patient and in a month or two there will be many more new women from which you will be able to choose.

HTH.

PS. give her a try, she seems DTF. She's been talked about on here before under a different username: https://www.seeking.com/member/dd5a3...2-936ba7e047e9

**Jt1896** · 12-23-20 23:41

Originally Posted by HornyTwist [View Original Post]

I had the exact same experience with Amy Rose. She gave her # in first reply but then said no to meeting very quickly on texting. Don't know what her deal is but SA is becoming useless even for me with all the scammers and I am someone who can and has spent big for the right gal. I guess some people thought that supply will exceed demand with COVID but has not exactly panned out that way. Now they are going to raise monthly fee on SA to 100. Fucking extortion. I guess that's what happens with a monopoly.

So it takes a few months but eventually, the choices will change. New women will come on, old ones drop off and those who are always on there will be there when you come back. If you're gone through the entire lineup right now sometimes it pays to get off and just let the process work and wait until you think there are enough new women to try.

During my month, I've been able to get 4 potential SB's. Two of which I've seen and one which is a keeper. It doesn't always work out like this but just be patient and in a month or two there will be many more new women from which you will be able to choose.

HTH.

PS. give her a try, she seems DTF. She's been talked about on here before under a different username: https://www.seeking.com/member/dd5a3...2-936ba7e047e9

**HornyTwist** · 12-23-20 22:49

Originally Posted by Jt1896 [View Original Post]

https://www.seeking.com/member/6e030...8-2e9e8b61607c

Don't know why she doesn't put that in her profile. Went to text and then said no sex. WTF? Waste of time.

I had the exact same experience with Amy Rose. She gave her # in first reply but then said no to meeting very quickly on texting. Don't know what her deal is but SA is becoming useless even for me with all the scammers and I am someone who can and has spent big for the right gal. I guess some people thought that supply will exceed demand with COVID but has not exactly panned out that way. Now they are going to raise monthly fee on SA to 100. Fucking extortion. I guess that's what happens with a monopoly.

**Mongerian** · 12-23-20 16:42

Originally Posted by CoolDaddy07 [View Original Post]

She prefers to meet in person before even shares any other information (text), she does have an attitude but don't have the looks or body to support that gps type attitude 😊.

Exactly, pushy to meet, couldn't understand why that's tough during holidays and like you said, doesn't have the look to carry that attitude.

**CoolDaddy07** · 12-23-20 16:17

Originally Posted by Mongerian [View Original Post]

Haven't run into a snarky attitude like this one in a while.

https://www.seeking.com/member/c97b8...a-3ffeefaa1b4b

Don't even know what high expectations I'm sure she has for herself. Couldn't get past the pissy tude.

She prefers to meet in person before even shares any other information (text), she does have an attitude but don't have the looks or body to support that gps type attitude 😊.