Bareback Providers

[SeattleMG]

Yes. Anyone who cares who it is, knows about it by now and she's probably got it fixed. If you want to do bareback constantly there's no need to demonize someone that catches an STD because of it. It's a risk you take.

Shit. I'm starting to sound like the hookers on the other board.

Yeah, you do, LOL.

A simple "Yes" would've worked, and I only asked because people are still inquiring about this as recently as today (on this thread) and sending me messages about it. You made a whole lot of assumptions regarding what people know / don't know or my intentions for possibly wanting to post it (e. G. Posting it out of a sense of pragmatism).

Any post I would have made would have been simple and objective (as my posting history demonstrates).

[Michael1967]

Sent. The messages I received confirm it's the provider I had in mind.

Is it a violation of the Board rules to post her name?

Yes. Anyone who cares who it is, knows about it by now and she's probably got it fixed. If you want to do bareback constantly there's no need to demonize someone that catches an STD because of it. It's a risk you take.

Shit. I'm starting to sound like the hookers on the other board.

[SeattleMG]

She is back in Renton. No longer enticing if she has changed her menu. Also she has been using the same pics for ever wonder if she still looks like her pics.

I saw her 3-4 times about 2 years ago. She agreed to forum activities once for +$100 in the heat of the moment (2nd appointment I believe), but declined in subsequent sessions.

Pics were pretty flattering a few years ago and she was living a pretty fast life style, so I'd suggest moderating any expectations in that area.

Also, be prepared for a long, drawn out scheduling process full of all the cliche excuses and a high probability of being no showed.

[SeattleMG]

Can I get this info too please?

Sent. The messages I received confirm it's the provider I had in mind.

Is it a violation of the Board rules to post her name?

[Wong Hing]

I have seen three KAngels, who were the prettiest, and who, surprise surprise, gave the least service.

Angel / Jo, Misty and Julie.

If I wanted to repeat with one of them, conceding that service would be mediocre, BUT just enjoy a BBFS with a pretty girl, I would be most inclined to repeat with:

Angel / Jo. I think that with repeat visits, things could get slightly better, as she would be more comfortable and familiar with the client.

I would be least inclined to repeat with Misty, as she did NO kissing at all.

[Wong Hing]

I have found several Thai women sexy, that I've had BBBJ with.

Any decent-looking Thai or Laotian women (Asian or American born) who offer BBFS?

[TheThinker808]

I sent a few DMs out about this but haven't heard anything back (I think I know who it was.). Did this name ever surface, or can someone DM it to me?

Thank you.

Can I get this info too please?

[MartyByrde]

OK, my "Canada budget," that I barely used since March, the well is going to run dry. I REALLY want to report to all of you, because if you look at my LOOKS rankings, service and overall, I think that you can all "connect the dots. ".
The doog and dab about Julie: She's cute. The pictures are her, glammed hope, but not OVERLY glammed up. She reminds me of a cute petite Japanese girlfriend I had. Smiley and friendly enough. Body is ok. Breasts are not perky, but she has huge puffy nipples.

NOTE: If you see KAngels, give them 350 first, then distinctly give your 100 tip right after that. I want to give Lexy and Julie the benefit of the doubt, but both thought I was doing CFS. I told them when they got the condom, that I paid 450.

Julies BBBJ is frankly, not great. Not deep for the most part, and seems to have to stop after every 5 or 10 thrusts. Did a little LFK. She just doesn't seem to have a long attention span.

I did get to BBFS her, and in reverse cowgirl. When it comes to the oral and the sex, it just wasn't as smooth as say with Venus or Lexy.

I may be taking a little bank break, BUT I hope my rankings will give you a pretty good idea: There is a direct correlation between looks / body, and service / overall:

Here are my opinions of the girls I've seen:

Face: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Julie, 4. Lexy, 5. Venus, 6. Ivy, 7. Nikki.

Body: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Venus, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Lexy, 7. Nikki.

Service: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Angel, 7. Misty.

Personality: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Julie, 4. Misty, 5. Angel, 6. Nikki, 7. Ivy.

Massage: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Julie, 5. Misty, 6. Ivy, 7. Angel.

Overall: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Ivy, 4. Julie, 5. Angel, 6. Misty, 7. Nikki.

Really appreciate your posts on the K-Girls! Very informative.

[DrtyHarry]

I saw her a few days ago. Wouldn't let me do what we do here. Otherwise great appointment. She was adamant.

As always, with everyone... YMMV. What I did not do was point out I heard about her on this board

She is back in Renton. No longer enticing if she has changed her menu. Also she has been using the same pics for ever wonder if she still looks like her pics.

[DrtyHarry]

You are right! I couldn't remember the old handle, but recognized a photo.

I had a terrible time in her trailer, she didn't want to do anything once she had the money, I left in disgust.

I remember she made me wait because she had to shower. When she let me in she obviously hadn't showered for some time, and she had money stashed in her bra that she kind of forgot about. When it fell to the floor she was surprised. She was not a handsome women.

This is the photo I remembered, and if you search the Review over yonder using (its.okay) you will see the connection.

Correct. Thanks a lot. Great intel here. A lot of people responded to this. Thanks - all consistent in messaging. Guess I will have to take my kink elsewhere.

[SeattleMG]

I'm seeing a lot of people asking who to avoid, please fill me in or dm me who to avoid. Thanks in advanced!

I sent a few DMs out about this but haven't heard anything back (I think I know who it was.). Did this name ever surface, or can someone DM it to me?

Thank you.

[Rotten Robert]

No, I'm positive it's her. I checked out her gallery and several pics are the same as years ago.

Perhaps she's off drugs now I have no idea, but that's definitely her.

You are right! I couldn't remember the old handle, but recognized a photo.

I had a terrible time in her trailer, she didn't want to do anything once she had the money, I left in disgust.

I remember she made me wait because she had to shower. When she let me in she obviously hadn't showered for some time, and she had money stashed in her bra that she kind of forgot about. When it fell to the floor she was surprised. She was not a handsome women.

This is the photo I remembered, and if you search the Review over yonder using (its.okay) you will see the connection.

[Wong Hing]

OK, my "Canada budget," that I barely used since March, the well is going to run dry. I REALLY want to report to all of you, because if you look at my LOOKS rankings, service and overall, I think that you can all "connect the dots. ".

The doog and dab about Julie: She's cute. The pictures are her, glammed hope, but not OVERLY glammed up. She reminds me of a cute petite Japanese girlfriend I had. Smiley and friendly enough. Body is ok. Breasts are not perky, but she has huge puffy nipples.

NOTE: If you see KAngels, give them 350 first, then distinctly give your 100 tip right after that. I want to give Lexy and Julie the benefit of the doubt, but both thought I was doing CFS. I told them when they got the condom, that I paid 450.

Julies BBBJ is frankly, not great. Not deep for the most part, and seems to have to stop after every 5 or 10 thrusts. Did a little LFK. She just doesn't seem to have a long attention span.

I did get to BBFS her, and in reverse cowgirl. When it comes to the oral and the sex, it just wasn't as smooth as say with Venus or Lexy.

I may be taking a little bank break, BUT I hope my rankings will give you a pretty good idea: There is a direct correlation between looks / body, and service / overall:

Here are my opinions of the girls I've seen:

Face: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Julie, 4. Lexy, 5. Venus, 6. Ivy, 7. Nikki.

Body: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Venus, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Lexy, 7. Nikki.

Service: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Angel, 7. Misty.

Personality: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Julie, 4. Misty, 5. Angel, 6. Nikki, 7. Ivy.

Massage: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Nikki, 4. Julie, 5. Misty, 6. Ivy, 7. Angel.

Overall: 1. Venus, 2. Lexy, 3. Ivy, 4. Julie, 5. Angel, 6. Misty, 7. Nikki.

[Jonderin]

I'm pretty sure you are confusing Mia with someone else (Jessica Crush? I have seen Mia for a BDSM session but she didn't agree on bareback and she didn't look like a chemical user to me. (Well I'm no doctor, lawyer or cop).

I saw her because I wanted to see a girl who likes belt on ass and she is very pro at that but no bareback. (others may have different experience as I have no game and no big pile of cash to throw).

No, I'm positive it's her. I checked out her gallery and several pics are the same as years ago.

Perhaps she's off drugs now I have no idea, but that's definitely her.

[RedHot11]

I haven't seen her but I remember one of the pics. Unless I'm mixing her up with someone else, I think she used to go by Its Okay. She worked out of a trailer or something in someones backyard.

I think you described what pooners generally saw her for. It wasn't for her face. I think she used to charge $100 or so.

I'm pretty sure you are confusing Mia with someone else (Jessica Crush? I have seen Mia for a BDSM session but she didn't agree on bareback and she didn't look like a chemical user to me. (Well I'm no doctor, lawyer or cop).

I saw her because I wanted to see a girl who likes belt on ass and she is very pro at that but no bareback. (others may have different experience as I have no game and no big pile of cash to throw).