Massage Parlor Reports

[Nice Guy 99]

https://georgegascon.org/wp-content/...0-07-.docx.pdf

Nice Guy 99, your headline is misleading. Here is the actual directive (link posted above). It only mentions Penal Code 653.22 (a)(1), which concerns loitering with the intent to commit prostitution. This applies narrowly to "streetwalkers" who wait out in the open with the intent to entice customers. It also applies to patrons who are present with the intent to engage a streetwalker. The key action for this particular crime is loitering.

Penal Code 647 (b) covers engaging in or soliciting prostitution. It's very much still on the books, and is not impacted by this directive.

Thank you for the clarification 5th.

[PlayerN818]

Any of you guys see this chick? I have a feeling her hour is FS, but its just a hunch I get from her wording. Any feedback or reviews would be appreciated.

https://www.slixa.com/california/los...harmony-temple

Not seen her, but at those prices, yeah, you better get more than a beej.

[DickGrayson101]

Any of you guys see this chick? I have a feeling her hour is FS, but its just a hunch I get from her wording. Any feedback or reviews would be appreciated.

https://www.slixa.com/california/los...harmony-temple

[PriscillaM]

I was there this afternoon. A little less expensive than what you've posted. Still an expensive HJ but they have young hotties. Mostly Latina, but they're latinas that seem like they grew up around here. They speak English like natives. I posted a detailed review in the OC thread a few hours ago. Not the holy grail by any means but beats the bell out of 90% of the AMP experiences I've had. There's times when a $60 HJ from a 40 year old Korean woman with a bitchy attitude hits the spot, but after all these years that's become a tired act and I'd rather go less often and pay for better quality.

As the woman said in no country for old men, you know how many times I have been to downey? Zero. I am confident I will die not having been to downey, bellflower, or bhutan. I am fine with that.

[Grimmy23]

Monger please. I am a tolerant guy, but the fake pics on those Asian sites make PCR tests seem reliable.

I still state that no one has presented an alternative to the "overpriced" hand jobs I so frequently pay for.

I was there this afternoon. A little less expensive than what you've posted. Still an expensive HJ but they have young hotties. Mostly Latina, but they're latinas that seem like they grew up around here. They speak English like natives. I posted a detailed review in the OC thread a few hours ago. Not the holy grail by any means but beats the bell out of 90% of the AMP experiences I've had. There's times when a $60 HJ from a 40 year old Korean woman with a bitchy attitude hits the spot, but after all these years that's become a tired act and I'd rather go less often and pay for better quality.

[TempletonRat]

Monger please. I am a tolerant guy, but the fake pics on those Asian sites make PCR tests seem reliable.

I still state that no one has presented an alternative to the "overpriced" hand jobs I so frequently pay for.

I am sorry you haven't found decent K girls, but historically speaking, I have seen many young and hot ones for two fiddy (all cfs).

[PriscillaM]

You're not TOTALLY wrong, but there are some 25-30 year old kgirls. Ravi being one of them. And J girls can be younger as well. And even if some of them are over 30 theyre asian so they still look 20's.

Monger please. I am a tolerant guy, but the fake pics on those Asian sites make PCR tests seem reliable.

I still state that no one has presented an alternative to the "overpriced" hand jobs I so frequently pay for.

[TylerDurd]

Not interested in Asian age 36 to 40. Even if the pics are of an 18 year old baby Ray or pocket girl.

You're not TOTALLY wrong, but there are some 25-30 year old kgirls. Ravi being one of them. And J girls can be younger as well. And even if some of them are over 30 theyre asian so they still look 20's.

[PriscillaM]

I'm sure you know that you can fuck a real Korean girl for what you pay for these hippie broads to put their hands on your winkie.

Not interested in Asian age 36 to 40. Even if the pics are of an 18 year old baby Ray or pocket girl.

[TempletonRat]

Actually, I just pay 250 and let the temple keep the change. It is the kind of guy I am.

And before this forum turns into some kind of dick measuring contest in terms of how "well, if you only looked, you could get a handjob for 25 dollars", and a hide the ball contest in terms of "well, I can't tell you who gives handjobs for 25 dollars, it is a secret", let me give you my criteria:

1. Smell. The pad cannot smell like any type of food that has the stink equivalent of a homeless encampment at 110 degrees (so basically, the entire SGV is out).

2. Weight. The girl cannot be fat. And by avoiding fat I mean I want someone who feminists would say is anorexic.

3. Young. An Asian woman age 36-40 is not going to work.

4. Cleanliness. Sheets and towels are replaced after each ejaculation.

5. Location. Westside, meaning west of Robertson, not Downey.

6. Internet. The girl has an internet presence.

So, if you know of a candidate on the westside like that for anywhere under 200, te salud.

I'm sure you know that you can fuck a real Korean girl for what you pay for these hippie broads to put their hands on your winkie.

[JonathonJammer]

[Message to Admin deleted]

EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited to remove a message directed to the Forum Admin.

The open Forum is not the appropriate venue to contact the Forum Administration regarding individual questions, complaints or comments about the administration of the Forum. Instead, please use the Contact Us link at the bottom of this page to send me an email voicing your complaints about the administration of the Forum, and I will respond as quickly as possible. Thanks!

[FifthSunset]

I think that the LA Sheriff is simply not going to bother going after prostitution...

Gascon's directive for select misdemeanors does not apply within LA City limits, which is City Attorney and LAPD territory. LAPD enforcement for misdemeanors, including prostitution, will continue as it did before Gascon's election. For the LA Westside, the only areas patrolled by LA Sheriff are West Hollywood and Marina Del Rey. Even if the Sheriff shared your opinion re: enforcement, it would only make a practical difference in the areas covered by this patrol map below:

http://shq.lasdnews.net/content/uoa/...risdiction.pdf

LA City already has a diversion program for first-time offenders convicted of prostitution solicitation. It's informally known as John School, and those who attend get their charges dismissed. This is the most likely outcome for any readers of this thread who are unfortunate enough to get arrested.

http://lajohnschool.com/program-eligibility/

[Oswalt]

Having Gascon here makes me miss Jackie Lacey already. Especially hubby, locked and loaded to get them off the porch.

[PriscillaM]

This claim is disputed, as shown in previous posts to this thread. The penal code sections covering prostitution have not been repealed, and deputy district attorneys can still prosecute it. The directive is primarily focused on "quality of life" crimes (ie, crimes associated with homelessness and poverty). This includes drinking in public, urinating in public, trespassing, loitering, etc. The goal of the directive is to tackle the underlying public safety issue by prioritizing diversion programs over fines and jail time. But deputy DAs can still deviate from the directive and bring charges if special circumstances exist (and a supervisor approves).

The directive only covers misdemeanors handled by the LA County District Attorney's Office, which includes unincorporated areas of the county and all cities (except Burbank, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Pasadena, Redondo Beach, Santa Monica and Torrance). Misdemeanors for the cities just mentioned are handled by the local City Attorney's office, which set their own policies.

Not sure fact checking has a place here, but I think that the la sheriff is simply not going to bother going after prostitution because Gascon just does not care. Like you say, he wants l. A. To be a shithole with no rule of law rather than have rule of law with the attendant problem of peaceful protests. Of course, we all know we will get both.

In good news, I finally managed to make a connection with a homeless venice chick and may be sharing her around.

[FifthSunset]

LA District Attorney, George Gascon, announced today that prostitution will no longer be prosecuted in LA County.

This claim is disputed, as shown in previous posts to this thread. The penal code sections covering prostitution have not been repealed, and deputy district attorneys can still prosecute it. The directive is primarily focused on "quality of life" crimes (ie, crimes associated with homelessness and poverty). This includes drinking in public, urinating in public, trespassing, loitering, etc. The goal of the directive is to tackle the underlying public safety issue by prioritizing diversion programs over fines and jail time. But deputy DAs can still deviate from the directive and bring charges if special circumstances exist (and a supervisor approves).

Does this include incorporated areas? Or just Co. Territory?

The directive only covers misdemeanors handled by the LA County District Attorney's Office, which includes unincorporated areas of the county and all cities (except Burbank, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Pasadena, Redondo Beach, Santa Monica and Torrance). Misdemeanors for the cities just mentioned are handled by the local City Attorney's office, which set their own policies.