Thread: Non Pro's
+
Add Report
Results 7,201 to 7,215 of 10428
-
09-23-20 18:39 #3228Senior Member

Posts: 27Them
Probably because no one wants to pay her $$$ for nothing bare. There are plenty of hotter girls out there for covered for that much. If she's still on about no bare shit I doubt anyone's going to pick her. She should just go back to the good little cum **** she was when she started.
Originally Posted by MorganCreamin
[View Original Post]
-
09-23-20 14:26 #3227Senior Member

Posts: 88Why?
Any more info on this one? I sent you a PM with no response and all other messages I got about her were useless.
Originally Posted by Bronco62
[View Original Post]
Getting doxed is should be something everyone watches out for. Never had the experience since I'm pretty careful.
-
09-23-20 12:28 #3226Senior Member

Posts: 1217Like a boomerang, she's back again
Look who the escort life didn't agree with.
https://www.seeking.com/member/02e8a...8-7ed0464546e8
-
09-23-20 01:20 #3225Senior Member

Posts: 135Any Insight on These Five?
NadiaInLove.
https://www.seeking.com/member/fe8f6...a-f6e1079b5995
She wrote, "I prefer no sexual contact. " I'm wondering if that's here way of weeding out lurkers and only drawing the serious SD's.
Alyccc.
https://www.seeking.com/member/dda8b...0-f837cbfa4ffd
Profile says she's 40. Wow, what a nice bod for 40.
Rulerofurjunge.
https://www.seeking.com/member/399a6...6-2a7a5a716b5e
Says she's not a pro, but this pic. May say otherwise.
Kay2264.
https://www.seeking.com/member/80d74...d-b841d2a8920b
Her screen name says "Kay", but her tagline says, "My name is Emma". Student at UW. Or so she claims.
And Morrison.
https://www.seeking.com/member/b911c...e-f082fc6884b4
"I don't want everything to be about sex. Although I do work at a sex shop. " Yeah, I like her instantly.
-
09-22-20 22:37 #3224Senior Member

Posts: 191I want to be her sugarbaby!
-
09-22-20 16:35 #3223Senior Member

Posts: 534The picture on her profile is of porn star Emily Bloom. You can see free pics of Emily Bloom here: https://www.coedcherry.com/models/emily-bloom.
Originally Posted by Bronco62
[View Original Post]
-
09-22-20 16:00 #3222Senior Member

Posts: 503Way to good to be true.
Originally Posted by Bronco62
[View Original Post]
-
09-22-20 14:41 #3221Senior Member

Posts: 334
-
09-21-20 14:43 #3220Senior Member

Posts: 534For me, it seems it's never one obvious thing anymore since the scammers have gotten more sophisticated but more that a bunch of little things that don't add up. If I'm chatting with them, I'll play dumb and start asking leading questions to try to catch them in lies or contradictions.
Originally Posted by MarkoRamius
[View Original Post]
-
09-21-20 01:15 #3219Senior Member

Posts: 908Scammers on SA
There are so many scammers on those sites, and they change identities so rapidly, that in my opinion it is pointless to point them out to others. If we posted all of the scammers we encounter on those sites there would be nothing here but scammer posts.
Originally Posted by DelToro
[View Original Post]
What is interesting to point out are weird patterns that are probably indicative of scams. One example: on Secret Benefits, there was a cluster of girls on the site (more than a dozen) who listed their location as George, Washington. George is a tiny village along I-90 between Vantage and Moses Lake. It seemed unlikely to me that there were so many attractive young ladies there looking for arrangements. Sure enough, in communications with several of them it became quickly obvious is that none of them lived in George or even in the state.
Another example: there was a girl on SA a couple of years ago who listed as their city a town that no longer exists. Literally. There is a sign along the highway where the town site was. Literally nobody lives within a dozen miles of the town site.
I also look for profile pictures that are clearly identifiable as being in the area. That at least means they made an effort if the pictures are fake, and likely means that the girl in the profile pictures actually exists.
My assumption, and it is a safe one, is that all of the girls on those sites are scammers until they are standing naked in front of me. And even then I won't trust them very much.
-
09-20-20 22:58 #3218Senior Member

Posts: 534It wasn't with this particular reply but I did say in an earlier post that I don't bother reporting the scammers on SA but I just block them and post on here.
Originally Posted by DelToro
[View Original Post]
-
09-20-20 20:06 #3217Senior Member

Posts: 49Yes, can't stress this enough. The payment for these girls is for a date, it lasts as long as it lasts, multiple rounds of sex, hanging out, whatever.
Originally Posted by DelToro
[View Original Post]
-
09-20-20 18:11 #3216Senior Member

Posts: 503Its a bit of a selfish position, as they could keep scamming other people, and then what is the purpose of this forum.
Originally Posted by Twister100
[View Original Post]
That I agree.
Originally Posted by Twister100
[View Original Post]
-
09-19-20 21:14 #3215Senior Member

Posts: 461Nessa172012 SA
Does any body recognize her as an escort? She looks familiar from escort sites to me and she behaves like professional. She talked about getting the room or me sending her the hotel address where I am and the room number.
https://www.seeking.com/member/91e76...e-edc523bfd670
-
09-19-20 14:03 #3214Senior Member

Posts: 534Scammers
I always felt it was better to just block the scammers than to respond back with the reasons as to why you think they are scammers. My thinking is that by telling why you think they are a scam, you are giving them the info they need to refine their scam so it becomes more difficult to source them out in the future.
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]












Reply With Quote




